IDS gets his sums wrong – by £1.85 BILLION

September 14, 2012 4:00 pm

Yesterday The Daily Mail reported that IDS’s claim that “benefit tourism” would cost Britain £155m a year. Funnily enough though, there was no mention of the fact that he previously claimed that it would cost £2 BILLION. That means the figure he’s now arguing is “enormous” is a whopping 92% lower than his original guesstimate – £1.845 billion lower to be precise.

Lets take a look at that in chart form.

It’s enough to make you question what other sums this government have got disastrously wrong…

  • rekrab

    Heavens above! and his universal benefit is about to go live!

    • http://twitter.com/MatthewSDent Matthew S. Dent

      Well, you say that…

  • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

    What exactly are Labour’s plans for the Welfare system?
    There can be no doubt that IDS has been torpedoed by George Osborne with whom, according to the Telegraph, there is a lot of shouting going on. The Treasury, apparently, is in charge of the IT system which has to be put into place to make Universal Credits work and the Treasury simply is sitting back and letting nothing happen. It is, you are right, a total disaster.
    So let me repeat my question:
    What is the Labour policy on Welfare Reform?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715486331 Alex Otley

      Labour doesn’t have a policy I’m sad to say, but hopefully Ed’s wonkish ‘predistribution’ thingy will develop logically into “make housing affordable so people don’t need housing benefit”.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    To me, “could” as he actually said has a different meaning than “would” as you report him saying.

    The real point is that benefit tourism, as worked out by his civil servants, could cost us all £155 million a year, which is £155 million too much, and that if we can reduce that £155 million to zero cost, what does £155 million buy in social provisions that we would all support?  By coincidence, it could mean a near 20% cut in the costs of “Meals on Wheels” for vulnerable and mostly elderly people, some of whom are facing an 88% rise in the cost of the service.  See:  http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/8880747.Meals_on_Wheels_costs_to_soar_by_88_per_cent/ . Apart from anything else, the cost of a single meal, even if delivered to the door, of £5.64 seems excessive to me for pensioners on very low incomes.

  • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

    Lol, but tribalism aside we should support measures to crackdown on benefit tourism.

  • William Bungay

    Ugh, what is this?

    The £2bn figure is a potential worst case and even if it is wrong, the ‘error’ is cautious IN OUR FAVOUR.

    If your only points against IDS are, as they seem to be, that 1. he isn’t psychic and 2. he’s taking a bit more care with the money forcibly taken from me every year than labour ever did, then he doesn’t seem bad to me.

  • Brumanuensis

    As FullFact put it:

    “The problem with this analysis – which supposedly led to the vast overestimate – was that it included households who had already qualified for benefits and so wouldn’t be affected by a change in the ‘right to reside’ law. The latest estimate this week from Iain Duncan Smith now excludes these households.

    Full Fact contacted the DWP today for more information on the latest estimate, but no one was available for comment.

    However the whole affair raises serious questions over how the Department has handled both making the estimate itself and publishing its findings.

    On neither occasion has the DWP published any details of its estimates, meaning that anyone interested in knowing what basis there is for trusting these figures is going to be sorely disappointed.

    There is also a secondary problem: neither the Department nor Mr Duncan-Smith seems to have indicated that there was a problem with the old figures that were previously quoted. The new £155m estimate has superceded the old £2bn estimate, but the error has not been corrected”.

    Sums up the DWP at the moment, really.

  • Serbitar

    Iain Duncan Smith is one of the stupidest and least able politicians of any political party not only now but historically. Not to put too fine a point on IDS is as thick as two short planks. More than the Coalition’s economic failure the forthcoming Welfare Reform Bill looks catastrophic: the worst of it is that everybody knew that this was going to be the case from the moment IDS took over at the DWP intent on implementing Centre for Social Justice policies despite the fact that Liam Byrne is supposedly “broadly supportive” of three quarters of its contents.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/sep/15/welfare-bill-iain-duncan-smith?newsfeed=true

    Even dyed-in-the-wool, semi-detached Tory Boys are now convinced that the bill is wrong:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/10/universal-credit-benefits-disaster

    It is almost impossible to put into words how personally disastrous these ridiculous IDS reforms are going to be, if they go ahead, to millions upon millions of men, women and families. Surely the Labour Party should find a much better, braver, effective, passionate and competent defender to stand up for the voiceless and the helpless and the innocent about to face lives blighted by poverty and homelessness than the crypto-Tory and diminutive Liam Byrne? The seriousness of this matter is impossible to over emphasise.

  • MonkeyBot5000

    What’s a factor of ten between friends?

  • williamtheconker

    £1.85 billion?
    Huh!
    How many billion was Gordon wrong by?
    IDS seems like a rank amateur.

Latest

  • Comment The culture of high risk credit is being exploited by betting shops

    The culture of high risk credit is being exploited by betting shops

    Since the financial crisis, the perfect storm of recession and banks restricting access to credit has led to the rise of payday lenders. Our high streets are slowly deteriorating from the vibrant, diverse places they once were into an abyss of pawnbrokers, payday loan shops and bookies. The three feed off of each other, targeting some of our most deprived areas and perpetuating a cycle of despair driven by the need for extra income. Research carried out by Geofutures found [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should people be asked if they are party supporters when they register to vote?

    Should people be asked if they are party supporters when they register to vote?

    Chris Clark and Rav Seeruthun on a small change that if adopted, would free activists to spend more time on community work Every year at party conferences we hear professional politicians eulogise hard-working party volunteers. And there’s no activity more often evoked than that of ‘knocking on doors’. It’s a common delusion that the purpose of doorstep canvassing is to ‘persuade’ voters. Having taken part in our fair share of Labour canvassing sessions, we’ve both had the dispiriting experience of [...]

    Read more →
  • Europe Featured You can always rely on the Conservatives to ignore the public when it comes to Europe

    You can always rely on the Conservatives to ignore the public when it comes to Europe

    Europe is not often the issue which comes top of people’s concerns on the doorstep. Nor do opinion polls suggest that Europe is a priority for voters when compared to issues like the economy or jobs. But you can always rely on the Conservatives to ignore the public when it comes to Europe. This week saw over a hundred Conservative MPs rebel and vote against their own Queens Speech. They were angry that it hadn’t included a bill which would [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →