The Arc of Underachievement: How to ensure no school is left behind

November 15, 2012 1:00 pm

One of the achievements I am most proud of is the way in which the gap between the richest and poorest pupils was narrowed by a Labour Government. Analysis carried out by the Financial Times showed that between 2006 and 2010 there was a “sustained improvement in the results of children from the poorest neighbourhoods”.

However, there are still too many pupils in too many schools who don’t achieve their full potential. Addressing this inequality is central to our fight for a One Nation education system.

I have termed this challenge the ‘Arc of Underachievement’.

This Arc of Underachievement runs through many of our seaside towns and coastal cities.  In places such as Clacton, Torbay and Morecambe, there are too many schools which are below the national average for GCSE results.

If you take Cornwall – the probability that a poor child will have GCSE results in the bottom quarter nationally increased by 8% between 2006 and 2010. Whereas in Southwark, the probability decreased by 7%.

There is also an Arc of Underachievement that includes a number of Northern towns and cities in England – including some schools in places such as Hull, Blackpool and Knowsley.

I know that by naming these places, it will produce a defensive reaction.

I am not for one minute saying that all schools or teachers in these areas are not up to scratch.

Some schools are improving, and there is much good practice, but as fighters for social justice, we must not fear to challenge the fact that poor pupils are not making the most of their potential.

As a Labour party, we must fight the idea that ‘you don’t know what we are working with – you can’t turn coal into diamond.’ If that was the case, why is that children in places like Jarrow defy the odds?

There are many beacons of excellence which we should celebrate – places like Bolton, Bury and Manchester in the North West, or Lambeth, Hackney and Tower Hamlets in London.

Michael Gove thinks the only way to improve a school is to make it an academy. Labour’s academy programme achieved great things, but changing a school’s governance structure is no guarantee of success. The most important factor is the quality of teaching and leadership – and that happens in schools of all types.

I think there are three ways in which we can tackle the Arc of Underachievement, to ensure that no school is left behind.

First, is to improve the quality of teaching. That means working with existing heads and teachers to provide better training and support. It also means expanding schemes like Teach First which brings in high flying graduates, and places them in schools in tougher neighbourhoods. I also want to examine the case for providing a rebate on teacher tuition fees if you agree to teach in a school in a poorer part of the country for a minimum of two years.

Second, it is about stronger schools supporting weaker schools. The London Challenge and the City Challenge set up under Labour helped achieve a startling turnaround in the fortunes of schools in the capital and in Manchester. Instead of pitting schools against each other, as Michael Gove would like, we encouraged better school collaboration, and built a sense of pride in the education service. I would extend these challenges to areas in the North and coastal towns that need additional support.

The third element is the wider children’s agenda and investing in the early years. This was a central priority of the last Labour Government, but the Tories are turning back the clock. There are 281 fewer Sure Start centres compared to 2010. Early Intervention budgets are facing a staggering cut of over 40% over the course of this parliament, as over £1.1billion is taken out of programmes to help troubled families, fund children’s centres and provide breaks for families with disabled children. As any parent or teacher will tell you, giving a child the best start in life starts well before primary school.

Ed Miliband set out a radical and progressive vision for Britain when he talked about One Nation Labour. One Nation Education will be fundamental to addressing the divided country we face today – and rebuilding our economy so it works for working people.

What is needed is a relentless drive on school improvement which is focussed on clear leadership, early intervention and effective collaboration. To ensure that no school is left behind.

Stephen Twigg MP is Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • http://twitter.com/edsajw Jack Whitehead

    I’ve enjoyed Stephen Twiggs’ rhetoric in ‘The Arc of Underachievement: how to ensure that no school is left behind’. In creating ‘One Nation’ such rhetoric may have to be complemented by the narratives of those of us who are committed to building ‘One Nation’, in which we share evidence-based explanations of our educational influences in our own learning, in the learning of others and in the learning of the social formations in which we live and work, as we seek to live the values of ‘One Nation’ as fully as possible. I’ve included my own narrative in the living theory web-site at http://www.actionresearch.net .

  • http://twitter.com/SolHughesWriter Solomon Hughes

    Perhaps schools could be improved by getting some kind of well funded, democratic local organisation to help them work together and improve. It could be a kind of authority for education, a sort of local one.

    • Dave Postles

      LEA LOL.

  • PaulHalsall

    Look, in any scheme that measures schools 50.1% will always be better than 49.9%. That is a matter of statistics which cannot be just dismissed.

    We need to support all schools to become better, but get rid of the obsessive New Labour, and now Tory, methods of ranking.

  • PaulHalsall

    Look, in any scheme that measures schools 50.1% will always be better than 49.9%. That is a matter of statistics which cannot be just dismissed.

    We need to support all schools to become better, but get rid of the obsessive New Labour, and now Tory, methods of ranking.

  • PaulHalsall

    Let me make this clearer.

    You can NEVER get a situation in which more than 50% or schools are above the national average.

    I really despair when I see figures like Stephen Twigg pushing this nonsense.

    Perhaps Portillo should have won in 1997.

    • Serbitar

      Based on what I’ve heard Portillo say since he left politics behind him I’m not sure that Ribena Boy isn’t somewhat to the left of Stephen Twigg, politically speaking, in many ways and about many things.

  • Dave Postles

    Gove is pushing on an open door – opened by Blair. There will be nothing left. We read of successful schools being closed to promote nearby academies. Could Blair not perceive the unintended consequences? It’s another fine mess into which Blair propelled us. You can make all the distinctions that you like about NL academies and Gove’s academies, but NL placed the door ajar.

    • Dave Postles

      Bung us two mill in a brown envelope and you can have a school and do what you like with it.

      • AlanGiles

        I won’t be too harsh on Twigg. After all following the June 10th BBC TV interview he gave on The Politics Show, where he was all over the place, contradicting himself we know he is an expert in underachievement.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Can Mr Twigg learn some basic lessons, obviously his use of percentages has already been highlighted, but what gets my goat is the belief that teaching will be improved by programmes like Teach First. Is there any actual evidence that students with the Firsts in their degree will make better teachers? The real target should be actual teacher training and then ongoing training. If you set the bar adequately enough during teacher training then you should be able to remove those people who are not going to cut it. This seems to me a far more sensible route than just assuming getting people with strong academic qualifications will automatically produce good teachers. The core skills for a teacher are not going to be evident from a degree classification, aside from the issue of subject knowledge, but even then the specialising at degree level does not garuntee a candidates has the competent subject knowledge of some lower level courses, one would hope they could quickly acquire this of course.

  • Alexwilliamz

    And of course no vision of what post primary education should be about other than achievement as measured through a narrow exam subject.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I agree with the thrust of what has been said so far. It’s far too simplistic to talk in terms of whole areas. Morecambe for example is greatly affected by significant patches if intensive poverty and transitory population and the continued existence if a popular boys grammar school in Lancadter

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y