The Tory Right are a threat to Labour – but they’re a bigger threat to Cameron

September 27, 2012 9:26 am

Since late 2010, I’ve always believed that Labour could wind up inadvertent allies with the Tory Right.

After all, we are united by our distrust of David Cameron.

Back then the Tory Right looked peeved but “managed”. The coalition project was ticking along, there was still growth in the economy, and memories of the Rose Garden were still fresh. So too were memories of the “Turnip Taliban”, where sections of the Tory grassroots were trashed in the press. Rows had ensued over candidates, many of whom were seen as Cameron stooges. It was used as an opportunity for the Tory hierarchy to paint their own grassroots as old fashioned, out of touch and borderline bigoted.

As a party management effort it was brutalist, but not wholly ineffective.

Yet ironically, Cameron’s beloved 2010 intake – a group he expended so much effort on getting into Westminster – are now the ones coming to get him. And some of the most the most vaunted newcomers have even written a book which seems designed to do just that, by dragging Cameron as far away from the political centre as possible.

The book, of course, is Britannia Unchained – a rip roaring read for those who think that the biggest cuts in modern history are a bit soft.

Jon Cruddas has an important critique of this Cameron-busting tract in today’s Guardian. Perhaps the most interesting section of his review is this:

“the authors of Britannia Unchained represent a project that is extreme and destructive, and which threatens the essential character of our nation. It is because this faction is in the ascendancy that Cameron is actually failing; he remains captive to an economic reductionism that could well destroy conservatism – in the proper sense of valuing and conserving the nature and assorted institutions of the country.

Cameron is not one of this crew. Tactically, in the short term he might survive; but in the medium term he is toast. The economic liberals’ march through the Conservative party will continue; every day there is less and less opposition, and they will eventually win.”

The barbarians are at Cameron’s gate, and no matter how far he moves in their direction, it will never be enough for them. They will destroy him, but he will cannibalise his own “Cameroon” agenda first in an attempt to survive – ether by co-opting elements of the unchained agenda or the authors themselves.

For Labour this is both a huge opportunity and a terrifying threat. On one hand, the Tory party seems hell bent on the detoxification if their party and the destruction of their single biggest electoral asset David Cameron. They want to pursue a Britain in which unfettered capitalism is allowed to run rampant – which post-crash is not going to be an easy sell for them. Despite some herculean efforts at revisionism, it was banks, not public spending, that crashed the global economy, meaning the unchained pill will likely be unswallowable for much of the electorate,

That’s the opportunity.

The threat is that if this group – once fringe, now increasingly mainstream in the Tory Party – actually gain power, it could leave the state not as something that can be repaired, but as rubble. They mean to dismantle the state – nothing less. Those of is who believe that government can do good things, should be very concerned by their ascendency.

But it the short term at least, perhaps not as scared as the Prime Minister.

  • http://twitter.com/Anna_Hayward Anna Hayward

    Along with the extreme right, liberal economic views comes a nasty racist, xenophobia which could win them votes. Look at the Daily Mail yesterday (Wed 26/09/12). Its all a little too reminiscent of 1930s Germany.

  • Daniel Speight

    Interesting that Cruddas sees this new right of the Tories as having an economic liberal core and just a veneer of social liberalism. I suspect he is correct. To me they are the British equivalent of Paul Ryan and the Ayn Rand crazies.

    We can see it with the right wing libertarians like Paul Staines. There ‘liberalism’ and the wish for less state interference doesn’t stop them from campaigning for a return of capital punishment.

    • peteyvv

      Yep libertarian nonsense based on freedom. Yet complete freedom doesn’t really exist. Flawed logic that conveniently makes the rich even richer.

    • Winston_from_the_Ministry

      Can you explain to me why it would?

      • Daniel Speight

        I guess because I can’t think of anything more interfering by the state on personal freedom in general than the state taking an individual’s life.

        • Winston_from_the_Ministry

          I think it’s fairly obvious that anyone sentenced to the death penalty has given up their right to personal freedom.

          Libertarians still believe in crime and punishment y’know.

          • Daniel Speight

            So Winston although these right-wing so-called libertarians are against the ‘big state’, they are happy to give the state this ultimate power over individuals?

            Myself I think the conservatives with a small ‘c’ are a bit more honest in their views.

          • Winston_from_the_Ministry

            As I state clearly above, they still belive in crime and punishment.

            I’m sure you’d find many both for and against the death penalty for various crimes. A range of views if you will.

            It’s this attempting to tie people down to “viewpoints by association” that has polluted the political discourse in this country. 

          • Brumanuensis

            Libertarianism: the belief that the state is too incompetent to be trusted to run libraries, but manifestly well-equipped to make decisions as to whether or not to kill people.

          • Hugh

            Libertarianism: the belief that the state is too incompetent to be
            trusted to run libraries, but manifestly well-equipped to make decisions
            as to how long to lock people up.

            I don’t agree with the death penalty, but it’s not at all logically inconsistent – not least because one might hold that both the legislature and executive are incompetent but still trust in an independent judiciary.

          • Brumanuensis

            I doubt it’s possible, given that the judiciary is a branch of the state and criminal prosecutions are undertaken by the state, not to mention that the laws used to determine the application of capital punishment will be drawn up by the ‘less competent’ branches of the state. And of course, who appoints the judges in the first place? It’s extremely difficult, if you believe that the state is either malicious or inept, to compartmentalise its components, as they are all mutually interdependent, particularly under the British constitutional set-up, where Parliamentary Supremacy affirms the inferiority of the Courts.

          • Hugh

            Libertarianism generally argues for small government not no government, and if you allow the state to lock up people for life in specific cases, there’s no reason on libertarian grounds why you cannot support the death penalty and still be in favour of small government.

          • Brumanuensis

            Believing in a ‘night-watchman’ state doesn’t mean that libertarians abandon laissez-faire within the criminal justice system. Milton Friedman was deeply sceptical about the effectiveness of the death penalty and advocated drugs liberalisation. It may be that some libertarians support capital punishment, but from a perspective of intense suspicion of the state, this seems frankly illogical and incoherent, almost as if socialists decided en masse that the way to achieve equality was through a massive expansion of the number of private schools.

  • http://keithsww.blogspot.com/ keith s

    Britannnia Unchained are the same school as the Tea Party and Romney. It is quite possible that they will succeed, especially if Cameron loses the next election. The shadow banking figures who fund the Tories will want a return for their pounds.

    Of course, if Cameron wins then the state will be pretty much changed in the manner the hedgers and private equity nabobs want. The NHS, education and welfare provision will have become yet another business opportunity.

    And then what is Labour going to do? Accept the change or try some sort of social democratic reform. If Labour wins in 2015 then there will be huge expectation that it will reverse the changes and improve the living standards of the majority.

  • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

    I don’t see them as a threat to us at all, more like ‘useful idiots’.  If economic liberals like the Free Enterprise Group, Conservative Voice and the Deep Blue Group continue their hold on their party, it will prove to people how rightwing the Tories are an then be implemented in Tory policy. You will get Lib Dems backing as well as defending, extreme proposals.
    I like Jon Cruddas’ definition of ‘conservatism’, because it is something that everyone from the centre-left can identify with.

    • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

      “it will prove to people how rightwing the Tories are”

      Meaning that they’ll then be unpopular? Or perhaps not. Being rightwing doesn’t seem to be doing any harm to UKIP’s prospects at the moment.

    • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

      “it will prove to people how rightwing the Tories are”

      Meaning that they’ll then be unpopular? Or perhaps not. Being rightwing doesn’t seem to be doing any harm to UKIP’s prospects at the moment.

      • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

        It would make them unpopular, dave. Do you really think the country would vote for a Government that could suspend capital gains tax, introduce radical deregulation which hits workers’ rights, clamping down on right to request working times and parental leave? Do you genuinely think that will not make them unpopular. The reason why UKIP gaining in popularity is because of widespread Euroscepticism  – people want a referendum.

        • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

          Sure, they’ll be unpopular but can Labour become any less unpopular?

          Of course, there could be an inspirational, imaginative and convincing alternative but would anyone associate those three words with the PLP as currently constituted – think about it for a moment: inspirational, imaginative and convincing – the Parliamentary Labour Party? Nah! The suits are behaving as if they’re on a weekend break from government.

          However, I think we can look forward to a crescendo of huffing and puffing.

          • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

            You’ve been reading too much of Neal Lawson’s pieces.

  • Serbitar

    The burning question in respect to rightward political drift is less concerning as far as the Tories are concerned – they are collectively moving to the right and have been for some time – but where is the Labour Party going? The Labour Party as constituted now is far to the right politically of the Conservative Party led by patricians like Harold Macmillan of centrists like Ted Heath. Will the Labour Party be able to resist the inexorable pull of the black hole-like singularity of free market capitalism, individualism, and hostility towards the helpless, sick, disabled and the needy, stoked by a right-wing press with its own agenda? I doubt it. Especially given the selfish ineffectual careerist drips currently in the shadow cabinet.

  • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

    …and then huge porcine figures rose in the air and began to spread their wings. These swine-like beasts then took for the sky and started to fly.

    • Serbitar

      Many people throughout New Labour’s wasted glory days thought that Tony Blair could walk on water (and even turn it into wine) but me, after noticing Blair’s feet were made of clay early on, well, I never gave credence to Blair’s purported saintliness or promises in respect to future miracles. And I was proven right. And now as far as the shadow cabinet is concerned, although most of them are admittedly porcine gasbags and bladders full of hot air, I really don’t think that any of them will ever be able to defy the pull of right-wing gravity and fly somewhat left-ward back towards the centre.

  • http://twitter.com/redrenie24 Renie Anjeh

    The difference is that most of the people from the Free Enterprise Group are socially liberal, in fact Liz Truss was a Lib Dem.

  • robertcp

    British voters have shown that they vote agsinst parties that they see as too far from the mainstream, for example, Labour from 1983 to 1992 and the Tories from 1997 to 2005.  If Cameron is mad enough to move too far to the right, it will be an opportunity for Labour and may even save some Lib Dem MPs.  Cameron may be seen by history as the Conservative leader who did not take the opportunity for the centre-right to dominate British politics for a generation.   

  • AlanGiles

    Here you are, gentlemen: From this mornings (28th Sept) “Independent”

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-threat-is-no-joke-labour-warns-ed-miliband-8182638.html

    Perhaps the “Scarlet Pimpernel” manque’ Steve Rowley and others like him can stop taking out their spite on the Greens and concentrate on something more immediate and tangible

  • Hugh

     Perfect social justice doesn’t exist either, so I guess progressives are wasting their time too.

Latest

  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is party politics dying out?

    Is party politics dying out?

    This week has brought the role of party members and activists back to the front pages. That’s rather unusual to be honest – and rightly so, as party members (swivel eyed and otherwise) make up only 1% of the British population. Being a party member is already a niche interest. You are somewhat odd if you’re a party member – sorry to break that to you, but of course I’m odd too (and quite possibly odder than you). What swivel-eyed [...]

    Read more →