The case for Relational Welfare

12th November, 2012 3:01 pm

By Hilary Cottam

80% of jobs available in Britain are never advertised but filled by word of mouth – if you want to get a job you need a social network.  Loneliness has proven to be a bigger killer than a lifetime of smoking – if you want to live long and well, you need strong social bonds.  Diabetes, obesity, it is the same story: chronic disease accounts for 80% of hospital costs yet our industrial medical system cannot cure or prevent these conditions.  Only strong collective action and social support work.  Everywhere in our social lives the case for Relational Welfare is becoming apparent.

Now, when much of what previously looked so solid – economic stability, functioning democratic institutions, infinite resources – seems to have melted in more ways than one, people are asking new and different questions, to which the ideas behind Relational Welfare offer answers for three key reasons.

Firstly the nature of the problems the welfare state is trying to solve have changed.  Challenges such as ageing, chronic disease, climate change and the scale of entrenched inequality were not foreseen when our current welfare services were designed.  There is a mis-match between these challenges and the institutions and services on offer.

Secondly because technology is pervasive, cheap and makes ideas that many of us could only dream of in the 1970s practical and real.  Relational services have to be highly local to work – you cannot build a relationship with someone you don’t know.  At the same time they need elements of central support – to share knowledge and reap economies of scale.  Technology platforms make this possible.

Thirdly because current approaches to welfare reform have failed.  It is now clear that market based reforms have rarely either saved money or improved outcomes.  Rather the social and cultural effect of much of the last 15 years has been to intensify an outmoded transactional relationship, whilst obscuring the deeper systemic challenges.  The neo liberal efficiency narrative has run its course.

All of this means it is time to change the questions we are asking – not how can we reform existing institutions but how can we provide services that support people to grow and flourish in this century.

Relational Welfare is not just a nice theory.  At Participle we have created new examples of how this Relational Welfare can actually work.

Circle, our social enterprise which supports older people with lower level care and practical tasks whilst building a rich social network and our work with families in crisis shows how those who live in the most difficult of circumstances want to foster their capabilities if given both a genuine chance and the relationships that support a developmental conversation (as opposed to a transactional message).

Backr is an early prototype of a service which fosters employability by building resilient social networks around those seeking work, at low cost.  Backr provides someone to vouch for you, to support you and reflect with you.  The community critically includes those in and out of work and strong connections to local business. Working with hundreds of people who were languishing in the current system and watching their lives transform within this different culture does feel akin to watching people leave a bad relationship.

The distinctive elements of these examples that characterise Relational Welfare are: a focus on root causes; being developmental in approach; fostering capabilities rather than (expensively) addressing need; counting social change not things.  The mantra is “don’t assess and refer me, enthuse and support me”.  Relational Welfare models are open to all (like the problems they address) in direct contrast to the old models, the more who use relational services the stronger they are.

The state needs to actively support, seed and provide working models of different ways of organising, valuing and providing – that is alternatives to the domestic sphere and to the market.

Relationships are the glue that keep us together, the dimension that keeps us human, not just atomised consumers or parts of the body politic.  Relational welfare offers a state defined in principle and practice by collaboration and relationships rather than the agenda of institutional reform and efficiency.

Hilary Cottam is a partner of Participle

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Smith/516168738 Daniel Smith

    It’s true – I’m a writer and a smoker, a very lonely profession. The reason I have turned out like this, rather than a middle manager is that it is safer than other things to do. If you mix too much you compromise your security. There are a lot of bad apples out there and you just can’t trust anyone anymore.

  • CD13

    “80% of jobs available in Britain are never advertised but filled by word of mouth.”
    I assume you have evidence for that statement?

  • http://twitter.com/indraadnan Indra Adnan

    Hugely important shift in political thinking and action on offer here from Hilary Cottam and Participle – from top down, arms length theories of change to bottom up, close up actions for long term development. Feels real.

    In terms of welfare, success will depend on emotional literacy and capacity of front line to deliver – relationship itself must be informed of both the disaggregated emotional needs of individuals and the state of their inherent resources to meet those needs before wading in to help. People need security, attention, autonomy, intimacy, privacy, status, connectivity, community, meaning and purpose. We are born with all the resources to meet these needs, but sometimes lack coping skills, or a toxic environment prevents us from using them. Recommend look at Human Givens Institute for more on this.

    In terms of the broader society also, an (emotionally literate) relational approach is key to our being able to re-viviify communities during the long haul of recession and beyond. It speaks to crime, unemployment, education, parenting and above all general and mental health. Women have traditionally taken the lion’s share of this work on in the caring professions,voluntary work and at home. As 51% of the population they will recognise the value of this approach – it’s a vote winner – and will be looking for leadership roles. Political parties would be wise to try and reflect this re-balancing of skills in their cabinets.

  • Serbitar

    Complete and utter sh*te!

    It reminds me of the good old “relational” days where people in financial difficulty had to “go on the Parish” and were expected to sell their possessions – even a spare pair of shoes if they had them – to raise a few coppers to require the least amount of subsistence help given to them reluctantly by the locals. Absolute complete and utter twaddle! Even dafter, more unworkable, and potentially disastrous than Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reforms. How can anybody with any knowledge of British history and half a brain consider this as anything other than preposterous?

    Words fail me.

Latest

  • Comment Is civic nationalism the way forward for England?

    Is civic nationalism the way forward for England?

    What is striking about the general election in England and Scotland is not just the difference in outcome but emotional tone. In Scotland, burgeoning support for the SNP was not simply about particular policies but an expression of what the sociologist Emile Durkheim called ‘collective effervescence’ – powerful emotional identification with a wider community. By contrast, in England support for the Conservatives seemed based largely on judgments about Labour’s economic competence and fears about SNP influence, with no whiff of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why proportional representation will be Labour’s only saviour

    Why proportional representation will be Labour’s only saviour

    Everyone’s whispering about it: the Conservatives pulled a blinder offering the Lib Dems the referendum on changing the voting system at the beginning of the Coalition’s term. Doubtless if it had be run at the same time as the 2015 General Election, things may well have turned out very differently. As it was, Cameron et al made their ‘partner’ show their hand too early; the Lib Dems should have kept those cards closer to their chest in the hope of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Blairism is no solution to Labour’s identity crisis

    Blairism is no solution to Labour’s identity crisis

    The ‘Blairites’ are certainly right about the so-called 35% strategy. How one envies the SNP for whom every Scottish voter is a target voter. Whatever happened to ‘One Nation Labour’? They are also right to suggest that we should help people fulfil their aspirations but their definition of aspiration is too narrowly focused. It’s one thing to aspire to shop at John Lewis – I might aspire to shop at Fortnum and Mason – but what about those who aspire […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Our human rights are not the Tories’ to give away

    Our human rights are not the Tories’ to give away

    When discussing the Human Rights Act it is important to set out the developments which led to it so as to dispel the falsehood, too often insinuated in the anti-European press, that the Act constitutes the meddling in British affairs by the bureaucracies of the European Union. On 10th December 1948 the U.N. adopted The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in response to the Second World War and the atrocities committed during it. Its purpose was to ensure individuals, without […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Before Labour finds it’s next leader, it needs to find its George Osborne – and fast

    Before Labour finds it’s next leader, it needs to find its George Osborne – and fast

    Here’s a quick challenge for you. It will only take a minute. Try and find a Labour Party blog that praises George Osborne. Nope, me neither. The Chancellor of the Exchequer is understandably not popular within our ranks. After all, the Chancellor has presided over the weakest economic recovery in Britain’s history and unleashed a wave of crippling public expenditure cuts, while doubling the national debt and failing to eliminate the budget deficit. If you were being kind you might […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit