Why is Labour not using the business community against the Tories?

November 20, 2012 9:48 am

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

There are three key areas where Labour should be making common cause with British businesses against this government. If done effectively, they could undermine David Cameron’s central narrative that he knows what is best for Britain over Ed Miliband.

Broadly speaking, British businesses are opposed to Cameron’s highly restrictive and bungling immigration policies; they want a sustainable energy policy that also deals with climate change by investing in renewable energy; they fear Britain’s exit from the EU would hurt their prospects.

Each of these areas has huge implications for job creation, national infrastructure and energy, and economic growth. Businesses are increasingly frustrated that this government is putting narrow ideology over jobs and growth.

The financial press is full of scorn and ridicule. In October The Economist called immigration the Tories’ barmiest policy and told Cameron to “wake up”. The Financial Times has similarly railed against restrictive immigration policies and pointed out how they’re harming growth.

On the environment too there is similar anguish. In opposition Cameron told the press: “I want to make my position on this absolutely clear. We are not going to drop the environmental agenda in an economic downturn.” Yet that is precisely what Cameron has done, lamented The Economist.

‘Go green or we quit Britain’, splashed the front page of The Times in October. Today, 21 major investors controlling over $21 trillion of assets tell George Osborne to take climate change seriously. Business leaders in the United States have also been saying the same to President Obama. The Economist too has lamented Cameron abandoning his promises before the election on green energy.

The same applies to Europe. Yesterday’s speech by Ed Miliband to the CBI on the EU was warmly received because they almost entirely agree with them. Business leaders are now getting agitated over the EU-exit talk too.

In each case Labour’s approach is sensible, driven by evidence and morally right. Conservative policy in contrast is muddled, hinders our economy and driven by narrow ideology. It illustrates Cameron in his true nature: a man who has broken promises and put British jobs and economic security at risk because he is too weak to face down rebellious backbenchers.

And yet… something is missing. Despite the cacophony of anguish amongst British businesses, it doesn’t feel like Labour is taking full advantage of these opportunities. Ed Miliband has belatedly made a speech about the EU and the economy, and has said little about the energy bill and restrictive immigration policies.

Don’t get me wrong: there has been a constant barrage of press releases from shadow ministers on these areas. But they are not breaking through. It doesn’t look like the party is leading the charge and constantly hammering the government over them.

Criticisms of the government, such as those mentioned above, feel very sporadic and ad hoc. Plus, the Libdems always manage to place themselves firmly against the Tories on these issues without doing any heavy lifting in practice. They have been out-manoeuvred and pushed aside every step of the way without consequence.

It’s time for Labour to lead the charge more strongly on these issues, and work with businesses to drive them forward. It would not only benefit the country but also help Labour’s agenda immensely.

  • http://twitter.com/Shinsei1967 Nick Reid

    “British businesses fear Britain’s exit from the EU would hurt their prospects.”

    To be fair it is really only big businesses who are pro-EU. The SME sector is largely opposed (in the same way as the general population).

    The CBI and FTSE100 CEOs have always been pro-EU and they are probably the only group in the UK that would still consider joining the Euro.

    Basically the raft of EU legislation on maternity leave, dismissal etc that causes small businesses such a cost and a headache is of no consequence to the likes of Vodafone with its tens of thousands of staff to fill gaps and HR depts to do the paperwork.

    However FTSE100 CEOs with their still ridiculously large salaries (for poor performance) and questionable tax policies probably aren’t the people Labour want to be seen to be associated with at the moment.

  • Forlornehope

    The problem is quite simply credibility. Nobody would really believe in Ed Miliband mounting a white charger on behalf of business; it just won’t wash. Labour needs a straightforward message which should be that we will spend more on public services and benefits than the LibCons. We have to accept that we cannot do this by borrowing or just by taxing “the rich”; it means that people on and above media income will have to pay more tax. That choice needs to be put to the British people and until Labour starts putting it, everything else is just hot air.

  • David B

    The SME sector is terrified of the massive increase in borrowing required by the “Plan B” of Ed Balls. This will require the UK banks to lend money to the government, restricting further the borrowing to those SME’S and will ultimately lead to a rise in interest rates. This will restrict economic growth and force more of those SME’s out of business

    Ed is also playing a two faced game over the EU. Displaying his pro EU thinking to audiences who are already bought into that policy while playing games for political advantage when the public are watching. When he voted for a cut in the EU budget he gained political advantage by cornering Cameran into a policy he cannot deliver but raise public expectations. When this cannot be delivered the public will become more disenchanted with the EU and the calls for an in/out referendum will increase and the chances of an out voted will increase proportionately

  • AlanGiles

    Let’s be frank about it, members of the IoD, CBI etc are not natural supporters of Labour (though of course that chancer Digby Jones was tempted by the Tory-lite policies of Blair – at least for a time).

    At the moment thanks to the long-winded “policy review”, even Labour’s natural supporters and members don’t really have any firm idea of what the party would get up to back in power, so you can hardly expect conservative/Conservative businessmen to be too enthralled. Part of Labour’s current problem is that they try to be all things to all men.

  • Pingback: Did businesses lobby Boris to change his stance on the EU referendum? | Liberal Conspiracy()

  • Pingback: Ed Balls is also giving an important speech tomorrow | Liberal Conspiracy()

  • Pingback: Liberal Conspiracy: Ed Balls is also giving an important speech tomorrow | moonblogsfromsyb()

Latest

  • Comment We want to build relationships with Labour – but they need to take some bold steps

    We want to build relationships with Labour – but they need to take some bold steps

    First my credentials. I have supported Labour at every election since I was old enough to vote. I am a party member of some 30 years standing. Why then, as the General Secretary of the trade union for staff in further and higher education am I in such utter despair at the timidity of the policy offer made by Labour to the members I represent and their students? Let’s be clear, I believe the coalition’s policies have been a disaster […]

    Read more →
  • News I was “never ever complicit” in illegal rendition or torture, says Jack Straw

    I was “never ever complicit” in illegal rendition or torture, says Jack Straw

    Jack Straw has condemned the use of torture and denied being complicit in the torture of suspected terrorists, following the publication of a report in America concerning the CIA’s use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” (EITs). Straw was Labour’s Foreign Secretary from 2001 to 2006, during the foremost years of the “War on Terror” and the UK’s military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. Questions have been raised concerning what members of the British government knew about the use of EITs, but […]

    Read more →
  • Comment How not to change the constitution

    How not to change the constitution

    In this Parliament AV was rejected, Lords reform stumbled and even the Tories attempt to ‘equalise’ constituencies fell. ‘The Implications of Devolution for England’ already looks unhealthily like these other failed constitutional reforms. Nonetheless, the issue holds real dangers for Labour. Hague’s partisan and divisive Commons statement showed the Tories’ more concerned to maximise difference than to bring people together for the good of England. Yet even this couldn’t disguise Conservative divisions. In three months his Cabinet Committee failed to […]

    Read more →
  • News “Our choice is the country’s choice” – Lisa Nandy’s LabourList Christmas Lecture

    “Our choice is the country’s choice” – Lisa Nandy’s LabourList Christmas Lecture

    On Monday evening Lisa Nandy MP gave the LabourList Christmas Lecture to launch her pamphlet “Our Labour Our Communities” – you can download the pamphlet here. Here’s the text of that lecture: We’ve got five months to go until the most important General Election in a generation. And over the last year, as I’ve spent time with Labour candidates meeting and listening to people in communities as diverse as Brighton, Norwich and Calder Valley it seems to me the overwhelming […]

    Read more →
  • News Polling New Ashcroft polls shows the point where the Labour gains stop coming

    New Ashcroft polls shows the point where the Labour gains stop coming

    The latest batch of marginals polling carried out by Lord Ashcroft has been published today, and it does not bring many glad tidings for Labour. The polling covers four Labour seats: Dudley North, Great Grimsby, Plymouth Moor View and Rother Valley; eight Conservative seats: Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire, Ealing Central & Acton, Elmet & Rothwell, Harrow East, Pendle, South Swindon, Stevenage, and Warwick & Leamington; and one Green Party seat: Brighton Pavilion. All of the Conservative held seats, bar Warwick & […]

    Read more →