A disaster for students and universities alike

December 13, 2012 10:34 am

This week marks the two year anniversary of the vote in Parliament on the Tory-led government’s unnecessary and unfair decision to treble tuition fees for students to £9,000. And today UCAS published its regular ‘end of cycle’ statistics which show us the shape of student application, acceptance and entry to higher education of those starting courses this academic year – the first in which students can be charged the maximum £9,000 fee.

While there is more work to be done to fully understand how students’ and universities’ behaviour is adapting to the new system, the numbers are revealing: This year saw a fall of 54,000 students going to university compared to last year – an 11% drop. Even taking into account shifting demographics and issues with comparing different cohorts, this is a substantial reduction and exposes the deep uncertainty and disruption caused by the government’s chaotic approach to higher education.

And however you read the figures, it is clear that the consistent trend established under the last Labour government of a steady rise in people of all ages going to higher education has been stopped in its tracks.

With falling numbers attending university, how can the UK remain competitive and continue to punch above its weight across the globe with a highly skilled and educated workforce?

The Tory-led government has also ignored mature and part time learners – once considered niche cohorts but who now make up significant swathes of the student population. Too often policies have ended up being too narrowly focused on 18 year old full time students, and there was not enough consideration of the impact trebling fees would have on mature students. As a result, we have seen entries from every age group above 18 decline significantly this year. This is a cause for tremendous concern, impacting on the long-term health of our adult skills base which higher education plays a critical role in developing.

Figures for part time students don’t appear in the UCAS data but Vice Chancellors from across the sector have told me that they have seen a dramatic decline in part time students applying to their institutions. Part time provision plays an important role in raising participation, providing a flexible route in to higher education.

The numbers released this week also reveal how the chaotic and misjudged number control policies have failed, increasing uncertainty and taking out places at popular universities and auctioning them off on the basis of price, not quality. And the UCAS data this week shows the number of AAB students actually fell despite all restrictions being lifted on their recruitment by ministers, and their claims that this policy would provide high achieving students more opportunity to access higher education.

By any objective analysis, two years on we are left with the worst of all worlds as a result of the government’s higher education policies. Ministers betrayed students by trebling fees to £9,000, they created uncertainty for universities by slashing their funding and introducing the now discredited number control policies, and to add insult to injury, the Home Office’s actions now risk deterring legitimate international students to the UK which will harm the sector significantly, and which could cause real and lasting damage to the economy – we mustn’t forget that higher education is the UK’s seventh largest export.

The last two years of Tory-led Government have been a disaster for students and universities alike. I challenge them to tell us all how they plan make the next two an improvement on their poor record so far.

Shabana Mahmood MP is Shadow Minister for Higher Education

  • JoeDM

    It was, of course, Labour who first introduced fees & loans for students.

    • MonkeyBot5000

      And as many said at the time; if you introduce fees, they will inevitably rise and it will hit the poor hardest.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    So what’s the Labour alternative then? ………

    Labour had no ideological issues with shifting the cost of HE from state to student, the Tories have just gone further and faster than Labour. Would Labour shift the balance back toward state funding? Even if it meant less funding for early years provision or EMA or any of the other schemes?

    • robertcp

      My suggestion would be to replace the current fees with a graduate tax, which students would pay after they graduate. This is effectively the system that we have now, because many people will not pay back all of their fees. Increasing grants would also help.

      To be honest, I am not sure if 54,000 fewer students is a disaster for them, universities or the economy if they go into employment or training instead.

  • Hugh

    “With falling numbers attending university, how can the UK remain
    competitive and continue to punch above its weight across the globe with
    a highly skilled and educated workforce?”

    Any chance you could provide us with the research showing the rise in university students had led us to become more competitive from 1997 to 2010?

    • robertcp

      I agree Hugh. I am not sure if my History degree made the UK more competitive.

  • Dave Postles

    ‘ they created uncertainty for universities’
    No, it’s what the VCs of the Russell Group and the 94 Group wished for – as they requested from the Browne Commission. The leadership of the universities has been supine. Willetts will further undermine them by sanctioning private institutions of HE. He has already allowed £100m for support for undergraduates at these private institutions. He has reduced the criterion of the number of undergraduates for approved status. The VCs took the sugar and now they must take the pill. It’s too late.

  • robertcp

    Training skilled workers will probably be better for the UK economy than educating History graduates like me.

Latest

  • Comment UN report shows we must take bold action on climate change

    UN report shows we must take bold action on climate change

    The Fifth Assessment report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) could not be clearer. Catastrophic climate change can be prevented if all countries, rich and poor, make the transition to a low carbon economy, and that this can be achieved without damaging economic growth. The IPCC has provided overwhelming and compelling scientific evidence that climate change is real, that it is caused by human activity and that it will have disastrous consequences if urgent action is […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland From food banks to fair pay

    From food banks to fair pay

    We all know that politicians love to talk about ‘fairness’.  Hardly anyone will disagree that people should be paid fairly for the work they do.  But scratch beneath the surface, and there are big political differences. In today’s Britain, hundreds of thousands of people don’t earn enough to feed their families without turning to food banks.  New figures released today by the Trussell Trust show that in 2013-14, their food banks gave emergency food supplies to over 913,000 people.  This […]

    Read more →
  • News Diane Abbott publicly attacks Ed Balls

    Diane Abbott publicly attacks Ed Balls

    Former shadow health minister Diane Abbott has taken to The Guardian website to launch a fairly scathing attack on the economic direction of the Labour leadership. The famously outspoken backbencher warns that if Labour “accept the coalition cuts agenda” they will not last more than a term in office. Abbott says: “Balls has a plan. He just does not feel able to spell it out to party members. It is called embracing Tory austerity.” Interestingly, no mention is made of […]

    Read more →
  • Featured The proof that Clegg’s taxpayer-funded aide is Lib Dem election strategist

    The proof that Clegg’s taxpayer-funded aide is Lib Dem election strategist

    Yesterday LabourList reported the accusations that Nick Clegg was paying his aide, Ryan Coetzee, £110,000 of taxpayers’ money to be a Lib Dem election strategist, rather than a Government aide. Today we can show you powerpoint slides, prepared by Coetzee, that prove he is doing partisan work for the Liberal Democrats. The slides, bearing the Lib Dem logo, show polling figures for the public’s feelings about the Coalition, Clegg and whether people would consider voting Lib Dem. Damningly, one slide […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Five reasons why Labour is likely to win the next general election

    Five reasons why Labour is likely to win the next general election

    On Monday this week, YouGov President Peter Kellner wrote about the ‘fundamentals that favour Cameron’ being re-elected PM in 2015. He lists some fair points, though I’ve argued before that Mr Kellner can be a bit selective in how he presents public opinion. So let me offer you a counter-point: the fundamental factors that favour Ed Miliband and the Labour party in 2015. These are the reasons why I think Labour will emerge as the largest party after the General Election […]

    Read more →