Labour needs LGBT candidates on European lists in every region in 2014

12th December, 2012 5:54 pm

There isn’t the media attention on the work of the European Parliament and our MEPs that there is on Westminster, which allows the homophobic behaviour and voting records of Tory, UKIP and BNP MEPs to go unnoticed by the general public. Ahead of crucial European elections in 2014, it is time for Labour to encourage LGBT people to sit up and pay attention.

UKIP, it seems, is now a two-issue party. In addition to their ceaseless whining about the evils of Europe based on dodgy stats and populist prattle, Nigel Farage has revealed his intention to make same sex marriage a central plank of UKIP’s campaign for the 2014 European elections.

This move forms part of a ploy to peel off members of the Tory blue rinse brigade who are deeply unhappy that same sex couples are being given the same rights they themselves enjoy.

The fact that Tory Members of the European Parliament hold views on LGBT people that would make David Davies blush hardly seems to matter in the clamour to attract the homophobe vote.

When looking at the voting record of British MEPs in the European Parliament, it is hard to tell whether the Tories, UKIP or the BNP are the most homophobic. All routinely vote against any measures promoting equality. Just this week Tory MEPs voted to remove all 14 paragraphs which referenced LGBT equality from a new comprehensive report of fundamental rights in the EU (UKIP voted against the whole report). Last month one of my own MEPs, the charming Nick Griffin, landed himself in hot water when he tweeted the address of a gay couple who won a case against the owners of a B&B.

Europe is treated with the same apathy amongst LGBT voters as it is by the rest of the public, yet the European Union has done much to advance LGBT equality over the last 20 years. Many of the progressive laws introduced by the last Labour government to bring about equality for LGBT people originated in the European Parliament and Commission and it was Labour MEPs and their colleagues in the group of Socialists & Democrats who ensured they were passed.

If we’re to win big in 2014 and send the Tory, UKIP and BNP homophobes packing, we need to build a rainbow coalition with LGBT voters across the country.

LGBT people make up approximately 6% of the UK population – between 3 and 4 million voters – with large concentrations in big cities, from London to Brighton in the south to Manchester, Liverpool and Blackpool in the north. We need a much more visible presence in the LGBT community in these areas and across the country if we are to mobilise support for Labour.

The excellent work of Labour MEPs such as Arlene McCarthy and Michael Cashman on LGBT rights needs to be communicated to LGBT voters and we need to expose the disgraceful comments and appalling voting records of our opponents on the right on these issues.

Labour should launch a broad campaign bringing together head office, the frontbench foreign office and equality teams, the EPLP, socialist societies such as LGBT Labour and Labour Movement for Europe and trade union LGBT groups to get out into the LGBT community over the next 18 months to engage with voters on European issues.

In addition, Labour should pledge to ensure that we have an LGBT candidate on Labour’s European Parliamentary list in every region of the UK. When Michael Cashman stands down in 2014, Labour won’t have a single LGBT MEP. In fact, with the loss of Michael Cashman, not one of the 78 MEPs Britain currently sends to the European Parliament will be LGBT, except – bizarrely – a UKIP member.

As the party of equality, we need to do much more to increase the representation of minorities. We strive to ensure that we have adequate BAME representation on Parliamentary shortlists and we should do the same for LGBT people.
If we want the support of LGBT voters in 2014, we need candidates who reflect the community and we need an effective campaign of engagement with LGBT people. That campaign should start now.
  • http://www.facebook.com/samuel.rushworth Samuel Rushworth

    I could not disagree more with a central plank of your a argument – that in order to reach out to and represent LGBT people we somehow need to ensure they are disproportionately represented among our candidates. Are you really suggesting that as a straight person I am not capable of thinking about and advocating the needs of my LGBT friends? If we follow this argumnent to its natural conclusion of course the inverse would be true – that LGBT people can only effectively represent those who are just like them. Which of course is rubbish. Or is it that you are implying that somehow Labour has a selection bias against LGBT people? I find that difficult believe as those who join Labour do so to fight for equality. My fear with your suggestion – which ammounts to a sort of LGBT only shortlist – is where does their use stop? Should we not be controling for every social category to ensure perfectly proportionate (or in this case advantagious) representation for any minority or marginalised group? We could have places reserved for every race, minority religions, even (could you imagine it?) working class people! Of course pretty quickly we’d run out of categories leaving some groups left out completely.

  • NT86

    Haven’t Labour’s all-women shortlists taught us anything about how promotion due to race/gender/sexuality/etc, etc alone deprive more capable candidates from contesting elections? I 100% support gay marriage and LGBT rights more widely, but positive discrimination is still discrimination. That’s not to say that there’s no qualified candidate who is gay, because I’m sure there is.

    The majority of Labour’s MP’s are straight. That didn’t stop them from having exceptional records on gay rights during Labour’s time in government. The Parliamentary party is expected to overwhelmingly vote in favour of equal marriage when it comes to Commons. Labour MEP’s gay or straight would do a great job of representing the party in Brussels in the face of Tory and UKIP members.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I’d certainly like to see more LGBT candidates standing for selection, but I definitely don’t want any more quotas! Arlene McCarthy, our MEP, is straight but you couldn’t find anyone more completely committed to full LGBT equality

  • Daniel Speight

    It’s all very well asking for more gay, women, black, Asian or disabled candidates, but that is not where the biggest discrimination takes place in Labour Party selections. The truth is we are overloaded with young university educated careerists who have never really worked in non-political jobs, who have very little in common with ordinary people and who in the last twenty or thirty years have changed politics and Labour for the worse.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

      Yes. I think we do need more people with a range of experiences who have preferably not worked in full time politics or in London. Some of these people are likely to be in some of those other categories too.
      For me , its also about their politics. I’m a gay man, and so I do want to see gay people in parliament – along with a range of others, as I think there are clear advantages in diversity. But do I want to see a load of Progress-supporting clones who happen to be gay – not on your Nelly!

      • Daniel Speight

        Well said Mike.

  • http://www.facebook.com/marinamep Marina Yannakoudakis

    UK Conservative MEPs did NOT ask for the paragraphs to be removed. That was the centre-right EPP group. The European Parliament Intergroup on LGBT Rights (of which I am a member) issued misleading press release which was later corrected.

  • Pingback: Labour needs to engage with LGBT voters ahead of the European elections in 2014 | Kevin Peel Blog()

Latest

  • Comment The Labour leadership contest: too much politics and not enough personality

    The Labour leadership contest: too much politics and not enough personality

    Our recent prime ministers were not elected to lead their parties following general election defeats, and there are many problems with electing leaders whilst on the rebound. One of the biggest is that everyone is still in General Election Mode, presenting manifestos rather than their qualities as a leader. Policies and ideas are not wedded to any one person – any candidate could institute a policy suggested by any other candidate. Having good ideas qualifies one for the top table, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment What lessons does Lynton Crosby have for Labour?

    What lessons does Lynton Crosby have for Labour?

    After May’s general election, it appeared everyone in the party who tweeted or blogged was sure they knew why Labour had lost. By some weird coincidence, these opinions always seemed to mirror the prejudices of the author. You know the type of thing – our policies were too right wing, our policies were too left wing, our policies were too centrist, etc. Not very enlightening. So, to get a more balanced view, I turned to Lynton Crosby. I appreciate that’s […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour is in “mortal danger” – “we need to save it again”, says Peter Mandelson

    Labour is in “mortal danger” – “we need to save it again”, says Peter Mandelson

    Peter Mandelson has argued that Labour is in “mortal danger” . In an article in the Financial Times (£), the former cabinet minister and Labour campaigns director has warned against a Jeremy Corbyn victory. If the Islington North MP wins the leadership election, “that would be a very bad outcome for anyone who cares about fairness in our society or Britain’s place in the world”, Mandelson writes. Mandelson has called for a tightening of the rules over the leadership election […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Attracting people who didn’t vote at the last election is key to winning in 2020, say LabourList readers

    Attracting people who didn’t vote at the last election is key to winning in 2020, say LabourList readers

    In recent weeks there has been building concern from some over who has been deemed eligible to vote in the leadership election. Under new rules, members of the public can sign up as party ‘supporters’ for £3, this buys them a vote in the leadership election. However, it’s been reported that some Conservative and other non-Labour supporters have been given a vote. Labour say they have a vigorous vetting process to weed such people out. Yet some Labour supporters and […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Jeremy Corbyn dismisses “hysteria” over his policies and says he’ll defeat the Tories in 2020 with “people’s politics”

    Jeremy Corbyn dismisses “hysteria” over his policies and says he’ll defeat the Tories in 2020 with “people’s politics”

    Jeremy Corbyn has dismissed the “hysteria” and “deliberate misrepresentation” of his campaign’s policies and said that he is committed to ensuring that the Labour party defeat the Tories in 2020 with “people’s politics”. The leadership candidate has argued that despite attacks directed at his campaigns policies, the message his team are sending out is “resonating”. In an article in The Times (£), Corbyn has brushed off the idea that his policies are “extreme”, which has been suggested by some Labour […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit