Introducing “Labour: Coast and Country”

November 23, 2012 2:03 pm

One Nation – Our nation, the nation this Labour generation seeks to represent and to serve, is a complex and varied place, stretching from coast to inner city, from wooded glade to urban park, from ports and estuaries to high-rise flats and terraced houses.

One Nation Labour is a powerful statement of a Party seeking to acknowledge, understand and to try and address the issues and opportunities of all of these places, and of each of their communities.

Sadly the Labour Party, and sometimes the wider Labour movement can be a bit stereotypical about those parts that we frankly don’t often reach – the market town, the village, the farm, the fishing port, the coastal resort…

History shows that in the momentous elections, 1945, 1997 where Britain faces a profound choice we have won these sorts of constituencies.

There is talk of the profound choice that will face the British public in 2015 – can we, again, engage, understand and address the issues and opportunities of those places we don’t often reach?  If we can, our ambition to be One Nation Labour will be realised with a powerful majority.

A good starting point is the policy review, another is these very communities and the many Labour members and Labour supporters that are at their heart.

I would set every member of the Shadow Cabinet the gentle challenge of describing their ambition for Britain, and any emerging policies as if they only applied to the communities living in the Counties of England.  Of course, contrary to the view of some London-based party members, next year isn’t a year off from electioneering, as it will see County Council elections.  In the corresponding elections in 2009 we didn’t do well: our momentum towards 2015 depends on good results next year.

If I were being more challenging I would ask the Shadow Cabinet to describe what their policy would do for people who live a market or coastal town, or in the ancient or planned countryside; what a policy would mean for those whose only means of transport, to get to work, school or any shop is a car that’s a bit long in the tooth with poor mpg; or the impact we would hope to have on the lives of those who can’t afford to live in the village where they grew up…

Thoughtful politicians will have good answers to these questions that show we have listened to real people in a great variety of places, understood their needs and come up with something that could work for them, in other words One Nation policies.

Some might say that we don’t really need the votes of people who live in such places – I would beg to differ.  From an election perspective we need a good showing in the County Council elections only months away.  More importantly a robust narrative that shows we value our villages, our fishing ports and our market towns will be a better narrative for anyone who might vote Labour.

Such a narrative would show we value those people and communities who live and work on the land and the sea, who create and manage our landscapes, who produce quality food for us to savour, and whose lives are lived over miles not meters.  And care for them as much as we value the produce and benefits they offer.

Many people will know of a beautiful Ash tree, there are thousands.  I know of one on the crest of a hill near the Brecon Beacons.  While we value it, the scene it enhances, and are rightly fearful of Ash dieback; we must also understand and value the sheep farmer on whose land it grows, the agricultural worker who tends the sheep and cuts the hay, and the men of the abattoir who bring the lamb to our table.  They are as important to that view as the Ash tree.

If, like me, Jim, Jonathan, Mark and Sally you feel the policy review must engage, understand and support these communities and address their issues properly then join us, the founder members of Labour: Coast and Country.  We know that understanding the issues of the people of the orchards of Suffolk, the coast of Dorset, the Dales of Yorkshire, the pit villages of the North East and the meadows of Carmarthenshire can ensure we can win in 2015, as One Nation Labour.

Hywel Lloyd, a Founder member of Labour: Coast and Country, was previously an advisor to the Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP and the Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP.

This piece was commissioned as part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • AlanGiles

    Good God it gets ever more desperate. Not only after the Green vote, but those in peril on the sea. Perhaps there should be a special One Nation Potholers Group too, to take care of all bases. That just leaves the sky …..

  • NT86

    There’s still Labour representation in coastal/semi-rural parts of Cumbria and I believe Derbyshire to an extent (the NE Derbyshire constituency). They lost seats in Blackpool, Great Yarmouth and several in Derbyshire in 2010 though. The problem is that Labour in government wedded itself to London far too much. Countryside and rural folk felt patronised by this urban metro-centric mentality.

  • TomFairfax

    It’s a start. A lot of good points, but I wonder if this article is really targeted at rural people or fantasists living in cities who believe in something off of one of John Constable’s paintings.

    Key issue is that every time a politician goes on about choice in schools, or hospitals, or doctors, or anything else, they mean choice for people in large towns and cities.

    The wealthy already have a choice, they pays their money and makes it. There’s no choice when the option is the facility that’s already there and supported by a bus route, or nothing.

    As for the descriptions of our country, I’m almost tempted to ask whether the author knows what his talking about, save for the Brecon Beacon’s bit which he’s clearly familiar with.

    Suffolk has lots of Corn (translated as wheat for Americans) and Barley fields. Even an abundance or pigs. Most of the orchards I know were ripped up years ago, I’m afraid, though there are enough to keep Aspal in cidre and James White in business. Capella might still be going as well. Not sure about Dan Neuterboom. Heard they’d closed, which is a shame for the people who brought the Discovery apple to us.

    Biggest obstacle is the perception of Labour due to Foot and Mouth and the hunting with hounds issues. Neither affected Suffolk particularly, but the mood music these created was abysmal. As was the bigotted approach John Prescott took to complaints about rural bus services being cut back (seemed he thought that only the wealthy who chose to do so lived in the countryside).

  • TomFairfax

    It’s a start. A lot of good points, but I wonder if this article is really targeted at rural people or fantasists living in cities who believe in something off of one of John Constable’s paintings.

    Key issue is that every time a politician goes on about choice in schools, or hospitals, or doctors, or anything else, they mean choice for people in large towns and cities.

    The wealthy already have a choice, they pays their money and makes it. There’s no choice when the option is the facility that’s already there and supported by a bus route, or nothing.

    As for the descriptions of our country, I’m almost tempted to ask whether the author knows what his talking about, save for the Brecon Beacon’s bit which he’s clearly familiar with.

    Suffolk has lots of Corn (translated as wheat for Americans) and Barley fields. Even an abundance or pigs. Most of the orchards I know were ripped up years ago, I’m afraid, though there are enough to keep Aspal in cidre and James White in business. Capella might still be going as well. Not sure about Dan Neuterboom. Heard they’d closed, which is a shame for the people who brought the Discovery apple to us.

    Biggest obstacle is the perception of Labour due to Foot and Mouth and the hunting with hounds issues. Neither affected Suffolk particularly, but the mood music these created was abysmal. As was the bigotted approach John Prescott took to complaints about rural bus services being cut back (seemed he thought that only the wealthy who chose to do so lived in the countryside).

  • TomFairfax

    It’s a start. A lot of good points, but I wonder if this article is really targeted at rural people or fantasists living in cities who believe in something off of one of John Constable’s paintings.

    Key issue is that every time a politician goes on about choice in schools, or hospitals, or doctors, or anything else, they mean choice for people in large towns and cities.

    The wealthy already have a choice, they pays their money and makes it. There’s no choice when the option is the facility that’s already there and supported by a bus route, or nothing.

    As for the descriptions of our country, I’m almost tempted to ask whether the author knows what his talking about, save for the Brecon Beacon’s bit which he’s clearly familiar with.

    Suffolk has lots of Corn (translated as wheat for Americans) and Barley fields. Even an abundance or pigs. Most of the orchards I know were ripped up years ago, I’m afraid, though there are enough to keep Aspal in cidre and James White in business. Capella might still be going as well. Not sure about Dan Neuterboom. Heard they’d closed, which is a shame for the people who brought the Discovery apple to us.

    Biggest obstacle is the perception of Labour due to Foot and Mouth and the hunting with hounds issues. Neither affected Suffolk particularly, but the mood music these created was abysmal. As was the bigotted approach John Prescott took to complaints about rural bus services being cut back (seemed he thought that only the wealthy who chose to do so lived in the countryside).

    • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

      Hi Tom, thanks for this. Trust me, we understand where you’re coming from. The perception of Labour that you’re talking of will only be changed when Labour changes its approach to the countryside, and to do that we need more people within the party to understand it. That’s in part what this group is about. For too long Labour’s view of the countryside has been to look down its nose at the way of life. Being from a rural community in Yorkshire (with strong links to a rural North Wales community too), I know as well as anyone the long journey we have to go on, especially as there are many people from larger towns/cities who think they understand the countryside, but really do not. But the journey is worth taking!! The more people from rural backgrounds we can get to be involved in this group, the better. So please do get involved if you wish. It sounds like you’d have something to contribute.

      • TomFairfax

        Hi Jonathan, Thank you.I took the liberty of replying on the ‘Interested?’ link from the blog site you’ve set up for this yesterday. The problem is that numbers count in decision making. How to build those numbers so that the people taking decisions feel the need to pay attention is I think important.

        • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

          Great news! You’re right. Part of this campaign is to organise those within the party who understand and feel passionate about rural and/or coastal communities. It’s also about finding ways of bringing new people into the party to boost those numbers and utilise their expertise in policy making. I think Mark is handling the responses to the website, so I’m sure you’ll hear from us soon – but great to have you on board. J.

  • http://twitter.com/GlamorousLeft Will Porter

    Hopefully this will be more successful than the Conservative Cooperative Movement.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Nowhere should be off-limits. Indeed, many coastal areas are now marginal – Morecambe, Hastings, Blackpool, Great Yarmouth, and of course the coastal cities.
    But lets be realistic. We are not about to win Bournemouth. Neither will we storm North Yorkshire’s huge rural village seats, or Penrith and the Border. It is very important that we encourage a presence, though, in particular standing in council elections when possible. When we don’t do that we simply remove ourselves from the public consciousness and allow it to become a Con-LD contest

Latest

  • News Video Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters appear to be losing their patience with David Cameron’s attempts to get out of appearing the pre-election TV debates. It is widely understood that Cameron has been advised by strategist Lynton Crosby not to take part in the leaders’ debates and has been dragging his feet during negotiations, making more debates each time broadcasters make new proposals. Following the initial invitation of UKIP to appear, Cameron claimed that the Green Party should also take part. Now the Greens, SNP […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    So Compass holds a debate about the relevance, or not, of tactical voting in the run up May and straight away John Spellar MP and then Luke Akehurst are on to us. John accused us of calling on people ‘not to vote Labour”, Luke says we are ‘naïve’. Well first lets be clear: we have set up the space on our website for a debate; we have one article for tactical voting and one against. We wanted to see what […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Yvette Cooper has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to exploit concerns about immigration rather than attempting to come up with practical policies. The Shadow Home Secretary also derided UKIP for getting themselves in a “ridiculous tangle” on the issue – last week a spokesperson for the party said they would introduce a net migration target of 50,000, while Farage today claims that it is not party policy. This follows Ed Miliband attacking David Cameron for missing his 2010 immigration promises […]

    Read more →
  • Featured PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    There are only three PMQs left until the election. Three more of these turgid, unattractive, unedifying and borderline pointless sessions to sit through before May. If this is the highlight of the Parliamentary week then Parliament can’t prorogue quick enough, frankly. Evidently many MPs feel the same, judging by the wide open spaces on the green benches this lunchtime. After a few minutes MPs had all spaced themselves out a little bit to make the place look a bit less […]

    Read more →
  • News Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Andy Burnham, Shadow Health Secretary, has said that charities should be the “preferred provider” of NHS services. He has said that Labour would introduce legislation, to get rid of parts of the contentious 2012 Health and Social Care Act, that would mean not-for-profit organisations would be seen as the “preferred provider” for the NHS. Contracts would be five or ten year agreements. This is part of Labour’s plan for health and social care. Speaking at the Association of Chief Executives […]

    Read more →