Our high streets – and the “crack cocaine of gambling”

17th November, 2012 11:59 am

By Carl Packman and Matt Zarb-Cousin

Financial divisions in the UK are growing while the economy of Britain is in dire straits – and the Tory-led Coalition government seem increasingly unable to do anything about it.

Nowhere is this downturn more accurately reflected than in the state of our high streets up and down the country.

Two types of business, which can so often be a blight to our high streets, recongised by Mary Portas in her report for the government, are payday lenders and gambling shops.

Payday lending growth did not appear out of nowhere. For years many working people’s wages were essentially substituted by easy credit that is now, for better or for worse, not available.

Rising prices for our services and stangnant wages meant a dependency for many on borrowed money, sustained only by what researchers at the Personal Finance Research Centre at Bristol University called “the dramatic growth in the mainstream consumer credit market”.

Unsurprisingly the payday lending industry has grown by unprecedented levels. In 2004 it was worth approximately £100 million; today in 2012, conservative estimates put that figure at £2 billion.

These lenders make a fortune off the backs of vulnerable people who are unable to make it to the end of the month by their own means alone – and the government seem complacent in that.

But if the government are not willing to cooperate, it is time for people themselves to do all they can to stop the little shylocks of the high streets.

Lewisham Council has recently set a precedent by calling an end to “legal loan sharks”. The council recently passed a resolution pledging to promote credit unions in the borough, community based organisations that offer access to affordable credit and promote savings.

Councillor Mike Harris for Lewisham Council concluded that the next step now is for the government to give councillors the power to say no to more pay day loan shops in their area.

For it to be effective, this must be done in simultaneity with a national cap on the amount a lender can charge a borrower – to ensure against companies ripping off the most vulnerable.

With gambling, back in April, the Local Government Association published a report suggesting 57% of local councillors believed betting shops were hitting economic growth. The clustering of betting shops on our high streets can be attributed to the cap of four highly addictive FOBTs (fixed odds betting terminals) per shop, causing the pack-like bookies to leapfrog regulations by opening up as many shops as possible.

The effect on economic growth is two-fold. As Clyde Loakes, vice chair of the LGAs environment and housing board, said:

“The general public is less likely to shop on high streets with clustering, while businesses may be less willing to set up on roads with unsavoury clusters.”

On top of this, FOBTs – dubbed the “crack cocaine of gambling” – drain thousands of pounds out of struggling local economies each week. Coral made £945 per machine, per week in 2011, and this figure is forecasted to rise to £1000 by 2013.

They’re targeting our poorest areas, too. Research commissioned by the recent Dispatches programme “Britain’s High Street Gamble” found there were more than twice as many betting shops in areas of high unemployment than there are in areas of low unemployment.

To be clear, in exemplifying these two types of service, the authors of this piece are not naïve to the potentially sour reality of ridding them completely without credible contingency plans – and by no means call for bans.

However it cannot go unnoticed any longer that the toxic economy of betting shops, pawnbrokers and payday loan companies is deterring investment in our high streets and stifling economic growth.

This government is not serious about localism and about doing all it can to stop the destruction of our high streets against capitalism’s predators. But a Labour party, making good on its One Nation promise, can be the corrective our high streets need.

Giving councils more powers to combat the amount of payday lenders and gambling shops, by placing them into seperate use classes, would be a first step. Looking further at ways to stop people from becoming dependent on bad debt is a crucial driver that serious advocates of One Nation politics need to deliver on.

Carl Packman is the author of Loan Sharks: The Rise and Rise in Payday Lending. Matt Zarb-Cousin is a consultant at the Fairer Gambling Campaign. 

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • DaveAtherton20

    You say “..local councillors believed betting shops were hitting economic growth.”

    Nothing to do with all the tin pot councils charging extortionate levels of parking meter fees, quasi police in the shape of parking wardens handing out £50 fines when you want a loaf of bread and a pint of milk? Woe betide anyone over staying their allotted time on a parking meter and incurring a £200 tow away fee. Nothing to do with the fact that people prefer to drive to shops and park for nothing or a low charge rather than walk, rather than carry 20lbs of shopping on the bus?

    Any other shop or business has a right to bid for the freehold or lease for the premises and it appears that the politburos of Lewisham et al have through their greed and incompetence have killed the high street stone dead. There does not seem to be a market for scented candles and obscure 3rd World art. Hate the car lose the shops.

    I see you have not mentioned the National Lottery. If you put £millions every day/week/month over enough time if your luck evens out you will lose 50% of your money. You really are better off putting your money of the “No Hope Government” horse in the 2.30 at Ascot.

    Betting shops offer people employment to people and whether they survive is up to attracting enough punters through the door, not some jumped up authoritarian from the council. Also how dare you look down your nose at a past time enjoyed by working class people.

    BTW plan B is while I am typing I am playing on line poker, I also have the choice of a bet on the nags too.

  • PaulHalsall

    We need a new usury law, and a way for people to claim back the excessive interest they have already paid (as per PPI).

  • http://twitter.com/Tech_Recipe Andrew Webb

    Excellent article. You are absolutely spot-on about gambling hitting economic growth.

    It does not take a brilliant mind to realize that if you have a groups of people addicted to something, such as drugs, you’ll have more crime, and gambling is no exception. With gambling people get into impossible situations: some opt for crime, others opt for bankruptcy. Others will steal from their family or employer while some even commit suicide. A percentage of people will use money they have no business in using, that could otherwise have gone into food, toys for their kids, or help the local economy in some way, and this is no small percentage.

    For councils to allow gambling outlets to prey on citizens is just plain wrong. The argument that betting shops and casinos help the local economy is pathetic. The money is basically a tax on the weak-minded and does not create any development at all – not if you mean new infrastructure, new technologies, helping small start-ups or training graduates, apprentices etc.

Latest

  • Comment The Blairites don’t know why they’ve lost control of the Labour party

    The Blairites don’t know why they’ve lost control of the Labour party

    If there’s a lesson from the Labour leadership contest, it is that most of its MPs have lost control of the party. Daily pleas from senior MPs to members to choose someone “electable” i.e. not Jeremy Corbyn) seem to be falling on deaf ears. A full scale insurgency is in effect. Blairites sound even more disorientated. Last week the Independent’s John Rentoul blamed Ed Miliband for Corbyn’s rise, claiming that while he was leader, “the party chose as candidates a […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Unison back Jeremy Corbyn to be Labour leader

    Unison back Jeremy Corbyn to be Labour leader

    Unison have announced that they will be backing Jeremy Corbyn for the Labour leadership. The union has nearly 1.3million members. It has said that this is just a recommendation and that individual union members who sign up to vote as should vote for whichever candidate that think is best. They have said that Yvette Cooper is their second choice. Andy Burnham and Liz Kendall are also in the running to be Labour’s next leader. Unison General Secretary Dave Prentis explained […]

    Read more →
  • News 23 council leaders pen statement endorsing Caroline Flint

    23 council leaders pen statement endorsing Caroline Flint

    The leaders of 23 Labour councils have publicly endorsed Caroline Flint’s campaign for deputy leader today. In a statement, the local government leaders praise the Shadow Energy Secretary for her “radical ideas” and “track record of working in partnership with local government”. The signatories include leaders of some of the biggest councils in London, the North West, North East and Yorkshire. Flint finished second in the MPs’ nominations, and is a close third behind Stella Creasy in CLP nominations – […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Forget vacuous ‘One Nation’ – Labour is missing a global vision

    Forget vacuous ‘One Nation’ – Labour is missing a global vision

    Many things have been written so far about the Labour leadership debate, but one thing that most people agree on is that it has been far from visionary. At exactly the time when people in Labour need to lift our sights and look to the future we seem to be chained to the past, caught debating spending decisions in 2006 rather than mapping out a future for 2020 and beyond. George Osborne’s latest budget pushed the right buttons to ensure […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It’s absurd that people registering to vote in the leadership contest say they might not vote Labour

    It’s absurd that people registering to vote in the leadership contest say they might not vote Labour

    A bit of a hornets nest has been stirred up by my suggestion that those who didn’t vote Labour at the last election shouldn’t get a vote in the Labour leadership. A majority of those who have contacted me to disagree are explicit that having registered for £3, they will not vote Labour if either of the other three candidates win. Some democracy this. For those who have slogged their guts out for Labour for years to discover that people […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit