The progressive national state

November 12, 2012 11:30 am

If the idea of progressive patriotism was once anathema, for ‘One Nation’ Labour it’s a powerful framework for centre left values. If we once thought progress meant weakening national identities there has been a profound rethink.

Opening the British economy to globalisation with no national industrial strategy left it weakened. Reclaiming St George in Euro 96 and the Union Flag around the Olympics showed patriotic symbols expressing a progressive idea of who we want to be. In devolution, progressive national stories become the framework for social democratic politics. Governments concerned about social behaviour have realised a nation depends on how its citizens behave, and whether these reflect a shared values.

We make our own national stories. While the reactionary and the progressive have always struggled for ascendancy we can choose which parts of our past to celebrate to shape a progressive story for the future. And we can shape a state to support it.

New Labour lacked confidence in the state’s ability to shape the economy, but believed a target driven, top down state could shape society. Britain was painted as a nation of public service consumers, distrustful of democracy, relaxed about the efficacy of markets, scornful of professionals, unconcerned about unaccountable power and confident in technocratic solutions.

We need different values for a progressive national identity.

The patriotic economy has an active state that promotes national economic interest. Cadbury, Pfizer, Autonomy, Bombardier and now Ford have left us all saying ‘This wouldn’t happen in Germany’ as the state abandoned its job.

Our state would engage actively with private business to shape the economy. The rules on corporate governance, investment and finance need to work with the effective use of regulation, procurement and long-term public policy to create market opportunities and certainty. Not to turn our backs on globalisation but to succeed in it.

We need a national mission, not technocratic policy. National economic renewal must be the value of the boardroom and the shop floor. A shared mission will help Labour let investment in infrastructure and innovation trump the demands from public services. But a shared mission won’t grow in a wildly unequal society, so we can make Labour’s commitment to economic justice part of our national story.

Policy must reinforce popular progressive values, not undercut them. The NHS has a popular resilience because its basic principle: ‘we all pay in and it’s there when we need it’ ; says something about how we see our country. By contrast, consent for the social security system has fallen steadily. The needs based-responsibilities blind allocation of housing, services and benefits seen as ‘fair’ by the left was out of touch with rugged British sense of fairness, based on responsibility and contribution as well as of rights. The progressive patriotic welfare state must reflect contribution and earned entitlement; values that bind us together, not pull us apart.

Popular sentiment often supports a progressive story. By all means use private companies to tackle a public service problem but we don’t want services run for profit. The idea of a public space, a common good, that lies beyond markets and individuals is deeply held and a foundation of any progressive national story.

This is not simple populism. We have to challenge the reactionary as well as build on the progressive. We can shape old ideas into radical change. So the new story for a less centralist state will draw on historic pride in our towns, cities and distinctive regional identities. Those values should be reflected in the leadership of local institutions, including those we elect. We should remake community institutions, and voluntary organisations in our tradition of tackling problems for ourselves, not as subcontracting partners of a centralised state. Do this right and empowering local institutions can be the story of English renewal within a strong Union.

 

Progressive patriotism has been missing in the debate between multiculturalism and integration. Multiculturalism has fostered respect and mutual coexistence but tells us little about the country we share.Like ‘integration’, multiculturalism makes migration and culture ‘the problem’. But our national story is shaped more by wars, religious schism,invasions and empire, Chartism, unions and suffrage, the NHS and the welfare state than by migration. By focussing on nation building, patriotism can tell an inclusive story in which our new diversity is part of a longer history.

Teachers welcome migrant kids with high aspirations. Manufacturers envy the status of German technicians. Atheists acknowledge that faith communities volunteer more. The Finns have tackled obesity. Stories of ‘how people like us behave’ are influential and there is space, too, in our progressive national story to reinforce the values of aspiration, self-reliance, looking out for each other and defending the common good that we would all want see in a good society.

John Denham is Labour MP for Southampton Itchen, and a former Minister

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • Dave Postles

    ‘Reclaiming St George in Euro 96 and the Union Flag around the Olympics
    showed patriotic symbols expressing a progressive idea of who we want to
    be.’
    This concept of the symbolic construction of community (Tony Cohen) doesn’t resonate. It’s meaningless and intermittent (pace Charles Taylor, its periodicity is not a constant binding force). In practical economic terms, let’s start from the simple notion of supporting one’s neighbour: we buy goods manufactured in this country to provide more employment; we boycott companies which are perceived not to pay their due taxes because they undermine the prospects of our neighbours who need our support. There’s no need to colour it as ‘progressive patriotism’ or ‘community’. It’s a simple idea: we support out neighbours.

    • FreedomNow

      Denham is on to something: A national rallying cry and a recognition that labour’s economic policy needs a post Brown, post – ballsian settlement. Thoughtful, radical, vote finding

  • Daniel Speight

    So let’s use corporate taxation to enforce those ideas of corporate behaviour. Let’s not cosy up to corporate leaders while turning our backs on the common people. No more corporate or lobbyist parties at conference possibly?

  • PaulHalsall

    “By all means use private companies to tackle a public service problem but we don’t want services run for profit.”

    This is incoherent. Why else would private companies want to tackle a public service problem if it were not to make a profit?

  • franwhi

    It seems incoherent that you talk of how the Labour Party can work to support and strengthen a developing UK national narrative while here in Scotland the party do their utmost to distort and scotch every national narrative accusing those who are building this narrative of separatism, damaging small mindedness, cultural chauvinism and anti-English bigotry. How come on the one Labour hand it’s a manifestation of something positive and forward thinking yet on the other Labour hand a well rounded Scottish national identity which naturally seeks greater political self-determination is viewed as a damnable thing by the party establishment ? I don’t understand. Can you please explain ?

  • Serbitar

    Reading this disjointed and disconnected article was weird and comedic.

    ” The Finns have tackled obesity.”

    They also chose to weaken the level, qualification criteria, coverage, and time limits associated with social benefits during the 90s, which I am sure Mr. Denham would also applaud privately if not publicly. (Like many in the Labour Party John considers a bit of unpaid labour bracing for the poor.) Sadly Finland’s departure from the post-war Nordic model of welfare failed to increase labour market demand, as hoped, while part-time work and underemployment boomed just like here in Blighty, although prolonged unemployment and underemployment does probably encourage slimness in those affected, although not in a good way it has to be admitted. .

    Well, folks, it cannot be too long now before articles begin appearing advocating a consequentialist “contributions based” revamp of the welfare system which seems now to be considered Labour’s “last best hope” to win over the “squeezed middle” and not to look too compassionate (that is to say soft!) as far as all those indolent benefit claimants slumbering behind “closed curtains” at five o’clock in the morning goes.

    It’s the same undercooked b*llocks served on a platter by every political party it seems.

  • Serbitar

    This disjointed article was as weird and comedic as a Monty Python sketch.

    ” The Finns have tackled obesity.”

    They also chose to weaken the level, qualification criteria, coverage, and time limits associated with social benefits during the 90s, which I am sure Mr. Denham would also applaud privately if not publicly. (Like many in the Labour Party John considers a bit of unpaid labour bracing for the poor.) Sadly Finland’s departure from the post-war Nordic model of welfare failed to increase labour market demand, as hoped, while part-time work and underemployment boomed just like here in Blighty, although prolonged unemployment and underemployment probably would help encourage slimness in those affected, although not in a good way it has to be admitted.

    Well, folks, it cannot be too long now before articles begin appearing advocating a consequentialist “contributions based” revamp of the welfare system which seems now to be considered Labour’s “last best hope” to win over the “squeezed middle” and not to look too compassionate (that is to say soft!) as far as all those indolent benefit claimants slumbering behind “closed curtains” at five o’clock in the morning goes.

    It’s the same undercooked b*llocks served on a platter by every political party it seems.

  • http://twitter.com/bencobley Ben Cobley

    I’d be interested in any thoughts about my own article on One Nation, the Olympics and Danny Boyle’s Opening Ceremony – spare no venom! See here: http://shiftinggrounds.org/2012/10/one-nation-olympics-opening-ceremony-revisited/

Latest

  • News Video The racist European party who will save UKIP £1m a year

    The racist European party who will save UKIP £1m a year

    Last week, UKIP’s grouping in the European Parliament was forced to dissolve after an MEP from Latvia decided to leave, meaning they no longer had members from enough countries to continue. This would have cost UKIP around £1 million a year in public funding. Fortunately, a Polish MEP has agreed to join Farage’s Europe for Free and Direct Democracy group (EFDD), and restore UKIP’s lucrative funding. Unfortunately, it appears he is absolutely awful. New EFDD recruit Robert Iwaszkiewicz has praised […]

    Read more →
  • Comment What will Labour do about this deadly epidemic?

    What will Labour do about this deadly epidemic?

    There’s an epidemic sweeping the world. It destroys families, snuffs out hope and opportunity and hurts those who least deserve a painful death. I’m not talking about Ebola (though that’s an unspeakably horrifying plague), nor am I talking about Malaria or TB (both of which cause a death toll that dwarves Ebola every single year). I’m talking about something that kills every five minutes. Violence against children. Unicef UK have a new report out today (“Children in Danger”) that highlights […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The UKIP Calypso should be number one

    The UKIP Calypso should be number one

    On the 1st March 1945, a reggae legend was born. Two years later, on the 1st March 1947, Mike Read was born. Unfortunately, a birthday is no longer the only thing that connects Mike Read and multiple Grammy-winner Burning Spear. They are now both purveyors of politically charged Afro-Carribean songs about independence. By now, you should all be aware of the new UKIP single. Sung by former Radio One disc jockey Mike Read, it is a rare foray by the […]

    Read more →
  • News What does the new Shadow Europe Minister mean for Labour’s position on free movement

    What does the new Shadow Europe Minister mean for Labour’s position on free movement

    The biggest story of last night’s mini-reshuffle was the return of Pat McFadden to Labour’s frontbenches, as Shadow Europe Minister, four years after he left his post at Shadow Business, Innovation and Skills. While much has been made of his Blairite credentials, what may be more interesting is his position on free movement within the EU. The Labour Party has been talking a lot about “fair movement, not free movement” in the EU – most recently Shadow Immigration minister Dave […]

    Read more →
  • Featured If you care about the rise of Ukip, go to Rochester and Strood

    If you care about the rise of Ukip, go to Rochester and Strood

    If you care about the rise of UKIP’s populist right-wing politics and you want to do something to stop it now, there is one place you need to make a trip to and campaign for Labour between now and 20 November: Rochester & Strood. Polling guru Mike Smithson has said it “will have a dramatic affect on the political environment in the six months to the May 7th general election.” He’s thinking of the impact between UKIP and the Tories, […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y