Constituents come first, but MPs should be concerned about national and international issues too

15th August, 2012 12:11 pm

Last week I paid a very brief visit to Moscow, at my own expense, to observe a high profile court which raises serious questions about human rights. I’ve already blogged about this – the Pussy Riot trial – for LabourList.

This trip, on the back of a few opportunistic comments from political opponents (a former Lib Dem councillor and wannabe MP presenting himself as a “local resident” and a tweeting Tory troll from miles away) sparked a bit of a debate in my local paper about whether MPs should be concerning themselves with such things. I would argue that yes, they should.

Of course my constituents in Bristol East come first. They are the people who elected me and the people who have put their trust in me to fight their corner. But I don’t see that as just fighting their corner on local issues. I deal frequently with very local issues, such as parking or cycling on pavements, planning applications, people not having big enough wheelie bins, no issue is too small for my office to swing into action, and more often than not we get good results. I have four excellent full-time members of staff in my constituency office who do a brilliant job in following up on cases for me.

I also deal with issues that are very important to individual constituents but have wider policy implications too. And that’s why the constituency link is so important. It’s by meeting local people – whether it’s at surgeries, on the doorstep or out in the community – and talking about the problems they face that MPs get a real feel for what impact Governent policy is having, and what needs to change.

The best example I can give of this is the treatment disabled people are receiving at the hands of Atos, the body that carries out Work Capability Assessments to see if they are fit to work. I have seen some appalling examples of poor decision-making, and some very distressed constituents as a result. My first response is always to try to sort out that particular constituent’s plight, going into battle with the powers that be at the DWP. But it’s also important, as a national politician that I take this up in Westminster too. Anyone who checks my record will see that I speak in more debates than most MPs and ask more questions than most MPs. I also write lots of letters to Ministers and government agencies. These days, with the advent of ‘pavement politics’ some people don’t seem to understand why MPs have to go to London each week when parliament is sitting, but that’s why we do it.

There are also big issues – at the moment it’s the South West Health Consortium (which is trying to renegotiate NHS employment on a regional level), the renewal of the Great Western Rail franchise, plans for more free schools in Bristol, the City Deal for an elected Bristol mayor, and the failings of the Government’s Work Programme – which take up a lot of my time, locally and nationally.

And there’s dealing with policy matters, whether it be scrutinising government legislation or initiating debates on important topics. I recently had a debate on protecting the oceans and marine eco-systems, for example. And no, that’s not directly relevant to my constituency, but I know from my postbag that many constituents care a great deal about the environment and want someone to speak up about it in Parliament.

And finally, there’s the international element of an MP’s work, which in my case is linked to my role as a shadow foreign office minister. What goes on in the wider world – the battle for human rights, an end to the arms trade, aid and trade for development – is important too, and if MPs aren’t taking these issues up, then who will?

Caring about what’s happening in other parts of the world shouldn’t – and doesn’t – mean an MP doesn’t care about the poor, the downtrodden, the sick, the oppressed or those who are simply having a bit of a hard time at the moment in their own patch. I know that my Liberal Democrat neighbour, Stephen Williams, has been taking an interest in Palestine recently and has been out there to visit. I would never attack him for this. It’s a very important issue. MPs should take an interest in local, national AND international affairs. We’re not local councillors; we’re national politicians. It’s a lot to take on, but it’s what we were elected to do.

Kerry McCarthy is the Labour MP for Bristol East

  • Pingback: MPs should be concerned about national and international issues too. | Votes for Expat Brits blog()

  • Heinrich Deichman

    One of the problems in our politics today is the electorate expect MPs to be social workers rather than Members of Parliament. 30 or 40 years ago, MPs focused solely on the big national and international issues of the day. I don’t know what the problem with that is. We have local councillors who deal with the parking, the planning and the licencing. An MP should be focusing on far more important issues to the national debate than whether or not their constituency’s pavements are wobbly.

    • brianbarder

       Absolutely right! 

  • Franwhi

    …  And you get very well paid for it and have generous pensions, extensive holidays during recess, very little accountability to voters between elections and some autonomy over your own workload. And don’t even mention your 4 full time staff – I know local schools with 1500 children on the school roll and 100 teaching staff who don’t have 4 full time admin staff. You’re having a laugh – the disconnect between MPs and their electorates has never been wider. The Tory posh boys are only the tip of the iceberg and IMO the contrast between all MPs and most citizens lived reality is huge and growing. The expenses scandal was surely the ultimate evidence of this.  

    • Lee Butcher

      As you said, those 4 admin staff in a school have 1500 students, plus staff, to adminster. A vitally important job they do as well. However, an MPs office have (on average) 70,000 people to look out for. Nor it is limited to admin, but often involves quasi-social work, advanced policy research, liaising with local and national and national government bodies and much more. Your dislike for politicians seems to be clouding your judgement. 

      • Franwhi

        I dont dislike them – as a taxpayer I just want much better value out of them and for them to be more accountable like all public servants. Tney should publish data on their constituency caseloads. Yes 70 000 POTENTIAL cases but who do you think has that workload ? We don’t even know if ONE constituent contacts them in a month. More monitoring of MPs is needed and maybe that will encourage a better. more ethical and efficient role for MPs. That’s surely something worth fighting for.  

  • Billsilver

    it’s a shame many ‘national’ politicians as you describe them are inexperienced special adviser hangers-on who have weaselled their way into a constituency.

  • brianbarder

    Personally I believe that an MP’s first priority should be his or her duties in parliament, primarily concerned with national and international affairs.  It’s deeply regrettable that the spectre of deselection forces so many MPs to spend far too much time cultivating their local constituency officers and activists, and holding surgeries in their constituencies in which they try to act as social workers and members of a citizens advice bureau for which most of them have neither aptitude, nor training, nor inclination.  The vast majority of case-work activity to which MPs have to devote disproportionate time ought to be done by local councillors and indeed even by local council officials:  MPs are elected to a national institution, not a local one.  In parliament, they should exercise their own best judgement, not obediently speaking and acting in accordance with instructions issued in resolutions by the local party — Burke’s address to the electors of (ironically) Bristol should be their Bible.  Of course they should keep in touch with their local electorates, including those who didn’t vote for them, promoting their interests at Westminster, taking their various opinions seriously into account, but remembering always that they are not mandated but independent members of the supreme national legislative body.

    They shouldn’t blindly obey the party whips, either.  But that’s another story.

    It’s a real problem that any MP, unless elected by a massive majority and a huge personal following, who tried to act as I suggest would probably be deselected after a single term, either by his affronted local party or by the enraged whips.  No wonder our parliamentary politics are so tame and unadventurous.  Half the MPs spend three-quarters of their time trying to get a tax rebate for some indigent widow in their constituencies, and the rest of it trooping obediently through the lobbies in obedience to the whips’ daily instructions.  That’s the way to ensure many undisturbed decades as a Member, no doubt.  But it makes for lousy politics and a near-total failure of parliament to hold the government to account.  No, I don’t have a solution.

  • Pingback: Has the left forgotten the world? | Shifting Grounds()

  • Pingback: Today I started blogging again… « Shot by both sides()


  • News Weekly Survey: Momentum, fiscal charter and the Privy Council

    Weekly Survey: Momentum, fiscal charter and the Privy Council

    Supporters of Jeremy Corbyn have formed a group called Momentum, which says it will organise to campaign on issues both inside and outside the Labour Party. Do you think it should focus on working inside or outside the party? Having said two weeks ago that Labour will support the proposal, Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell has now said that the party will vote against the fiscal charter on Wednesday. Do you think the move to oppose the charter is a good […]

    Read more →
  • Comment No serious economist supports Osborne’s fiscal charter. Opposing it doesn’t make us deficit deniers

    No serious economist supports Osborne’s fiscal charter. Opposing it doesn’t make us deficit deniers

    I have been worried about the impact of George Osborne’s fiscal charter since it was floated last summer, which is why as a member of the Treasury Select Committee I asked questions of the economists who came to give evidence last July. We found no one, not even the Governor of the Bank of England, who would endorse George Osborne’s latest proposal. This was not just criticism from left wing economists. The Thatcherite professor who now runs the Institute for […]

    Read more →
  • Comment A green London isn’t a luxury, it’s a lifesaver

    A green London isn’t a luxury, it’s a lifesaver

    We’ve reached a tipping point. Most Londoners now say action is urgently needed on climate change. The ICM survey published today for Here Now climate campaigners, shows that this isn’t a preserve of ‘red’ Islington or ‘hipster’ Hackney but a view held across the capital, inner to outer London. As an executive member of SERA, Labour’s environment campaign, we’ve recognised the salience of this argument and that action is not a nice to have but a necessity. ‘It’s the environment, stupid’ […]

    Read more →
  • News Corbyn claims victory after Cameron u-turns on Saudi prison deal

    Corbyn claims victory after Cameron u-turns on Saudi prison deal

    Jeremy Corbyn is this afternoon celebrating the news that the Government has cancelled a £5.9m prisons contract with Saudi Arabia. The deal would have seen training programmes for Saudi prisons, and came under criticism because of the severity of the country’s judicial system. It emerged today, for instance, that a British pensioner is facing 360 lashes after being caught with homemade wine. Corbyn used his Labour Party Conference speech to attack the deal, claiming that overlooking Saudi Arabia’s human rights abuses […]

    Read more →
  • News Full text: McDonnell’s letter to Labour MPs on opposing fiscal charter

    Full text: McDonnell’s letter to Labour MPs on opposing fiscal charter

    Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell yesterday sent a letter to Labour MPs informing them that the party would now be voting against the Charter for Budget Responsibility on Wednesday, having previously stated they would support it. The letter has been passed on to LabourList and can be read in full here: Dear Colleague, Charter for Budget Responsibility and the Fiscal Mandate On Wednesday the vote will take place on an order to adopt the Government’s charter for Budget Responsibility including the fiscal […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends