Labour’s Police and Crime Commissioners should take a broader view of “justice”

October 11, 2012 12:00 pm

As election day for the Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) draws ever closer, it seems a good juncture to take stock of the debate around crime and justice the campaign has drawn out. Labour has a genuine opportunity with the PCC elections to reorientate the discourse of what falls into the remit of ‘crime and justice’, ensuring that Labour values of equality and fairness remain at the heart of these elections, and putting forward a progressive alternative which ties criminal justice to social justice.

As can be expected, Labour candidates have taken a strong stance on anti-social behaviour, domestic violence and youth crime; while at the same time many PCC candidates have championed a progressive opposition to police cuts. However, Labour candidates are often failing to think outside the traditional comfort zones of crime and justice, when they, more than any other party, have a unique chance to challenge the criminality of the Coalition’s economic policies and harmful neglect of the environment.

It would be helpful for Labour’s PCC candidates to conceive of justice not just in terms of criminality, but also in terms of social harm. Looking at harm, as opposed purely to criminality, could see a dramatic opening-up of debates around justice. This would mean challenging the illegality of mortgage misselling, of companies failing to pay workers the wages they are due, and harms in the community that may be more life-threatening than crime itself such as work-induced health problems or environmental degradation.

An example of one of the areas currently off the campaign agenda, which Labour’s PCC candidates could bring to the fore, is the unreportedly large number of companies currently in non-compliance with the National Minimum Wage. According to the 2011 Low Pay Commission Report, in 2009/2010 there were around 1256 cases of non-compliance with the nnational minimum wage. Although this was a 28% fall in the number of cases from the previous year, this resulted in only a 17% fall in the number of workers not paid the minimum wage.

The Low Pay Commission estimates that in the UK there are currently between 146,000 to 219,000 workers not being paid the minimum wage who are owed it. Since the introduction of the minimum wage, only 2 companies have ever faced criminal action over non-compliance with the minimum wage, around 0.13% of cases of non-compliance, exposing a significant failure in the system to bring companies to justice. Labour PCC candidates could expose this great injustice and spearhead it as a central part of their campaign which affects ordinary people who are victims of corporate crime.

Similarly, workplace safety is an area where Labour has a strong record in government, and ensuring that Labour champions workers’ rights and campaigns against the criminal neglect of workers by the Coalition government is essential. There were 175 workers killed at work in 2010/2011 according to the Health and Safety Executive, with 1.2 million people suffering from a workplace illness. These figure are only expected to grow as a result of Coalition policy, making major cut-backs in safeguards to prevent people at work being harmed. By 2015, the Health and Safety Executive will have suffered a 35% budget cut, which will result in workplace inspections falling to below 18,500 a year, down from 60,000 inspections a decade ago.

Labour PCC candidates can weave these shocking facts into their narrative about what makes communities safer; danger in the community isn’t only embodied by the ‘hoody’ on the end of a darkened street, but is right there in your workplace, and it is Labour’s job to prevent that.  With 26.4 million working days lost due to work-related illness and workplace injury, preventing harms in our community also prevent harms in our economy.

The role of the Police and Crime Commissioner is in fact a very broad one, concerned not just with policing, but also with crime reduction grants, drug and alcohol services and probation, and Labour must recognise that the debate should be as open as possible. Labour can be incredibly bold about the offer it can make to the public during the PCC elections, and can afford to be quite maverick in its approach to crime and justice.

During the last Labour government, Blair’s “tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime” soundbite in practice seemed more intent on the former, and viewed the latter as an afterthought.  Labour has an impressive record on crime reduction, and one we should be proud of, but crime and justice cannot be seen in a vacuum to other societal harms.

Reconceiving justice not only as that which is defined by Daily Mail headlines, but as tied unbreakably to our broader vision for a more equitable and prosperous society should be imperative to the upcoming PCC elections and the general election beyond. By envisaging opposition to the corporate destruction of our environment as an as essential part of our crime and justice platform as promising to put more police on our streets, Labour can make a truly radical reconception of how justice looks in Britain. This would be a justice where criminals at the top of society have as much chance of conviction as those at the bottom, and the harms which afflict our communities are prevented and not just reacted to.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think the problem is that the PCC elections haven’t remotely entered into the public consciousness. I am concerned that we seem to be accepting this very mistaken change as something which cant be altered . I think we should make it clear that these will be one term posts and that an authority-type structure, directly elected and with non-politician independent community participation, will be reintroduced. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/jim.crowder2 Jim Crowder

    Don’t worry. When the Labour Party is elected again, they will be able to address the criminality of the Tories. All you have to do is to explain which laws they have broken and which people have done it. No problem there.

    Similarly, the companies which have committed crimes. Identify them and which laws they have broken, and they can be prosecuted. If you have evidence that companies are flaunting the minimum wage laws, make a fuss; get them convicted. The same goes for Health and safety. It’s no good just talking about it; if you have evidence, go for it. I’m certain that the TUC will support a private prosecution if the state refuses.

    Laws exist to support the people. You might not necessarily like the people they support, so an involvement in politics might help change them.

    On the other hand, to pretend that crimes are those actions you don’t like sounds like a dictator in waiting, with rule by decree. Not part of a democracy, but then dictators don’t like democracies either. 

  • Robert_Crosby

    I worry that too many of our candidates represent the past and have just been on the lookout for a “job”.  The PCC election has turned into a potential life raft for has-beens and never wases, sadly.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    Each police force has a budget, which is being cut, and you want the police and crime commissioners to tell the police that in addition to what they currently do, to start checking up on wage levels and conducting health and safety checks?  There are other non-police bodies that should already be doing that, which continue to exist, and will not be under any form of control of a new PCC.

    Please do not get me wrong, I do not support getting rid of the functions of investigating allegations of below NMW pay, or failing to regulate health and safety policies.  I just do not believe that it is the police’s function to do either.  I am also wholly unconvinced that a PCC function should exist at all.  What purpose does a PCC fufil?  Not an expert in policing, not involved in budget setting, too political, sitting on the edge and meddling between the police commander and the proper role of the police.  For once, I am in agreement with Mike H.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    Each police force has a budget, which is being cut, and you want the police and crime commissioners to tell the police that in addition to what they currently do, to start checking up on wage levels and conducting health and safety checks?  There are other non-police bodies that should already be doing that, which continue to exist, and will not be under any form of control of a new PCC.

    Please do not get me wrong, I do not support getting rid of the functions of investigating allegations of below NMW pay, or failing to regulate health and safety policies.  I just do not believe that it is the police’s function to do either.  I am also wholly unconvinced that a PCC function should exist at all.  What purpose does a PCC fufil?  Not an expert in policing, not involved in budget setting, too political, sitting on the edge and meddling between the police commander and the proper role of the police.  For once, I am in agreement with Mike H.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    Each police force has a budget, which is being cut, and you want the police and crime commissioners to tell the police that in addition to what they currently do, to start checking up on wage levels and conducting health and safety checks?  There are other non-police bodies that should already be doing that, which continue to exist, and will not be under any form of control of a new PCC.

    Please do not get me wrong, I do not support getting rid of the functions of investigating allegations of below NMW pay, or failing to regulate health and safety policies.  I just do not believe that it is the police’s function to do either.  I am also wholly unconvinced that a PCC function should exist at all.  What purpose does a PCC fufil?  Not an expert in policing, not involved in budget setting, too political, sitting on the edge and meddling between the police commander and the proper role of the police.  For once, I am in agreement with Mike H.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    Each police force has a budget, which is being cut, and you want the police and crime commissioners to tell the police that in addition to what they currently do, to start checking up on wage levels and conducting health and safety checks?  There are other non-police bodies that should already be doing that, which continue to exist, and will not be under any form of control of a new PCC.

    Please do not get me wrong, I do not support getting rid of the functions of investigating allegations of below NMW pay, or failing to regulate health and safety policies.  I just do not believe that it is the police’s function to do either.  I am also wholly unconvinced that a PCC function should exist at all.  What purpose does a PCC fufil?  Not an expert in policing, not involved in budget setting, too political, sitting on the edge and meddling between the police commander and the proper role of the police.  For once, I am in agreement with Mike H.

  • uglyfatbloke

    Mike – absolutely right, almost nobody outside the party political community gives a damn about it and those who have an opinion generally think that the whole idea is pointless. Commissioners will have no real power to make choices that suit their community. Imagine if someone stood on a ticket of  ’no prosecution for prostitution, cannabis, defending yourself or gambling’ and got themselves elected. Does anyone really think that Cameron or Miliband would let them do what they were elected to do?  

  • AlanGiles

Latest

  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is party politics dying out?

    Is party politics dying out?

    This week has brought the role of party members and activists back to the front pages. That’s rather unusual to be honest – and rightly so, as party members (swivel eyed and otherwise) make up only 1% of the British population. Being a party member is already a niche interest. You are somewhat odd if you’re a party member – sorry to break that to you, but of course I’m odd too (and quite possibly odder than you). What swivel-eyed [...]

    Read more →