Britain is broken. But it is the system that is broken, not the people

January 16, 2013 9:15 am

Politics is about struggle, about the clash of interests.  It is, ultimately, about how to create a society of common interests.

So let’s take a contemporary example – “One Nation”.  I applaud Ed Miliband for the way he has raised this idea and for the content he is trying to give it. But let’s not pretend that we are “one nation”, or that we will become one without the conflict that Ralph Miliband placed at the heart of politics.

We cannot create common interests across a society that is now more unequal than for generations simply by wishing for it. So how do we get to “one nation” and what part does working-class politics play?

The labour movement has been the backbone to political change and progress for generations; if the 20th century was the century of the working class, it was so because of organised labour and the trade union movement, itself a child of conflict (over who benefits from the wealth generated by capitalism). That is why the ruling class is so keen to keep trade unions in legal shackles.

Britain was the first country of trade unionism – a point reflected in Danny Boyle’s inspirational opening ceremony at the Olympics. If we measure the success of the labour movement as the extent to which it re-shaped the responsibilities of government, the 20th Century saw victories on an unimaginable scale.

It is a remarkable feat that, at a time when wealth was accumulated at the top and poverty for working people who lived ‘hand to mouth’, the labour movement was able to secure such radical change. The working classes, against all odds, transformed society.  If you were to have a Monty Python moment and say “what has the trade union movement ever done for us” some would of course talk about better pay and improved conditions at work. I would go much further, and say that the political activity of the working class secured almost everything we value today: democracy, peace, equality, our welfare state.

The idea that capitalism or the ruling elite would have introduced democracy or social equality or welfare on their own is fanciful. Much of these achievements are under pressure today.

I grew up in vibrant and politicised communities – life was centred on the docks.   Around work were formed the circles of working-class life – trade unionism, community, the Labour Party. Today, we cannot simply start from there. We cannot build a future working-class politics on a basis which has long eroded.

Perhaps the more significant change is the decline in secure and stable employment. Capitalism is the only system which has normalised unemployment. It is the responsibility of any system to offer work to people, and if it fails in this basic obligation, don’t blame the victims. In the last two weeks 11,000 jobs have been lost – HMV, Jessops, Honda to name a few. Today’s hard working poor – victims – are tomorrow’s benefit scroungers, if you listen to the right wing press.

We must first confront the crisis of confidence born of increasing marginalisation, to say that we speak for the working class, that the working class speaks for a better world for all – and we have to organise and fight on that basis.

Unite is leading the way with an ambitious new programme to recruit, organise and educate across the whole of our communities. The unemployed, the disabled, carers, the elderly, the voluntary and charity sector – it is time for these people to be organised and to be given a voice. Who better to do this than the trade union movement?. This sits comfortably within our traditions. Unite’s community membership scheme means that those not in work – aged 16 to 116 – can join our family for 50 pence a week. Community branches are springing up across the country, and our activists are going into communities, empowering people to do something for themselves.

Unite is also working to meet the needs of our members through the creation of a new credit union network. My union says pay day loan vultures have no place in our society, profiting off the misery of people on poverty pay. So our members will be able to obtain credit without having to resort to the ruinous interest rates of the pay-day loan companies.

The 21st Century is not ringing out the death knell of the labour movement; it is sending out a call to arms.  The apparently endless economic crisis which began in 2008 is seeing to that. In 1992 Margaret Thatcher claimed ‘It is the end of Socialism.’ A few years later Tony Blair declared ‘that the Class war is over’.  No doubt from the boardroom of JP Morgan or wherever he is now, it may look that way.

But this is false evidence that we have nothing left to fight for.

We are told that strike action, civil disobedience, direct action and protest are all somehow unpatriotic. Our history tells us they are not. Our `rulers’ are deeply afraid of Ralph Miliband’s assertion that politics is about conflict. They believe that those without hope, without jobs, now looking at cuts in their meagre welfare, that families being shunted out of London because of housing benefit changes should simply put up with it. Council leaders from our major cities have warned that people might respond with anger and civil disorder.  I would not be surprised.  We have seen remarkable local protests recently: from 20,000 in Eastbourne and 15,000 on the streets in Lewisham to defend their NHS to 350 people crammed into a room to protest against a library closure in Newcastle.

Protest against inequality is alive and well – look at the work done by UK Uncut to challenge outrageous tax avoidance by Vodafone and other giant corporations. It takes courage to risk unpopularity and vilification. But the truth does prevail.

The labour movement’s message must be one of ‘hope’. Britain is broken. But it is the system that is broken, not the people.

I am proud to associate Unite with these initiatives, and to hope to form a longer-lasting alliance between organised labour and radical protest, even if it comes from outside our traditional movement. And, as I have made clear before in relation to the trade union laws, while I do not ever advocate violence, nor do I preach worship of the law at all costs. So my message to capitalism is this:  mend your ways or risk mounting social breakdown and disorder.

People need a political voice.  Labour is the natural, historic, vehicle for their voice. But should there be any return to the discredited recipes of Blairism, the Labour Party will be over for me and I believe millions more besides.

In the midst of an unending economic crisis, with what Ralph Miliband would have called a discredited ruling class at the helm, it is time for the working class to step forward with its own vision and alternative.

Our values are eternal. Let’s stand courageous, and triumph like those that have gone before.

Len McCluskey is the General Secretary of Unite

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    Well said,Len – nail on the head, as usual.

    Unite’s community to membership scheme meaning that “those not in work – aged 16 to 116 – can join our family” is an excellent forward-thinking initiative. I’d urge everyone who wants to get stuck into meaningful political and trade union activity to join:

    http://www.unitetheunion.org/growing-our-union/communitymembership/

    • AlanGiles

      I agree. Len is one of the very few LL writers who has had the courage to point out that we are not “one nation” and given very good reasons to explain why.

      I think that if Labour continues to make this subtle distinction between “strivers” who are in work and struggling and people who are not working being somehow less value will rebound on them. I made the point yesterday that as I no longer do (paid) work I am not a striver. Makes you feel a bit of a second class citizen in Labour eyes, and I worked all my life – just imagine how those sort of slights must come over to somebody be they 18 or 40 or 50, who, through no fault of their own, just cannot get a job – especially when in some areas you have 50 people chasing one vacancy.

  • JoblessDave

    I am nervous about the rhetoric the author employs, and strongly question the democratic legitimacy of his approach.

    Q “So how do we get to “one nation” and what part does working-class politics play?”

    A It has no part to play, any more than asking “what part does landed gentry politics play?”: the idea of any one small group creating a “society of common interests”, which is then to apply to the majority is not democracy. I agree that all voices must be heard, but believe that to divisionalise the discussion is to miss the point of “one nation” ideals.

    “We are told that strike action, civil disobedience, direct action and protest are all somehow unpatriotic.”

    Not unpatriotic, but profoundly undemocractic: akin to saying “if we don’t agree with the will of the country we’ll stop it doing what it said it would do” and this is commonly-held to be a reason why politics shifted so far and so fast to the right in the late 70’s and 80’s: British people will typically sympathise with the under-dog, but they don’t like being bullied by a vocal minority.

    The author also repeatedly raises the spectre of Ralph Miliband as, undoubtedly, a name check siren call, without actually making clear the hard extent of the Marxist principles he is appealing to, which have been at the fringe far-edge of British politics for almost a century. I worry that such an approach boarders on the intellectually-dishonest, by appealing emotionally to people without making the consequences fully apparent.

    All that said, I applaud the author for having his convictions: I believe as a broad church Labour can listen with respect to these views, however quite frankly I see no place from them in directly influencing modern Labour party policy.

  • Chilbaldi

    “So my message to capitalism is this: mend your ways or risk mounting social breakdown and disorder”
    with all due respect, this is the sort of language that alienates 99% of the country.

  • JoeDM

    The voice of Old Labour, a rare sound these days.

Latest

  • Featured Labour will make £250m worth of savings in Home Office to preserve frontline police jobs

    Labour will make £250m worth of savings in Home Office to preserve frontline police jobs

    Labour have published the first report from their zero-based spending review (ZBR) – the assessment of all governmental spending that the party launched in December last year to plan how to tackle the deficit. The ZBR is led by Chris Leslie, the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and today’s initial report is launched jointly with Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, as the focus lies on her department. Today’s report announces that Labour would making savings to the Home Office budget of £250 million, and […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Our response is not to carry on as before, but to adapt and change

    Our response is not to carry on as before, but to adapt and change

    When I last wrote for LabourList, in the wake of the Heywood and Middleton result, someone suggested that my position was that “no change of tack was needed”. Even the headline of that article “the overnight results only underline the nature of the challenge we all face” makes it clear that this is untrue. But I wanted to explore this challenge further – which is why I gave a speech recently on this topic. We owe it to ourselves as […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The talent we need to improve Labour’s image already lies on our backbenches

    The talent we need to improve Labour’s image already lies on our backbenches

    The message that Labour will repeal the bedroom tax and the NHS reforms and initiate a massive programme of house building and youth employment is lost in a morass of chatter: how well you eat a bacon butty, a badly judged tweet or a dodgy photo. And voters are supposed to make decisions that will affect them, their children and their country for ever. Labour must come to grips with that reality to give us any hope at all of […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly Survey: Scottish income tax, Rochester & Strood by-election and Thornberry’s resignation

    Weekly Survey: Scottish income tax, Rochester & Strood by-election and Thornberry’s resignation

    Former Chancellor and chair of the Better Together campaign Alistair Darling weighed in on matters of fiscal devolution this week, arguing that income tax should not be completely devolved to Holyrood. “We risk ending up with the same institutional structures of the eurozone: an integrated monetary union without a fiscal union,” he warns, “No one voted for that.” Of the candidates for Scottish Labour leader, all have expressed their reservations about total devolution on the subject, although Jim Murphy has […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour will meet industry demand by creating more engineers by 2020

    Labour will meet industry demand by creating more engineers by 2020

    Ed Miliband has pledged that a next Labour government would train more people as engineers. In a Facebook post today, Miliband has said that under Labour there would be 400,00 more engineers by 2020.   Miliband notes that research shows “the country needs  approximately 780,000 more engineers between now and 2020 to meet industry demand – 156,000 per year.” But that at the moment “we are training less than half that – leaving Britain with a shortfall of more than […]

    Read more →