What do we do with a problem like suburbia?

November 14, 2012 7:48 pm

The political pulse of the nation has bene defined variously over the years by  pollsters and strategists: Mondeo Man (1992), Middle England (1997) and the squeezed middle (as trademarked by Ed Miliband) are all really are about the same thing though: suburban voters hailing not from the heart of our throbbing cities but instead from around their edges.

The majority of Brits now live in suburbs; on some estimates upwards of 80%. Nevertheless metropolitan opinion formers tend to hold these in sneering contempt.  The Tories traditionally champion the countryside and Labour the urban agenda but in the main suburbs have escaped the attention of policy-makers. Academic sociology commonly looks at problems to approach them in problem-solving terms. Yet suburbs are seen as a little bit naff and pretty twee but because they are regarded as fairly self-sufficient they are distinctly unsexy as a cultural or political prospect.

Suburbs come in many shapes and sizes from 1930s ribbon development semis, garden suburbs, the grand Victorian affairs of brick-built villas for the carriage classes and council estate suburbia. We can all probably think of examples. They are however all reviled by the urban elite. The runaway hit Inbetweeners Movie opens with narrator Will describing how suburbia is “safe, comforting, stifling, boring… I can’t wait to f***ing leave”. It’s a sentiment repeated stated throughout popular culture –  George Orwell’s Coming Up For Air for example also implies that suburbs are about narrow mindedness and small-c conservatism.

Part of the suburban attraction was as places of possibilities bridging the rural idyll of country with convenience of the city – often with handy road and rail links. The Metroland poetry of Betjamin is well known and a recent exhibition at the London Transport Museum displayed kitschy inter-war posters with phrases promising punters that they could leave behind the ills of the city and find true happiness and tranquillity in Edgware/ Hounslow etc.

Given the derision heaped on suburbia and the way that the word “suburban” is pejorative it’s easily forgotten that suburbia was conceived of in optimism – whether by speculative builders with their wooden sunshine gates or the corporation suburbia of homes fit for heroes for those who had fought returning from the Great War.

Twenty first century suburbia is not what it was previously though. Suburbia is feeling the pinch and cannot afford to be smug with the present downturn. Behind the clichés about neurotically houseproud suburbanites twitching behind their net curtains some of our suburbs are not wearing well 80-odd or even 100+ years after their original development. High street shops were once a sign of the viable suburb and consumerism/ keeping up with the Joneses was seem as intrinsic to suburban lifestyles. The notion of “boarded up Britain” however captures the stark reality of unlet shops in many suburban centres.

In some neighbourhoods ethnic commerce has injected life into decaying localities. South Korean shops have stopped the atrophy of the New Malden district of Kingston upon Thames. Here another suburban stereotype is turned on its head. The notion of “white flight” was another unstated driver of suburban drift. Yet we are seeing “brown flight” with progressive outward diffusion of minorities frequently along familiar arterial passages – eg from Brixton to Croydon (Caribbeans) or Bethnal Green to Ilford (Bangladeshis). Jon Cruddas has enthused about how his Dagenham seat is the most rapidly changing constituency in the UK with east Europeans and Africans making the same journeys that old eastenders did previously.

In short many natural Labour voters have located to the suburbs; these areas are far from outposts. Even before Boris’ prediction of future benefit changes ushering in Kosovo-style ethnic cleansing, gentrification priced many inner-cities out of reach of the average person. Indeed house-prices everywhere, particularly in a post-imperial super-diverse global metropolis and megacity of London have made much housing everywhere unobtainable. The average age of a first time buyer is now 37. On a traditional 25 year mortgage… well you do the math.

Labour needs to put the suburbs at the centre of its strategy as they are now the political cockpits that matter and will deliver or deny electoral success on 2015.

Dr Rupa Huq is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Kingston University and author of the forthcoming book ‘On the Edge: the contested cultures of English Suburbia’.

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Suburban seats in this area are already all Labour. Whether that means others can learn from us, I don’t know

  • DanMcCurry

    In the south you can define the safe seats simply by drawing lines around the inner cities. What Rupa says is that the rest of the conurbations are a hotpotch of different types, rather than a single type.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    She doesn’t say that though. She suggests there’s some sort of new development taking place where, shock, Labour voters may live in the suburbs – well that might be new for London or the South East but it’s old hat everywhere else.

Latest

  • Comment As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    Ed Miliband has tackled the issue of his perceived image problem. Rather than embarrassingly excuse himself or convince the public he is something he is not, he has embraced his own persona, accepting it in order to extinguish the ongoing media analysis of who he is rather than what he stands for. This move shows courage, political prowess and most of all, it’s set the stage for next year’s election to be about policy rather than personalities. I cannot tell […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Yesterday, David Cameron offered an ominous threat to people who are deemed to be ‘illegal immigrants’, when he said “we will find you and make sure you are sent back to the country you came from.”  Who knew he meant this literally?  This announcement was worrying enough in itself – such a threat demonises immigrants and ignores the many reasons people might be in the UK illegally – but the PM decided to take his intimidating statement one step further. Cameron, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Fireworks, champagne corks popping and rare mashups of Hallelujah and Ode to Joy were heard echoing down the corridors from staffrooms across England and Wales in response to the news that Michael Gove had at long last been sacked as Secretary of State for Education. Forget the unpopularity of his policies, his mishandling of the scandal over suspected attempts to indoctrinate Birmingham’s children to Islamic extremism or his inability to work with anyone from teachers to the Home Secretary – […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    The Electoral Commission’s annual report of party finances has been published for 2013, and it turns out that Labour actually raised more money than the Conservatives last year – by almost £8 million. Labour raised £33.4m, while the Tories raised just £25.4m. As George Eaton points out, over at the New Statesman, much of Labour’s advantage comes from short money (the money opposition parties receive from the state). However, this only amounts to £6.9m, meaning Labour still raised roughly an […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We need a Mayor who offers London serious alternatives

    We need a Mayor who offers London serious alternatives

     Speaking at the launch of Labour’s summer campaign last week Ed Miliband said “We need a new leadership: Leadership that thinks deeply and offers creative, new ideas. Leadership that seeks to be faithful to principle, even when it’s hard to do. Leadership that listens and cares.” His eyes, of course, are set on the general election but he could have been talking about the London mayoral campaign. This time next year a very short primary season will be in full […]

    Read more →