Either we all live in a decent Britain, or nobody does

September 11, 2012 12:44 pm

Over the past few months, there has been a steady flow of stories about the rise in the number of foodbanks in Britain. Anyone reading beyond the first line of any of these articles will be aware that a large part of the rise appears to be due to working people no longer being able to make ends meet. While David Cameron, George Osborne and an unpleasantness of other Tory MPs might welcome this as a symbol of the Big Society; the rise in foodbanks sums up everything that is wrong with Cameron’s Britain. It captures the essence of why Osborne was booed at the Paralympics despite the positive feeling of the 2012 games. Due to government policies many Britons are broke,  but Britain is not yet broken.

The past four years of recession has chipped away at what people earn. Wages have been frozen or cut while prices continue to rise. The changes and cuts to tax credits and benefits are adding more pain to families and mean many more people can no longer afford to feed themselves.

We should be clear that food poverty isn’t really just about food. It is about poverty. In the same way as fuel poverty is less about the fuel than the ability to buy it. Adding other words to preface the word ‘poverty’ serves somehow to soften the word ‘poverty’, but simultaneously illustrates the choices people have to make when they don’t have enough money. Do you pay your fuel bill or buy food? Do you pay your rent or skip a payment on the interest on an unpaid credit card or payday loan bill?

The debate we have as a party – which I hope will form part of the debate at this year’s Labour Party conference – has to be about how ensure a future Labour government will move beyond policies that are essentially no more than sticking plasters. We need to deal with the cause and not the symptoms. We have to be clear how we are going to deal with 21st century poverty. We have to find a way to avoid the need for food-banks, breakfast clubs and teachers taking in food for children who regularly go to school hungry. We need sustainable solutions. Dare I say it – we need a more equal society.

We should worry when people start quoting George Orwell to describe today’s Britain. Over the past few weeks as I have been talking to people about food poverty in London, a number have quoted the same section of Down and out in Paris and London to me. If you missed out on Orwell, or have got a bit rusty, read the book and discover the quote yourself. In the meantime, here’s an alternative Orwell quote from The Road to Wigan Pier:

“The world is a raft sailing through space with, potentially, plenty of provisions for everybody; the idea that we must all cooperate and see to it that everyone does his fair share of the work and gets his fair share of the provisions seems so blatantly obvious that one would say that no one could possibly fail to accept it unless he had some corrupt motive for clinging to the present system.”

There will always be decent people who will help others in a worse situation than themselves by setting up food-banks and other charitable endeavours. However, a situation in which people cannot earn enough money to feed themselves and their children, with them going to school (and bed) hungry or malnourished is fundamentally wrong. If we fail to come up with a solution that doesn’t change the current system for the better, a solution that creates work and ensures that work pays enough to live on, it will be us not his unpopular namesake that Orwell would be pointing his finger at.

Fiona Twycross is a Labour member of the London Assembly

  • AnotherOldBoy

    It is not at all clear whether the growth in food banks has much, if anything, to do with the recession, rather than with the rolling out of the concept since 2004: see http://www.trusselltrust.org/resources/documents/Our%20work/Lambie-(2011)-The-Trussell-Trust-Foodbank-Network—Exploring-the-Growth-of-Foodbanks-Across-the-UK.pdf

    The founders of the Trussell Trust decided that Salisbury needed a food bank in 2004, well before the recession, and that, if Salisbury needed a food bank, then so did every other town in the UK.

    The Trussell Trust give a number of stories at their website.

    The first concerns a couple who suffered from the need for exceptional heating in the cold of January 2010 (when, of course, Labour had been in office for 13 years) and a delay in receipt of their benefits.  This had nothing to do with the level of benefits proposed by the present government or paid under the last: it was a delay to receipt of benefit.

    The second is about an ex-soldier who suffered from post traumatic stress disorder.  All too many ex-servicemen end up on the streets.  In this case, while he had a home and a family, but no job, the ex-soldier was too proud to claim benefits and so ended up with no money.  Again, nothing to do with the level of benefits.

    The third is another tragic tale: a schoolboy who skipped school rather than be seen to be unable to pay for lunch.  It turned out that his father, in whose names the benefits were paid, had decamped.  It was going to take months to resolve the benefits position.  Again, the problem was not the level of benefits.

    Finally, there is someone who spent 22 years linving on the streets suffering from alcoholism.  His life has been turned around by his local foodbank, for whcih he is now a volunteer.

    The lesson I draw from this is that the benefits system is inefficient and (inevitably) imperfect, not that the level of benefits is too low.

  • Hugh

    “We should be clear that food poverty isn’t really just about food. It is about poverty.”

    Hence the name.

  • charles.ward

    “Do you pay your fuel bill or buy food? Do you pay your rent or skip a
    payment on the interest on an unpaid credit card or payday loan bill?”

    The problem is that those in food poverty are generally there because they have built up debts, initially at reasonable rates but when those become unavailable at much higher rates.  I have never seen any examples of people in food poverty who haven’t got there through excessive debt.  I believe that the benefit system is adequate to keep people out of food poverty if they are not paying excessive interest on debt and you can never provide enough benefits to those who will borrow more than they can afford to repay.

    Maybe the answer is to restrict credit to those on benefits so that any loan must be approved by the benefits agency.  I guess that wouldn’t prevent them getting black market loans.

    • charles.ward

      Mark, can you explain why Hugh’s comment (posted after mine) took about half an hour to pass moderation but mine took hours?

      Are you fast-tracking certain comments?  Wouldn’t it be fairer to moderate them in the order they come in?  The rate at which articles drop off the front page delaying comments is almost as good as quietly dropping them.

      AnotherOldBoy’s comment seems to have been delayed as well.

  • markfergusonuk

    Some commenters are moderated and some aren’t. All moderated comments are taken and moderated together.

    • charles.ward

      What’s the criteria for deciding who is moderated and who isn’t?  I’ve been commenting on LabourList for some time and I’ve never broken the rules for commenting or had a comment rejected.  I’ve posted over 200 comments averaging over 2 likes per comment.

      I starting to suspect that certain commenters are stuck in the “moderation required” group because of their views not their commenting record.

      If you were to post the objective criteria by which you decide who is moderated this would help dispel my suspicions.

  • AlanGiles

     ”The second is about an ex-soldier who suffered from post traumatic
    stress disorder.  All too many ex-servicemen end up on the streets.  In
    this case, while he had a home and a family, but no job, the ex-soldier
    was too proud to claim benefits and so ended up with no money.  Again,
    nothing to do with the level of benefits.”

    But I feel the problem has a lot to do with the stigmatisation of those on benefits by both the present and the previous governments, which they did to ingratiate themselves with the tabloid newspapers so beloved of “hard-working families”. After 2009 a nice soft, easy target for two failing administrations

    There is a great deal of anecdotal evidence that a lot of (especially older) people do not obtain all the benefits they are entitled to, either out of pride or this attitude towards climants so common amongst right-wing politicians of both major parties.

  • markfergusonuk

    That’s a fair point Charles – I’ll take a look at removing you from moderation.

    • charles.ward

      Thanks Mark.  The fewer people who are moderated the less work it is for you remember!

Latest

  • Featured Technology isn’t just something for geeks to worry about

    Technology isn’t just something for geeks to worry about

    If you Google ‘Ed Miliband,’ you quickly get the old stuff about him being a bit of geek. His appearance at Google’s big Tent on Wednesday almost begged the headline “Geek Goes Home”. But that assumes technology is just something for geeks to worry about, and that Ed is a techie. Neither are true. What we saw on Wednesday was a leader with the courage to tell Google straight that it should live up to its founding principles on the [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Woolwich: The British people – and our politicians – have risen to the occasion

    Woolwich: The British people – and our politicians – have risen to the occasion

    “We want to start a war” – Woolwich attacker “right now it is only you versus many people, you are going to lose” - Ingrid Loyau-Kennett Only 24 hours ago, news began to trickle through about a barbarous crime, committed on the streets of our capital city, in broad daylight. It seems that the murderers who attacked and brutally murdered a soldier felt they were acting in a way endorsed by their religious beliefs and their god. But to try and [...]

    Read more →
  • News

    Labour NEC Report – 21st May 2013

    Party Organisation The General Secretary (GS) noted the party’s good performance in the recent Local, Mayoral and South Shields elections and thanked all members, activists and staff for their contribution to that success. The committee discussed the work of Blue State Digital who have been brought in to revolutionise the party’s use of new and social media as part of our suite of campaign tools. It was noted that Matthew McGregor, Head of Blue State Digital’s London Office and former [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s London Assembly Leader responds to Woolwich attack

    Labour’s London Assembly Leader responds to Woolwich attack

    Following yesterday’s attack in Woolwich, Leader of the Labour Group on the London Assembly Len Duvall AM said: “The attack in Woolwich was horrific, the actions of local people in response and the head-teacher and staff at the school are a reflection of the values and strength of our community. “At this afternoon’s London Assembly Police and Crime Committee questions will be asked about yesterday’s attack and the response, and at a future assembly meeting we will come together to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    Today End Violence Against Women (EVAW) releases a new report auditing the Government’s progress in acting to prevent violence against women and girls. And with the revelations from Operation Yewtree and group exploitation cases set to roll on for many months , we hope the response from Parliament, policy-makers and the media will be unanimous : that prevention must be at the top of the priority list for any government, of any colour, from now on. On that basis, it’s [...]

    Read more →