What do we do with a problem like suburbia?

November 14, 2012 7:48 pm

The political pulse of the nation has bene defined variously over the years by  pollsters and strategists: Mondeo Man (1992), Middle England (1997) and the squeezed middle (as trademarked by Ed Miliband) are all really are about the same thing though: suburban voters hailing not from the heart of our throbbing cities but instead from around their edges.

The majority of Brits now live in suburbs; on some estimates upwards of 80%. Nevertheless metropolitan opinion formers tend to hold these in sneering contempt.  The Tories traditionally champion the countryside and Labour the urban agenda but in the main suburbs have escaped the attention of policy-makers. Academic sociology commonly looks at problems to approach them in problem-solving terms. Yet suburbs are seen as a little bit naff and pretty twee but because they are regarded as fairly self-sufficient they are distinctly unsexy as a cultural or political prospect.

Suburbs come in many shapes and sizes from 1930s ribbon development semis, garden suburbs, the grand Victorian affairs of brick-built villas for the carriage classes and council estate suburbia. We can all probably think of examples. They are however all reviled by the urban elite. The runaway hit Inbetweeners Movie opens with narrator Will describing how suburbia is “safe, comforting, stifling, boring… I can’t wait to f***ing leave”. It’s a sentiment repeated stated throughout popular culture –  George Orwell’s Coming Up For Air for example also implies that suburbs are about narrow mindedness and small-c conservatism.

Part of the suburban attraction was as places of possibilities bridging the rural idyll of country with convenience of the city – often with handy road and rail links. The Metroland poetry of Betjamin is well known and a recent exhibition at the London Transport Museum displayed kitschy inter-war posters with phrases promising punters that they could leave behind the ills of the city and find true happiness and tranquillity in Edgware/ Hounslow etc.

Given the derision heaped on suburbia and the way that the word “suburban” is pejorative it’s easily forgotten that suburbia was conceived of in optimism – whether by speculative builders with their wooden sunshine gates or the corporation suburbia of homes fit for heroes for those who had fought returning from the Great War.

Twenty first century suburbia is not what it was previously though. Suburbia is feeling the pinch and cannot afford to be smug with the present downturn. Behind the clichés about neurotically houseproud suburbanites twitching behind their net curtains some of our suburbs are not wearing well 80-odd or even 100+ years after their original development. High street shops were once a sign of the viable suburb and consumerism/ keeping up with the Joneses was seem as intrinsic to suburban lifestyles. The notion of “boarded up Britain” however captures the stark reality of unlet shops in many suburban centres.

In some neighbourhoods ethnic commerce has injected life into decaying localities. South Korean shops have stopped the atrophy of the New Malden district of Kingston upon Thames. Here another suburban stereotype is turned on its head. The notion of “white flight” was another unstated driver of suburban drift. Yet we are seeing “brown flight” with progressive outward diffusion of minorities frequently along familiar arterial passages – eg from Brixton to Croydon (Caribbeans) or Bethnal Green to Ilford (Bangladeshis). Jon Cruddas has enthused about how his Dagenham seat is the most rapidly changing constituency in the UK with east Europeans and Africans making the same journeys that old eastenders did previously.

In short many natural Labour voters have located to the suburbs; these areas are far from outposts. Even before Boris’ prediction of future benefit changes ushering in Kosovo-style ethnic cleansing, gentrification priced many inner-cities out of reach of the average person. Indeed house-prices everywhere, particularly in a post-imperial super-diverse global metropolis and megacity of London have made much housing everywhere unobtainable. The average age of a first time buyer is now 37. On a traditional 25 year mortgage… well you do the math.

Labour needs to put the suburbs at the centre of its strategy as they are now the political cockpits that matter and will deliver or deny electoral success on 2015.

Dr Rupa Huq is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Kingston University and author of the forthcoming book ‘On the Edge: the contested cultures of English Suburbia’.

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Suburban seats in this area are already all Labour. Whether that means others can learn from us, I don’t know

  • DanMcCurry

    In the south you can define the safe seats simply by drawing lines around the inner cities. What Rupa says is that the rest of the conurbations are a hotpotch of different types, rather than a single type.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    She doesn’t say that though. She suggests there’s some sort of new development taking place where, shock, Labour voters may live in the suburbs – well that might be new for London or the South East but it’s old hat everywhere else.

Latest

  • News Video Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters appear to be losing their patience with David Cameron’s attempts to get out of appearing the pre-election TV debates. It is widely understood that Cameron has been advised by strategist Lynton Crosby not to take part in the leaders’ debates and has been dragging his feet during negotiations, making more debates each time broadcasters make new proposals. Following the initial invitation of UKIP to appear, Cameron claimed that the Green Party should also take part. Now the Greens, SNP […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    So Compass holds a debate about the relevance, or not, of tactical voting in the run up May and straight away John Spellar MP and then Luke Akehurst are on to us. John accused us of calling on people ‘not to vote Labour”, Luke says we are ‘naïve’. Well first lets be clear: we have set up the space on our website for a debate; we have one article for tactical voting and one against. We wanted to see what […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Yvette Cooper has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to exploit concerns about immigration rather than attempting to come up with practical policies. The Shadow Home Secretary also derided UKIP for getting themselves in a “ridiculous tangle” on the issue – last week a spokesperson for the party said they would introduce a net migration target of 50,000, while Farage today claims that it is not party policy. This follows Ed Miliband attacking David Cameron for missing his 2010 immigration promises […]

    Read more →
  • Featured PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    There are only three PMQs left until the election. Three more of these turgid, unattractive, unedifying and borderline pointless sessions to sit through before May. If this is the highlight of the Parliamentary week then Parliament can’t prorogue quick enough, frankly. Evidently many MPs feel the same, judging by the wide open spaces on the green benches this lunchtime. After a few minutes MPs had all spaced themselves out a little bit to make the place look a bit less […]

    Read more →
  • News Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Andy Burnham, Shadow Health Secretary, has said that charities should be the “preferred provider” of NHS services. He has said that Labour would introduce legislation, to get rid of parts of the contentious 2012 Health and Social Care Act, that would mean not-for-profit organisations would be seen as the “preferred provider” for the NHS. Contracts would be five or ten year agreements. This is part of Labour’s plan for health and social care. Speaking at the Association of Chief Executives […]

    Read more →