Balls vs Osborne – a review

July 6, 2012 10:22 am

I watched the Banking regulation debate yesterday.

I’ve watched a lot of “debates”. Watched literally hundreds of parliamentarians stand at the despatch box by now.

I have never seen a better performance than Ed Balls gave yesterday. As Louis Walsh might say, “He owned  the stage”

We can descend into a bit of partisan point scoring, but there’s just no denying he was masterful. He controlled the House like a conductor, riding the cat calls and jeers with humour and confidence, his oration soaring and swooping from loud and commanding to quiet and dripping with authority.

Most interestingly, when they jokes and jibes settled down and he spoke seriously, the entire House fell silent in a way I’ve rarely seen before.

As he leant on his arm, his hair swept across, he actually reminded me of that other great orator who held the House in the palm of his hand. Both he and Nye Bevan overcame stutters to create such magic in parliament.

When he warned that the Government were making a grave mistake, he held Osborne’s eye, spoke quietly and again the House fell silent.

By the time Osborne stood up, he must have felt bruised. His pip-squeaky voice and unruly quiff gave the air of Little Lord Fauntleroy, a 6th form debater so out of his depth, it may have been better for all if he’d just wandered off and found William Hague.

He had only one thing to say ; “They started it Miss!” – over and over in a playground loop, nothing to say, nothing to add, no way forward, no panache, no charm, no charisma, no confidence. Just a little-boy-lost on the world’s stage.

I’ve seen right wing commentators write articles on how partisan and lowly the debate was. Well no, your man was just an embarrassment. This boy-child is our Chancellor! He is the man tasked with getting us out of the worst financial crisis in living memory. HE is the one who needs to persuade, to charm, to cajole and to inspire.

On yesterday’s evidence he simply is not up to the job. Not in any way at all.

But this interested me : When they all trooped back after the vote, Osborne was a changed man. He seemed weak with relief, quieter, conciliatory. Even smaller and more insignificant – if that were even possible. Immediately, his aides started to brief the BBC’s Nick Robinson that, no, in fact, he withdraw accusations that Balls had been involved in the Libor fixing scandal.

It was clear that this vote had been much, much, more important to him than us mere mortals could know. I wonder who had made George so determined to avoid a judge led enquiry that he would mislead the House repeatedly to discredit his opposite number, only to withdraw the accusations as soon as the vote had passed?

How desperate must he have been to flirt with a libel case to make his oh-so-shabby and pointless case?

This man is our Chancellor – one of the most powerful men in the world. The Conservative Party should be deeply ashamed by both his performance and his character after yesterday’s debate. For all our sakes,  they should find a politician who could actually manage the job. And they should do it fast. He holds all of our futures in his slippery hands.

This post was originally published here.

  • treborc

    Children playing party politics, who have no idea what the look like or sound like to the public, it was shambles which showed  how far politics is in the gutter and how the public are being turned off. labour wants to get the millions it lost back, well this will not do it.

    If you took Balls and Osborne mixed the DNA you still not get a decent Chancellor, people said do not bring back Brown as a chancellor he makes these two look like clowns..

  • betsyBounce

    well said sue … unfortunately, this boy-child is my MP. frankly, i’d rather have hamilton back than him.

    janet (@betsybounce)

  • http://twitter.com/johnringer John Ringer

    Their response to the LIBOR scandal was just incredible in its desperation and incompetence. To quietly brief that “Whitehall” was shorthand for Ed Balls would itself be despicable, but to basically come out and say it on the floor of the House (and have your press office trumpet it on Twitter) is just… mind-bogglingly stupid.

  • Franwhi

    Osborne may have been flinging mud around in the Commons but Labour, New Labour and the three B’s Blair, Brown and Balls cannot escape the blame for their part in the banking scandal. They courted and feted these bankers, they were laissez-faire to the point of neglectful when it came to regulation and they out-Toried the Tories when it came to being seen as ‘friends’ of the bankers. Yesterday’s tribal battles in the Commons is all bread and circuses as far as I’m concerned. A smoke screen which conceals any decisive action on the part of politicians of all stripes to reign in the banking big beasts.  Even if Balls did win the battle of words against Osborne what do the voters gain and how will it redress the financial damage done to millions of savers, mortgage holders and small businesses who lost out due to LIBOR rigging ? Get real Sue – Yahoo-boo politics is no substitute for honourable action in dealing with the bankers  either now or in the recent past.  Stating the obvious inadequacies of Osborne is easy – he’s a lampooner’s wet dream – but its much  harder to excuse the collective ‘banking’  amnesia on the Labour front benches.    

  • Tory Boy

    I really don’t think Sue Marsh is the best person to comment, subjectively, about male politicians. She is a terrible judge of character as evidenced by the following article in which Ms. Marsh fulsomely praised non other than Iain Duncan Smith!

    http://labourlist.org/2011/02/in-praise-of-iain-duncan-smith/

    You’ve got to laugh haven’t you?

    • LaurenceB

      Many Jewish Germans praised Adolph Hitler when he became Chancellor  in 1933.

      We all make mistakes and Sue Marsh made a corker there.

  • LuckyMIke

    Sue must have been watching a different debate to the real one! George plastered Ed across the green benches. He cannot deny he was City Minister at the time, main adviser to Gordo who, by that multi millionaire Polly Toynbee, was city worshipping at the time (Guardian 5 June).Whilst Sue may not like it the voters are not stupid, who were in charge Labour, who was in there with Gordo, Ed Balls. Ed likes to peddle the propoganda that it was a world wide problem, wrong Canada, Australia and many other countries did not face the problems we did, why, tough regulation not the light touch loved by Gordo and Balls. Just  hope the MP’s are up to getting to the truth which is probably Labour were up to their necks in it!

    • Mike Murray

      “.  .   . the light touch loved by Gordo and Balls”. 
      Strange you don’t mention the even lighter touch demanded by the Tories when in opposition. Before the financial meltdown they were insisting that there was too much regulation. Or have you forgotten that? Strange too that Cameron didn’t want Jeremy Hunt to be interogated by the parliamentary commissioner because a judge led inquiry (Leveson) could put him under oath and cross examine him. Yet Cameron rejects those same justifications for a judge led inquiry into the LIBOR scandal saying that parliament can do better. Draw your own conclusions.

    • Dave Postles

       Deutsche Bank being investigated for attempted manipulation of offered rates.

      ‘German market regulator Bafin is reportedly conducting an investigation
      into Deutsche Bank as part of a wider probe into manipulation of the
      Libor rate. The bank’s shares fell about 4% on the news. Results from
      the probe are due in the middle of this month. Do we also get a TV
      grilling of DB bosses a la Bob Diamond?’

      Note too that DB is one of the panellists for Euribor.

    • John Ruddy

      Suprising how many others WERE affected by the UK Labour party, though, wasnt it?

    • Francis Gerald Allen

      Wasn’t lucky enough to have watched the debate, but to see Gideon Osbournes boatrace on the short clip shown on the 6-00p.m. news last night was a picture of a rat caught in a trap, I had the impression that if the camera’s had stayed on his features 10 seconds longer he would have thrown up, he looked that sick. the fact that his special little friends were scurrying around like rats to try and minimise the damage from the mauling that Balls had just given him tells its own story; and just to confirm what a mauling he’d recieved, his pal Tom Bradbury on I.T.V. news at 6-30p.m. tried to whitewash Paul Tuckers comments of “absolutely not” and the Commons debate. But even better was the fact that Gideon has
      scurried away,with not even a mouse squeak to the Telegraph, and hasn’t been seen since. How thick is “Lucky Mike”, in his attempt to discredit Ball’s; his argument that it isn’t a worldwide ecomomic crisis is as pathetic as Osbourne’s attempt to nail Ball’s over the Libor scandal, and his example of Australia and Canada are the stuff of the 1st year of nursery school,these are two of the only countries avoiding a slump because they happen to have two of the commodities that are only in demand throughout the world, oil(tar-shale in Canada) and iron ore in Australia, there economies are booming because of the (even limited)demand for these products, not because of the slash and burn policies that have led to ruin here, so slavishly adhered to by Osbourne and Cameron. 

  • Amber Star

    This is a great article & very well written. Balls did really well. And the way he turned Dominic Grieves’s (Tory attorney general’s) legal position into points which favoured the Judge-led inquiry was masterful.

    All the Tory bloggers & opinionistas are out in force, trying to say Osborne did well & winning was what mattered. They won the vote but Osborne’s credibility has been utterly destroyed. Journalists simply won’t believe him in future unless he has ‘iron clad’ evidence; & neither will MPs in the HoC.
    That is a serious own goal by Osborne.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Osborne was like a squeaking little boy. Its obvious to even the most  stupid that a full enquiry would be far more likely to smoke out everyone involved than a botched parliamentary committee. So he came over as wanting to block the most open approach possible

    • treborc

      We all knew the Tories and the Liberals would defeat that, so really it would have been better to seek as they did to late that a judge and barristers be involved, because to be honest the MP’s who  questions Diamond must Be using the kid   gloves type of argument, he’s rich so leave  him alone.

      • Dave Postles

         SFO is now launching an official investigation into Barclays.  So, that seemingly contradicts any quick Parliamentary inquiry, which will have to exercise extreme caution for fear of prejudicing the potential criminal investigation.

  • Hugh

    It seems a bit pointless to dissect the writer’s argument when people can watch the debate themselves to find that Balls ‘swooping and soaring’ oratory is pure fantasy, as is the awed silence it is meant to have provoked. In fact, I’d also be interested which of his witty asides you had in mind when you write of him riding those cat calls with humour. Overall, it would be helpful if  the writer could perhaps specify which particular parts she felt most strongly channeled Nye Bevan.

    http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=11031

  • Peter Dixon

    More interestingly was how Osborne’s lip curled as we saw him on the TV debate – nasty little man.

Latest

  • Featured Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    A cleaner met me on the corridor the other day as I was leaving the office and gave me a huge hug. “Thank you, City Mayor,” she told me “that’s been the best news for years.” After I had recovered from my embarrassment, I realised what she was talking about. Salford had just introduced the full Living Wage – becoming the first local authority in Greater Manchester to implement a full Living Wage of £7.45 for every member of staff [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    In four weeks time the Chancellor will announce the results of the 2015 spending Review. There won’t be many winners but some will have lost more than others. Political commentators and discussion forums will pass judgement and public sector managers will, yet again, pick through the debris, making do and mending from what ever they can salvage. Before we get overtaken by the detail we should reflect on the bigger picture. What ever the chancellor says on June 26th it [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment A call for action at the G8

    A call for action at the G8

    In less than a month’s time, the UK hosts the G8 Summit. With hunger, tax, trade and transparency all on the agenda, the UK has a unique opportunity to show global leadership on these issues. The scale of hunger is devastating. There is enough food in the world for everyone, yet 1 billion people still go hungry. 2.3 million children every year die from malnutrition – to put that in perspective, that is around 16,000 children every day. Or one [...]

    Read more →
  • News TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run “The TUC along with its international equivalent – the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – is calling on UEFA to address the appalling treatment of workers and players in Qatar and [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    The Labour Party spends a great deal of time beating itself up over its performance in Southern England. We know it simply isn’t good enough, but we can’t seem to put our finger on why exactly that’s the case. Is it demographics? No. Culture? Perhaps. Lack of basic party organisation in some areas? It’s certainly a factor. But whilst we’re flagellating ourselves over our inability to perform south of the Watford gap (outside of London), we should remember that the [...]

    Read more →