What do we do with a problem like suburbia?

November 14, 2012 7:48 pm

The political pulse of the nation has bene defined variously over the years by  pollsters and strategists: Mondeo Man (1992), Middle England (1997) and the squeezed middle (as trademarked by Ed Miliband) are all really are about the same thing though: suburban voters hailing not from the heart of our throbbing cities but instead from around their edges.

The majority of Brits now live in suburbs; on some estimates upwards of 80%. Nevertheless metropolitan opinion formers tend to hold these in sneering contempt.  The Tories traditionally champion the countryside and Labour the urban agenda but in the main suburbs have escaped the attention of policy-makers. Academic sociology commonly looks at problems to approach them in problem-solving terms. Yet suburbs are seen as a little bit naff and pretty twee but because they are regarded as fairly self-sufficient they are distinctly unsexy as a cultural or political prospect.

Suburbs come in many shapes and sizes from 1930s ribbon development semis, garden suburbs, the grand Victorian affairs of brick-built villas for the carriage classes and council estate suburbia. We can all probably think of examples. They are however all reviled by the urban elite. The runaway hit Inbetweeners Movie opens with narrator Will describing how suburbia is “safe, comforting, stifling, boring… I can’t wait to f***ing leave”. It’s a sentiment repeated stated throughout popular culture –  George Orwell’s Coming Up For Air for example also implies that suburbs are about narrow mindedness and small-c conservatism.

Part of the suburban attraction was as places of possibilities bridging the rural idyll of country with convenience of the city – often with handy road and rail links. The Metroland poetry of Betjamin is well known and a recent exhibition at the London Transport Museum displayed kitschy inter-war posters with phrases promising punters that they could leave behind the ills of the city and find true happiness and tranquillity in Edgware/ Hounslow etc.

Given the derision heaped on suburbia and the way that the word “suburban” is pejorative it’s easily forgotten that suburbia was conceived of in optimism – whether by speculative builders with their wooden sunshine gates or the corporation suburbia of homes fit for heroes for those who had fought returning from the Great War.

Twenty first century suburbia is not what it was previously though. Suburbia is feeling the pinch and cannot afford to be smug with the present downturn. Behind the clichés about neurotically houseproud suburbanites twitching behind their net curtains some of our suburbs are not wearing well 80-odd or even 100+ years after their original development. High street shops were once a sign of the viable suburb and consumerism/ keeping up with the Joneses was seem as intrinsic to suburban lifestyles. The notion of “boarded up Britain” however captures the stark reality of unlet shops in many suburban centres.

In some neighbourhoods ethnic commerce has injected life into decaying localities. South Korean shops have stopped the atrophy of the New Malden district of Kingston upon Thames. Here another suburban stereotype is turned on its head. The notion of “white flight” was another unstated driver of suburban drift. Yet we are seeing “brown flight” with progressive outward diffusion of minorities frequently along familiar arterial passages – eg from Brixton to Croydon (Caribbeans) or Bethnal Green to Ilford (Bangladeshis). Jon Cruddas has enthused about how his Dagenham seat is the most rapidly changing constituency in the UK with east Europeans and Africans making the same journeys that old eastenders did previously.

In short many natural Labour voters have located to the suburbs; these areas are far from outposts. Even before Boris’ prediction of future benefit changes ushering in Kosovo-style ethnic cleansing, gentrification priced many inner-cities out of reach of the average person. Indeed house-prices everywhere, particularly in a post-imperial super-diverse global metropolis and megacity of London have made much housing everywhere unobtainable. The average age of a first time buyer is now 37. On a traditional 25 year mortgage… well you do the math.

Labour needs to put the suburbs at the centre of its strategy as they are now the political cockpits that matter and will deliver or deny electoral success on 2015.

Dr Rupa Huq is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Kingston University and author of the forthcoming book ‘On the Edge: the contested cultures of English Suburbia’.

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Suburban seats in this area are already all Labour. Whether that means others can learn from us, I don’t know

  • DanMcCurry

    In the south you can define the safe seats simply by drawing lines around the inner cities. What Rupa says is that the rest of the conurbations are a hotpotch of different types, rather than a single type.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    She doesn’t say that though. She suggests there’s some sort of new development taking place where, shock, Labour voters may live in the suburbs – well that might be new for London or the South East but it’s old hat everywhere else.

Latest

  • News Miliband speaks out on anti-semitic abuse targeted at Luciana Berger – and calls on social media companies to act

    Miliband speaks out on anti-semitic abuse targeted at Luciana Berger – and calls on social media companies to act

    As we reported last week, Labour MP and Shadow Minister Luciana Berger has been the victim of a sustained torrent of disgusting online anti-semtic abuse. Ed Miliband has hit out at Berger’s abusers today, calling on social media companies to be more proactive in tackling sustained, orchestrated abuse. He told Jewish News: “The anti-Semitic abuse that Luciana Berger has experienced over recent days is utterly appalling and has absolutely no place in our country. We must have no tolerance for this vile […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers

    The debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers

    Big numbers abound in housing debates and rightly so. Two-hundred thousand new homes – the number the Labour frontbench has committed to building annually – is a response to the housing crisis that is starting to approach the scale we need. But the debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers. To make the point, look at the extreme case of ‘buy-to-leave’ homes that are bought off-plan as investors’ latest fancy and sit there empty in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The mansion tax is a progressive tax and Labour in London should support it

    The mansion tax is a progressive tax and Labour in London should support it

    For those of us who believe in progressive taxation the last few weeks in London Labour have been pretty dismal. We seem to have an array of Labour MPs (mainly wannabe London mayoral candidates) and council leaders rushing to the press denouncing the proposed mansion tax as a’ tax on London’ (or if they were more honest a tax on the rich parts of London). Yes the promotion of the Mansion Tax has been inept and it would more accurate […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It’s time to put the Green Belt back on the table

    It’s time to put the Green Belt back on the table

    The UK’s housing crisis has finally been recognised across the political spectrum as an issue that needs urgent attention. Yet despite this consensus, political inertia on housebuilding has seen subsequent governments fail to create policies that address the issue coherently and strategically. Labour’s recent Lyons Review demonstrates a commitment to house-building, with a target of constructing 200,000 homes a year. Yet while the Review recognises that the housing crisis is not evenly spread, requiring different solutions in different places, there is […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland ASLEF backs Neil Findlay for Scottish Labour leader

    ASLEF backs Neil Findlay for Scottish Labour leader

    Neil Findlay has become the first Scottish Labour leadership candidate to pick up Trade Union support. Rail union ASLEF have backed the MSP this afternoon, becoming the first union to formally endorse a candidate (although it looks like Unite will back Findlay too). Their General Secretary Mick Whelan released the following statement: “We are supporting Neil Findlay in his bid to become leader of the Scottish Labour Party and, we hope, First Minister in 2016, because he has the character, […]

    Read more →