Primaries – why our heartlands need them more than London

9th November, 2012 1:50 pm

I was recently part of a conversation in which a local member of Parliament proudly proclaimed that the Young Socialists were once so numerous in my native County Durham that they had their very own County wide football league and would often be seen painting fences in the local community or cutting grass as an example of ‘practical socialism’. Whilst I suspect a degree of exaggeration was at play, the truth is that mass membership once meant the selection of candidates for local and national government was a big affair in the close-knit communities I grew up in.

Recently I saw firsthand the County Durham selections for the 2013 local elections and I was surprised by how few people were involved in the selection of candidates, with a large number of selection meetings consisting of less than eight people. This is not a new problem, the regional media highlighting that during the 2010 leadership election areas such as the North East had relatively low party membership in relation to the level of electoral support for the party.

The steady erosion of the links between the party and our traditional avenues of support (along with declining membership) has left the door wide open for Primaries or a hybrid of the current method of selection, which could help the party re-engage with some of our most committed supporters giving them a stake in the Labour party and helping to inspire a true grassroots movement.

The argument against primaries and their variants often centres on the role of membership in our party and how primaries could alter the traditional role of a membership in selecting candidates.  Yet in areas where the party has receded but our support has not there is a clear opening for new ideas and new methods of selection to be tested. While membership would no longer be the sole force in deciding selections it could play a role with members forming an electoral college with primary voters to decide on the eventual outcome a selection, this could be applied to the selection of Prospective Parliamentary Candidates or Prospective Local Government Candidates.

Membership of the party would still be a requirement for candidacy however primaries would force potential candidates to actively campaign for selection giving local parties a much needed dry run for local elections and keeping our activist base on its toes even in areas of strong support. It could also be a powerful new way to convince active members of the community to transfer their support into membership of the party, helping further bolster local party institutions.

While there is no magic bullet to the problem of declining party membership there can be little harm in actively engaging local communities in the selection of their next Labour candidate through a more open system which includes the views of supportive members of the electorate.

  • Daniel Speight

    Craig, taking it that there was a ‘degree of exaggeration’, although if your local member was talking about either pre-war or shortly after the war then it’s possible, but on hearing how it was once instead of saying let’s again aim at being a mass party of the labour movement you instead want Labour to follow some American model where money will control selections.

    Why not say, ‘let’s rebuild a local Young Socialist movement, maybe start signing up kids who would like the help of an EMA?’ Really how much better would it be to let the Westminster political class take the local party activists out of the equation? This sounds like a charter for the apparctchiks and ‘red princes’.

    (And yes, I still remember when a much later version of the YS run discos on many council estates throughout the country.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    My concern is that reaching a larger audience may be easier for the professional politico with money, networks, time and contacts

  • Redshift1

    This is a terrible argument. Our membership may have dwindled but to accept that certain areas need to have primaries on the basis of low membership is just opening the door for well-heeled candidates from often outside these areas coming in and running an expensive selection campaign, and getting selected purely through bulldozering through more leaflets than their opponents because they have more money. 

    We need to active engage the public, not take party democracy in the one place we still have a decent degree of it, where the membership still gets a decent say – and degenerate it into what would be painfully less popular version of The X Factor.  

    • Alexwilliamz

      It also seems counterintuitive. If membership is low does that not suggest people are not interested in the party, why then would they want to register for a primary? It’s like those people who want to deal with the low numbers of young people voting by lowering the voting age. there is a very simple way of being a stakeholder in the party or to be involved, it’s called membership! You might then get a role in selecting the candidate too, just like a primary.

    • Alexwilliamz

      It also seems counterintuitive. If membership is low does that not suggest people are not interested in the party, why then would they want to register for a primary? It’s like those people who want to deal with the low numbers of young people voting by lowering the voting age. there is a very simple way of being a stakeholder in the party or to be involved, it’s called membership! You might then get a role in selecting the candidate too, just like a primary.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    The article talks about actively engaging the community in selecting candidates but does the party even actively engage its members?

  • Alan Ji

    How could we possibly find the resources to organise an (almost) open selection for our candidates?
    And don’t you have any equally old stories about CLPs treated as front organisations by the NUM?

Latest

  • News Maria Eagle accuses Cameron of breaking Leveson promise

    Maria Eagle accuses Cameron of breaking Leveson promise

    Labour is seeking to force the Government to proceed with the second part of the Leveson inquiry after Ministers suggested it was on the brink of being dropped. Maria Eagle, shadow Culture Secretary, accused David Cameron of breaking a promise to set up an examination of misconduct in the press and police, which was due to follow the completion of criminal investigations triggered by the phone hacking scandal. Today Eagle said Cameron is “reneging on this promise as though he […]

    Read more →
  • News Striking doctors fight imposition of contracts but Labour “neutral” on walkout

    Striking doctors fight imposition of contracts but Labour “neutral” on walkout

    The head of the body representing NHS Trusts sparked fury by urging Jeremy Hunt to override the views of striking doctors and impose on them the controversial new contracts. Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, called for a tougher government approach as around 37,000 medics joined the 24-hour walk-out at 8am today. He spoke out as Labour again condemned the “utter shambles” which led to the strikes, now in their second wave. Hopson urged the Department of Health to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour must be bolder than the Tories on devolution

    Labour must be bolder than the Tories on devolution

    The launch last week of the new Centre for Cities report Cities Outlook 2016 brought another stark reminder that most cities in the North and Midlands are continuing to punch below their weight economically – with wages in most places north of the Watford Gap falling below the national average, while welfare spending is higher. In Hull, for example, average weekly wages amount to just £376, compared to £539 in Milton Keynes, and £591 in Reading. Even in Manchester – […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured PMQs Verdict: Corbyn shows his passion for housing, despite his relaxed approach

    PMQs Verdict: Corbyn shows his passion for housing, despite his relaxed approach

    Jeremy Corbyn cares about housing. This is obvious. But does he care much about PMQs? At his first meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) as leader, he told MPs that housing would be one of his biggest priorities. Shortly after that, he made the Shadow Housing minister a Shadow Cabinet role, and in John Healey appointed a well-respected figure across the party to the brief. Only last week, the party launched a review, the biggest of its kind in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured MPs should have more respect for their colleagues rather than ridiculing them

    MPs should have more respect for their colleagues rather than ridiculing them

    Monday night shouldn’t have happened as it did: a group of Labour MPs roaring at their colleague Emily Thornberry about Trident, then telling journalists all about it. Screaming down fellow Labour MPs and parading internal feuds in front of the media, doesn’t do anyone any favours. It’s a state of affairs that wouldn’t be acceptable in most workplaces. It doesn’t have to be this way; dispute doesn’t have to lead to all out war and debate doesn’t have to morph […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit