Galloway’s Respect Party lose ANOTHER leader

8th December, 2012 11:12 am

George Galloway’s Respect Party have lost their second leader in just three months, according to a report in the Guardian. National Chair Arshad Ali stood down earlier this week, after it was revealed that he had a spent conviction for electoral fraud. Arshad had led the party since November.

Ali told the Guardian:

“I was elected leader about a month ago but informed the national sec that I was unable to take on that role due to being unable to travel nationally as would be required of me.”

Senior Respect officials have claimed that Ali was never the leader of the party, but the Guardian notes that on November 5th election was announced in a message to the Respect national council email group. Yet it seems that the electoral commission still has Salma Yaqoob registered as Respect leader – even though she resigned from the party nearly three months ago…

  • NT86

    Pretty soon it’ll just be George Galloway and a remainder of his stooges running the show. Hopefully Muslim voters will realise how terrible Respect is, as it does nothing aside from exploiting their votes for self-interest. What are the odds that Galloway will even contest Bradford West in 2015? He stood down from Bow and Bethnal Green to contest another seat in 2010 after all.

    When Salma Yaqoob bailed it was quite clear that Respect would go into meltdown. No one can cooperate with that horrible man.

  • MonkeyBot5000

    I can understand them overlooking some minor vandalism as a teenager, but how did they miss a conviction for electoral fraud?

  • Brumanuensis

    In fairness, the point about spent convictions is that they’re not supposed to be taken into account. But I can see why this causes difficulties (obviously).

  • http://www.robbiescott.com/ Robbie Scott

    Do political parties generally have anyway of knowing if you have a spent conviction? I think i’m right in saying that we don’t CRB any of our candidates and it’s all done on trust.

  • http://www.robbiescott.com/ Robbie Scott

    Do political parties generally have anyway of knowing if you have a spent conviction? I think i’m right in saying that we don’t CRB any of our candidates and it’s all done on trust.

  • http://www.robbiescott.com/ Robbie Scott

    Do political parties generally have anyway of knowing if you have a spent conviction? I think i’m right in saying that we don’t CRB any of our candidates and it’s all done on trust.

  • http://www.robbiescott.com/ Robbie Scott

    Do political parties generally have anyway of knowing if you have a spent conviction? I think i’m right in saying that we don’t CRB any of our candidates and it’s all done on trust.

  • http://www.robbiescott.com/ Robbie Scott

    Do political parties generally have anyway of knowing if you have a spent conviction? I think i’m right in saying that we don’t CRB any of our candidates and it’s all done on trust.

  • http://www.robbiescott.com/ Robbie Scott

    Do political parties generally have anyway of knowing if you have a spent conviction? I think i’m right in saying that we don’t CRB any of our candidates and it’s all done on trust.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    Respect is a misnomer if ever there was. Awful party. Just awful.

Latest

  • Comment Labour’s leadership hopefuls need to ditch ‘aspiration’ and start talking about ‘meritocracy’

    Labour’s leadership hopefuls need to ditch ‘aspiration’ and start talking about ‘meritocracy’

    As the post-mortem of Labour’s election defeat takes place in the midst of the party’s leadership election, observers can’t help but have noticed the term ‘aspiration’ persistently cropping up in the language of the three main contenders. The theory is that Labour failed to appeal to those in the middle in the last campaign, because its manifesto and campaign was too narrowly focused on the interests of those at the bottom. Therefore, we have this focus on ‘aspiration’, but what […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News “I’m the only person in this race that isn’t ‘Continuity Miliband'”, says Liz Kendall

    “I’m the only person in this race that isn’t ‘Continuity Miliband'”, says Liz Kendall

    Liz Kendall has argued that she is the only person in the Labour leadership race who isn’t ‘Continuity Miliband.’ Kendall is running to be Labour leader against Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper and Jeremy Corbyn. In an interview with the Sun, she argued that: “The other candidates haven’t spelled out how they would be different from Ed Miliband. If we stick with what we have been saying for the last five or eight years, we will have the same result”.  This […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Don’t set up an English Labour party, say LabourList readers

    Don’t set up an English Labour party, say LabourList readers

    Last week Jon Cruddas revealed that he is part of a group of MPs (the rest of whom currently remain anonymous) who are setting up an English Labour party. However, Labour officials said that this is not currently supported by the party. We do LabourList readers this? Do Labour need an English wing of the party, similar to Scottish and Welsh Labour? Most say no. 53% think that Labour shouldn’t support Cruddas and other MPs’ plans. However 32% are on […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Cooper says she’d create two million high-skilled manufacturing jobs as she calls for Labour to champion science investment

    Cooper says she’d create two million high-skilled manufacturing jobs as she calls for Labour to champion science investment

    Yvette Cooper will today announce how she would create two million new high-skilled manufacturing jobs. Cooper is in the running to be Labour’s next leader. Today she will visit the Graphene centre in Manchester where she will say that she would seek to bring the UK in line with countries like Germany, by investing 3% of GDP in manufacturing jobs. She will also say that she’ll increase collective investment in science and Research and Development to 3% of GDP. As […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured You need more votes than your opponents, not predecessors

    You need more votes than your opponents, not predecessors

    Elections are simple affairs in a first-past-the-post country. The task of the candidate is to get more votes than their opponent. Not 50 per cent of the vote, nor a reliance on being enough people’s second preferences to deny your adversary victory. Just more – one will suffice – than the other person standing. The role of the party leader is not dissimilar. More votes than the party on the opposite benches and you invariably get more seats in the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit