Labour elects first woman leader

August 23, 2012 12:52 pm

Well, not quite. The idea of a woman leading the Labour Party is so off the wall that it is now the stuff of satire. It emerged yesterday that the hapless Nicola Murray will be leading the Opposition in the new series of The Thick of It.

Twenty-two people have held the post of leader. There have been two women, Margaret Beckett and Harriet Harman. They held the post for 70 days and 137 days respectively. Which means in the 38,200 days the post has been in existence, 207 of them have seen a woman in the post. That is 0.6%.

It gets worse. The Labour Party has never elected a woman to the post. Ever. Despite leading the cause of feminism in Parliament when the Tories were still denying women the right to vote, we have remained unable to bestow our trust in a woman. Some have tried to reach the top, but we can’t quite do it.

Until now. In satire.

I am sure I am not the only Labour member to feel uneasy when Conservatives cite Margaret Thatcher’s elevation to the Tory throne. All I can do is point to the elite Tory meeting place, the Carlton Club, which only admitted women to membership four years ago after almost two centuries of existence. Occasionally, I somewhat disingenuously point to Beckett and Harman, the two short-lived interim leaders, whilst my sparring partners perform that all too familiar Tory laugh. “They weren’t elected to it”, they roar. “Come back when you have your own Thatcher.”

I know it is all in vain, for we have not planted our flag in the moral high ground on the matter. We have attempted to climb the mountain of, err, feminism, but the summit is just out of reach, and the Conservatives look down on us with a smug, wispy smile.

That we have been beaten to electing a woman to the leader’s office by a television satire should be ringing alarm bells. We can laugh as Nicola Murray stumbles from crisis to crisis and Malcolm Tucker’s phone bill shrinks as his power diminishes, but it highlights a deep flaw in our Party. All women shortlists have been a short-term fix that has elected many talented women to Parliament, many of whom are rightly touted as future leaders, but we have yet to take the final leap.

I usually feel uncomfortable pontificating on matters of feminism, and I have very little right to do so. But I hope every woman in the Labour Party considers standing for parliament, and does not see our embarrassing failure to elect a woman to the highest post in the labour movement in the past as a sign that it will not happen in the future, because it will, sooner rather than later.

  • http://liberaltaxi.blogspot.com/ corporeal

    Despite leading the cause of feminism in Parliament when the Tories were still denying women the right to vote,
    —————-

    What? Women over 30 got the vote in 1918 when Labour were the 4th party with ~50 seats.

    It was then age equalised by a Conservative majority government in 1928.

    • Winston_from_the_Ministry

      Pfft…. facts.

      You can prove anything with facts.

    • Redshift1

      Equal pay? 

    • Brumanuensis

      Yes, but the Tories were rather more prominent in the anti-suffragette movement, nay?

    • http://twitter.com/tomwilliamsisme Tom Williams

      The Tories had denied women (and men, for a long while) the vote since the 17th century. Labour enters Parliament, and it is eighteen years until women are given the vote by the Tories, with a few more until universal suffrage is achieved. The Tories were still refusing to cave in to the suffragette movement for a couple of decades after Labour entered Parliament.

      • http://liberaltaxi.blogspot.com/ corporeal

        Labour enters Parliament, and it is eighteen years until women are given the vote by the Tories
        ——————–

        Is that your justification? Correlation and Causation etc. The 2 Labour MPs elected in 1900 were the cause behind women getting the vote? The party with the 4th most seats in Parliament set the agenda on major constitutional change?

        It’s just a bizarre claim.

  • EmmaBurnell

    Mark,

    You don’t have to be a woman to pontificate in support feminist issues, you just have to be a feminist.

    • markfergusonuk

      I know – this wasn’t written by me!


      Mark Ferguson

      • EmmaBurnell

        Sorry! Meant for Thomas!

        • markfergusonuk

          :)


          Mark Ferguson

  • http://twitter.com/FireballDarren Darren Burgoyne

    We may be short of women, but we sure aren’t running low on people called Tom Williams

    • markfergusonuk

      What is the plural of Tom Williams?


      Mark Ferguson

  • Redshift1

    We will have a female leader sooner or later, and she’ll be a bloody good one – not the wicked witch of the west who nicks milk of school kids. 

    I’m perfectly content to be in the party of Barbara Castle, Mo Mowlam and Harriet Harman. 

    Finally, it is hardly pedantic that the Tory party at large has only ever elected a fraction of their leaders, usually they have been elected by MPs – whilst Labour has involved millions of people in their leadership contests. In short, Margaret Beckett and Harriet Harman had more democratic mandates as party leadership figures than many Tory PMs, nevermind leaders. 

  • Brumanuensis

    I think focussing on the leader is a bit short-sighted. In terms of women MPs, we’ve normally been in the lead, especially since the late 1980s.

    http://www.ukpolitical.info/FemaleMPs.htm

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      How about an all woman shortlist for the leader’s position in June 2015?  What could be fairer and more progressive than that? It is after all ruled to be fair and progressive at constituency level.

      Alternatively, those not in the Labour Party may be forgiven for viewing all women shortlists for candidate MPs to be little more than low risk window-dressing to enhance an agenda without handing over control of it.  The “proof of the pudding is in the eating” – when the Labour Party puts forward a serious candidate for leader as opposed to Diane Abbott.

      • Brumanuensis

        I think the macro picture of the PLP is more important than whether the leader, a single individual, is a man or a woman. I think Harman’s idea of a balanced leadership team (leader and deputy leader), makes more sense. On the other hand, I think the position of deputy leader ought to be abolished, so swings and roundabouts.

        It was a pity, as you say, that Diane Abbott was the only female candidate. I suspect the next leadership contest around 2025 – at the end of Ed’s second term in office – will see a more diverse portfolio, including, I hope, the lovely Rachel Reeves.

        • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

          Rachel Reeves is a future Chancellor. I hope Stella Creasy would be leader after Ed, with Chuka Ummuna as her deputy.

          • Brumanuensis

            Rachel would be the perfect candidate: a southerner from a modest background, educated at a comprehensive before going to Oxford and the LSE, with extensive experience of working in the private sector.

            Stella’s a good MP, but I think her talents are best deployed either on the backbenches, or in a ministerial role. Chuka Ummuna is too smooth for my liking, although I’ve nothing against him in policy terms.

          • http://twitter.com/renieanjeh Renie Anjeh

            I don’t think so. It’s interesting seen as you have been very critical of the right of the party but Reeves is someone who is firmly on the right of the party. I love Rachel Reeves but she is not Prime Ministerial but more Chancellor-material. She is not particularly charismatic but she has got economic credibility and seen as she is remarkably intelligent she would be good in terms of economic strategy for eg. pointing out flaws in a proposed Budget. We need a strong economist as Chancellor in the future.I am a huge fan of Stella’s, and you wildly underestimate. Her action on loan sharks, her action on Youth Knife Crime and also she is at the heart of debate in the party. She is charismatic, down-to-earth, good at relating with people and her performances in the House of Commons and on Question Time have been “stellar”. She also can win support right around the party. Also, her latest intervention on public spending shows that he is not just a good MP, community organiser but she is fiscally credible. If we are going to have a woman as leader, it has got to be her.
            Chuka Ummuna would be a good leader of the party, and probably will be. I think it would great to have a black Prime Minister or Deputy Prime Minister but also he is the right person. He is bright, a very good performer, he is authority and stature in the party. He can get support from across the party from both Progress and Compass wings and there’s something a little Blair-esque about him. Also, he is a very popular and could win amongst a  whole range of voters.
            I also think Tristram Hunt would be a good leader or deputy leader but his problem is that he is too posh.

      • John Reid

        Harriet’s Idea of A balanced ticket of male and female leader and deputy, Was twaddle, what IF Diane Abbott had won the leadership Would Harriet have resigned as there needed to be A Male deputy, Also If Prescott had stood on when Blair resigned it would have meant that there would have had to be A female Leader take over in 2007 when of all the candidates available then there wasn’t A women whop would have been the best choice

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1557475545 Jack Bonner

    Should we however have a female leader for the sake of having a female leader? I do want to see a female Labour leader in the future absolutely, but should we have to have an all women short-list at top level to achieve that? Is it right to have a party leader elected on the basis of gender, not who we think is best? 

    I do support AWS for constituencies and council seats,  and I’m proud of Labour’s record in getting women into politics, but I’m not sure if I would support an AWS for electing a female leader of the party. 

  • Jeff_Harvey

    Hands up if you want Yvette Balls nee Cooper as the first female leader of the Labour Party!

    Anybody? 

    No?

    Thought not.

  • Brumanuensis

    Actually, I quite like Yvette. If she’d stood in 2010, I would have voted for her.

    (I know, shocking).

    • Jeff_Harvey

      There’s always one isn’t there?

  • Brumanuensis

    I don’t think we ought to count the Sinn Fein MPs in the tally, as they never took their seats. It’s not unheard of for minor parties to have influence over larger ones: much of Lloyd George’s ‘People’s Budget’ – especially pensions – came from Labour pressure on the Liberals.

    • http://liberaltaxi.blogspot.com/ corporeal

      Yes, but the claim made was specifically about the cause in parliament so the number of MPs would be very relevant (and as you corrected yourself, the Irish Parliamentary Party did sit). Certainly Tom Williams seems to think that the election of two Labour MPs in 1900 was a great watershed moment for feminism in parliament.
      Likewise I’m skeptical of your claims on the people’s budget. The Liberal party after 1906 when most of the reforms were introduced and mapped out was sitting on 400ish seats with the Labour party down somewhere below 50. Doesn’t seem a recipe for much pressure being applied, rather the Liberal party at the height of power.

      The 1910 elections of course saw a much closer result but they were called as a way to implement the reforms rather than being the genesis of them, and it was the IPP rather than Labour that enabled the Liberals to form a government.

      You can point to common thinking between parts of the Labour party and parts of the Liberals, but you can’t retrospectively co-opt New Liberalism or the radicals as being part of Labour when they simply weren’t. And just because in some cases Labour were pulling in the same direction doesn’t mean they were setting the course.

      But that’s running off topic. I desperately hope that Tom Williams has some better reasoning for Labour ‘leading the cause of feminism in parliament’ than women getting the vote  18 years after Labour gained their first MPs, because that’s the laziest of lazy thinking.

  • http://twitter.com/tomwilliamsisme Tom Williams

    I’m not sure why you refuse to accept that the Tory Party refused to give women the vote for centuries. It is a fact.

    • http://liberaltaxi.blogspot.com/ corporeal

      I don’t. But that’s not the claim you were making. 

      You said the Labour party was leading the cause for feminism in parliament at the time.

      ‘There were two Labour MPs elected in1900 and 18 years later women got the vote’ just doesn’t cut it as evidence.

      Wiki informs me there were 42 Labour MPs when the 1918 act was voted on and the act passed by 385-55.

      Still not seeing the importance of the Labour party’s role in ‘leading feminism in parliament’.

    • http://twitter.com/renieanjeh Renie Anjeh

      That is true but we should remember that the Tories and the Liberals were extremely reluctant to do so and it was the Labour Party which was pressurring both parties and supporting women in terms of getting the vote.

Latest

  • Featured This week, amid so much fear, hatred and confusion, let us not forget love

    This week, amid so much fear, hatred and confusion, let us not forget love

    Life can come out and shock you. The events of yesterday are unimaginable. The family of the poor victim are in indescribable pain. Those who knew the men who have done these terrible things will also be suffering. They too are victims of this awful crime. Over the next few days and weeks we will see the best and the worst of humanity. As John Lydon once sang, anger is an energy. Well directed anger is healthy. We should be [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband statement on Woolwich murder

    Ed Miliband statement on Woolwich murder

    In a statement this evening, Ed Miliband said: “This is a truly appalling murder which will shock the entire country. “All of my thoughts are with the family and friends of the victim. “The British people will be horrified by what has happened in Woolwich. They will be united in believing that this terror on our streets cannot be allowed to stand. “The Labour Party will offer the Government our complete support in establishing the facts of what happened and [...]

    Read more →
  • News Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    With much jubilation, the 3rd reading of the same-sex marriage bill passed the House of Commons last night, carried through on the weight of Labour votes, but how have individual MPs voted on this bill? In the 2nd reading of the equal marriage bill, Labour MP voting totals were: 217 – for 22 – against 14 – non-voters For the third reading 192 – for 14 – against 49 – non-voters —————————————————————- 192 Labour MPs who voted yes on 3rd reading (9 didn’t [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Speaking at the Google Big Tent event Ed Miliband said (please note, Miliband spoke without notes, but this is the text released by the party): It is great to be here inside the Google Big Tent. My sons Daniel and Sam think I do a very boring job, so they will be excited when I tell them I appeared along with the “Killer Robots” and the “Captain of the Moonshots” at your sessions. I’d like to start by showing you [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Unions The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    Lord Mandelson, or Baron Mandelson of Foy, as he should be referred to since he was packed off to the House of Lords by a small cabal, recently accused the Unite union of ‘manipulating selection procedures’ in the Labour Party. He went on to warn Ed Miliband that this ‘stores up danger for a future Labour government’. Irony has always been in as short supply as sheer chutzpah has been plentiful with old Mandy – but since his faithful disciple [...]

    Read more →