Why on earth is the NPF meeting just days before people are elected to it?

June 16, 2012 10:59 am

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

I’ve already written about Ed Miliband’s “brave” speech to the National Policy Forum today, and we’ll be bringing you more coverage of that as this weekend progresses.

However, I do have one questions about the whole NPF event.

A matter of hours ago, voting closed for the NEC and the NPF. We’ll find out who was elected on Wednesday. Therefore the term of office for many of the current NPF reps is coming to an end. They were elected nearly two years ago, and yet this is only their third meeting, which is bad enough (once upon a time the NPF met multiple times a year).

But for the third meeting to be held when their mandate is over and their replacements are all but elected seems perverse.

Could the meeting not have waited a month until the new NPF reps were in post?

I understand issues about scheduling and the cost of venues. I also understand that the results are being revealed earlier than first planned. But regardless, holding a meeting just days before the end of an elected term just seems flawed at best. By the time these reps have reported back to CLPs and activists about their actions this weekend, they may no longer even be NPF reps.

So where is the democratic accountability in that?

If the NPF wants to be a serious body in the party, rather than a punchline, then at the very least we need a timetable for meetings and elections. That seems like an absolutely basic place to start – and a pretty good first item of business for new NPF Chair Angela Eagle and General Secretary Iain McNicol.

If I were a cynic I’d say this were more fixing (and indeed I am a cynic) but I think it’s more likely that this just wasn’t thought through properly…which is a shame, as the NPF is a body that needs to work if we’re to have anything like real membership engagement (and democratic policy making). It needs to work.

We’ll be hearing from NPF reps later to see exactly how well it is, or isn’t working at present.

  • Stuart

    I wondered the same thing. Apart from any other consideration, will the new “crew” any decisions taken today?

    • Stuart

       That comment should read;

      I wondered the same thing. Apart from any other consideration, will the new “crew” be bound by any decisions taken today?

      • Bibble

        I can reassure you about that, because no decisions will be made.

        How can the policy forum take any policy decisions when the policy review itself is just being relaunched?

  • Black spiders

    I don’t like the way Labour does policy making, having not seen a NPF rep at my CLP in years, with internet access there are better ways of member involvement.

    • Chris

       Not just me then! I would have thought that a structured system of web discussions for party members was both practical and more inclusive. Now this does risk some uncomfortable policy views for the leadership but they need to practice making a good case and persuading people rather than relying on the usual suspects to be friendly!

  • Politique

    Mark,
    You raise a valid and important point. In whose interests is the policy forum. Whay are so many of the representatives placeing themselves up for election from London. This is not representative of the Labour Party.
     
    The party needs to move on from Livingstone et al.

    Ed you cannot have a NPF that is more of the same. You need real COMMUNITY representatives that reach out into the grassroots outside London.

    More needs to be done

Latest

  • News Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Speaking at the Google Big Tent event Ed Miliband said (please note, Miliband spoke without notes, but this is the text released by the party): It is great to be here inside the Google Big Tent. My sons Daniel and Sam think I do a very boring job, so they will be excited when I tell them I appeared along with the “Killer Robots” and the “Captain of the Moonshots” at your sessions. I’d like to start by showing you [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Unions The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    Lord Mandelson, or Baron Mandelson of Foy, as he should be referred to since he was packed off to the House of Lords by a small cabal, recently accused the Unite union of ‘manipulating selection procedures’ in the Labour Party. He went on to warn Ed Miliband that this ‘stores up danger for a future Labour government’. Irony has always been in as short supply as sheer chutzpah has been plentiful with old Mandy – but since his faithful disciple [...]

    Read more →
  • News Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Cameron says no more EU-turns “After one of his most difficult weeks since becoming prime minister, David Cameron put in a polished and assured peformance on the Today programme this morning. The most notable line came on Europe, with Cameron [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Miliband is off to speak to Google – but it’s not all about tax avoidance

    Miliband is off to speak to Google – but it’s not all about tax avoidance

    Ed Miliband is speaking at the Google “Big Tent” event this morning, and as we noted earlier this week, he’s picking a bit of a fight with them over their tax affairs. Understandably, most of the press coverage in advance of Miliband’s speech (and presumably afterwards too) is about Google’s tax affairs. That’s in part due to David Cameron’s unwillingness to challenge his adviser, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, when the two met earlier this week. The Downing Street media team [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MPs and Equal Marriage – analysis, and some special mentions

    Labour MPs and Equal Marriage – analysis, and some special mentions

    It was good to see the vast majority of Labour MPs voting for marriage equality yesterday, although here are some special mentions – Iain McKenzie, Frank Roy & Mike Wood - voted FOR after voting against in the 2nd reading Anne Begg, Gordon Brown, Bill Esterson, Pat Glass, Michael Meacher, Ian Mearns, Yasmin Qureshi, Virenda Sharma, Shaun Woodward - these MPs didn’t vote in the 2nd reading, but all voted FOR this evening (not all abstentions, a number were unable to attend [...]

    Read more →