#esaSOS – the government are sneaking through major changes to how disabled people are assessed

17th January, 2013 11:00 am

On 28th January 2013 the UK government is due to make a set of changes to the Work Capability Assessment (WCA). The WCA is the flawed ‘fitness to work’ test which assesses whether sick and disabled people can get Employment and Support Allowance (ESA): a benefit designed to help and support very unwell or profoundly disabled people into work.

Although these changes have been advertised as small ‘amendments’, they will in fact have a huge impact on the way people’s illnesses and disabilities are assessed. Many vulnerable people’s needs will suddenly be able to be overlooked or ignored, meaning they could end up losing the support they desperately need to manage their conditions.

Hundreds of thousands of sick and disabled people across Britain need your help to fight these changes

PROBLEM 1: FALSE ASSUMPTIONS

In the fitness to work test, your needs are assessed by a ‘healthcare professional’ employed by the French private company ATOS. This assessor doesn’t just need to look at your current difficulties. For example, they can also imagine how using an aid (e.g. a wheelchair) might improve your ability to work and make a judgement based on that – without even asking your opinion!

However, soon this “imaginary test” will be able to be used for many more aids (including guide dogs and false limbs!). This means that soon thousands more people could be judged as fit to work, without being consulted, on the basis of an “imaginary” aid they don’t own or may not be able to use!

It gets worse. Even if returning to work may clearly put you at risk, these changes will mean you can still lose your disability benefit – as long as the assessor believes that trying a new therapy or treatment might reduce that risk. There’s no need for evidence that the treatment will help: you will lose support either way, making it much harder to manage if the treatment doesn’t work as hoped – let alone if it ends up making things worse.

If the government’s rule changes go through, people who are desperate to work will find it nearly impossible to get an accurate assessment, affecting the quality of their support and actively preventing their efforts to get back into work.

PROBLEM 2: SEPARATING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH

The government is also trying to change the way people’s conditions are assessed by dividing health problems into two separate boxes: ‘physical’ and ‘mental’. When looking at what tasks people can do, only the ‘physical half’ of the test will apply to those with physical disabilities. The same goes for the effects of treatment: for e.g., if you’re taking mental health medication, only mental health side-effects will be looked at.

This completely fails to understand the way that many disabilities and illnesses can lead to both physical and mental effects. This is also the case for many common treatments: such as those for schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis.

Pretending the effects of illnesses and disabilities can be separated in this way goes against all medical practice. Going even further, and using this method to ignore sick and disabled people’s needs, is at best hopeless policy, and at worst deliberate cruelty. We cannot let the government treat some of the most vulnerable people in British society in this way.

HOW YOU CAN HELP?

The main way you can help is by spreading the message about these changes to ESA. The government have tried to sneak them under the radar – the last thing they will want is people talking about them.

Here are some great ways you can raise awareness:

1) Email your MP (you can search by name or constituency at http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/);

2) Share this blog post on twitter (using the hashtag #esaSOS), Facebook and other social media.

3) Email your friends and family a link to this post – or simply talk to them about it.

Thank you so much for reading this far. Now let’s make sure these unwanted, damaging benefit changes never see the light of day.

If you want to do more, please sign #WOWpetition and call on the government to think again. 

A longer version of this post appeared at the Diary of a Benefit Scrounger blog.

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • Having had 2 assessments in 2012 by the French Company that Labour first gave the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) contract to in 2009, I can say this new development with their imaginary test is a worry.

    • Timmo111

      Labour got atos involved much earlier then that, in fact the economy was going very well when that choice was made so you can bet your life that labour would be doing the same right now had they won the election.

  • kb32904

    I have just watched the most compelling debate on the WCA and MPs of all colors stood to declare it unfit for purpose. They each recited incorrect decisions received by their constituents. Not one MP stood in defence of Atos until Mark Hoban did the summing up for the govt. the tale he told nearly made me check he was still talking about Atos and the WCA ! His tale was one of perfect decisions by a company that could do no wrong !!

    Unbelievable !

    As for contacting MPs Sue – I emailed mine (he’s yours too) about the mobility changes in PIP. I got the standard auto-response followed by a ‘leave it with me while I find out what’s happening’ yet here we are 10 days later and nothing ! Not a squeak !

    It really disappoints me that they either don’t want to face the realities that we have as disabled people or else they think that everything in the DWP is rosy and choose to ignore us or they really don’t care. Whichever it is, it’s not good enough ! We put them in that place to represent us but as soon as they get their backsides on the shiny green seats, for the vast majority of them it appears that their seat there means that out goes any concern they have for us, their constituents – until the next election of course when suddenly, they can’t do enough to help !

  • As_expected

    In case it needs to be said, readers could do worse than sign and pass on the #WOWpetition for a Cumulative Impact Assessment on cuts to benefits for disabled people: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/43154

  • AlanGiles

    The present and the previous government and their polecat henchmen at ATOS prove they haven’t the slightest idea what the sick and disabled go through.

    It has been known for decades that physical and mental wellness and illness are closely entwined, and that increased stress makes a patients condition deteriorate. Making people who already have severe problems even more anxious is inhumane, and yet again demonstrates how politicians of all parties are so ignorant about so many aspects of life – perhaps they should drive around in ministerial cars a little less, and go on less stage-managed visits to hospitals, and see things for themselves, as they really are, rather than told what they want to hear by some little wet-behind-the-ears 20 something “adviser”.

Latest

  • Europe Featured News Both EU and NATO vital to keep us safe, says Thornberry

    Both EU and NATO vital to keep us safe, says Thornberry

    Emily Thornberry has said that the UK’s membership of the EU is “indispensable” in helping keep Britain safe, following a visit to NATO’s headquarters in Brussels. The Shadow Defence Secretary met with a number of senior NATO officials over two days, and says that it was “repeatedly made clear” that the EU is considered an important ally of the security alliance. “In recent days, we have been told by Leave campaigners that the EU is irrelevant to British security, because […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The long read: Why Corbyn’s moral clarity could propel him to Number 10

    The long read: Why Corbyn’s moral clarity could propel him to Number 10

    It is accepted wisdom that for a party to be elected in a first past the post two-party system it has to appeal to swing voters, particularly those in marginal seats. As a result the two main parties have vied for the centre-ground. Consequently, in recent decades a large section of the electorate came to see little to choose between them. People have also come to believe that you cannot trust politicians. Distrust increases if politicians clearly behave in ways that are motivated […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Naushabah Khan: We feel pride in our country so let’s use this to tackle Labour’s “Englishness problem”

    Naushabah Khan: We feel pride in our country so let’s use this to tackle Labour’s “Englishness problem”

    The reality of last year’s general election is that Labour’s failure to secure a victory in an England, suffering at the hands of UKIP, ultimately resulted in our defeat. As a parliamentary candidate in Rochester and Strood, for both the general election and by-election, caused by the defection of Mark Reckless to UKIP, I am all too aware of the public mood, that considered us out of touch with their lives and values. Both elections also revealed fascinating notions of nationalism, belonging and identity politics that as a […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Rachel Reeves: Queen’s Speech showed the typical Tory failure on pensions and infrastructure

    Rachel Reeves: Queen’s Speech showed the typical Tory failure on pensions and infrastructure

    Yesterday in Parliament we voted on the Government’s programme of legislation for the year ahead, as set out in the Queen’s Speech. The background to yesterday’s debate about its economic measures is the critical decision our country faces about its relationship with Europe. The evidence I have heard as a member of the Treasury Select Committee has left me more convinced than ever that a vote to leave would scupper any hopes and well-laid plans we might make for our […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Corbyn puts campaigns at heart of Labour staff reshuffle

    Corbyn puts campaigns at heart of Labour staff reshuffle

    Jeremy Corbyn has carried out a shake-up of the way the Labour Party operates with a review of the party’s internal structure and a reshuffle of his backroom staff. As the leader approaches nine months in the job, Simon Fletcher, chief of staff, will move to a new role of Director of Campaigns and Planning. While some have seen this as readying the party for a possible post-referendum snap election, it is seen internally as filling a more long-term brief – covering areas such […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit