The reshuffle showed the Lib Dems true colours too

September 11, 2012 7:16 am

Almost every newspaper splashed that last week’s Government reshuffle was “a lurch to the Right”.  It was, after all, a reshuffle that received the endorsement of Norman Tebbit.  The promotion of Jeremy Hunt at Health, Owen Paterson at Environment and Grayling at Justice, together with Michael Fallon and Matt Hancock encircling of Vince Cable at BIS, is all solid evidence of this.  But the appointment of David Laws, ostensibly at Education but with a “roving brief” across Whitehall, is just as telling in terms of the direction of Liberal Democrats in the Government.

In recent weeks, as the Lib Dem conference looms and in the face of more dire polls for his party, Nick Clegg has stepped up his “differentiation strategy”.  His political re-entry after the summer holiday was, unsurprisingly, an interview in the Guardian, the newspaper that told us all to vote Lib Dem at the election.  Clegg talked of the need to “hard-wire fairness” and that the rich should shoulder a greater burden.  Only weeks after he sanctioned the tax cut for millionaires, we have come to expect this level of bare-faced dishonesty.

But like rats deserting a sinking ship, there is a lot of this progressive reinvention going on within the Lib Dems.  Paul Burstow, the Lib Dem minister who led the Health and Social Care Bill through the Commons, rejecting amendment after amendment at Committee stage, stepped down from the Government and within hours he launched an attack on the “dangerous” plans to cut hospital services in London.    Sarah Teather served at Education, backing Michael Gove on scrapping school buildings and child poverty targets.  Like Burstow, she too has left the Government to go and spend more time with her fragile majority.

The good voters should be sceptical indeed of former Lib Dem ministers suddenly wishing to trade pay-cheques for principles.  Some Lib Dems would like to give the impression that their support for the Government is moving towards “confidence and supply”.  But Lib Dem support for the Government is on the same basis as it was before – convenience and supply.

The come-back for the disgraced David Laws shows Clegg’s true colours.  This was Clegg’s number one priority.  The so-called ‘Orange Book’ Lib Dems, of which Laws is the poster boy, are ideologically at one with Cameron and Osborne’s failed economic doctrine.  This is what they really believe – it is why they came into politics.  Before the reshuffle, according to Philip Cowley, the only Lib Dem backbenchers never to have “rebelled” against the Government are Laws, Chris Huhne and Lorely Burt.

Earlier this year, Economic Affairs contained a number of articles discussing the effect the Orange Book had eight years ago.  Laws described the centre ground, where many Liberal Democrats previously believed was their rightful place, as “the muddled middle of British politics”.  His conclusion for the Lib Dems was:

“We must keep faith with economic liberalism.  Free market capitalism…offers the best prospect for increasing wealth and reducing poverty and poor living conditions.”

And what of Osborne’s failed economic plan?  In January of last year, Laws wrote in the Guardian:

“It seems highly likely that 2011 will be the year in which the coalition is proved right on economic policy.”

So if last week’s reshuffle did mark a further shift to the Right, amongst the Tories and the Lib Dems, what are we to make of it?  To attack the Government because it has “lurched to the right” is pretty meaningless and abstract to most people.  They are rightly interested in what it means for themselves, their families and the things they care about, like the fact that last week’s reshuffle means that the clear and present danger to the National Health Service is ongoing.

Last week’s reshuffle does mean that the Conservative party continues to re-toxify at a pace.  David Cameron has long since given up on modernisation and on being the change that was promised.  But we also have a Liberal Democrat party with MPs that are completely at home in this Tory-led Government.  The Lib Dems are guilty of two things: duplicity (in promising one thing and doing the exact opposite) and complicity (in enabling the worst aspects of the Cameron and Osborne Government).  All Lib Dem MPs must be held accountable for this.  No Lib Dem MP that has served in this Government, or voted in the lobbies for this Government, has a free pass or a get-out-of-jail-free card at the next election.

Michael Dugher is Labour MP for Barnsley East and shadow minister without portfolio 

  • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

    “Last week’s reshuffle does mean that the Conservative party continues to re-toxify at a pace. ”
    Well, actually not enough for us Tory Trolls. We need action on the EU, on Tax simplification, on the bureaucracy and the deficit and debt immediately. Not austerity actually, just common sense and a bit more freedom for us down here at the bottom.

    I am not sure that Mr Ed Milliband’s kiss on the delicate cheek of the President of the TU Congress went last night down awfully well with those of us old enough to remember Mr Heath either.

  • http://twitter.com/MandyHall64 Mandy Hall

    As a former Conservative supporter I am amazed at how fast the party has managed to move in Government and betray many of its so – called core supporters. Once, the LibDems were an alternative party and I can’t see any future for them at the next election. However what does this mean for our ‘democratic’ system if there is only one effective choice left? 

    I’d like to hear what Labour has to say – what it would do better, do they recognise the aspirations of people (and I don’t just mean being able to put up an extension…) , how are they going to do this – but without simplistically saying, ‘soak the rich’. (Who are ‘the rich’ anyway?).

    I have a lot of problems voting with Labour on a variety of issues and I don’t want to be limited to just one choice… but is there another credible alternative.  I might have to vote holding my nose…

    • Prepareus

      Mandy there are many reasons why you should vote Labour but the obviously one is that Labour do have a plan to put us on the path for economy recovery without throwing the baby out with the bath water. This includes bringing forward key long term projects and a one year insurance tax break for firms who take on additional workers- helping businesses to breath and grow.

    • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

      Labour understands aspiration but how is the priority at a time of fiscal constraint, to spend £3bn on giving millionaires a giveaway of £40,000. There is no evidence that will help growth and it is just needlessly spending money. People’s priorities are to be able to cope with living standards, to know that real fairness exists in society, for them to know that if they work hard they will be rewarded, that contribution is key, that they can have a job or a home if they need one and could eventually have their own home, that they can have good schools or universities, a thriving NHS – that is aspiration.

      • http://twitter.com/MandyHall64 Mandy Hall

        Renie, we probably then have much in common! 

      • Serbitar

        On several occasions you appear to speak in an official capacity on behalf of the Labour Party. Out of interest do you have a recognised role within the Labour Party? Are your comments actual reflections of official Labour Party policy or merely an assortment of opinions made by a Labour Party member? 

        Just wondering.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    And this is why (for what it is worth), I ticked “NO” in the box asking if Labour should be talking to the LibDems. While the state of the party monthly surveymonkey exercise is not going to change the world, I wonder what others in the party think.

    After 20 years or so of trying to build the trust of their party, the LibDems have utterly blown themselevs apart. They have no credibility, and after the next election they will also have very few MPs.

    But my biggest gripe with them is that the LibDems have served for two years now as a smoke screen to divert the attention of the media away from the serious divisions within the Tory party itself.

Latest

  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →