Cameron “totally unable to cope with dissenting voices” says ex-adviser

14th December, 2012 12:23 pm

A former member of David Cameron’s Business Advisory Group has taken Cameron’s handling of the group – in particular the removal of some members – rather badly, telling Sky News:

“The whole process has been abysmally handled. It has been shabby and has fomented a negative attitude to Cameron and suggests that he is totally unable to cope with dissenting voices.”

Remarkably, despite the removal of several business leaders, David Cameron has kept Google Chief Exec Eric Schmidt on the panel – even though he said earlier this week he was “proud” of Google’s tax avoidance schemes.

Nice to see whose advice Cameron values…

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      Is it really necessary to pursue your dislike for someone who merely has different views from you, to the point of making a statement like this as the first comment on a topic? I can see the link you try to make, but actually believe that it is you of the pair of you who is perhaps unable to cope with Alan.

      Alan and I are politically “many miles apart”, and probably both off the “normal” Labour spectrum to left and right, or only tenuously connected at best. But we do not have a difficulty in conversing. He is also interesting on his jazz music, and recollections of a world now mostly passed with proper engineering apprentice-ships. I find it easy to agree with him on that topic, as the need for them is self-evident.

      • aracataca

        According to my recollection you and I have also had no difficulties in ‘conversing’ despite the fact that we disagree on many matters. Indeed I remember last week engaging in a’ conversation’ so to speak about Keynesianism. However,if you had been so grossly misrepresented and subjected to such vile abuse by Giles then you might understand where I am coming from.Difference is the midwife of debate, personal abuse is its undertaker- Would you agree?

      • aracataca

        According to my recollection you and I have also had no difficulties in ‘conversing’ despite the fact that we disagree on many matters. Indeed I remember last week engaging in a’ conversation’ so to speak about Keynesianism. However,if you had been so grossly misrepresented and subjected to such vile abuse by Giles then you might understand where I am coming from.Difference is the midwife of debate, personal abuse is its undertaker- Would you agree?

        • jaime taurosangastre candelas

          Well aracataca, I recall that conversation, and I certainly have no difficulty with conversation with you, as you say despite our differences. Indeed, I am probably closer to your political position that that of Alan’s, but perhaps his gentler tone warms me to his support. I believe by the balance of all his comments that Alan is indeed a person of personal conviction, but that he also has a capacity not given to all of us – and that may include me – to deal with “equanimity” with some fairly robust responses.

          If I have missed some insult to you by Alan that causes you to think this way, I will apologise. I do not suppose everyone reads every post, so somethings can be missed.

          But I have to say, you two do seem to go on at each other quite a lot.

        • jaime taurosangastre candelas

          Well aracataca, I recall that conversation, and I certainly have no difficulty with conversation with you, as you say despite our differences. Indeed, I am probably closer to your political position that that of Alan’s, but perhaps his gentler tone warms me to his support. I believe by the balance of all his comments that Alan is indeed a person of personal conviction, but that he also has a capacity not given to all of us – and that may include me – to deal with “equanimity” with some fairly robust responses.

          If I have missed some insult to you by Alan that causes you to think this way, I will apologise. I do not suppose everyone reads every post, so somethings can be missed.

          But I have to say, you two do seem to go on at each other quite a lot.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      Is it really necessary to pursue your dislike for someone who merely has different views from you, to the point of making a statement like this as the first comment on a topic? I can see the link you try to make, but actually believe that it is you of the pair of you who is perhaps unable to cope with Alan.

      Alan and I are politically “many miles apart”, and probably both off the “normal” Labour spectrum to left and right, or only tenuously connected at best. But we do not have a difficulty in conversing. He is also interesting on his jazz music, and recollections of a world now mostly passed with proper engineering apprentice-ships. I find it easy to agree with him on that topic, as the need for them is self-evident.

  • aracataca

    Rather like Alan Giles.

  • aracataca

    This little episode reconfirms the importance of pluralism.It is a characteristic that our party must never dispense with.

  • aracataca

    This little episode reconfirms the importance of pluralism.It is a characteristic that our party must never dispense with.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    Eric Schmidt should have been given the boot for his comments about being “proud” of tax avoidance forthwith. Disgraceful.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001102865655 John Ruddy

      So much for the google motto of “Do no evil”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    Eric Schmidt should have been given the boot for his comments about being “proud” of tax avoidance forthwith. Disgraceful.

  • JoeDM

    Well, well, well. A political leader who does not like criticism. Whatever next?

    I wonder if he threw mobile phones a la Crash Gordon.

    See: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-559576/MP-claims-raging-Gordon-breaks-phones-week-hurling-wall.html

    • aracataca

      Ah the Daily Mail – a beacon of sweetness, light, truth and honesty in a dark and dishonest world and the reference is only 4 and a half years old. Who’s in government?

Latest

  • Featured News Miliband announces plans for emergency nursing recruitment drive as part of “NHS Rescue Plan”

    Miliband announces plans for emergency nursing recruitment drive as part of “NHS Rescue Plan”

    Ed Miliband is set to announce Labour’s “NHS Rescue Plan” – starting with an emergency recruitment drive designed to get another 1,000 nurses into training this year. Speaking to student nurses at Manchester Metropolitan University, the Labour leader will say that this 1,000 nurses is the first installment of the 20,000 nurses (and 8.000 doctors) the party would fund thanks to its “time to care” fund. Labour would – on the first day of a Miliband government – ask universities to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured 5 things we learned from Miliband’s Evan Davis interview

    5 things we learned from Miliband’s Evan Davis interview

    Ed Miliband was the third leader to face an Evan Davis grilling tonight. Davis isn’t not as pugnacious as Jeremy Paxman, nor as dogged as Andrew Neill (who I’d like to see interview all of the party leaders), but he’s smart, well prepared and hammers home at points of potential weakness. He’s an incredibly tough interviewer – you’d have to be to do the Today Programme and Newsnight – and that was certainly the case for Miliband tonight, at least in the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland The SNP manifesto is a dangerous throwback to the 80s

    The SNP manifesto is a dangerous throwback to the 80s

    This isn’t the article I expected to write about the SNP manifesto. I was ready to praise Nicola Sturgeon’s political guile for producing a carbon copy of Labour’s programme. After a full week to digest Labour’s offer, I fully expected an identikit policy programme, presented as a ‘hand of friendship’ from the SNP: part of the party’s lethal campaign to minimise the differences between itself and Labour; to prove to Scots that there is nothing to fear from switching to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Shrewsbury 24 deserve to know what really went on in 1972

    The Shrewsbury 24 deserve to know what really went on in 1972

    In 1972, after an industrial dispute in the Shropshire town of Shrewsbury, 24 men were prosecuted under the ancient 1875 Conspiracy Act. Ever since then, the 24, their family and friends protest their innocence and have tirelessly fought their convictions. It’s become a cause célèbre for the trade union movement. There have long been suspicions of murky political interference in the trial. Many have accused the then Tory Government of orchestrating a show trial.  Yet, time and again, demands for the truth have […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly Survey: Coalition, campaign and leadership

    Weekly Survey: Coalition, campaign and leadership

      We are now over halfway through the short campaign, and very little movement has been spotted in the polls. We’ve had manifestos, pledges and difficult interviews – but how would you rate Labour’s campaign so far? On current polling, it would seem a hung parliament is the likeliest outcome. If Labour have chance to form a government, and had a choice, what would be your preferred type of government? Finally, Ed Miliband’s personal ratings appear to be on the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit