What do we do with a problem like suburbia?

November 14, 2012 7:48 pm

The political pulse of the nation has bene defined variously over the years by  pollsters and strategists: Mondeo Man (1992), Middle England (1997) and the squeezed middle (as trademarked by Ed Miliband) are all really are about the same thing though: suburban voters hailing not from the heart of our throbbing cities but instead from around their edges.

The majority of Brits now live in suburbs; on some estimates upwards of 80%. Nevertheless metropolitan opinion formers tend to hold these in sneering contempt.  The Tories traditionally champion the countryside and Labour the urban agenda but in the main suburbs have escaped the attention of policy-makers. Academic sociology commonly looks at problems to approach them in problem-solving terms. Yet suburbs are seen as a little bit naff and pretty twee but because they are regarded as fairly self-sufficient they are distinctly unsexy as a cultural or political prospect.

Suburbs come in many shapes and sizes from 1930s ribbon development semis, garden suburbs, the grand Victorian affairs of brick-built villas for the carriage classes and council estate suburbia. We can all probably think of examples. They are however all reviled by the urban elite. The runaway hit Inbetweeners Movie opens with narrator Will describing how suburbia is “safe, comforting, stifling, boring… I can’t wait to f***ing leave”. It’s a sentiment repeated stated throughout popular culture –  George Orwell’s Coming Up For Air for example also implies that suburbs are about narrow mindedness and small-c conservatism.

Part of the suburban attraction was as places of possibilities bridging the rural idyll of country with convenience of the city – often with handy road and rail links. The Metroland poetry of Betjamin is well known and a recent exhibition at the London Transport Museum displayed kitschy inter-war posters with phrases promising punters that they could leave behind the ills of the city and find true happiness and tranquillity in Edgware/ Hounslow etc.

Given the derision heaped on suburbia and the way that the word “suburban” is pejorative it’s easily forgotten that suburbia was conceived of in optimism – whether by speculative builders with their wooden sunshine gates or the corporation suburbia of homes fit for heroes for those who had fought returning from the Great War.

Twenty first century suburbia is not what it was previously though. Suburbia is feeling the pinch and cannot afford to be smug with the present downturn. Behind the clichés about neurotically houseproud suburbanites twitching behind their net curtains some of our suburbs are not wearing well 80-odd or even 100+ years after their original development. High street shops were once a sign of the viable suburb and consumerism/ keeping up with the Joneses was seem as intrinsic to suburban lifestyles. The notion of “boarded up Britain” however captures the stark reality of unlet shops in many suburban centres.

In some neighbourhoods ethnic commerce has injected life into decaying localities. South Korean shops have stopped the atrophy of the New Malden district of Kingston upon Thames. Here another suburban stereotype is turned on its head. The notion of “white flight” was another unstated driver of suburban drift. Yet we are seeing “brown flight” with progressive outward diffusion of minorities frequently along familiar arterial passages – eg from Brixton to Croydon (Caribbeans) or Bethnal Green to Ilford (Bangladeshis). Jon Cruddas has enthused about how his Dagenham seat is the most rapidly changing constituency in the UK with east Europeans and Africans making the same journeys that old eastenders did previously.

In short many natural Labour voters have located to the suburbs; these areas are far from outposts. Even before Boris’ prediction of future benefit changes ushering in Kosovo-style ethnic cleansing, gentrification priced many inner-cities out of reach of the average person. Indeed house-prices everywhere, particularly in a post-imperial super-diverse global metropolis and megacity of London have made much housing everywhere unobtainable. The average age of a first time buyer is now 37. On a traditional 25 year mortgage… well you do the math.

Labour needs to put the suburbs at the centre of its strategy as they are now the political cockpits that matter and will deliver or deny electoral success on 2015.

Dr Rupa Huq is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Kingston University and author of the forthcoming book ‘On the Edge: the contested cultures of English Suburbia’.

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I don’t think the ‘suburbs’ as a concept for a target electoral group makes any sense and I think this piece is quite London/SE/Big-City centric and I’m not sure the conclusions apply outside those areas.

    Leave London and go to a new-town in say Essex or the Midlands, these have lots of suburban development and lots of different suburbs all with very different socio-economic groups often reflecting their history so typically who built them; council built or speculative developer/privately-owned.

    Sure the residents all live in suburbs and they will have some shared concerns as all people do but it seems naive to expect the families in the executive detached homes in the private housing estate are going to have the same concerns and priorities to the ones living in the former council estate.

    Living in the suburbs is not a bond of common socio-economic status, concerns or political outlook.

    Also, for many the suburb remains an aspiration, a lot of regional towns and cities have no urban elite, there is no great urban lifestyle to aspire to and urban living is likely to be a motley selection of cramped Victorian terraces or over-priced, small modern flats in a struggling town or city centre. Though the suburbs may be feeling the strain, in many areas they may remain more attractive than the urban alternative.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Suburban seats in this area are already all Labour. Whether that means others can learn from us, I don’t know

  • DanMcCurry

    In the south you can define the safe seats simply by drawing lines around the inner cities. What Rupa says is that the rest of the conurbations are a hotpotch of different types, rather than a single type.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    She doesn’t say that though. She suggests there’s some sort of new development taking place where, shock, Labour voters may live in the suburbs – well that might be new for London or the South East but it’s old hat everywhere else.

Latest

  • Featured Jowell confirms she will seek Labour nomination for London Mayor

    Jowell confirms she will seek Labour nomination for London Mayor

    Dame Tessa Jowell, widely seen as a Labour frontrunner for London Mayor, has confirmed she will seek the party nomination to run in 2016. Speaking to a Labour fundraiser in Ealing, west London tonight, Jowell said that when the selection race starts in May next year she will give it her “best shot” – but won’t make any formal announcement until then. According to people at the fundraiser, the Dulwich and West Norwood MP told party members: “I keep being […]

    Read more →
  • News Watson criticises changes to parliamentary selections, as making it “more likely special advisers will be selected”

    Watson criticises changes to parliamentary selections, as making it “more likely special advisers will be selected”

    Tom Watson has criticised Ed Miliband’s decision to take responsibility for choosing the shortlists for Labour parliamentary selections as of 11th December. The reform  was signed off by the Labour national executive committee (NEC) earlier in the week – and it gives an NEC selection panel the power to choose the shortlist that is then put to the local party in question. Watson, who was previously Labour’s campaign co-ordinator said: “It is remarkably early for the leader’s office to take […]

    Read more →
  • News Commons pass vote on Clive Efford’s NHS bill

    Commons pass vote on Clive Efford’s NHS bill

    The Private Member’s Bill brought forward by backbencher Clive Efford passed its first vote in the Commons today, by 241 votes to 18. While the opposition benches were almost full, there were a distinct lack of Government MPs in Westminster for the debate: The Labour MPs who turned out in force were joined by ex-Conservatives UKIP MPs Douglas Carswell and Mark Reckless, who were both voted in favour of the bill – which would repeal aspects of the 2012 Health […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Here’s our opportunity: the policies people want are real Labour policies

    Here’s our opportunity: the policies people want are real Labour policies

    There are a couple of very basic facts that underpin Scottish politics at the moment. Simply put, people are fed up and they’re angry. They’re fed up of business as usual in politics and of a system that means they work hard for very little while those who already have the most get more. They’re angry with a political establishment that’s seen as out of touch and just not listening as people on the ground struggle. The question we have […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Carswell, Farage and Reckless – stock brokers and merchant bankers, not champions of the working class

    Carswell, Farage and Reckless – stock brokers and merchant bankers, not champions of the working class

    We knew Mark Reckless had a brass neck. You’d have to have one to show your face again after you fell over blind drunk in the Commons on practically your first week in the job. Which, by the way, doesn’t bode well for him when it comes to keeping up with Nige in the pub after work. But I didn’t think even the Rochester rebel would have the nerve to claim the Chartists (and the Levellers, and the Suffragettes) for […]

    Read more →