A By-election strategy won’t save the Lib Dems in 2015

January 5, 2013 2:54 pm

Today in the Guardian there’s an interesting bit of briefing from the Lib Dems on their proposed general election strategy. It’s worth reading the piece by Patrick Wintour in full.

The argument goes that the Lib Dems will treat the General Election as a series of 57 localised elections (in each of the seats currently held by the Lib Dems), deploying a superior ground game and focussing their resources in order to exploit the power of incumbency. Effectively turning their general election campaign into 57 simultaneous by-elections. Clearly this plan is based on the idea that the Lib Dems are a ruthless campaigning machine, which is personified by their fabled excellence in by-elections. However their recent performances in Westminster by-elections is dreadful (4th, 4th, 2nd, 3rd, 8th, 3rd, 4th in 2012 – and even when they came 2nd or 3rd their vote more than halved as a %). The last time they won a by-election seat was in February 2006.

But Lib Dems will argue, quite rightly, that all of the by-elections held so far in this parliament have been in Labour-held (and in the case of Corby, Tory-held) seats. And therefore their superior campaigning prowess hasn’t had an opportunity to come into its own yet.

About that superior campaigning prowess…

An internal Lib Dem briefing (leaked to the Spectator in September) contained such admissions as “We have no evidence our tactics are working”. As for data – which anyone who has ever run a successful campaign knows is vital – the briefing admitted that the Lib Dems “Only have functional political data on <2% of the population”. The Lib Dems have the most advanced canvassing/data system in British politics (VAN) but they aren’t using it effectively – or as Isabel hardman put it “The party has bought a Ferrari and is treating it like a lawnmower.”

If you don’t have data, you can’t target voters effectively, and you can’t get your vote out (because you don’t know where they are). And getting more “political data” on the electorate conventionally means having activists doing door knocking and phone canvassing. Yet membership of the Lib Dems fell by 25% in their first year in government – meaning they have less than 50,000 members across the country (around a quarter of the membership of the Labour Party). Their membership is likely to have fallen further since.

So the Lib Dem plan for 2015 is to run 57 by-election campaigns, but without a proven strategy, without sufficient data and with a declining membership base. In my experience of campaigning against the Lib Dems, that may mean they fall back on widespread leafleting which can be done by a small number of dedicated activists. And that’s a strategy which (again, based on personal experience) doesn’t really work…

This plan seems intended to encourage Lib Dem MPs to stick with their leader and not get trigger happy with the leadership ahead of the general election. But any savvy Lib Dem MPs will realise that if this is their best hope of saving their seats, they are even more screwed than they might have imagined.

  • http://twitter.com/politicalhackuk John O’Shea

    A by-election strategy depends on focussing resources on one or two seats at a time. They will wind up spreading themselves too thinly. Some seats will have to be abandoned to electoral reality or they will be deluding themselves into losing other seats that they could hold by deploying people elsewhere.

  • Amber_Star

    Personally, I’d like their incredible campaigning prowess to be true for Con/Dem marginals. It would make beating the Tories a bit easier!

    • aracataca

      ‘their incredible campaigning prowess’
      My experience of them on the ground in elections is that they are petty, unpleasant and knowingly untruthful. Prowess doesn’t enter into it.

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    Surely the strategy is just to get some of their deposits back. I bet that’ll be their new marker for success. “Hey, we got our money back this time. An astounding victory for the Liberal Democrats!”

    We’re already seeing something of a strategy/saving one’s own skin happening with people like Sarah “I’m a government minister” Teather suddenly coming out swinging against the stuff they voted for. That’s always fun to watch.

  • NT86

    Where the Lib Dems have a strong presence in local government (e.g. Eastleigh, Portsmouth, South Lakeland), the party shouldn’t have too much trouble mobilising activists on the ground to campaign and leaflet. Those are possibly the seats they’ll hold in 2015.

    It’s going to be a lot harder in places like Brent Central (Sarah Teather) and Hornsey and Wood Green (Lynne Featherstone) which, according to an Indy report I read about 7 months ago, said that membership of the party locally has plummeted.

    With the exception of seats which the party has embedded itself into (including mine), no amount of savvy strategy will save them in 2015. When you let down most of the 6 million people who voted for you within months (on balance, I know Labour did its fair share of betrayals too but it was around the 6 year point that it got ugly for them), they will not forget.

  • billbat

    Grant Schapps is convinced that all sitting Tory MP’s will be re-elected because of incumbency. Was he pretending to be Michael Green in 1997 and missed the best night since 1979?

  • robertcp

    It is not a great strategy but they do not have any better option. My guess is that the Lib Dems will get about 30 MPs in 2015, which could still be enough for the balance of power in a hung Parliament. Incidentally, British history since 1918 suggests that Labour does well when there is a high Liberal vote, so it will not just be the Lib Dems that will be in trouble if their vote collapses.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001102865655 John Ruddy

    Bear in mind, its possible that they could achieve nationally only 8-10% of the vote, yet retain most of their existing MPs. Much as we might wish otherwise, Lib Dems such as Clegg and Laws are in such safe seats, that they can afford to lose some votes to Labour.

    I expect a lot of lost deposits in 2015 for them, though, as they go from challenging to nowhere….

    • Alexwilliamz

      Not sure Clegg will be all that safe as a Northern seat he might be seen as a legitimate target for dissatisfied voters (including Iib Dems) to give him a good kicking. I’d imagine they will hold on in the south west heartlands better.

      • NT86

        I live in his constituency. He has a very big majority here of about 15,000. It’s one of those seats which has remained consistently Lib Dem since 1997. The local party has been losing members as with other places although they’ve managed to hold off challenges to council seats on this side of Sheffield at least.

        The Tories have been losing support here for years (a seat they previously held) and Labour would need a swing of about 18% to unseat Clegg. It’s one of those seats which even Blair couldn’t capture back in the day so a Labour candidate would have their work cut out for them.

        • Alexwilliamz

          You are probably right, I just get this kind of ‘portillo’ kind of moment feel about Clegg!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    I think they (the libdems) are screwed.

  • David

    Good article, but don’t use the word screwed. It’s the amateurish and childish language that turns people off.

    • markfergusonuk

      Or it’s the kind of language that people use in everyday life…

Latest

  • Comment Reaching new communities

    Reaching new communities

    This article is from Our Labour, Our Communities – a pamphlet of 10 essays by Labour PPCs, published by LabourList in partnership with Lisa Nandy MP. I am proud to be standing as the candidate for my hometown of Hastings & Rye, but I am equally proud to stand as a parliamentary candidate who is also half Chinese and half British. My mother is Chinese Malaysian and came to this country 41 years ago to be a nurse in Hastings and continues to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →