At our best, when at our oldest

17th December, 2012 5:17 pm

Last Friday, the Archbishop of Canterbury called our attention to the place and contribution of older people in society by sponsoring a House of Lords debate that lasted five hours. It was a wise invitation in that this is central to the changes we need to make in our understanding of, and action in, the world.

The debate drew my attention to the fact that the Lords is unique in our politics in providing a place where older people, women and men with distinction and experience can have their voices heard – where they have a place and can make a contribution.  It is vital that this respect for skills, experience and accomplishment is retained in our conception of the Lords. (If we do ever have an elected second chamber, perhaps an age threshold should be set based upon vocation rather than location? That could be good way of keeping the Lords’ distinctiveness within a framework of democratic reform.)

The hard reality we need to look at, entering into a world with less money, is that in Britain we have not treated older people very well for a long time; within a marketing environment that promotes youngness and newness as overriding virtues. This took a step change under Margaret Thatcher when an entire culture of work and skill, carried in the shipyards and mines, was abandoned to its fate. And priorities didn’t change very much under successive Labour governments, which concentrated more on the skills of the young developed by modern methods.

If we view our skills shortage as a ‘resource’ problem then we take action to allocate and train in order to redirect the missing factors. We encourage immigration and engage in retraining programmes for example, to fill the gap. Far from being a burden or a problem, older people are a constitutive part of our inheritance and an undiscovered treasure through which the future can be shaped in a way that brings us together.

The Common good is a politics that seeks to conciliate estranged, divided and, indeed, hostile interests. There is a significant body of literature that sees older people as having at best, too large a share of existing assets and at worst, as a drain on resources. We are living longer, with a larger older population in Britain and an inadequate system of care. All the warning lights are flashing, but if approached in the right way this could be the making of us.

We have a problem with skills, vocation and the ethics of work, which older people are a crucial part of transforming. If we are to redeem the abandonment of the old then the renewal of vocational institutions, and the role of older people in the education and training of the young is vital. The idea of lifelong learning has become a cliché but if accompanied by the idea of lifelong teaching it comes back to life, because life itself is a great teacher. With experience of work, and a culture of skill, tenacity, solidarity and courage, older people have the values we need.

By not being bamboozled by university degree entry and academic aspiration when it is beside the point we can integrate the generations in the renewal of value. We need the retired ward sisters in the training colleges teaching young nurses the centrality of care and the importance of honesty. We need the discarded shipbuilders back in the colleges training for new maritime technology. Older people are our greatest teachers but we exclude them from passing it on, from shaping the future. If we change that we will have made a great contribution to national renewal.

There is a lot else to do to broker an inter-generational society. Above all however, we must have a commitment to status and honour for older people to show us how to survive and flourish in the modern world.

Lord Maurice Glasman is an academic, social thinker and backbench Labour Peer in the House of Lords. This piece first appeared at the Labour Lords blog.

  • Dave Postles

    Now more than ever, we need to focus on the young. Many of ‘us old uns’ have had a pretty good innings. By all means, make provision for those who are old and in need, but forget about those of us able to fend for ourselves. The young need our help more than any other cohort and they are not responsible for any of this mess.

  • Martinay

    There is a parallel between the increasing recognition of older people as a benefit and the decreasing attachment to neo-liberalism in society. It’s a parallel that I am surprised Maurice does not make.

    It corresponds to the simultaneous rise of neo-liberalism that was apparent by the late 70s and the rise of what was called ‘youth culture’.

    Youth culture was short-termist (a quick fix of one kind or another) just as neo-liberal economics and politics is short-termist. Despite its brevity, we all had to aspire to act young.

    “Age culture” is longer-term by definition (you have to wait quite a few decades to get there) and by nature (quick fixes are out, considered responses are in)

    Rather like responsible capitalism.

Latest

  • News Tony Lloyd confirms he wants to be Labour’s candidate for Manchester mayor

    Tony Lloyd confirms he wants to be Labour’s candidate for Manchester mayor

    Greater Manchester police and crime commissioner Tony Lloyd has ended weeks of speculation and confirmed he wants to take the post of mayor in the city-region. Lloyd, who is already serving as interim mayor of Greater Manchester, is the first party figure to confirm he will seek selection as Labour’s candidate. His announcement could set up an exciting battle with Sir Richard Leese, leader of Manchester city council, who may also run for the nomination. The role of elected mayor […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Trade Union Action Week Unions The Tories want to smash the unions and this is how they plan to do it

    The Tories want to smash the unions and this is how they plan to do it

    As a trade union representing ordinary, decent, hard-working men and women doing a safety-critical job to ensure that passengers on Britain’s railways get the first class public transport they deserve, we have serious fears about what this government is proposing. If the Trade Union Bill is passed by the House of Lords, we will face even more restrictions before our members can take action which is legally protected. A ballot will require not just a majority of those who vote, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Trade Union Action Week Unions TU Bill an onslaught on civil liberties

    TU Bill an onslaught on civil liberties

    The Human Rights dimension of the campaign against the Trade Union Bill received a fillip this week from the International Labour Organisation (ILO).  In response to a TUC submission, they: Expressed serious concerns the 40 per cent threshold breaches ILO standards Called on the government to exclude transport and education services from the 40% thresh-hold requirements in the Bill.  Called on the government to consider modernising methods of balloting. Criticised the proposed removal of the ban on agency workers to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Uncategorized Tory promises on equal pay are a lot of hot air

    Tory promises on equal pay are a lot of hot air

    Last summer David Cameron declared that he would “end the gender pay gap in a generation” and made the welcome announcement that his government would introduce measures to compel large businesses to publish their gender pay gap. Unfortunately, just like Cameron’s claim in 2010 that he would lead the “greenest government ever” this has proved to be hot air. Today, more than six months after the gender pay gap reporting regulations were announced (and on a Friday when Parliament is […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Hopes rise for a Government u-turn on cuts to Opposition funding

    Hopes rise for a Government u-turn on cuts to Opposition funding

    Labour today appeared closer to forcing a Government climbdown on the planned cuts to funding for Opposition political parties. Ministers have now pledged to open a consultation on the proposed 19 per cent cut to Short Money, which would have meant Labour losing an estimated £1.2m a year. The move, which was buried in the small print of the Autumn Statement, has been branded an assault on democracy when taken with the further £6m hit expected to result from the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit