A disaster for students and universities alike

December 13, 2012 10:34 am

This week marks the two year anniversary of the vote in Parliament on the Tory-led government’s unnecessary and unfair decision to treble tuition fees for students to £9,000. And today UCAS published its regular ‘end of cycle’ statistics which show us the shape of student application, acceptance and entry to higher education of those starting courses this academic year – the first in which students can be charged the maximum £9,000 fee.

While there is more work to be done to fully understand how students’ and universities’ behaviour is adapting to the new system, the numbers are revealing: This year saw a fall of 54,000 students going to university compared to last year – an 11% drop. Even taking into account shifting demographics and issues with comparing different cohorts, this is a substantial reduction and exposes the deep uncertainty and disruption caused by the government’s chaotic approach to higher education.

And however you read the figures, it is clear that the consistent trend established under the last Labour government of a steady rise in people of all ages going to higher education has been stopped in its tracks.

With falling numbers attending university, how can the UK remain competitive and continue to punch above its weight across the globe with a highly skilled and educated workforce?

The Tory-led government has also ignored mature and part time learners – once considered niche cohorts but who now make up significant swathes of the student population. Too often policies have ended up being too narrowly focused on 18 year old full time students, and there was not enough consideration of the impact trebling fees would have on mature students. As a result, we have seen entries from every age group above 18 decline significantly this year. This is a cause for tremendous concern, impacting on the long-term health of our adult skills base which higher education plays a critical role in developing.

Figures for part time students don’t appear in the UCAS data but Vice Chancellors from across the sector have told me that they have seen a dramatic decline in part time students applying to their institutions. Part time provision plays an important role in raising participation, providing a flexible route in to higher education.

The numbers released this week also reveal how the chaotic and misjudged number control policies have failed, increasing uncertainty and taking out places at popular universities and auctioning them off on the basis of price, not quality. And the UCAS data this week shows the number of AAB students actually fell despite all restrictions being lifted on their recruitment by ministers, and their claims that this policy would provide high achieving students more opportunity to access higher education.

By any objective analysis, two years on we are left with the worst of all worlds as a result of the government’s higher education policies. Ministers betrayed students by trebling fees to £9,000, they created uncertainty for universities by slashing their funding and introducing the now discredited number control policies, and to add insult to injury, the Home Office’s actions now risk deterring legitimate international students to the UK which will harm the sector significantly, and which could cause real and lasting damage to the economy – we mustn’t forget that higher education is the UK’s seventh largest export.

The last two years of Tory-led Government have been a disaster for students and universities alike. I challenge them to tell us all how they plan make the next two an improvement on their poor record so far.

Shabana Mahmood MP is Shadow Minister for Higher Education

  • JoeDM

    It was, of course, Labour who first introduced fees & loans for students.

    • MonkeyBot5000

      And as many said at the time; if you introduce fees, they will inevitably rise and it will hit the poor hardest.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    So what’s the Labour alternative then? ………

    Labour had no ideological issues with shifting the cost of HE from state to student, the Tories have just gone further and faster than Labour. Would Labour shift the balance back toward state funding? Even if it meant less funding for early years provision or EMA or any of the other schemes?

    • robertcp

      My suggestion would be to replace the current fees with a graduate tax, which students would pay after they graduate. This is effectively the system that we have now, because many people will not pay back all of their fees. Increasing grants would also help.

      To be honest, I am not sure if 54,000 fewer students is a disaster for them, universities or the economy if they go into employment or training instead.

  • Hugh

    “With falling numbers attending university, how can the UK remain
    competitive and continue to punch above its weight across the globe with
    a highly skilled and educated workforce?”

    Any chance you could provide us with the research showing the rise in university students had led us to become more competitive from 1997 to 2010?

    • robertcp

      I agree Hugh. I am not sure if my History degree made the UK more competitive.

  • Dave Postles

    ‘ they created uncertainty for universities’
    No, it’s what the VCs of the Russell Group and the 94 Group wished for – as they requested from the Browne Commission. The leadership of the universities has been supine. Willetts will further undermine them by sanctioning private institutions of HE. He has already allowed £100m for support for undergraduates at these private institutions. He has reduced the criterion of the number of undergraduates for approved status. The VCs took the sugar and now they must take the pill. It’s too late.

  • robertcp

    Training skilled workers will probably be better for the UK economy than educating History graduates like me.

Latest

  • Comment Do the media fear their grip on mass communications is failing?

    Do the media fear their grip on mass communications is failing?

    A twitterstorm – actually it was more of a sonic boom – over the weekend saw more than 260,000 actively participate in #CameronMustGo. And four days on, it was still trending. It’s a great campaign. It demonstrates that Cameron is out of touch – he says he’s fixed the economy but a recent poll shows eight in ten people have felt little or no impact on their standard of living. When I first tweeted the hashtag, I was immediately told […]

    Read more →
  • News Brown was a better chancellor than Osborne is now, poll finds

    Brown was a better chancellor than Osborne is now, poll finds

    As we reported over the weekend, there are rumours circulating that Gordon Brown is going to step down as an MP. In light of this, The Times Red Box, in collaboration with YouGov, have done a poll to find out what the public thinks about the former chancellor – particularly in relation to the current one, George Osborne. When respondents were asked whether they thought Gordon Brown was a better or worse chancellor of the Exchequer than George Osborne is […]

    Read more →
  • Featured “Tory Welfare Waste” – why Reeves’ new attack line will cut through with voters

    “Tory Welfare Waste” – why Reeves’ new attack line will cut through with voters

    Rachel Reeves will make a speech today slamming the Tories’ handling of the welfare system, and will trial what looks like could potentially become a recurring line for Labour in the election run-up. “Tory Welfare Waste” is the takeaway line from today’s speech, and is likely to stick in the craw of the Tories, who have spent years trying to paint Labour as the party of profligate welfare spending. But annoying your opponents is not the only effective attack line. Fortunately, this […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured 8 questions Iain Duncan-Smith must now answer

    8 questions Iain Duncan-Smith must now answer

    In November 2011 Iain Duncan Smith promised – one million people would be on Universal Credit by April 2014. Three years on fewer than 18,000 people are receiving Universal Credit. Despite over £600million being spent on the new benefit the programme is beset by chaos, waste and delays. This afternoon Iain Duncan Smith was forced to appear before the House of Commons to answer questions about this failing programme. But once again he refused to answer the simplest of questions about his […]

    Read more →
  • Comment They left us wanting more – Gordon Brown is only the latest big beast to depart

    They left us wanting more – Gordon Brown is only the latest big beast to depart

    “Always leave them wanting more.” It’s not entirely clear who said it first, but this has become one of the more popular, if rarely achieved, political clichés. Of all the recent political leaders we might have expected to stand aside with a clamour for more ringing in his ears, Gordon Brown would not have featured prominently in discussions. Brown’s Labour leadership culminated in the party’s second worst General Election performance in the post-war era. Although he opted to remain in […]

    Read more →