Blacklisting demonstrates the extent to which Cameron hates the Trade Unions

20th December, 2012 2:03 pm

The consequences of Lord Justice Leveson’s report will be debated long into the New Year by some sections of the broadcast media whilst the print papers will probably look to avoid any mention of the esteemed Judge’s name. That’s not surprising. Nor was the fact that the Prime Minister surrendered to Fleet Street even before the ink had dried on a report that carried the personal authority of – well – the Prime Minister himself, and had cost the taxpayer £5.6 million.

Perhaps what is surprising is how much of Leveson’s report has fallen by the way side. I was particularly interested in his recommendation which suggested that the newspaper industry work harder to more accurately define the “public interest”. As newspaper sales continue to dwindle, they must find a way of recapturing what it is that truly resonates with the public.

I believe that Fleet Street’s finest are at their best when they are exposing corruption, fraud and illegality, not when it is uncovering stories of who slept with whom and who lost weight versus who gained it and other such pap.

The MPs’ expenses scandal was a first class example. It shocked the country, it changed the culture of parliament and it is still making headlines three years later.

So that is why I am so shocked that an issue which has been described by one of the UK’s most respected public law professors, as “the worst human rights abuse in relation to workers” for more than half a century in Britain, is not demanding more attention of the newspaper proprietors.

Seumas Milne wrote about this issue in the Guardian. He demonstrates what I have been campaigning for in parliament through the tabling of my early day motion; blacklisting is a great wrong against hard working men and women and the Government isn’t doing a thing about it.

The very people who are supposed to protect the public are, instead, abandoning them. The previous Labour Government did pass the 2010 Blacklisting laws, but it hasn’t proved to be strong enough. But if Leveson proved that Cameron can often be too cosy with the press, Blacklisting demonstrates the extent to which he hates the Trade Unions and is willing to allow people to suffer as a result.

For those who are not as au fait with the travesty of blacklisting as others let me be clear what we are talking about.

Major UK companies have been paying annual subscriptions to ‘spying’ companies that produce lists for private sector companies which include information collected on workers. And it is not just the basic name, address, employment history either. The kind of information contained in the brief includes comments such as: “recently seen at a leftwing meeting”, “politically motivated” and “involved in a dispute” in previous jobs. The long and short is that companies are not hiring anyone they know are represented by a Trade Union because they want to be able to waive workers’ rights as and when they wish.

It is like an episode from our Cold War history and our leaders are choosing not to act.

The phone-hacking scandal revealed that illegal activity was rife in some of our newspaper newsrooms. What blacklisting research has revealed is that, as Milne articulates, the “illegality, surveillance and conspiracy is incontrovertible”. There is no ambiguity. Workers who are members of Trade Unions are being turned away from jobs – including jobs undertaking work awarded to companies through the public sector.

The truth is, the cost of blacklisting may not ever be calculated. We don’t fully know how much it is costing the economy in lost income, “enforced joblessness, family and psychological breakdown, emigration and even suicides” or even in NHS treatment.

What we need now is action. There is a tendency in Britain today, to stereotype everyone on benefits as scroungers. And yet here we have the reality; ordinary skilled workers who have worked and who want to work being told they can’t work, whilst millionaires like David Cameron and George Osborne who have never worked and simply inherited vast amounts of wealth, are sitting pretty.

Puts it into perspective doesn’t it? And it challenges the conventional orthodoxy that is used by Tories in the Chamber of the House of Commons but which only serves to reinforce the point that Ed Miliband made which is, that the people who have been blacklisted are the kind of people that Cameron will never meet and never understand.

Earlier this year I tabled an EDM regarding the need for justice for blacklisted workers that were unwillingly and unknowingly on lists ascertained by 44 construction companies.

There are some steps that should be followed urgently. Right now, the Information Commissioners Office must work far harder to seize all documentation and files relating to blacklisted workers from the Consulting Association. Only then will we know the full picture. Secondly, the Chancellor, along with Vince Cable and Iain Duncan Smith must now accept that the existing blacklisting regulations do not offer enough protection and are not fit for purpose, and that it should be a criminal offence to supply, compile, solicit or use information in connection with a prohibited list.

We know that the police and security services were complicit in compiling these lists of information on blacklisted workers that were then sold to companies for their information. In fact, we also know that the extent of corruption is much broader, with lists being compiled, not only on construction workers, but on academics and journalists as well.

Thirdly, all victims of blacklisting must be paid compensation immediately so that they can begin to rebuild their lives devastated by this practice.

Finally, I believe that we should have a full scale public inquiry into the blacklisting scandal so that there can be no cover up and we can get to the bottom of the corruption that successive governments have allowed to manifest for too long.

Blacklisting is a first class example of how the workplace has been corrupted and how those in positions of power have abused that power at the expense of the ordinary man and women in this country. We must take this issue seriously.

Steve Rotheram is the Labour MP for Liverpool Walton and member of the NEC

  • Daniel Speight

    Stick with this Steve.

  • Amber_Star

    We know you will have questions asked in PMQs etc. as often as you can! But are there no lawyers who will take their cases pro-bono? Or is there any possibility of a ‘fighting fund’ being set up which would allow us & their unions to donate enough to get the legal process started? If we don’t, then these people are in limbo until 2015 because there’s no chance of the coalition doing anything for them!

  • paul burke

    well put i remeber a few years ago they had blacklist compiled by an organation called somthing league few friends of mine got put on it never worked again hink it might of been ecnomic

  • http://www.facebook.com/dave.smith.52 Dave Smith

    Thanks for persistently raising the issue Steve – there are many blacklisted workers watching on and there are only a few MPs prepared to fight our corner.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Tolerating the undemocratic and sinister practice of illoegally holding information (some of it false) on individuals in order to prevent them from getting work. Another great ploicy from teh government that recently brought you the notion that even the most outragous behavoiur of the press cannot be regulated by law as it would “threaten freedom of speech”.
    The Tory concept of freedom is rather flexible.

Latest

  • Comment Victory is what we owe to the people we represent

    Victory is what we owe to the people we represent

    In 1963 JFK prepared (but never got to deliver) a speech attacking ‘voices preaching doctrines which apparently assume that … vituperation is as good as victory.’ Reading that last phrase recently I knew immediately what he meant. Years ago, after the 1980 local elections in the wake of Thatcher’s victory, there was a view in some quarters that, even when we won control locally, we should remain in opposition to ‘teach the electorate a lesson’. The idea was that if […]

    Read more →
  • Comment How well does Labour know its own members?

    How well does Labour know its own members?

    Reading an article on ConservativeHome provided a clear demonstration of how the Conservatives have embraced technology and have left Labour behind.  Without a clear signal of intent and without significant investment in tech, the Party will be hobbled at future elections. Fundamentally, the Party does not appear to have the level of information and detail required about its own members, let alone its voters and potential voters.  Without this it cannot motivate anyone.  The ability to tailor a pitch, an […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Corbyn promises to welcome “great talents” from all parts of the Labour party into his shadow cabinet

    Corbyn promises to welcome “great talents” from all parts of the Labour party into his shadow cabinet

    Jeremy Corbyn has said he would welcome “great talents” from all parts of the Labour party – including the Blairite wing – into his shadow cabinet if he becomes leader. In an interview with the Observer, the MP for Islington North says that he wants to have a “big tent”, including so-called Blairites and Brownites in his team. “Of course there are differences of opinion and I have to be big enough to accommodate those differences of opinion and I […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Neil Kinnock endorses Andy Burnham for Labour leader

    Neil Kinnock endorses Andy Burnham for Labour leader

    Neil Kinnock has endorsed Andy Burnham to be Labour’s next leader. The former Labour leader has written an article in the Guardian in which he argues that Burnham has “the radical values” “the experience as a campaigner and a cabinet minister” and “the credible policies” to be Labour leader. In a veiled jibe directed at Jeremy Corbyn, Kinnock also tells Labour members and supporters that the party “are not choosing the chair of a discussion group who can preside over […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Is Blue Labour the answer to Labour’s woes?

    Is Blue Labour the answer to Labour’s woes?

    What can the much-derided Blue Labour offer the party? It is a question worth asking, because the leadership contest has so far largely eschewed big ideas. Surely, losing so badly in England and being flat-out destroyed in Scotland calls for a thorough reckoning with the party’s downward trajectory from 2005 to the present – a soul-searching process which asks: what is Labour now for? Jeremy Corbyn is excelling and inspiring partly because he is the only candidate with a clear […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit