The government needs to question its role in driving innovation

24th November, 2012 7:52 am

By Su Maddock

Central government has much to learn from locality leaders who are forging innovation strategies not only in cities such as Manchester and Birmingham, but also in places such as York, Swindon, Bristol, Rotherham and counties such as Cornwall.  Local leaders are increasingly appreciating the need for connectivity across localities and between people’s capacities and business growth.  They are investing in digital connectivity, whole system budgeting, locality procurement networks and third-sector procurement consortia.

By contrast the Coalition’s innovation policy is fragmented, functional and fails to acknowledge the significance of the dynamic relationship between people’s capacity to solve problems and the context in which they live. Society and business depend on each other and we need an innovation strategy that supports both.

Many locality leaders recognise their own failure to connect to the smaller enterprises and Local Enterprise Partnerships are trying to find ways of engaging smaller businesses. One of the strengths of Heseltine’s recent report “No Stone Unturned” is its recommendations for SME growth and local governance. Over 85% of all trading in the UK is by SME and while clearly not all SMEs are innovative, many are active in boundary-spanning networks.

Central to locality innovation strategies are collaborative leaders who think in terms of wider public systems and systemic innovation that could provide the capabilities, connectivity and knowledge exchange between smaller enterprises, companies and public procurers.  Successful international cities, such as New York, also show a systemic approach to innovation

  • Embracing open innovation and creating smart buildings
  • Redesigning  schools, waste and energy systems
  • Creating networks of municipal innovators

By contrast BIS policy is not ‘open’ but focused on fragmented, institutional initiatives and high growth companies which is obscuring the value of locality business clusters and of the necessity of building bridges between small enterprise (SMEs, SE etc) and larger companies and public institutions.

Government needs to question it role in driving innovation. Manchester’s ‘Knowledge Capital’ brought entrepreneurs and business leaders together; however,  Manchester City Council did not stimulate the energy for change this came from creative entrepreneurs, who led, the council followed.  When central government policy–makers assume solutions and fail to acknowledge local context, then, over specification follows.  This is  particularly, problematic for innovation which demands motivated people and porous,  work environments that are open to exchange across sectors.  This is why investing in HE research is not enough – it is incentivising application and the adoption of ideas that is weak in the UK. Government recognises this. Given this, surely the role of public leaders is to create the conditions for innovation and to align funding and policy interventions with that of innovators in any sector.

Locality partnerships are driving a process of renegotiation between local government, business, higher education, the Arts and the Third Sector and collaborative capabilities and new forms of locality governance are emerging in many places.  The government’s recognition of cities has increased, evidenced by their recent announcement for twenty more city deals. However, in spite of this, locality innovation strategies are not visible or mentioned in BIS innovation policy documents.  While local leaders are learning to be more and to collaborate; government lags behind and continues to ignore open and systemic innovation,  which is essential if public governance is to mature and be capable of introducing public values into the growing outsourcing of services.

Public procurement is projected across Europe as the route to innovation uptake, but if policy-makers continue to believe in one-size-fits-all innovation,  this is problematic, especially for personal service innovation. Financial and service innovations are underpinned by very different objectives.  My own research on DWP’s procurement of the Work Programme reveals an assumption by government that a neat procurement model will deliver efficiencies, savings and personal service      innovation simultaneously. This is a mistake when there are tensions and trade-offs involved in the transfer of financial risk from government to companies,  efficiencies and service innovation.  Efficiencies may be delivered through corporate, rationalisation but personal service innovation depends on local inter-agency working and personal connections. Many locality leaders are aware of this and want more honest, debate on the impact of current outsourcing and procurement systems on small businesses and services.

Innovative public governance is urgently needed,   that is capable of scrutinising transactional systems and creating the frameworks for longer term investment and the local connections necessary for both social solutions and sustained business growth.

Su Maddock is a public innovation consultant, Hon Fellow of the Manchester Institute for Innovation Research and a Visiting Professor at UWE. 

This piece was commissioned as part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • TomFairfax

    Was this article written using the Plain English Campaign’s gobbledy-gook generator?

    In summary:

    Councils need to find better & cheaper ways of doing things, and it doesn’t help if Whitehall takes a one size fits all approach that isn’t always suitable to all places. Manchester City Council have found a way to things differently, but ‘better’, by not starting by stipulating the answer to the question, or making the solution so all encompassing that it is unnecessarily expensive. Here’s an example…

    And people wonder why the public is turned off by politics.

  • Dave Postles

    How about ’embracing’ OpenSource IT with inhouse development?

  • Jim Crowder

    Well, with clarity like this it’s no wonder that Labour can’t appeal to the masses. How can someone rise to that level of power and influence without being able to express themselves. Is it a reflection of our education system that she’s a Visiting Professor at UWE?

  • Pingback: From Local Innovation to Growing Global Market Share | Labour Finance & Industry Group (LFIG)()


  • Comment Featured A clean energy revolution is in reach within a generation

    A clean energy revolution is in reach within a generation

    In a few days’ time world leaders will gather in Paris for the UN summit on climate change. It will be a poignant moment. The Paris attacks were acts of hatred, designed to divide us from one another, crush people’s hopes and destroy lives. By contrast these talks, taking place in the same city, will be a huge opportunity for many countries to come together to put individual interests aside for our common good. It will be our chance to […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Hilary Benn tops LabourList readers’ Shadow Cabinet rankings

    Hilary Benn tops LabourList readers’ Shadow Cabinet rankings

    Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn is currently LabourList readers’ top ranked Shadow Cabinet member. Benn had the highest average score in the monthly survey, where readers rank each member on a scale of 1 to 5. His score came to just shy of 3.4, while second placed John McDonnell was close behind with slightly over 3.3. McDonnell had a high-profile week after responding to George Osborne’s Autumn Statement in the Chamber of the House of Commons, while Benn has been […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Shadow Cabinet on course to give MPs free vote on Syria

    Shadow Cabinet on course to give MPs free vote on Syria

    The Shadow Cabinet appears to be on course to give Labour MPs a free vote on airstrikes against ISIS in Syria next week after Hilary Benn confirmed his support for military action on the Today programme this morning. The Shadow Foreign Secretary said he is “convinced of the case for effective action” in Syria and said that a free vote may be where “we end up”. He also rejected the suggestion that he would resign over the issue on the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Full text of Momentum’s draft letter to Labour MPs about airstrikes on Syria

    Full text of Momentum’s draft letter to Labour MPs about airstrikes on Syria

    Momentum, the pressure group founded out of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership campaign, is urging its supporters to send this letter to Labour MPs. I am writing to you as a Labour voter to urge you to oppose Tory proposals for the UK to join military action in Syria against ISIL/Daesh. I am sure we would both like to see the defeat of both ISIL and the Assad regime – but it is not clear that this is an achievable aim. The military […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Full text of Jeremy Corbyn’s letter to Labour MPs about airstrikes on Syria

    Full text of Jeremy Corbyn’s letter to Labour MPs about airstrikes on Syria

    Dear Colleague, The Prime Minister made a Statement to the House today making the case for a UK bombing campaign against ISIS in Syria. A copy of my response has already been circulated. We have all been horrified by the despicable attacks in Paris and are determined to see the defeat of ISIS. Our first priority must be the security of Britain and the safety of the British people. The issue now is whether what the Prime Minister is proposing […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends