There’s a class war being waged in Britain – but not by Labour

October 10, 2012 2:32 pm

“There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

- Warren Buffett

David Cameron looked tired today. He was the future, once, but today he didn’t look like it. I said this morning that he needed to deliver a speech to inspire and unite the country behind his vision. He manifestly failed to do that, delivering a speech aimed squarely at his party, rather than the country. A few soundbites apart this was eminently forgettable fare.

The line that Cameron clearly wanted to get onto the news tonight is “Aspiration Nation”, which is so close to a Thick Of It catchphrase it surely will force the writing team to question whether or not their work in politics is done. (And the “yes-but-no” people was so close to “quiet batpeople” I winced). Seemingly the Aspiration Nation is where we now live. It’s easy to get confused of course, because it’s also a country with huge levels of youth unemployment, devalued qualifications and slashed pensions. But of course all of those suffering in the Aspiration Nation just aren’t aspiring hard enough…

Particularly galling was Cameron arguing, in the space of a few minutes, both that the Tory Party was on the side of those young people who were stuck in their parent’s homes but would also be cutting housing benefit for those under 25. Housing benefit is of course an in work benefit as well as an out of work benefit – so huge numbers of young people who have “done the right thing”, got a job against the odds and managed to get themselves a stable home of their own will now lose out. So much for sticking up for the “strivers”.

Similarly under attack for their lack of aspiration were teachers. Cameron lambasted those “so in hock to a culture of low expectations that they have forgotten what it’s like to be ambitious”. This made my blood boil. For me this point was personal. My partner is a primary school teacher. Each and every day (including weekends and holidays) I see her go above and beyond the call of duty for the kids she teaches because she cares about their futures. Long nights, early mornings and weekends hard at work. The life of a teacher that no-one sees. The same is true of teachers up and down the country in all manner of schools. Strivers? The aspirational? Those who work in their community? Teachers are exactly the kind of people you’re talking about Cameron – yet you choose to run them down. Shame on you.

But division and running down perceived opponents was the hallmark of this Cameron speech. He may have tried in vain to grasp elements of Miliband’s “One Nation” mantle, but this was nonetheless a divisive speech, peppered with references to “our people” – a phrase that of course suggests some people are not Cameron’s people after all. Teachers, the young, those who are out of work. Not Cameron’s people. And every moment spent dividing rather than uniting the UK merely served to show the widening gap between the visions of the two main party leaders. Cameron believes in the current system. His strategy is about nailing down the votes of the dwindling number of people who still vote, and seeks to capitalise on the public revulsion towards politics. Ed Miliband is trying something brave but almost unthinkably hard – to “grow the pie” of potential voters.

Cameron’s intention was never clearer than in the section of his speech where he – bafflingly – spent time focussing on and defending the 50p tax cut. A tax cut that impacts on a fraction of a fraction of society. An entire paragraph of speech for the 1%. Were that the unemployed were so lucky to have received such focus…. It was all about shoring up the Tory base, reassuring them that he was a Conservative – and damn the rest. If Miliband’s speech was in the clouds last week, this one was on the street corner, trying to kick Ed Miliband’s head in.

Tellingly, and most poigniantly, Cameron accused Miliband of waging “class war”. That’s a spectacular (mis)reading of last week’s speech, which Cameron surely knows. But listening to the PM’s speech today, it was hard not to recall the words of Warren Buffet – “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” Tax cuts for the rich, benefit cuts for the poor, no jobs, no security, pensions slashed, attempts to turn parents against teachers, those in work against the unemployed, a false dividing line between aspirational strivers and the lazy benefit scrounger.

David Cameron needed to take the British public with him today. Instead he gave a nasty little speech. The hand of Lynton Crosby and his ugly style of politics looms large over the modern Conservative Party. They’re no longer the optimists, they’re the class warriors. And they couldn’t care less.

  • Brumanuensis

    I actually thought that rhetorically it was quite a clever speech, although like Mark I found the content either vapid or misleading.

    What’s annoying is that Labour won’t make the obvious counter-argument to Osborne’s  housing benefit gimmick, that the Conservative Party has decided to penalise young people trying to set up independent households and encourage them to stay at home and mooch off their parents. Not that Byrne will try anything so obvious. Incidentally, the average weekly claim for housing benefit is £89.46, whilst claims of over £50 k make up 0.0025% of all claims, according to the DWP’s own figures (see here: http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/adhoc_analysis/2011/hb_awards_march_2011.pdf ). Not that Byrne will mention that.

    It’s rather striking that Cameron’s rhetoric on housing benefit was very alike to his rhetoric on public-sector pensions – echoed by Tim Montgomerie in response to Ed Miliband’s conference speech – i..e:

    a). private pension arrangements are largely awful

    b). public pension arrangements are much better

    c). ergo, let us make public-sector pensions worse

    And there was I thinking that the Conservatives loathed ‘the politics of envy’ (wooohhh! eeeevvvilll!)

    • Winston_from_the_Ministry

      Regarding the last point, I think it’s a bit different when you consider who is paying.

      • Brumanuensis

        Even the Hutton Report pointed out that the idea that most public-sector pensions are ‘gold-plated’ was highly inaccurate. Equally, private pension schemes benefit from preferential tax treatment, which is effectively a tax-payer subsidy. If Cameron wants to improve private pensions, why doesn’t he focus on that, instead of attacking public sector arrangements?

        • Winston_from_the_Ministry

          No idea, sorry.

          • Brumanuensis

            Fair enough.

        • ColinAdkins

          Seemingly absent from this attack on the public sector pensions are platinum plated ones for just 600 public servants. They don’t even require a trade union to protect this provision. How do they do it?

    • http://twitter.com/NewhamSue Newham Sue

      Its like that other bit of Tory hypocrisy, representing themselves as the party of value, that cuts out waste, but then introduces hugely wasteful, overpriced and socially divisive free schools to focus further on existing achievers at the expense of the very struggling kids who’d love to access to a free school’s level of spending/ pupil.

    • Quiet_Sceptic

      So a household reliant on housing benefits is ‘independent’ but someone living at home is mooching off their parents?

      Dependency on the state, on the taxes paid by other families across the country is acceptable but dependency on your own family is unacceptable?

      • Brumanuensis

        Thank you, Quiet_Sceptic, for completely missing the point of my remark. 

        No, I don’t believe they’re mooching off their parents, but it’s a funny sort of independence to be reliant on your family, and a funny sort of dependency to be in work and trying to set up an independent household, whilst claiming support for living costs. I don’t understand why conservatives see the former as perfectly compatible with independent life, but the latter as abject dependency. It’s a silly and trite dichotomy.

        • Quiet_Sceptic

          It’s not entirely a ‘silly and trite dichotomy’ because unfortunately the resources of the state are finite. The more people who chose to become dependent on the state, the fewer resources that are available for all of the various other services and benefits that the state provides.

          Unfortunately in the debate about housing, neither Conservatives nor Labour offer what these young people and families really need, which is a way of bringing down housing costs so that more of them can be truly independent of both parental support and state housing benefits.

          • Brumanuensis

            And a family’s resources aren’t? If anything, the average family is less able to accommodate extra relatives staying on at home, not to mention that having to live at home is a serious restriction on the ability of young people to move around and look for work. People on housing benefit aren’t solely dependent upon the state; a quarter of working age recipients are in work. Above all, given that the average housing benefit bequest is far lower than the Conservatives have suggested, the idea that the housing benefit bill is out of control is just incorrect.

            The best means to reduce housing benefit payments would be to build lots more social housing, but this seems beyond the wit of any major Party at the moment.

  • Serbitar

    Like a doomed man stuck in quicksand; the more Cameron struggles, the quicker he sinks.

  • http://twitter.com/bencobley Ben Cobley

    It was indeed a nasty little speech, of a guy fighting for his political life, designed to bring his lot on board ready for the fight ahead while laying into his enemies with all he’s got. Good old-fashioned trench warfare with all facts and context thrown out of the window. It was certainly not the speech of a Tory vegetarian – one might even call it rather butch…

    So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election), welfare and education. The latter has now taken on a quite horrific status as a political football for the Tories. It is politically essential for them that free schools and the new wave of academies be seen to succeed and ‘non-independent’ state schools fail so they can blame others (teachers) while praising themselves. It is one of their primary dividing lines, so this is going to get very, very ugly.

    He did not look a happy man, and the vision he was offering (Either We Do What I Say Or We Die) was not a vision of a happy country. Thankfully Ed seems to be moving towards something very different, but his team need to think through some properly cutting responses to these Tory attacks, cos they aren’t messing around. It’s going to come with both barrels, and keep coming.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

    • aracataca

      So anyway, the attack lines are now drawn – the economy (which can only go down so far and is quite likely to be recovering by the election).
      Really Ben? Please check out the economic stats for Japan 1991-present and you’ll find that economies can stay down for decades.

      • http://twitter.com/bencobley Ben Cobley

        I said “quite likely”, but I’m just guessing really, on the basis that
        economic cycles do exist and recoveries from recessions do happen – not sure how saying ‘quite likely’ merits the rebuke that you throw but never mind.

        Truth is we, and the economists, don’t know.

        • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

          I would have said “is quite unlikely to be recovering”.

          All growth forecasts have been revised downwards and, as Ha-Joon Chang of Cambridge Univeristy has pointed out*, there is no evidence at all to support the effectiveness of the supposed remedies currently being implemented by Cameron and Osborne.

          We’re up the creek.

          *http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/04/austerity-policy-eurozone-crisis

          • Serbitar

            When the remaining swingeing cuts kick in and begin to affect vast numbers of unsuspecting people from April next year onwards it will be interesting to see whether people will stand by stoically and bear them or be hurt and become angered by them. 

            When people see disabled children losing support and disabled adults falling into arrears and evicted from specially adapted accommodation because of the “bedroom tax” will they still believe that the Coalition’s austerity policies are worthwhile, fair and properly focused? When part-time workers lose in work benefits because they have been unable to find a full-time job, or additional jobs, or secured more paid hours as demanded by the new “conditionality” requirements of Universal Credit will they be pleased do you think? 

            I could go on… and on.. and on until I had written a Jeremiad bemoaning the awful hardships about to be visited upon the poor and striving but I won’t. These ordeals will be coming to a town near you in about six months time. And even worse if the repellent Cameron has his way.

            When this massive tonnage of foetid sh*t finally hits the fan and tens of millions of unsuspecting, innocent people get sprayed it really will be interesting to see how well the nation likes the Tories then.

          • jaime taurosangastre candelas

            Don’t exaggerate.  There are not “tens of millions” claiming non-housing income related benefits – more like 2-3 million, a mass total of 5 million on housing benefit, and huge overlaps of those claiming multiple benefits, because Gordon the Stupid redesigned our welfare system to work that way.

            Still big numbers, but you only make a point effectively if you produce accurate data.

          • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

            I can’t help but congratulate you for choosing a Brooks saddle. One of the many great things about Brooks saddles is that, if properly looked after (leather dressing as instructed etc.) they, as you comment, last a life time. You never need to buy another, unless you buy an additional bike without one – I have them on all three of my bikes..

            In this respect you have actually saved money. Also, because, once worn in, they are extremely comfortable, you won’t be needing to buy any of the padded garments that are popular with many cyclists who use lesser saddles.

            Bravo Brooks!

          • Brumanuensis

            Aye, I’m very glad Jaime has patronised (in the original sense of the word) some of our local businesses here in Birmingham.

            Interestingly, one of the more valid critiques of VAT is that it discourages the re-use and repair of items, unlike the old Purchase Tax which was not applied to repairs. So unfortunately the tax system is encouraging waste.

          • Serbitar

            Huh?

            Where did I claim that  ”tens of millions” of people were claiming non-housing related benefits? What I actually said was:

            “When this massive tonnage of foetid sh*t finally hits the fan and tens of millions of unsuspecting, innocent people get sprayed it really will be interesting to see how well the nation likes the Tories then.”

            By which I meant tens of millions of people in this country will be affected by the cuts agenda either directly (if their own benefits are cut) or in proxy (family members, friends, and/or, generally, anybody that they care about, or even stranger’s benefits are cut) and are distressed by the hardship and misery they experience or witness.

            You seem to have a very egocentric view of the world. You seem not to recognise that the British are a deeply compassionate people with a sense of fair play who are affected and often deeply moved by the suffering of others even though they may comfortably off themselves. Haven’t you noticed how much money the British selflessly donate to charities and good causes in order to help the downtrodden both at home and overseas? 

            Most people in this country will be affected when they witness the misery that is about to manifest in the visibly in the lives of their mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, nieces, nephews, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunties, friends, and unrelated innocent strangers cast into difficulty around them.

            David Cameron’s programme of casual cruelty has become too ambitious. His government could have spread the cuts more fairly over all government departments but chose to target the welfare budget during a recession, a time when the unluckiest citizens amongst us are most badly affected, needing and deserving essential assistance from the State until the situation improves. Cameron seeks to cynically abandon such people because he believes that by making such unfortunates shoulder most of the pain he will incur the least amount of backlash from demographics that vote Conservative. Sadly for him his programme of targeted cruelty has grown too ambitious.  

            He will be judged accordingly.

          • Brumanuensis

            I have to agree with Serbitar about the ‘tens of millions of people’ remark.

            The point about development is that Chinese people, Indians and Vietnamese are not aspiring to low wage jobs for the sake of international competitiveness. If they could have the social security net we have, they’d have it in a flash. Chinese employees are increasingly demanding higher wages and organising themselves into unions. Indians protest corruption and the abuse of of legal privilege by both government and the corporate sector. Consumers of all nations want better standards for food and other consumer purchases, as well as more leisure time and security in retirement. The idea that we have to become like the Asian nations, when they aspire to be more like us in this regard, is not sustainable and would have profoundly inhuman consequences.

    • leslie48

      Yes, picking up on education – a critical middle class battlefield- is essential to them. Somehow their spin is Labour let  everyone down. These are mainly lies as we know from massive expansion of universities, massive increases in Sixth form and A Levels , expenditure on new schools, improved conditions for teachers , better incentives for good graduates, improved primary school standards , tough OFsted,  EMAs, Surestart, etc., It is ugly propaganda – but we must block this propaganda as a few Academies and free schools or less university places will not spread much privilege to anyone. Moreover and Labour really have not grasped this one – the new GCSEs and new A-Levels will reduce opportunities for many lower middle class / working class children as units and retakes are completely stopped. Gove’s exam 1960s model is viscously class based & removes chances for average state kids. We let the Tories get away with propaganda too easily – where is our media response teams.

  • swingvoter83

    What a lazy article, making the most tenious of links to that already well worn out and over-used political reference bible that is The Thick of It. Seriously Mark, simply writing lines such as, “A few soundbites apart this was eminently forgettable fare,” and then going on to pick apart the rhetoric with a zeal that actually signifies that Cameron actually did get the message right, not just to the party, but to the country, whilst batting away with relative ease, Ed’s attempt at encroachment onto Conservative history. As a mid-cycle speech, it was solid and robust, with personal touches that show Cameron is not afraid to embrace his own past just as Ed has done and be as equally as comfortable with it. I for one welcome Ed’s improvement in his speeches and at PMQs, good opposition helps create good government.

  • http://twitter.com/chriswcheeetham Chris Cheetham

    I don’t understand how the Tories get away with this “we don’t fight class war” nonsense. Every tory I’ve ever met has been as much a class warrior as the average Trot – but without the guts to admit it.
    Of course Cameron is in deep trouble within his own party. The sharks scent his blood at the next election when he fails to win an overall majority and are angling for his job. So he turns to the traditional tory levers – lock up more criminals ( even if it doesn’t work), talk about a hard-line in Europe, cut taxes for the rich and  screw the poor – particularly vie Housing Benefit which he does not understand. Dead man walking comes to mind.

  • Carolekins

    Yes, a good analysis and I especially relate to what you said about teachers.  Teachers are always the whipping boys: I remember us being attacked by the Tories and then, to his shame, by Tony Blair and the dreadful Chris Woodhead – one of the main reasons I left the Labour Party.

Latest

  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →