The Tory electoral position is weak – they’ve just admitted it

November 27, 2012 12:14 pm

The Tories are around ten points behind in the polls, but they still display an admirable amount of bluster. They stride about the Commons as if they owned the place (although they did that in opposition too). Most still (publicly at least) refuse to countenance the idea that in 2015 Ed Miliband could be Prime Minister. They puff out their chests at the idea. They snort.*

And of course, despite their bluster, they’re right to say that Labour’s position is not as strong as it appears. This week we’re defending three “safe” Labour seats in by-elections and there’s a credible threat in two of them. But – tellingly – it’s not the Tories we’re worried about. It’s not mainstream parties at all. It’s Respect and UKIP – the parties of the fringes. The parties of disillusionment with politics.

UKIP are of particular interest to the Tories. The widespread belief is that all of their voters are Tories who got lost somehow on the way to the ballot box, and if only Cameron could woo them back into the Tory fold, there’s a parliamentary majority to be won.

Tory vice-chairman Michael Fabricant went one step further yesterday, when he advocated a formal pact with UKIP ahead of the next election. According to Fabricant:

“The Conservative Party might well win the 2015 General Election on our own.But a pact with Ukip on clear terms could deliver 20 extra seats.”

There are a few leaps of faith for the Tories here. To deliver 20 extra seats would require the vast majority of 2010 Tories to stick with the party, and for the vast majority of 2010 UKIP voters to switch to the Tories on masse. In my experience the electorate are rarely as compliant as such a strategy would require. (Although of course, the same could be said for Labour’s apparent Labour+ 2010 Lib Dems strategy for 2015).

What Fabricant has really shown is the desperation in the Tory ranks. For once, the mask has slipped. To take a punt on working with UKIP, with no gaurantee of success (and a potentially party splitting EU referendum surely added to the mix) seems a remarkable gamble for 20 seats.

A pre-election pact is a sign of weakness, not strength, for the Tory Party.

More remarkable still are attempts by Downing Street to claim that Fabricant’s pact plan isn’t official party policy. They may have forgotten, so I’m happy to remind them. Michael Fabricant is the Vice Chairman of the Conservative Party with responsibility for campaigning. Arguing that he doesn’t speak for the Tories is ludicrous, even by the standards of Downing Street denials.

Perhaps most interesting for Labour people is the simplistic way in which the Tories talk about UKIP and their voters. They talk about them as if they are aggrieved that they are “splitting the vote”. It’s the way Labour once spoke about the Lib Dems. But as we found out to our cost, these parties that infuriate you and “split your vote” can often turn out to be very different from the simple caricatures we have of them. One day the Tories will discover that about UKIP too. And that the only way to win isn’t to form a pact.

It’s to win over their voters.

* – in fairness there are a number of Tories who take the Labour threat seriously, but pragmatic, reality-based Tories appear to be a rare breed at present.

  • NT86

    The Tories’ problems are far deeper than UKIP taking their votes. Of course UKIP’s votes in 2010 was a contributory factor in preventing them from winning a majority, but is there much evidence that they wooed over Labour vtters/ Many labour voters probably stayed home or went Lib Dem, because no matter how disillusioned they were with their party, I couldn’t see many of them wanting to vote Tory.

    • aracataca

      Good point NT. My guess (and it is a guess) would be that the number of switches direct from Labour to Tory was comparatively small in 2010. In 2015 this trend is likely to continue (IMHO) while the collapse in the Fib Dem vote could be pivotal for Labour.Two caveats however, the Tories and the Fibs might not stand against each other in crucial seats and the Fibs might stand as ‘Independents’ as we’ve witnessed in the most recent elections.
      By the way Mark surely only Rotherham is really at risk this week?

  • Charlie_Mansell

    On the subject of the Euro elections, UKIP have polled 16% and 17% in the past two. They do well already and may not rise as much as people think. What is happening is their domestic election polling may be catching up with their Euro scores as they become the new party of protest in the gap opened up by the Lib Dems vacating it. We may see this in Middlesbrough and Rotherham on Thursday. In 2014 there is a good chance of the Lib Dems polling just 8% (based on their declines in London and Scottish list elections) and coming 5th behind UKIP and the Greens. Assuming Labour picking up a lot of that decline it will only require a 3% further swing to Labour from the Tories from the disaster of 2009 to top the Euro poll in 2014. That would be psychologically good for Ed and the Party (though we ensure we avoid any 1999 Hague hubris) a year before the 2015 General election. Perhaps the party should be developing its message for those elections (domestically in particular) to make the most of them, rather than just assume it is UKIP’s election?

  • Serbitar

    Fabricant’s ‘Crown Topper’ is as daft as the brain beneath it!

  • Serbitar

    Fabricant’s ‘Crown Topper’ is as daft as the brain beneath it!

  • Serbitar

    Fabricant’s ‘Crown Topper’ is as daft as the brain beneath it!

  • Serbitar

    Fabricant’s ‘Crown Topper’ is as daft as the brain beneath it!

  • Serbitar

    Fabricant’s ‘Crown Topper’ is as daft as the brain beneath it!

  • Serbitar

    Fabricant’s ‘Crown Topper’ is as daft as the brain beneath it!

  • kb32904

    Anthony Wells has written a post today wrt this claim of Fabricants and the number of seats lost to UKIP.

    http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/

    One paragraph from his comment says

    “This is nonsense of the highest order, but however often the argument is knocked down it refuses to lie down and die. At the last election there were 21 seats where the number of votes that UKIP got was larger than the number of extra votes the Conservatives needed to win. Where the argument that UKIP cost the Conservatives up to 40 seats comes from is beyond me, if every single UKIP voter has instead voted Conservative they would have got 21 more seats, no more”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    There is an excellent piece on the “myth of the 20-40 seats” claimed by Fabricant by Anthony Well in UK Opinion Polling website, which I would urge anyone to look at. Whilst UKIP take votes disproportionately from the Tories than Labour or Libdem, a sizeable number of UKIP voters were (and never would be) tory voters. The reality is that UKIP may have/may cost the tories between 1-5 seats.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    There is an excellent piece on the “myth of the 20-40 seats” claimed by Fabricant by Anthony Well in UK Opinion Polling website, which I would urge anyone to look at. Whilst UKIP take votes disproportionately from the Tories than Labour or Libdem, a sizeable number of UKIP voters were (and never would be) tory voters. The reality is that UKIP may have/may cost the tories between 1-5 seats.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    There is an excellent piece on the “myth of the 20-40 seats” claimed by Fabricant by Anthony Well in UK Opinion Polling website, which I would urge anyone to look at. Whilst UKIP take votes disproportionately from the Tories than Labour or Libdem, a sizeable number of UKIP voters were (and never would be) tory voters. The reality is that UKIP may have/may cost the tories between 1-5 seats.

Latest

  • Comment Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    In four weeks time the Chancellor will announce the results of the 2015 spending Review. There won’t be many winners but some will have lost more than others. Political commentators and discussion forums will pass judgement and public sector managers will, yet again, pick through the debris, making do and mending from what ever they can salvage. Before we get overtaken by the detail we should reflect on the bigger picture. What ever the chancellor says on June 26th it [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment A call for action at the G8

    A call for action at the G8

    In less than a month’s time, the UK hosts the G8 Summit. With hunger, tax, trade and transparency all on the agenda, the UK has a unique opportunity to show global leadership on these issues. The scale of hunger is devastating. There is enough food in the world for everyone, yet 1 billion people still go hungry. 2.3 million children every year die from malnutrition – to put that in perspective, that is around 16,000 children every day. Or one [...]

    Read more →
  • News TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run “The TUC along with its international equivalent – the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – is calling on UEFA to address the appalling treatment of workers and players in Qatar and [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    The Labour Party spends a great deal of time beating itself up over its performance in Southern England. We know it simply isn’t good enough, but we can’t seem to put our finger on why exactly that’s the case. Is it demographics? No. Culture? Perhaps. Lack of basic party organisation in some areas? It’s certainly a factor. But whilst we’re flagellating ourselves over our inability to perform south of the Watford gap (outside of London), we should remember that the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Why we love Woolwich

    Why we love Woolwich

    Woolwich is an amazing place. It’s where the Labour party was founded as a mass membership organization. The Woolwich Provident was one of Britain’s first building societies. The Royal Arsenal Coop one of our first cooperative societies. Woolwich had the second Polytechnic in the country, created with the aim of providing education for working adults. Woolwich is my nearest big town centre, where I shop and go to meet friends. In the last few days, for many people, its name [...]

    Read more →