UKIP candidate’s rambling “personal manifesto” appears to suggest “compulsory abortion” for Down’s Syndrome foetuses

December 18, 2012 4:00 pm

Update: UKIP have now disowned Clarke and said he will no longer be a candidate for the party.

In a bizarre and rambling 4500+ word “personal manifesto”, a UKIP by-election candidate appears to call for “compulsory abortion” for any foetus which has Down’s Syndrome or Spina Bifida.

Geoffrey Clarke – standing for Gravesham Borough Council in a by-election on Thursday – called for a Government review ofNHS expenditure, which should:

“re-examine the pregnancy abortion time limit. Consider compulsory abortion when the foetus is detected as having Downs, spina bifida or similar syndrome which, if it is born, will render the child a burden on the state as well as on the family.”

However the Independent reports that Clarke has since said “I do not endorse these ideas”. Yet they remain published on his website.

The manifesto also says, amongst other things, that Israel and Iran should both be kicked out of the UN, the Koran should be “updated”, that the government should ban the Burka and that same-sex marriage is an “abhorrence”.

And that’s only the stuff I’ve spotted so far…

  • Monkey_Bach

    So there is someone more repellent than George Osborne then? Eeek.

  • Monkey_Bach

    So there is someone more repellent than George Osborne then? Eeek.

  • Monkey_Bach

    So there is someone more repellent than George Osborne then? Eeek.

    • NT86

      There’s a significant number of Tory backbenchers more repellent than Osborne, surprisingly.

    • NT86

      There’s a significant number of Tory backbenchers more repellent than Osborne, surprisingly.

    • NT86

      There’s a significant number of Tory backbenchers more repellent than Osborne, surprisingly.

  • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

    A few other gems of red-hot crazy/evil you didn’t mention:
    -“medical treatment for those over 80 years of age, which is disproportionately costly to the NHS; (the cost of treatment for the often multiple ailments of the very elderly is growing very fast); identifying what services can and can no longer be afforded by the NHS”
    -” the pregnancy abortion time limit; compulsory abortion when the foetus is detected as having Downs, Spina Bifida or similar syndrome which, if it is born, could render the child a burden on the state as well as on the family”. The whiplash here from a common pro-life sentiment about lowering the national limit (albeit one I disagree with) to casually advocating *forced* abortion (pretty much the only position you can take on abortion that is guaranteed to be repugnant to both the pro-life and pro-choice sides in equal measure) was shocking
    -“The review might also include: legalising euthanasia and giving free euthanasia advice to all folk over 80 years of age, and indeed to all others”. Encouragement, seriously?
    -“Education. We should indulge in unashamed elitism”
    -“In my opinion the tyrrany of the minorities has begun”
    -Towards the end: “Many voters still believe we are the BNP in disguise, are extremists, madmen or dotty. Although they don’t tell me this to my face when I campaign (perhaps because I am clearly not a madman nor dotty)” Riiiiiiigght, because casually advocating the open encouragement of euthanasia and forced abortion clearly means you have you have your head screwed on

    Also, on a lighter note – “each of us will be a minority at some time or another: for example, when we are on holiday in a strange country. But in that instance we brush up on that country’s culture and take care not to offend anyone there. But we British don’t demand that others do that here.” This bit strongly suggested to me he’d never observed the behaviour British holidaymakers on the Costa Del Sol (or really anywhere).

  • http://twitter.com/ElliotBidgood Elliot Bidgood

    A few other gems of red-hot crazy/evil you didn’t mention:
    -“medical treatment for those over 80 years of age, which is disproportionately costly to the NHS; (the cost of treatment for the often multiple ailments of the very elderly is growing very fast); identifying what services can and can no longer be afforded by the NHS”
    -” the pregnancy abortion time limit; compulsory abortion when the foetus is detected as having Downs, Spina Bifida or similar syndrome which, if it is born, could render the child a burden on the state as well as on the family”. The whiplash here from a common pro-life sentiment about lowering the national limit (albeit one I disagree with) to casually advocating *forced* abortion (pretty much the only position you can take on abortion that is guaranteed to be repugnant to both the pro-life and pro-choice sides in equal measure) was shocking
    -“The review might also include: legalising euthanasia and giving free euthanasia advice to all folk over 80 years of age, and indeed to all others”. Encouragement, seriously?
    -“Education. We should indulge in unashamed elitism”
    -“In my opinion the tyrrany of the minorities has begun”
    -Towards the end: “Many voters still believe we are the BNP in disguise, are extremists, madmen or dotty. Although they don’t tell me this to my face when I campaign (perhaps because I am clearly not a madman nor dotty)” Riiiiiiigght, because casually advocating the open encouragement of euthanasia and forced abortion clearly means you have you have your head screwed on

    Also, on a lighter note – “each of us will be a minority at some time or another: for example, when we are on holiday in a strange country. But in that instance we brush up on that country’s culture and take care not to offend anyone there. But we British don’t demand that others do that here.” This bit strongly suggested to me he’d never observed the behaviour British holidaymakers on the Costa Del Sol (or really anywhere).

    • http://twitter.com/LouMcCudden Louise McCudden

      Don’t forget the poem! That’s the best bit.

  • robertcp

    Is he a member of Progress? No, a bit too right-wing even for them!

  • robertcp

    Is he a member of Progress? No, a bit too right-wing even for them!

  • http://twitter.com/youngian67 Ian Young

    You haven’t heard the half of it, check out Bloggers4UKIP-

    This UKIP rant for example explains why the US wants Britain to stay in the EU because Obama is a socialist president supporting the socialist EU empire.
    http://www.bloggers4ukip.org.uk/2012/12 … cials.html

    And it gets better (for comedy value that is)-
    “The UK outside of the EU would be a significant
    challenger to the US, particularly with the Commonwealth Free Trade Area
    that UKIP proposes.”

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

      As I have always said – they are the BNP in blazers

      • Hugh

        Yes, you’ve said that a few times. Is it too much to ask exactly how the article linked to – however wrong-headed – establishes that UKIP are a bunch of racists?

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • Brumanuensis

    I’m still struggling to understand how you can publish a manifesto on your website and then claim ‘I do not endorse these ideas’. If you were aggregating content, then fair enough, but your own published work?

    Mind you, the Koran probably does need updating.

  • PaulHalsall

    Most Down’s Syndrome children are killed before birth. I am not in a position (as a gay man) to condemn such decisions, but such children often seem to be loving and lovely.

    We should cherish and love such children and adults.

    Every bit of evidence I have seen shows that people love their down;s syndrome children and grandchildren with as much love as if they were perfect.

    They are perfect, and do not deserve to die in the womb.

    Again, I condemn nobody.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    This “manifesto” was a disgrace,

  • Robert Castlereagh

    UKIP are not a respectable political party

  • Robert Castlereagh

    UKIP are not a respectable political party

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      Does that mean that you merely do not agree with them, and find it easy to make a slur with providing any evidence, or that you have not the intellect to make a proper case for your assertion? Or with a depressing correlation, both?

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      Does that mean that you merely do not agree with them, and find it easy to make a slur with providing any evidence, or that you have not the intellect to make a proper case for your assertion? Or with a depressing correlation, both?

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y