The travesty of Adult Social Care – why Labour must do more

October 16, 2012 3:30 pm

We are all agreed that adult social care is in dire need of reform, but we are torn by the need to make tough decisions whilst offering a fair and effective care system. Our society is one that is rapidly ageing; one in three people in the UK is over 50 and the numbers are rising. There are now more people over 65 than over 16. So why are provisions for a dignified retirement are falling significantly short?

The last Labour government proposed a cap which was instantly derided by the opposition and widely criticised in the public sphere.  Why should older people who have worked hard – and saved harder – then made to pay for their own care? The idea was killed before it had even begun to take shape.

Since then, Labour has failed to put the issue back at the top of the agenda. Adult social care might feel like a minefield to approach, but it is an issue which Labour must lead the charge on. If we really are Ed Miliband’s vision of the “One Nation” party then we need to offer proposals that speak to, and address, the concerns of everyone – and not the few. A recent poll conducted by Age UK (2012) found one in four people now consider care for older people the most important issue that will sway their vote, behind only the NHS and the economy.

Now, the same ideas put forward by Labour during its last days are back, only this time, by the same politicians who derided us. Though there were many issues with Labour’s initial proposals, at least it was an honest attempt to address the ticking time bomb that is adult social care. With this government however – made up of many who in old age wouldn’t look twice at public sector care – it just feels as if proposals have been put on the table with the intention of making a problem go away. This Tory-led government back a reform which will see many forced to sell their homes or live in poverty after a lifetime of hard work; this is the same Government led by a man who declared at his party conference that he is here to spread the privilege, not defend it – well, his care policy says a lot about his commitment to that statement.

Labour must seize this and show the electorate that we are the party who truly stands up for everyone. We must show that we can capture the momentum and the frustrations of our society, not just of older people but those of their children too, the ones caught in a double-care trap, where they find themselves the primary carers of their parents as well as their own families; their priorities should be our priorities.

So what can Labour do? We can get behind the campaign for better, more responsible, adult social care. We should bring it to the forefront of our rhetoric, make it prominent in our policy review and ensure that it will feature heavily in our manifesto. Older people deserve a fair deal and Labour should be the key brokers in this by demand a fair and socially just package not just for them, but their families too. By offering older people real alternatives to the pick and mix care system, the Labour Party as a progressive political force can ensure a secure old age for all people and avoid the travesty of adult social care.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/QDMFX65KM5STSAFHAC4FOLFTO4 fran

    Are you moving in the direction of the Scottish system of free personal care because your Scottish Labour colleagyes are now moving in the opposite direction ?  

  • Mr Arthur Cook

    I grow weary of the phrase “the need to make tough decisions ”.
    “Decision” is an anagram of economic but “the need to make tough decisions ” seldom goes as far as fully evaluating options.
    We know that there will be conflicting needs but these are so often explored only within a single domain e.g. a pay rise for nurses means less money for patients. Or a pay rise for teachers means less books for children.
    Might we look at expanding the “tough decisions” across these boundaries?Let us mix and match!!
    How about “Submarines capable of delivering nuclear warheads to anywhere in the world” OR new primary school buildings?
    Massive subsidies to a privatized (therefore “efficient” railway) OR supporting rural bus services?
    Massive corporate tax breaks and turning a blind eye to tax avoidance OR providing social care and therefore  justice for the elderly who have contributed to the state coffers for a lifetime.
    If Labour thinks it will slide into power by default and give us more of the same old state collusion in corporate “prole tax farming”  then perhaps think again. A mandate offered by a small turnout of disillusioned voters will be as tenuous as the current sham government.
    Look to your roots Labour – you have nothing to loose but your silk suits!

      

Latest

  • News Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    Equal marriage – How every Labour MP voted at every stage of the bill

    With much jubilation, the 3rd reading of the same-sex marriage bill passed the House of Commons last night, carried through on the weight of Labour votes, but how have individual MPs voted on this bill? In the 2nd reading of the equal marriage bill, Labour MP voting totals were: 217 – for 22 – against 14 – non-voters For the third reading 192 – for 14 – against 49 – non-voters —————————————————————- 192 Labour MPs who voted yes on 3rd reading (9 didn’t [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Ed Miliband’s Google Speech – full text

    Speaking at the Google Big Tent event Ed Miliband said (please note, Miliband spoke without notes, but this is the text released by the party): It is great to be here inside the Google Big Tent. My sons Daniel and Sam think I do a very boring job, so they will be excited when I tell them I appeared along with the “Killer Robots” and the “Captain of the Moonshots” at your sessions. I’d like to start by showing you [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Unions The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    The chutzpah of Peter Mandelson – and why we need more trade unionists

    Lord Mandelson, or Baron Mandelson of Foy, as he should be referred to since he was packed off to the House of Lords by a small cabal, recently accused the Unite union of ‘manipulating selection procedures’ in the Labour Party. He went on to warn Ed Miliband that this ‘stores up danger for a future Labour government’. Irony has always been in as short supply as sheer chutzpah has been plentiful with old Mandy – but since his faithful disciple [...]

    Read more →
  • News Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Cameron says no more EU-turns – Media roundup: May 22nd, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Cameron says no more EU-turns “After one of his most difficult weeks since becoming prime minister, David Cameron put in a polished and assured peformance on the Today programme this morning. The most notable line came on Europe, with Cameron [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Miliband is off to speak to Google – but it’s not all about tax avoidance

    Miliband is off to speak to Google – but it’s not all about tax avoidance

    Ed Miliband is speaking at the Google “Big Tent” event this morning, and as we noted earlier this week, he’s picking a bit of a fight with them over their tax affairs. Understandably, most of the press coverage in advance of Miliband’s speech (and presumably afterwards too) is about Google’s tax affairs. That’s in part due to David Cameron’s unwillingness to challenge his adviser, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, when the two met earlier this week. The Downing Street media team [...]

    Read more →