What would a One Nation recovery look like?

November 14, 2012 7:00 am

After the longest double recession since the Second World War, the economy is growing again. Whilst a growing economy is obviously better than a contracting one, the UK is far from out of the woods.  Two and half million people are out of work, one third of them have out of work for over a year, three million are ‘under-employed’ unable to get the hours they want, real wages have been falling for almost three years now, youth unemployment remains around the one million mark and the longer term picture is of an economy that has barely grown for two years.

Now is not the time to break out the bunting and declare the crisis over.

Since the fall of Northern Rock, over five years ago, the media have become so used to bad economic news that the bar for success has been set low. Any level of growth is now seemingly hailed as a victory for the Government and a vindication of its policies. In reality the ‘recovery’ is far from secure and as long as the squeeze on living standards persists this won’t feel like a recovery to most people.

The challenge facing the country is actually two-fold and runs much deeper than simply generating growth. We need not only to get the economy moving again, but to generate the ‘right’ kind of growth.  We can’t simply return to business as usual, instead we need to build a new economy.

In the years before the crash things started to go seriously wrong in the UK economy. Growth became more and more concentrated in too few sectors and too few regions. The gains from this growth were increasingly captured by too few people.

In the five years between 2003 and 2008, the years before the recession, the economy grew by 11% but median real wages (the pay, after price rises, of those in the middle) were stagnant. Over three decades of a liberalised economic model, the public finances became too dependent on tax revenues associated with a booming city and a frothy property market. Household debt rose as easy credit replaced rising pay packets.  London and the South East’s share of the economy rose steadily whilst the other regions and nations fell behind. The contribution of financial services to GDP rose from around 6% in the mid 1990s to 10% on the eve of the crash. The level of investment in the real economy was weak by international standards. By 2008 we had an unbalanced economy, one that was vulnerable to sudden shocks.

Most forecasters now believe that the economy is set to grow in 2013 and 2014. The latest forecasts from the CBI have growth at 1.4% in 2013 and 2.0% in 2014. This would be a very weak result – just two years ago the Government’s own independent Office for Budget Responsibly assumed growth would be 2.9% and 2.7% in those years.

More worrying than the weak headline growth numbers though are the forecasts for living standards and unemployment. The CBI sees no rise in real wages for another 18 months and unemployment still at 2.4 million at the end of 2014. This simply isn’t good enough.

A meaningful recovery, what could be thought of as a ‘One Nation recovery’, would be marked rising real wages for those in the middle and below. The policy challenge is not just to generate growth but to generate growth that is balanced across the UK, not concentrated in too few sectors, jobs rich and which doesn’t see most of the rewards flowing to those at the top.

Such growth won’t be achieved just by relying on the old levers of fiscal and monetary policy (important as they undoubtedly are), instead it will require wide spread reforms to the structure of the banking system, corporate governance, skills and training systems, a modern industrial policy, steps to support green growth and wider set of government interventions into how the labour market works to ensure we are generating the kind of better paying, higher skilled jobs that we need.

The debate now has to be about not just how we get the economy moving again but how we ensure that we get a better balanced, more resilient, fairer economy where the benefits of growth aren’t captured by those at the top.

Duncan Weldon is a Senior Economist at the TUC

This piece forms part of Jon Cruddas’s Guest Edit of LabourList

  • Mr Arthur Cook

    A “One Nation recovery” would have one simple principle to guide thinking.
    This is that the economy is there to serve the people. It rejects the notion that the people are a “human resources” and a market which exists to serve the economy.
    It would abandon the Thatcher and Blairite neo-liberal mantra that “private is best” and recognise that “public-private” is simply a means of pouring taxpayers money into corporate pockets who then export their profits and a means of capturing a virtual monopoly which can then be used to fleece the powerless consumer and again export the profits. It would have an economy which recognises that coffee shops serve better coffee when their are 5 competing on the high street and recognise that “competition” and “private enterpise” in education and care of the elderly leaves the vulnerable exposed to minimum-waged untrained uncaring people who don’t want to do the job but have no choice because their purpose for being there is to earn profits for “Care-U-like co”
    Message for (New?) Labour. Forget “rebranding”…”marketing” and “communicating the message”. Before you start this you’d better ensure that you actually have a new message rather than a recycled Blaire agenda which failed and got you kicked out last time. Time for a change of direction NOT a new wrapper!

Latest

  • Comment Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    So Compass holds a debate about the relevance, or not, of tactical voting in the run up May and straight away John Spellar MP and then Luke Akehurst are on to us. John accused us of calling on people ‘not to vote Labour”, Luke says we are ‘naïve’. Well first lets be clear: we have set up the space on our website for a debate; we have one article for tactical voting and one against. We wanted to see what […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Yvette Cooper has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to exploit concerns about immigration rather than attempting to come up with practical policies. The Shadow Home Secretary also derided UKIP for getting themselves in a “ridiculous tangle” on the issue – last week a spokesperson for the party said they would introduce a net migration target of 50,000, while Farage today claims that it is not party policy. This follows Ed Miliband attacking David Cameron for missing his 2010 immigration promises […]

    Read more →
  • Featured PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    There are only three PMQs left until the election. Three more of these turgid, unattractive, unedifying and borderline pointless sessions to sit through before May. If this is the highlight of the Parliamentary week then Parliament can’t prorogue quick enough, frankly. Evidently many MPs feel the same, judging by the wide open spaces on the green benches this lunchtime. After a few minutes MPs had all spaced themselves out a little bit to make the place look a bit less […]

    Read more →
  • News Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Burnham announces charities should be “preferred provider” for NHS services

    Andy Burnham, Shadow Health Secretary, has said that charities should be the “preferred provider” of NHS services. He has said that Labour would introduce legislation, to get rid of parts of the contentious 2012 Health and Social Care Act, that would mean not-for-profit organisations would be seen as the “preferred provider” for the NHS. Contracts would be five or ten year agreements. This is part of Labour’s plan for health and social care. Speaking at the Association of Chief Executives […]

    Read more →
  • News Incomes on the rise, but not yet back to levels when Labour left office

    Incomes on the rise, but not yet back to levels when Labour left office

    Incomes have returned to pre-recession levels, according to new research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), but have not yet reached the all-time highs that existed at the time of the last election. Much of Labour’s election campaign is based on the fall in living standards under the current Government, and the party says today’s report confirms that people are worse off now than in 2010. The IFS say that it was not the decline of wages following 2010 […]

    Read more →