Primaries – why our heartlands need them more than London

9th November, 2012 1:50 pm

I was recently part of a conversation in which a local member of Parliament proudly proclaimed that the Young Socialists were once so numerous in my native County Durham that they had their very own County wide football league and would often be seen painting fences in the local community or cutting grass as an example of ‘practical socialism’. Whilst I suspect a degree of exaggeration was at play, the truth is that mass membership once meant the selection of candidates for local and national government was a big affair in the close-knit communities I grew up in.

Recently I saw firsthand the County Durham selections for the 2013 local elections and I was surprised by how few people were involved in the selection of candidates, with a large number of selection meetings consisting of less than eight people. This is not a new problem, the regional media highlighting that during the 2010 leadership election areas such as the North East had relatively low party membership in relation to the level of electoral support for the party.

The steady erosion of the links between the party and our traditional avenues of support (along with declining membership) has left the door wide open for Primaries or a hybrid of the current method of selection, which could help the party re-engage with some of our most committed supporters giving them a stake in the Labour party and helping to inspire a true grassroots movement.

The argument against primaries and their variants often centres on the role of membership in our party and how primaries could alter the traditional role of a membership in selecting candidates.  Yet in areas where the party has receded but our support has not there is a clear opening for new ideas and new methods of selection to be tested. While membership would no longer be the sole force in deciding selections it could play a role with members forming an electoral college with primary voters to decide on the eventual outcome a selection, this could be applied to the selection of Prospective Parliamentary Candidates or Prospective Local Government Candidates.

Membership of the party would still be a requirement for candidacy however primaries would force potential candidates to actively campaign for selection giving local parties a much needed dry run for local elections and keeping our activist base on its toes even in areas of strong support. It could also be a powerful new way to convince active members of the community to transfer their support into membership of the party, helping further bolster local party institutions.

While there is no magic bullet to the problem of declining party membership there can be little harm in actively engaging local communities in the selection of their next Labour candidate through a more open system which includes the views of supportive members of the electorate.

  • Daniel Speight

    Craig, taking it that there was a ‘degree of exaggeration’, although if your local member was talking about either pre-war or shortly after the war then it’s possible, but on hearing how it was once instead of saying let’s again aim at being a mass party of the labour movement you instead want Labour to follow some American model where money will control selections.

    Why not say, ‘let’s rebuild a local Young Socialist movement, maybe start signing up kids who would like the help of an EMA?’ Really how much better would it be to let the Westminster political class take the local party activists out of the equation? This sounds like a charter for the apparctchiks and ‘red princes’.

    (And yes, I still remember when a much later version of the YS run discos on many council estates throughout the country.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    My concern is that reaching a larger audience may be easier for the professional politico with money, networks, time and contacts

  • Redshift1

    This is a terrible argument. Our membership may have dwindled but to accept that certain areas need to have primaries on the basis of low membership is just opening the door for well-heeled candidates from often outside these areas coming in and running an expensive selection campaign, and getting selected purely through bulldozering through more leaflets than their opponents because they have more money. 

    We need to active engage the public, not take party democracy in the one place we still have a decent degree of it, where the membership still gets a decent say – and degenerate it into what would be painfully less popular version of The X Factor.  

    • Alexwilliamz

      It also seems counterintuitive. If membership is low does that not suggest people are not interested in the party, why then would they want to register for a primary? It’s like those people who want to deal with the low numbers of young people voting by lowering the voting age. there is a very simple way of being a stakeholder in the party or to be involved, it’s called membership! You might then get a role in selecting the candidate too, just like a primary.

    • Alexwilliamz

      It also seems counterintuitive. If membership is low does that not suggest people are not interested in the party, why then would they want to register for a primary? It’s like those people who want to deal with the low numbers of young people voting by lowering the voting age. there is a very simple way of being a stakeholder in the party or to be involved, it’s called membership! You might then get a role in selecting the candidate too, just like a primary.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    The article talks about actively engaging the community in selecting candidates but does the party even actively engage its members?

  • Alan Ji

    How could we possibly find the resources to organise an (almost) open selection for our candidates?
    And don’t you have any equally old stories about CLPs treated as front organisations by the NUM?

Latest

  • Featured News Polling New polling indicates late Tory swing hurt Labour

    New polling indicates late Tory swing hurt Labour

    Conservatives gained more than any other party from late changes of heart, in what is being partially credited to their warnings against a Labour/SNP pact. In research for the Daily Record, Survation contacted 1,700 voters in England they had spoken to prior to the election to see which party they ended up supporting. More Tory supporters stuck with their initial choice than any other major party – just 12.5% of those who said they would vote Conservative gave their backing […]

    Read more →
  • News Mandelson slams Labour’s “awful complacency”

    Mandelson slams Labour’s “awful complacency”

    The Labour Party has “gone back to sleep” and allowed an “awful complacency” to set in since the election, according to Peter Mandelson. In an interview with Newsnight, the Labour peer lambasts that the desire for radical thinking that defined the party immediately after the election defeat has been lost. The former Cabinet minister said: “Everyone said in the 24-48 hours after our defeat this year: ‘Oh my God, we’ve really got to think radically, overhaul, and realise where we […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Weekly survey: Budget surplus, Syria and Heathrow expansion

    Weekly survey: Budget surplus, Syria and Heathrow expansion

    The Labour leadership team seem to have agreed with George Osborne’s proposals that the government should run a budget surplus in “normal times”. Over the weekend Chris Leslie, Shadow Chancellor, said that signing up to these proposals was important for Labour to gain economic credibility. However, it’s unlikely everyone in the party will agree, particularly as 77 academics have argued this ignores “basic economics”. What do you think? Is it right for Labour to aim to run a budget surplus in […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour leadership candidates answer readers’ questions on education

    Labour leadership candidates answer readers’ questions on education

    LabourList readers can submit weekly questions on a different topic to the Labour leadership candidates. Here are the answers we got back from the first round of questions, on education. Note: Yvette Cooper’s will be added when we receive them. 1) How would you improve the quality and availability of childcare? Corbyn: It is important for all children to socialise together from an early age, and it’s a community good. We need to expand wraparound childcare at schools and free childcare […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Soft on welfare? The challenge of a popular welfare policy that works

    Soft on welfare? The challenge of a popular welfare policy that works

    We are being told that Labour lost votes through being seen as “too soft” on welfare. But we must understand the complexity of public attitudes in this area, and the difficulties of reconciling these attitudes with policy that works, and with the reality of the hardship caused by a “tough” policy. It must be Labour’s role to lead the debate on benefits, as well as follow public opinion. We can challenge the misinformation behind policies like Universal Credit and the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit