Labour will be offering a “free vote” on gay marriage – but the whole shadow cabinet will vote in favour

11th December, 2012 10:13 am

There has been some confusion in recent hours about what Labour’s exact position will be when it comes to the vote on gay marriage. The original understanding amongst MPs was that the vote would be whipped, however it now appears that only applies to gay marriages of the civil ceremony variety. Labour MPs will be getting a free vote on gay marriages that include a religious element (i.e. those held in religious buildings). Blame for the confusion over Labour’s position is being laid at the door oft he government, whose own position on exactly what votes will be brought forward has, in the view of the party, been confused. A Labour source confirmed to us that:

“If the Bill includes religious provisions we will respect a free vote.”

That could allow a small but significant number of MPs who oppose gay marriage (or gay marriage held in religious buildings) to vote against the majority of the party without breaking the whip.

This decision is likely to anger those within the party who had hoped Labour would whip the vote.

However senior Labour figures are keen to stress that the entire shadow cabinet will be backing gay marriage – which may not necessarily be the case for the government – and that Labour’s support for equal marriage should not be considered in doubt, with well over 80% of Labour MPs expected to support it, even in a free vote.

  • Redshift1

    To be honest when I first heard this I thought ‘ridiculous’ because I thought we were referring to the civil gay marriages.

    Frankly, given churches have all kinds of restrictions (including regular attendance) on who they let get married in house. I kind of feel that a) do I really as an atheist care if they want to make themselves look increasingly out-dated and anachronistic and b) actually forcing them do them will probably just lead to them finding another excuse not to wed the couple in the building.

    It is the lack of state gay marriage that is unacceptable – with serious implications therefore for the C of E as the state religion BUT for all others, I don’t really see why it matters. Doesn’t it just say to gay people, ‘look why follow that religion/denomination when they think you are inherently living in sin and have no respect for your love?’. Abandon the bigots, let them cast the rope that hangs them.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715486331 Alex Otley

      But religious gay marriage is not going to be forced on religions. It’s an optional thing that faith groups can opt into, and most won’t. There is absolutely nothing in the proposals that forces gay marriage in churches – in fact, by having an opt-in system, apparently it helps to protect those that don’t won’t to take part from being taken to court over it.

      • Redshift1

        That’s what I thought initially, but that isn’t what Mark is saying above.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715486331 Alex Otley

          Where does he say that?

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    Disappointed that it won’t be whipped, and I’m also disappointed that people keep pointing to the religious freedom element as if said freedom was ever at risk. It’s about choice, nobody’s being forced to do anything they don’t want to.

  • Hugh

    I’m slightly baffled that the government has any say whatsoever over whether religious institutions can marry people or not, to be honest – certainly outside the CofE.

    Once the government chooses to amend the civil law to permit same sex marriages, I had rather supposed churches could do what they wanted in any case. I’m not sure why what the quakers get up to within the framework of the civil law is any of the government’s business.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715486331 Alex Otley

      I think religious marriages are covered by different laws? Remember civil marriage is relatively modern, it all used to be done in a church originally.

      • PaulHalsall

        That changed in 1857

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=715486331 Alex Otley

    Labour is shooting itself in the foot here. ‘Issues of conscience’ is such a cop out; surely everything is an issue of conscience. If a whipped vote upsets a few oddballs then let them be upset. If they are shadow ministers then they are welcome to see themselves out. They won’t be missed.

  • metrolivia

    Cameron is supporting Gay Marriage in Church because he is after the ‘pink’ vote and for no other reason. I thought this was obvious as he has ostracized most other groups thus far. Labour should not sit on the fence with this one…we live in a democracy and we should be seen to be democratic. The option should be in place for Gay Marriage in a Church and for the individual church to make it’s own decisions..not unlike a landlord choosing who to serve!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    And I think its fair to say that those who vote against won’t exactly do their standing in the party a lot of good

Latest

  • Comment Scotland Scotland has a housing crisis and it demands radical solutions

    Scotland has a housing crisis and it demands radical solutions

    It’s vital that Scottish Labour goes into next year’s Holyrood elections with a bold and ambitious manifesto. Few issues need ambition more in Scotland than housing. With 150,000 people currently on waiting lists and private landlords pocketing more than £450m in housing benefit, there is a housing crisis. This week I was inspired on a visit to the West Whitlawburn Housing Cooperative in South Lanarkshire. Approaching its 25th birthday, the Coop provides over 600 properties and has transformed a community. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured There are too many young people in prison who don’t need to be there

    There are too many young people in prison who don’t need to be there

    Some truisms exist for many years yet nobody acts upon them. Then along comes an avalanche of evidence that proves the case and the argument’s time has come. A new report ‘Changing Prisons Saving Lives’ from Labour’s Lord Toby Harris about why so many 16-24 year olds die in prison is such an avalanche. It has been so diligently researched across all the issues raised by these tragic deaths and the environments where they occurred and its conclusions are so […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s leadership hopefuls need to ditch ‘aspiration’ and start talking about ‘meritocracy’

    Labour’s leadership hopefuls need to ditch ‘aspiration’ and start talking about ‘meritocracy’

    As the post-mortem of Labour’s election defeat takes place in the midst of the party’s leadership election, observers can’t help but have noticed the term ‘aspiration’ persistently cropping up in the language of the three main contenders. The theory is that Labour failed to appeal to those in the middle in the last campaign, because its manifesto and campaign was too narrowly focused on the interests of those at the bottom. Therefore, we have this focus on ‘aspiration’, but what […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News “I’m the only person in this race that isn’t ‘Continuity Miliband'”, says Liz Kendall

    “I’m the only person in this race that isn’t ‘Continuity Miliband'”, says Liz Kendall

    Liz Kendall has argued that she is the only person in the Labour leadership race who isn’t ‘Continuity Miliband.’ Kendall is running to be Labour leader against Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper and Jeremy Corbyn. In an interview with the Sun, she argued that: “The other candidates haven’t spelled out how they would be different from Ed Miliband. If we stick with what we have been saying for the last five or eight years, we will have the same result”.  This […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Don’t set up an English Labour party, say LabourList readers

    Don’t set up an English Labour party, say LabourList readers

    Last week Jon Cruddas revealed that he is part of a group of MPs (the rest of whom currently remain anonymous) who are setting up an English Labour party. However, Labour officials said that this is not currently supported by the party. We do LabourList readers this? Do Labour need an English wing of the party, similar to Scottish and Welsh Labour? Most say no. 53% think that Labour shouldn’t support Cruddas and other MPs’ plans. However 32% are on […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit