The Autumn Statement is when we find out whether the government have learned anything

December 3, 2012 4:10 pm

Some weeks, you could use some good news. You know the sort of week. It’s raining, your rent’s too high, your bills are too high, your laundry pile is too high, that guy hasn’t called, you’re about to be single over Christmas, you haven’t bought any presents yet, you’re out of vodka, your laptop’s broken, you accidentally stabbed yourself in the thumb while baking biscuits, another November has gone by without you finishing NaNoWriMo and you’re beginning to wonder if you should give up your dream of being a writer…you know, that kind of generic #firstworldproblems bad week that could happen to anyone. A bit of good news would pick me, I mean you, right up.

Trouble is, when there are conflicts and disasters across the world, floods across the UK, and a further 900 jobs due to go at Manchester City Council, thanks to government cuts, it’s hard to know where to look for glad tidings. They’re harder to find than a Turbo Man action figure on Christmas Eve. (Are these Yuletide similes doing it for you? No? I’ll stop.) Even when something seems like good news (Tesco’s Help Feed People In Need campaign over the weekend collected food and donations for people in food poverty across the UK), it’s often bad news in disguise (it’s 2012, in one of the richest countries in the world, and there are people relying on food parcels. Those of us who work in politics, or just pay too much attention to it, sometimes complain that we’re living through another episode of The Thick Of It – but for hundreds of others in the UK, life right now is more like a Dickens adaptation.)

At times like this you have to take your good news where you find it, so I had a little cheer over the weekend at the headline ‘George Osborne set to drop plan to end housing benefit for under-25s’. Fantastic. Our Prime Minister proposed an absurd, unworkable, punitive, cruel policy which would have been so unfair that the unfairness of it could be seen from space – but now it’s probably not going to happen. Yet. And they’ve also scrapped plans to freeze working-age benefits, a policy I confess I’d never previously heard of. Phew. My sense of relief is such that I might have a cigarette.

On further reading, however, my Bitter Cheer of Slight Celebration died, to be replaced by the Irritable Growl I Do When Lib Dems Annoy Me. It seems we have Clegg, Danny Alexander and Greg Mulholland to thank for this thin layer of padding around the wrecking ball we’re expecting from Osborne’s Autumn Statement on Wednesday. You’d have to be a very cynical person to think that the Tories deliberately designate some of their more bonkers and inhuman ideas as ‘stuff we’re happy to let the Lib Dems talk us out of’. But you don’t have to be a very cynical person to ask when, exactly, it was that the Lib Dems last stood up to the Tories on welfare reform?

They’ve been telling us for the last two and a half years – the Manchester Lib Dems will tell us this again in Council on Wednesday – that if they weren’t in coalition with the Tories, everything would be so much worse. Only their restraining influence has prevented Cameron and Osborne and IDS from…and this is the point where words have, in the past, seemed to fail them. From what? With billions slashed from the benefits bill, pensioners attacked alongside families and young people, the NHS being carved up in front of us, the poorest areas of the country punished again and again for not voting Tory, my imagination has frankly struggled to conceive of the Tory excesses the Lib Dems reckon they’ve been protecting us from. Was there a shelved project to privatise oxygen? Was IDS planning to do a Herod? We may never know.

So was the plan to scrap housing benefit for the under-25s the line in the sand, or was it never really a plan at all? We may never know that either, but I’ll say this. When I first heard about this policy back in June I wrote an article for this site in which I compared the Prime Minister to the ‘dad’ character in any family-based sitcom or cartoon, forever coming up with wacky schemes and not listening to anyone who tried to tell him it was a bad idea. It’s probably too light-hearted a comparison. But you know what I like about those programmes? At the end of every episode, the wacky scheme is put to bed, the long-suffering characters are vindicated, and Homer Simpson learns a valuable lesson.

Until next week, when it turns out he’s learned nothing at all.

You see where I’m going with this. The Autumn Statement on Wednesday is when we find out whether the government have learned anything: from the unpopularity of their policies, as they were reminded again and again in last month’s elections, or simply from the fact that they’re just not working. But I get the feeling I might have to look elsewhere to find good news.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    You had to go tempting fate didn’t you? Asking for good news and
    suddenly the nation’s got a royal baby on it’s hands. Some of us had
    only just recovered from the tedium of the royal wedding, now we’ve got 9
    months of press speculation about the birth.

    Ed reckons the whole nation will be thrilled, I do hope he said it tongue in cheek.

    • Alexwilliamz

      I reckon at some point the baby will be born. Is that sufficiently speculative?

      Grace I can always supply you with vodka if you run short! Hope the biscuits were worth it!

      In answer to your headline the answer of course is no. But then they are working to a different agenda in which there is no lesson to be learnt because everything is going swimmingly and if there was a sudden boom, the tories would have no justification for their policies! This is all cover for what they think should be happening anyway.

    • Alexwilliamz

      I reckon at some point the baby will be born. Is that sufficiently speculative?

      Grace I can always supply you with vodka if you run short! Hope the biscuits were worth it!

      In answer to your headline the answer of course is no. But then they are working to a different agenda in which there is no lesson to be learnt because everything is going swimmingly and if there was a sudden boom, the tories would have no justification for their policies! This is all cover for what they think should be happening anyway.

  • sdrpalmer

    I’ve certainly learned something – in spite of losing 330,000 jobs from the public sector, the pay bill keeps going up:-
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20561444
    Aparently, when there is a ‘pay freeze’ in the public sector you can still get your ‘annual increment’, i.e. a pay rise for being there a year longer.
    I’m sure that’s lovely for those receiving it but a bit of a kick for those of us putting money into the pot, for whom a pay freeze is really that.

Latest

  • Comment Educating Labour: We need a school system that will deliver equity as well as excellence   

    Educating Labour: We need a school system that will deliver equity as well as excellence  

    Should Labour win the next general election its new Education Secretary will inherit a school system that has been subject to significant ‘diversification’ and ‘structural reform’ since 2010. The key question for many Labour members and supporters is should a new Labour government continue with this focus on system-wide reform or put its efforts and resources into teaching and learning programmes that are proven to raise standards? The past 50 years of school reform in England shows us that the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Reaching new communities

    Reaching new communities

    This article is from Our Labour, Our Communities – a pamphlet of 10 essays by Labour PPCs, published by LabourList in partnership with Lisa Nandy MP. I am proud to be standing as the candidate for my hometown of Hastings & Rye, but I am equally proud to stand as a parliamentary candidate who is also half Chinese and half British. My mother is Chinese Malaysian and came to this country 41 years ago to be a nurse in Hastings and continues to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →