The Arc of Underachievement: How to ensure no school is left behind

November 15, 2012 1:00 pm

One of the achievements I am most proud of is the way in which the gap between the richest and poorest pupils was narrowed by a Labour Government. Analysis carried out by the Financial Times showed that between 2006 and 2010 there was a “sustained improvement in the results of children from the poorest neighbourhoods”.

However, there are still too many pupils in too many schools who don’t achieve their full potential. Addressing this inequality is central to our fight for a One Nation education system.

I have termed this challenge the ‘Arc of Underachievement’.

This Arc of Underachievement runs through many of our seaside towns and coastal cities.  In places such as Clacton, Torbay and Morecambe, there are too many schools which are below the national average for GCSE results.

If you take Cornwall – the probability that a poor child will have GCSE results in the bottom quarter nationally increased by 8% between 2006 and 2010. Whereas in Southwark, the probability decreased by 7%.

There is also an Arc of Underachievement that includes a number of Northern towns and cities in England – including some schools in places such as Hull, Blackpool and Knowsley.

I know that by naming these places, it will produce a defensive reaction.

I am not for one minute saying that all schools or teachers in these areas are not up to scratch.

Some schools are improving, and there is much good practice, but as fighters for social justice, we must not fear to challenge the fact that poor pupils are not making the most of their potential.

As a Labour party, we must fight the idea that ‘you don’t know what we are working with – you can’t turn coal into diamond.’ If that was the case, why is that children in places like Jarrow defy the odds?

There are many beacons of excellence which we should celebrate – places like Bolton, Bury and Manchester in the North West, or Lambeth, Hackney and Tower Hamlets in London.

Michael Gove thinks the only way to improve a school is to make it an academy. Labour’s academy programme achieved great things, but changing a school’s governance structure is no guarantee of success. The most important factor is the quality of teaching and leadership – and that happens in schools of all types.

I think there are three ways in which we can tackle the Arc of Underachievement, to ensure that no school is left behind.

First, is to improve the quality of teaching. That means working with existing heads and teachers to provide better training and support. It also means expanding schemes like Teach First which brings in high flying graduates, and places them in schools in tougher neighbourhoods. I also want to examine the case for providing a rebate on teacher tuition fees if you agree to teach in a school in a poorer part of the country for a minimum of two years.

Second, it is about stronger schools supporting weaker schools. The London Challenge and the City Challenge set up under Labour helped achieve a startling turnaround in the fortunes of schools in the capital and in Manchester. Instead of pitting schools against each other, as Michael Gove would like, we encouraged better school collaboration, and built a sense of pride in the education service. I would extend these challenges to areas in the North and coastal towns that need additional support.

The third element is the wider children’s agenda and investing in the early years. This was a central priority of the last Labour Government, but the Tories are turning back the clock. There are 281 fewer Sure Start centres compared to 2010. Early Intervention budgets are facing a staggering cut of over 40% over the course of this parliament, as over £1.1billion is taken out of programmes to help troubled families, fund children’s centres and provide breaks for families with disabled children. As any parent or teacher will tell you, giving a child the best start in life starts well before primary school.

Ed Miliband set out a radical and progressive vision for Britain when he talked about One Nation Labour. One Nation Education will be fundamental to addressing the divided country we face today – and rebuilding our economy so it works for working people.

What is needed is a relentless drive on school improvement which is focussed on clear leadership, early intervention and effective collaboration. To ensure that no school is left behind.

Stephen Twigg MP is Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • http://twitter.com/edsajw Jack Whitehead

    I’ve enjoyed Stephen Twiggs’ rhetoric in ‘The Arc of Underachievement: how to ensure that no school is left behind’. In creating ‘One Nation’ such rhetoric may have to be complemented by the narratives of those of us who are committed to building ‘One Nation’, in which we share evidence-based explanations of our educational influences in our own learning, in the learning of others and in the learning of the social formations in which we live and work, as we seek to live the values of ‘One Nation’ as fully as possible. I’ve included my own narrative in the living theory web-site at http://www.actionresearch.net .

  • http://twitter.com/SolHughesWriter Solomon Hughes

    Perhaps schools could be improved by getting some kind of well funded, democratic local organisation to help them work together and improve. It could be a kind of authority for education, a sort of local one.

    • Dave Postles

      LEA LOL.

  • PaulHalsall

    Look, in any scheme that measures schools 50.1% will always be better than 49.9%. That is a matter of statistics which cannot be just dismissed.

    We need to support all schools to become better, but get rid of the obsessive New Labour, and now Tory, methods of ranking.

  • PaulHalsall

    Look, in any scheme that measures schools 50.1% will always be better than 49.9%. That is a matter of statistics which cannot be just dismissed.

    We need to support all schools to become better, but get rid of the obsessive New Labour, and now Tory, methods of ranking.

  • PaulHalsall

    Let me make this clearer.

    You can NEVER get a situation in which more than 50% or schools are above the national average.

    I really despair when I see figures like Stephen Twigg pushing this nonsense.

    Perhaps Portillo should have won in 1997.

    • Serbitar

      Based on what I’ve heard Portillo say since he left politics behind him I’m not sure that Ribena Boy isn’t somewhat to the left of Stephen Twigg, politically speaking, in many ways and about many things.

  • Dave Postles

    Gove is pushing on an open door – opened by Blair. There will be nothing left. We read of successful schools being closed to promote nearby academies. Could Blair not perceive the unintended consequences? It’s another fine mess into which Blair propelled us. You can make all the distinctions that you like about NL academies and Gove’s academies, but NL placed the door ajar.

    • Dave Postles

      Bung us two mill in a brown envelope and you can have a school and do what you like with it.

      • AlanGiles

        I won’t be too harsh on Twigg. After all following the June 10th BBC TV interview he gave on The Politics Show, where he was all over the place, contradicting himself we know he is an expert in underachievement.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Can Mr Twigg learn some basic lessons, obviously his use of percentages has already been highlighted, but what gets my goat is the belief that teaching will be improved by programmes like Teach First. Is there any actual evidence that students with the Firsts in their degree will make better teachers? The real target should be actual teacher training and then ongoing training. If you set the bar adequately enough during teacher training then you should be able to remove those people who are not going to cut it. This seems to me a far more sensible route than just assuming getting people with strong academic qualifications will automatically produce good teachers. The core skills for a teacher are not going to be evident from a degree classification, aside from the issue of subject knowledge, but even then the specialising at degree level does not garuntee a candidates has the competent subject knowledge of some lower level courses, one would hope they could quickly acquire this of course.

  • Alexwilliamz

    And of course no vision of what post primary education should be about other than achievement as measured through a narrow exam subject.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I agree with the thrust of what has been said so far. It’s far too simplistic to talk in terms of whole areas. Morecambe for example is greatly affected by significant patches if intensive poverty and transitory population and the continued existence if a popular boys grammar school in Lancadter

Latest

  • Comment Why rural areas need free buses

    Why rural areas need free buses

    To have a fully functioning society, bus services in rural areas should be free of charge. For young people seeking employment, education or entertainment, the unwell needing to visit and be visited in hospitals or the elderly wanting to break the loneliness of isolation, public transport is essential. If governments don’t want to spend money on services in rural areas, they should at least provide the means for people who live there to get to them in urban areas. Regular […]

    Read more →
  • News Austin Mitchell rubbishes claims that Labour MPs could join UKIP

    Austin Mitchell rubbishes claims that Labour MPs could join UKIP

    The idea that any Labour MPs could follow Douglas Carswell’s lead by joining UKIP is merely “wishful thinking” on their part, according to a prominent Eurosceptic Labour MP. Yesterday, Nigel Farage claimed that he has “spoken to many” Labour MPs this year who “support everything UKIP is trying to do”, while a UKIP source today told the BBC that as many as ten “deeply unhappy” Labour MPs who are “fed up with being patronised by the Labour glitterati” and would […]

    Read more →
  • Featured David Cameron only has himself to blame for his problems with UKIP

    David Cameron only has himself to blame for his problems with UKIP

    This week’s defection by Douglas Carswell to UKIP was a hammer blow for the Prime Minister’s authority.  David Cameron and the Tories are running scared of UKIP and are more divided than ever before. With Stuart Wheeler, the former Tory donor and now UKIP treasurer, declaring that at least two more MPs are “seriously considering” defecting, we know that the introspection and turmoil is set to continue. As the Tories’ identity crisis deepens, it becomes clearer and clearer that they cannot provide […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Rather than focusing on free schools, Labour should consider supporting home education

    Rather than focusing on free schools, Labour should consider supporting home education

    The Labour Party, since at least 2010 have gradually begun to present a coherent, cohesive education programme, to present to the electorate in time for the General Election in 2015. We’ve rightly focused on Michael Gove’s profligate waste of money on free schools. We’ve rightly focused on the Liberal Democrats’ breaking their pledge to vote against raising tuition fees. We’ve rightly focused on the other 50% of people who decide to not go to University and we’re now right to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Attracting the anti-UKIP vote – why Clacton matters for Labour

    Attracting the anti-UKIP vote – why Clacton matters for Labour

    Make yourself a cuppa, pull up a comfy chair, and watch. Since Douglas Carswell’s surprise/no-surprise defection to UKIP yesterday and the forcing of a by-election in Clacton, there will be some in the party tempted to adopt this attitude. And not without good reason. Consider the previous by-election outings over the last year or so. In Eastleigh, a Liberal Democrat/Tory marginal, from nowhere, became a LD/UKIP marginal. The Conservatives were dumped into third place and our vote stagnated at just […]

    Read more →