Art imitates life, once again

September 10, 2012 10:58 am

People will forgive you a lot if you’re funny. That’s not my motto (although it might be Boris Johnson’s), so much as a goal I hope one day to achieve. But it’s also based on evidence, including that exemplified by Armando Iannucci. ‘We in politics’ (now, there’s a phrase that needs to become obsolete) don’t care that Iannucci took the slightly unexpected step of accepting an OBE. We don’t care that he has based his best TV series and film around the simple idea that every single one of us are thick, deluded, vicious, self-serving and/or incompetent. The man’s so bloody clever and funny that we’re more than happy to forget how, days before the general election in 2010, he tweeted encouraging people to vote for a coalition, while acknowledging that it would make his life more difficult. Good job it was only his, eh.

Difficult as it must have been to find a place for unexpected new characters (if that’s a word one can use to describe the Liberal Democrats), the new Thick of It is still very funny and still rings very true. Joanna Scanlan as Terri continues to walk the right side of the line between stereotype and ooh-I-know-someone-just-like-her (“I turn off all work devices at 6pm. After that it’s just me, the Kindle and Jodi Picoult”), and her new ambition to be made redundant promises hilarity ahead. Peter Mannion MP is likewise recognisable without being either a pantomime yah or a Ken Clarke tribute act: he’s just one of those Tories of a certain age, baffled that society now expects him to be able to tweet and refrain from public racism.

Stewart ‘Steve Hilton’ Pearson, the press and the two Sceptical Teen members of the public Mannion encounters all ring similarly true. Glenn, on the other hand, has gone a bit odd. Odder. I won’t spoil it in case you haven’t seen it yet, but I would never have expected that character to do what he has apparently done. Nevertheless, it suggests some interesting tension later in the series.

I was curious to see how the new series portrayed the Lib Dems, and the answer is ‘they’re a bit weird’. This may or may not have been the intention. Based on this first episode – which features Mannion being forced to front a plausible-sounding, Lib-Dem-authored policy he doesn’t understand – the junior coalition partners appear to have been cast in the role of the semi-competent, if somewhat irritating ones who might have made a half-decent government themselves if they hadn’t been yoked with Tory SpAds keen to put them in their place.

Or maybe I’m just reading too much into Iannucci’s own views here. After all, Fergus the Lib Dem minister also has an unconvincing approach to TTOI-speak which is hilarious if it’s deliberate. In a stand-up diatribe at Terri he sounds a little like Steve Fleming as portrayed by someone from Black Books. It’s quite tempting to imagine that all the Lib Dems took office thinking that now they had proper jobs in politics they all had to talk like Malcolm Tucker.

Unfortunately, as the Telegraph’s review also pointed out, everyone in this episode sounded a bit like Malcolm Tucker. The structure of the new 7-episode series is apparently ‘Coalition, Opposition, Coalition, Opposition, Everyone, Everyone, Everyone’, and the obvious weakness of any Coalition-only episode is a Capaldi deficiency. In his absence, this episode at least relies too heavily on all characters having the same knack for insults and inventive swearing as Tucker: the line every other review is repeating as the episode’s funniest (“You’re basically a couple of homeless guys we’ve invited to Christmas dinner. Don’t bitch because we don’t let you carve the turkey”) was given to Tory SpAd Phil, who is usually much funnier when he’s failing to keep up with everyone else’s jokes. Angry Mannion, meanwhile, closely resembles David Mitchell having just discovered he’s been burgled.

What am I hoping for in next week’s episode? Bucketloads of Malcolm, naturally – but also a bit of the heart this episode was lacking. Don’t laugh: previous series have brought us Glenn’s public breakdown, Nicola worrying that she was failing as a mother, and Malcolm Tucker’s career collapsing before his eyes. Mannion’s apologetic request for his wife to ‘put something eggy on a tray’ for his tea isn’t really in the same league, although I did warm to Disappointed Stewart as he slunk out of the office with his foldaway bike between his legs.

I suppose what I’m saying is that although watching the cock-ups of coalition is entertaining, what I’m really looking forward to is seeing what the Opposition have got for us. Art imitates life, once again.

  • postageincluded

    I loved it. Roger Allam is a brilliant actor, and how nice to see his Mannion, who struggled with the minor frustrations of opposition, being put through the mangle of office. I’m looking forward to seeing the Inbetweeners getting thoroughly mauled too.

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    I need a “Keep Calm & Carry On” style poster with the phrase  ”I’m bored of this, I’m going for a Twix” on it.

  • http://twitter.com/shibleylondon Dr Shibley Rahman

    As for art imitating life, I think the Mannion character is priceless for being so ‘prone to gaffes’. 

    I think in this respect he most imitates Ken Clarke, who’s traditionally one of the Left’s “favourite Tories”?

    Yes, I think they captured the #omnishambles element very faithfully in fact.

  • http://twitter.com/RF_McCarthy Roger McCarthy

    Good that you alluded to the Telegraph review which came as close as someone can there to bemoaning that this is yet another thing the coalition has ruined for the rest of us.

    It also had the line that a Malcolm and Ollie and Nicola (although perplexingly and utterly implausibly – does nobody else remember he was angling for a safe Labour seat in S3 – not Glen) -free ITTOI is like watching someone trying to plug a gaping hole in a brick wall with Lego – these are no more than supporting players and can’t sustain a whole episode by themselves.

    And the Lib Dem characters are just utterly uninteresting and unbelievable – which may be painfully accurate but does not make for good comedy.

    The reason is presumably the lack of Lib Dem stereotypes other than the local sandal-wearing leaflet-obsessives who are of course never allowed into Parliament and that they already have the hapless loser minister slot that should naturally be the Lib Dem’s filled by Mannion.

    So they incongruously have to try and balance him with a more predatory and ambitious figure.

    And where was the cutting edge topicality? – AFAICS the only line that couldn’t have been written a year ago was the Nazi quote one.

    Hasn’t quite jumped the shark yet but the the boat is at the dock and the waterskis are out of the locker (or where ever you keep waterskis).

    • postageincluded

      ” And the Lib Dem characters are just utterly uninteresting and unbelievable – which may be painfully accurate…..”

      Haha. It’s funny ’cause it’s true

    • postageincluded

      By the way, Glen was angling for a safe seat but didn’t get it – rejected because of his association with”glummy Mummy” Nicola.

      Glen did need a new job but it was a surprise that he “crossed the floor”. I’d say it’s plausible nonetheless, given his isolated position at the end of the last series. And it’s not as if there weren’t a few similar defections from Labour post-2010.

Latest

  • Featured The propaganda of the class war

    The propaganda of the class war

    I have become fascinated by Made in Chelsea. Not by the storylines or characters. I honest couldn’t care less if Binky is going out with Proudlock, or whether Ollie is gay or straight (or if the concept of bisexuality ever makes it to SW3), though I was surprised to find that Fran and Cheska were two separate people. Given that this is supposed to be reality TV, the most extraordinary thing is how bad the acting is. If you were [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Monday saw the first day of Committee on the Same Sex Marriage Bill, where it became clear after a three hour debate on how to distinguish Same Sex Marriage from so called “traditional” marriage that opposition to this bill has not gone away. Despite a huge defeat on Second Reading, opponents reheated and repeated their earlier speeches, in part because their arguments rely on belief and prejudice not evidence or fact. So we sat until 11pm debating conscience clauses, Registrars [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Well that was a bad PMQs for Ed Miliband – the second in a row. Perhaps he hasn’t gotten back into his stride after such a long period without the weekly Wednesday joust, but whatever it is, Miliband isn’t hitting his marks at PMQs. Meanwhile Cameron – who has been jousting with world leaders this week – seemed far more o top of his game than we’ve been used to seeing him lately. Alas the problem for Miliband was that [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Last week it was revealed that the government discussed secret plans to hike interest on pre-existing student loans, meaning that anyone with a student loan will be expected to pay far more than expected. Today, the Prime Minister was asked about this – he spoke for nearly a minute but wouldn’t answer the question. What does he have to hide? How much more does he expect graduates to pay?

    Read more →
  • Comment Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Across the industrial north, it is striking how old pit villages and industrial towns are proving far less willing to embrace renewable energy than the noisier, more polluting fossil fuels and industries which shaped their identity. Energy companies are getting a nasty shock after mistakenly believing that these communities would not bat an eyelid at a few wind turbines on the surrounding hills because they had been content to make huge slag heaps part of the landscape in decades past. [...]

    Read more →