Mesothelioma – what it does, and what the government have done…

July 2, 2012 4:31 pm

Mesothelioma is a terrible disease contracted by people who have breathed in asbestos fibres. Here is what mesothelioma does. If one asbestos fibre goes into someone’s lung it can lie dormant for many years, but when it becomes active there is no alternative—that person suffers horribly and then they die. There is no cure, no remission and no element of survival; they die. Everybody who gets mesothelioma will die an agonising death.

I arranged a debate in Westminster Hall, the second chamber of the House of Commons, about the changes to legal aid because of a new law passed by parliament which makes victims of mesothelioma pay their own legal costs. At present those costs are paid by the insurance companies but only if victims win their case. The new law will take a quarter of the compensation away from victims or more accurately their families, as the victims usually die before insurance companies settle the claims.

A good number of Labour MPs, also spoke briefly in the debate in Westminster Hall and a number of others spoke strongly in the debates on the LASPO bill. Some government MPs (including Tracy Crouch and Andrew Percy) also spoke on this subject and all of us who spoke pleaded with the government to exempt mesothelioma from the changes to the law on no win, no fee. In Westminster Hall alone, Dave Anderson, Dennis Skinner, Steve Rotheram, Nia Griffith and Paul Goggins all intervened in the half hour debate we were granted. Andy Slaughter has led for the Labour front bench and many it the Lords spoke powerfully on behalf of the victims and their families on this subject.

The government said that it would review the support given to victims of mesothelioma and their families. This follows the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act which included industrial diseases along with Road Traffic Accidents in measures to end no win no fee litigation in the courts. It is the LASPO legislation which threatens to hit the victims of mesothelioma and other industrial diseases by cutting the level of compensation. Remember that people who suffer and die from industrial diseases like mesothelioma become ill because they went to work and were not protected by employers who knew of the dangers.

The government says it wants to stop fraudulent insurance claims and that is why it has stopped no win no fee legal actions. But there is no evidence of fraudulent claims from those suffering from mesothelioma.

The House of Lords tried to amend the legislation and to exclude victims of mesothelioma from the changes to no win no fee legislation but the amendments made by the Lords were rejected by the government. The government instead said that it would hold a review and that it would consider how it would support the victims and their families. So far ministers have not said what that review will consist of and have not said when the review will be held. Victims and their families need to know and in the debate in parliament I pressed the government to say what will happen in the review so that those suffering from this terrible disease know how the review will be carried out and can prepare their evidence so that they do not lose out as a result of the end of no win no fee.

The idea that those suffering from mesothelioma could possibly be involved in fraudulent claims is absurd and it is disgraceful.

It cannot be right, that victims of asbestos-related diseases should be required to surrender a quarter of the damages they have been awarded to pay for legal costs. Those damages are awarded to recognise and compensate men and women, if it is at all possible to compensate them, for the pain, suffering and life-shortening illnesses they got from their work.

As things stand, if the legislation is enacted, that is what will happen. The government rejected the Lords amendment which would have exempted mesothelioma from this provision but it has yet to say how sufferers and their families will be protected and in all the non answers from government ministers, they have yet to justify to thousands of families why they did not exempt mesothelioma.

Bill Esterson is the Labour MP for Sefton Central

  • treborc

    My father died of it, we are not sure if my mother died of it, I would say she did , as she use to wash our clothes which was covered in the stuff , to be honest I watched my father go from a big 6.5 active bloke to somebody that was weak small and not my father.

    It’s an evil illness.

    • Dave Postles

       Sorry to hear that, treborc.  Of course, it’s the nanny state and otiose red tape which has resulted in precautionary measures in the removal of asbestos.

  • Bill Lockhart

    What did Labour do about this disease during its 13 years in power?

    • treborc

      Opposition can change people.

    • Dave Postles

      How does that relate to the issue above, which is about legal aid, no win/no fee, and compensation?

      • treborc

        Then of course why not have it’s heading No win no fee, or even legal aid.

    • Redshift

      Maintained a system where it was possible for the victims to be compensated. 

      The question here is why is the government trying to take away their compensation. 

Latest

  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →