Market abuse should lead to jail

October 14, 2012 4:09 pm

This week in the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee Euro MPs backed by a massive majority my proposals for new tougher market abuse rules. The vote is a clear signal that the EU is not a soft option or safe haven for perpetrators of market abuse. For the first time we are introducing EU wide criminal sanctions including jail terms for those intent on committing market abuse.

Earlier this year it came to light that banks had been colluding to fix the inter-bank lending rate? Libor (the London inter-bank lending rate), is one of the most crucial interest rates in finance. $350 trillion in derivatives and around $10 trillion in loans are set according to Libor.

The concern for individuals is that this is also the benchmark for pricing some UK residential mortgages, more commonly for commercial mortgages, and increasingly for pricing commercial loans by banks to UK businesses.

Barclays has already been fined £290 million in the UK and US and regulators have now extended their investigations to at least four of Europe’s biggest banks: Crédit Agricole, HSBC, Deutsche Bank and Société Générale. Yet these fines were not a big enough deterrent to prevent the abuse happening in the first place.

The real lesson to be learnt from this crisis is the need to focus on putting in place rules and sanctions to prevent crises and not scrambling and reacting after the banks have yet again undermined confidence and trust in the markets.

The Libor scandal is market manipulation of the worst kind and has demonstrated that the culture in the financial sector has not changed and that they cannot be trusted to self regulate. Our vote has therefore extended the law so that all benchmarks and indices fall under market abuse rules to cover all possible and future manipulation.

The strong stance we have taken on criminal sanctions for market abuse has been shown to have wide public support. The campaigning organisation Avaaz presented me with a petition, signed by over 720,000 people, calling for such sanctions. According to their figures released this week, the overwhelming majority of people polled in France (90%), Germany and the UK (89% each) believe that bankers responsible for fraud or manipulating markets should face criminal sanctions such as jail sentences.

There is still much to do in restoring the trust and confidence in banks and the financial services industry. We must get the real economy moving again and make sure consumers are protected in the financial services sector. These new tougher rules on Market Abuse are a key step along the way in the reform process designed to ensure that financial markets are brought under control and ensure our banks start operating in the interests of the real economy.

Arlene McCarthy MEP is Vice Chair of the European Parliament’s Economic & Monetary Affairs Committee and the Parliament’s Rapporteur on Market Abuse.

  • Dave Postles

    Add UBS to your list – investigations in the US about manipulation of Libor.

  • AnotherOldBoy

    “According to their figures released this week, the overwhelming majority of people polled in France (90%), Germany and the UK (89% each) believe that bankers responsible for fraud or manipulating markets should face criminal sanctions such as jail sentences.”

    Rather a silly poll.  I think you will find that bankers who are convicted of fraud face criminal sanctions such as jail sentences already.  A banker who manages to abuse a market without commiting fraud would only face a civil fine (or naming and shaming) under s.123 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 passed by the last Labour Government which did not, apparently, see any need for a specific criminal offence of market abuse.

Latest

  • News Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    From: HERBERT, Nick Sent: 20 May 2013 16:29 To: HERBERT, Nick Subject: Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill – voting today   Dear Colleague Thank you for your support for the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at Second Reading. You will be aware of the amendments tabled by Tim Loughton and others (new Clauses 10 & 11) to extend civil partnerships to heterosexual couples I have no issue with the principle of this proposal, but I am very worried that adding this measure to the [...]

    Read more →
  • News Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whilst the Westminster village has been working itself up into a lather over the rise of UKIP and when/if there should be an EU referendum, the DWP snuck out a report on the evidence of DWP league tables that we brought you recently. It’s a total whitewash. The report – which you can read here – argues that claims of a league table are entirely down to individual managers at a number of job centres. You could call it the [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    So after toying with support for the Tim Loughton amendment over the weekend, Labour has decided to abstain on that particular amendment, and propose their own. Let’s be clear – the most important news today is that Equal Marriage will pass through the commons, and that’s a cause for huge celebration for all but an isolated minority in the Labour Party. I made clear this morning that I didn’t buy the argument that supporting the Loughton amendment would stop or [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour MPs will be encouraged to back this amendment – rather than that of Tory backbencher Tim Loughton – today: House of Commons Monday 20 May 2013 CONSIDERATION OF BILL New Amendments handed in are marked thus * MARRIAGE (SAME SEX COUPLES) BILL MANUSCRIPT AMENDMENT (a) As an Amendment to Secretary Maria Miller’s proposed New Clause (Review of civil partnership) (NC16):- Kate Green (a)(a * Line 8, leave out from ‘practicable’ to end of Clause, and insert ‘and include a [...]

    Read more →
  • News Is Ed Miliband picking a fight with Google?

    Is Ed Miliband picking a fight with Google?

    In his interview with the Observer yesterday, Ed Miliband singled out Google as a company who aren’t “living up to their responsibilities” on tax, saying: ” I don’t think [Google] are living up to their responsibilities at the moment, and I will be very clear about that on Wednesday. It is part of a culture of irresponsibility. If everyone approaches their tax affairs as some of these companies have approached their tax affairs we wouldn’t have a health service, we wouldn’t [...]

    Read more →