The Misunderestimated Mr Miliband

July 13, 2012 1:30 pm

Has Private Eye done one of those “Ed Miliband – An Apology” items yet? You know, the one that goes – “In a previous article we may have given the impression that we thought Ed Miliband was a hopeless nerdy loser, doomed to drag his party down to ignominious defeat. In a paragraph headed ‘More of a Wally than a Wallace’, we may have unwittingly stated that ‘the lanky clown ought to be sent back to an LSE seminar on carbon trading’. We now realise that Mr Miliband is in fact a Man of Destiny the like of which we have not seen for many centuries, possibly millennia. We are blessed to have him with us at this time, and look forward eagerly to his next pronouncement.”

Judging by some of the write-ups of Prime Minister’s Questions this week, parts of the press are gearing up for the second half of the standard-issue Private Eye “apology”. Ed had wiped the floor with a red-faced Cameron, effortlessly displaying his mastery of the House. In fact, I think the Indy’s Steve Richards was right to point out that, while he had done well, this had not been a radically different performance from the Labour leader from those he had given before. He is dealing well with heckles and looks more relaxed. The real difference is the crumbling in authority of the government and the now semi-permanent poll lead of between eight and ten points. Ed has some momentum, and Cameron has none.

Iain Martin (of the Telegraph) deserves some credit too. He launched his Don’t Underestimate Ed Miliband Association (DUEMA) well over a year ago. True, it almost went into liquidation at one point, and lay dormant for some time. But he spotted what virtually no other Conservative commentator (and Tory front-bencher) did: that the early caricature of Ed Miliband as leader was a long way from the truth.

The ups and downs of Ed Mili’s reputation and standing say more about lobby journalism and the modern media than they do about the subject of all the chat. Since the non-election of October 2007, until the budget a few months ago, the dominant conventional wisdom in the media was that Cameron was an inevitability: born to rule, perhaps, but a natural at it. He knew how to stand up straight and read a speech out nicely. He looked and sounded confident.

Ed Miliband, by contrast, seemed more hesitant, awkward even. Warm and spontaneous in private, he was less engaging in public. He fought the dominant narrative, but rarely came off well. He had spoiled the lobby’s script – that his more Blairite big brother would recreate the New Labour magic and take the fight back to Cameron on some very narrow middle ground. The old order would be left more or less undisturbed. No new thinking would be required.

Well, bollocks to that. It hasn’t turned out that way. And Ed Mili has been rewarded: fortune has favoured the brave, so far. As Polly Toynbee suggests in the Guardian today, that approach needs to continue. And the signs are that it will – sharing a platform with Tony Blair one day, and another with the Durham miners (or what’s left of them) the next.

Labour has not won the next election. The government has not yet lost it. Eventual economic recovery, which will come (but when?), will change the mood. The next two years will require a steady ramping up of credible policy proposals and principled opposition. The Labour leadership team clearly understands this.

What the Con-Lib coalition and the media need to understand, though, is that they have, in the words of President George W Bush, misunderestimated Ed Miliband. They laughed at him with his bad jumpers and his Rubik’s Cube. But there was perhaps a clue even there. The guy who fixes a Rubik’s Cube likes a challenge and solves problems methodically, leaving things better organised than they were before. Whereas the guy who spends all day with Angry Birds and Fruit Ninja is really just pissing his life away.

  • CharlesOJ

    Hard to judge a man who has suspended making policies until 2015 (or so Angel Eagle tells us).

    By only criticising, and coming up with no constructive solutions, Ed Miliband is enjoying a free ride. To be fair, Cameron did the same thing up to the 2010 election, revealing his policies as late as possible.

    It’s great for poll ratings. But undermines his credibility. 

    The truth is we still know very little about Ed M. What would he cut? How would he deal with the Eurozone crisis? What will he do about rapidly increasing life expectancy and the pressure it is putting on pensions?

    So far he isn’t in the debate.

    In fact this article can not cite a single achievement or policy victory. Only that he deals with heckles in the house well  (as did Hague in the late nineties, much good it did him).

    Ps: Does anyone really think Cameron spends “all day” with Fruit Ninja? A Toynbeeism.

    • Ianr Stewart

      Well, that is what being in opposition means. You keep your powder dry until the very last minute, whilst doing the Government down on their proven failures.

      To be honest, this is what sensible politicians have been doing since at least Abraham Lincoln (another underestimated candidate) refused to be bound by pre-election promises in 1859.

      As a criticism, it is pretty meaningless. 

      • aracataca

        Correct.

      • treborc

         Then you light the fuse and find your powder is damp, you have no time to manoeuvre your troops to counter the barrage.

        Labour may not have to come out with direct Policies but they have to be in opposition, to offer an opposition to a Tory party.

        It’s no good now these days coming out saying you oppose something, you now have to cost it and prove your idea is workable.

        In the past to many labour oppositions have kept the powder dry, then come out with fighting talk, touched the fuse to hear nothing.

        Opposition is not about saying nothing but offering an opposition view to things you believe the Tories have got wrong, silence only works if the people know why your saying nothing, otherwise they might think you have nothing to offer

  • Guest

    It was a good article until the petty, childish nonsense of accusing Cameron of spending all day playing Angry Birds. 

  • Paul Lynch

    Excellent article. And for the moment, policy ‘meat’  isn’t the main issue. What is is creating  a narrative of a confident, competent leader who can convince people to back him and his party, which Ed is doing brilliantly. Well played

    • treborc

      Well played pity he missed that googly, labour cannot keep on saying little or nothing one day they will need to speak, lets hope people are listening

  • LaurenceB

    As Cameron’s star falls Miliband’s rises – it doesn’t mean Ed has won over the British public or that he is any good, only that he represents the only logical alternative to an increasingly unpopular and unsuccessful Coalition government. 

    • aracataca

      Correct

    • treborc

       But we all know that Cameron will pull this around, he will be looking to get his star if you like back up. Miliband has to  come forward with a plan an idea sooner or later, if he leaves it to late he will have little room to manoeuvre.

      • jazz6o6

        “……..But we all know that Cameron will pull this around, he will be looking to get his star if you like back up. …….”

        Not much chance of that. He’s upset the growing numbers of right wingers too much, they’ve seen through him. 
        It will be interesting to see which folds first, the Coalition or Cameron’s leadership.

  • MaryHardy

     Yes, Ed is growing in confidence each day..  no doubt there will be set-backs as there are in every leader’s life – whether in politics or elsewhere.  But in essence I’m liking what I’m seeing more and more.  Its time to stop moaning and get behind Ed Miliband as Polly Toynbee said in her most recent article.  He’s speaking about what will affect our lives long term. Short-termism is so tory and so yesterday..  So no policies but we haven’t a clue what we’re going to be facing in 2015..  if the coalition lasts that long.  Hopefully it won’t.  But this  awful coalition will hang on by its grubby fingernails as long as it can..  Seems to me that Ed has the answers.  I’m sticking with him.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I voted for Ed, worked on his campaign locally, and still think he was the best choice

  • John Dore

    Cameron is Labours biggest asset. Lurching from one disaster to the next. My big fear is that he may stumble into something that makes him re electable. A situation that will probably not be of his own making. 

    It happened with the Falklands and it could happen with a new relationship with Europe and Cameron spinning it to a Eurosceptic public. Dragging the UKIP vote back into the fold. We’re still 2.8 years to the election should the coalition survive, which gives Cameron time. 

    Ed is following Cameron’s path of no policy before the election. I have never thought this the right strategy. Cameron followed the pilloried Brown and couldn’t secure a mandate (epic failure on his part and the Tories). When the tables are turned I think we’re headed for another stalemate. The electorate need to build a bond with Miliband over a long period of time for him to win in 2015.

    He has proven that he is not RedEd, he is not a puppet of the Unions and he is prepared to continue with the best elements of the past and evolve. Copying Cameron’s approach, he’s not doing enough to build a relationship with the electorate and that might be his downfall.

    • jazz6o6

      “……Cameron is Labours biggest asset…..”

      You might be right.  Gordon Brown was the Tories biggest asset and they failed to achieve a majority because of Cameron and his modernizer friends.

  • Macro

    Miliband looks just like a leader only smaller.

    • postageincluded

      No, Dougall. Cameron is small. Ed is far away.

      For now.

  • http://twitter.com/DelroyBooth Delroy Booth

    “Durham miners (or what’s left of them)”

    Smart-arse, cheapshot, disrespectful glib comment. Not needed.

    • jazz6o6

      I don’t see anything disrespectful in that statement, it’s perfectly accurate. If  I where a Durham ex miner I think I’d be a bit p****d off at the number of people free loading on the back of the Gala. Of course it’s always been a bandwagon for opportunistic politicians of which Milliband is just the last in a long line.

Latest

  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Bug Tent tomorrow, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from today’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →