Bristol Labour confirms councillors will not join Independent mayor’s cabinet

November 25, 2012 5:54 pm

Tags:

Share this Article

Recently rumours have circulated that Labour councillors could choose to join the cabinet of “independent” (ex-Lib Dem) Mayor George Ferguson in Bristol. This evening the Labour Party has ruled that out (after much to-ing and fro-ing), with a spokesperson saying:

“After further careful consideration and after listening to a wide range of views across Bristol, and the wider Labour Party, we have decided not to enter the cabinet.

We will support the Mayor when we agree with his decisions, and we want to be free to offer constructive alternatives when we believe a better solution is available.

We will continue as a Labour Party to work with the local communities we represent, and to do our best for the people of Bristol.”

  • http://twitter.com/DigitalJonathan Jonathan Phillips

    Bad decision.

    Short-sighted, petty, counter-productive: The election is lost but why not get involved and at least try and shape Bristol’s future from the inside until the next time?

    The party needs to understand how this is publicly interpreted. It infers that the Labour party was interested in power, but not Bristol’s future. It infers that the Labour party would rather snipe at the leadership from the sidelines than make a real difference.

    I speak as a Labour supporter when I say that this makes me angry. We’re better than this.

  • Redshift1

    Thank god. We can’t play a part in a cabinet supporting a mayor who balks at the living wage and other ideas.

  • Redshift1

    Thank god. We can’t play a part in a cabinet supporting a mayor who balks at the living wage and other ideas.

  • Redshift1

    Thank god. We can’t play a part in a cabinet supporting a mayor who balks at the living wage and other ideas.

  • notme3

    cowards

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    We really ought to be opposing these showy, pointless innovations. Get a petition together to reverse the mayoralty decision and it would almost definitely pass

  • tomkeeley

    In case anybody is under any illusions about negatively this decision is being received in Bristol look at the comments at the bottom of this article in the Bristol Evening Post. I can’t see anyway in which this helps Labour take Bristol West and Bristol N West in 2015.

    http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Labour-u-turn-angers-new-mayor-George-Ferguson/story-17425182-detail/story.html

  • aracataca

    The problem here is that he stood as an ‘Independent’ when he was in fact a Fib Dem. The Fibs did the same thing in the North Wales PCC elections. This is a new Fib Dem tactic and constitutes a new low even for them.It is of course very deceitful and deliberately misleads the electorate and that’s why the decision not to participate was made IMHO. If he was a genuine independent then there wouldn’t be an issue.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

      We shouldn’t be having any truck with these ‘mayors’ at all. One of our worst recent ideas which should be buried

  • Nick Grant

    This NEC decision need to be overturned and quickly too. This decision will do immense damage to Labour’s real interests in Bristol. Last year I lapsed 40 yrs membership with office at every level of the Party to become simply a Labour Voter instead. It renders a great new perspective and I commend it to those commenting here who really ought to understand what drives the voter as distinct from internal party machinations.

    By just exactly what moral right does Labour resile from the opportunity to lead the administration in housing, transport and education at least until May? Labour was offered three out of six seats in the cabinet and has now now turned down the opportunity to prove its responsibility, capability and competence which was manifestly so absent in voter support on 15 November.

    If the NEC believes that Labour with ‘clean hands’ will be stronger in next May’s election the evidence already to hand refutes that beyond all doubt. Labour will not be forgiven in Bristol for a decade or more. The Labour Group – to its great credit – understood the huge outcry against the rumours. The NEC needs to get real, right now, before it’s too late.

Latest

  • News Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Tony Blair may not have been Prime Minister for nearly seven years now, but his views – particularly on foreign policy – are always newsworthy. This morning he gave a wide-ranging and controversial speech at Bloomberg’s London HQ on the Middle East, urging the West not to pull back from the Middle East as an unsolvable problem, but to engage. Although despite the billing, this was as much a speech about faith as it was about geo-politics. At the roots of Blair’s […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour plan to step up their media monitoring process in the run up to the 2015 general election, according to The Independent. A team will be in charge of rebutting negative media to avoid a re-run of the 1992 election, where an onslaught of attacks from the press played their part in a unexpected Conservative victory. Michael Dugher, the MP in charge of Labour’s communications, is this week in the US discussing strategy with new appointment David Axelrod and other political […]

    Read more →
  • Featured UKIP, England and St George

    UKIP, England and St George

    Labour tends to view UKIP like Nelson viewed the signal at the Battle of Copenhagen. He held the telescope to his blind eye and said, ‘I really do not see the signal’.  Our image of  UKIP is a protest vehicle for disaffected, older, right wing Tories in the South. But UKIP represents more significant trends than this caricature suggests. UKIP is a symptom of the deep social and economic changes that have taken place over the last thirty years. Its […]

    Read more →
  • News Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Regular readers will know that we’re always keeping an eye on Lib Dems leaflets. Their local propaganda sheets are always good for a questionable bar chart, or forgetting the name of the generic place their text is for – but they can also be quite shy about their party affiliation too. For example, take the “Islington Chronicle”. Sounds like a local paper, and there’s no Lib Dem logo and barely a splash of their trademark yellow. But it is, in […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Seats and Selections Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    This morning we noted that the Tories haven’t selected candidates in nearly half of the most marginal Labour and Lib Dem seats. But what’s particularly telling is that in over 60% of target seats in the Midlands and the North they have so far failed to select a candidate, while the Independent claims that in Scotland there are no Tory parliamentary candidates at all. However, Mark Wallace over at ConHome notes that the Tories have in fact selected a total of two […]

    Read more →