#esaSOS – the government are sneaking through major changes to how disabled people are assessed

17th January, 2013 11:00 am

On 28th January 2013 the UK government is due to make a set of changes to the Work Capability Assessment (WCA). The WCA is the flawed ‘fitness to work’ test which assesses whether sick and disabled people can get Employment and Support Allowance (ESA): a benefit designed to help and support very unwell or profoundly disabled people into work.

Although these changes have been advertised as small ‘amendments’, they will in fact have a huge impact on the way people’s illnesses and disabilities are assessed. Many vulnerable people’s needs will suddenly be able to be overlooked or ignored, meaning they could end up losing the support they desperately need to manage their conditions.

Hundreds of thousands of sick and disabled people across Britain need your help to fight these changes

PROBLEM 1: FALSE ASSUMPTIONS

In the fitness to work test, your needs are assessed by a ‘healthcare professional’ employed by the French private company ATOS. This assessor doesn’t just need to look at your current difficulties. For example, they can also imagine how using an aid (e.g. a wheelchair) might improve your ability to work and make a judgement based on that – without even asking your opinion!

However, soon this “imaginary test” will be able to be used for many more aids (including guide dogs and false limbs!). This means that soon thousands more people could be judged as fit to work, without being consulted, on the basis of an “imaginary” aid they don’t own or may not be able to use!

It gets worse. Even if returning to work may clearly put you at risk, these changes will mean you can still lose your disability benefit – as long as the assessor believes that trying a new therapy or treatment might reduce that risk. There’s no need for evidence that the treatment will help: you will lose support either way, making it much harder to manage if the treatment doesn’t work as hoped – let alone if it ends up making things worse.

If the government’s rule changes go through, people who are desperate to work will find it nearly impossible to get an accurate assessment, affecting the quality of their support and actively preventing their efforts to get back into work.

PROBLEM 2: SEPARATING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH

The government is also trying to change the way people’s conditions are assessed by dividing health problems into two separate boxes: ‘physical’ and ‘mental’. When looking at what tasks people can do, only the ‘physical half’ of the test will apply to those with physical disabilities. The same goes for the effects of treatment: for e.g., if you’re taking mental health medication, only mental health side-effects will be looked at.

This completely fails to understand the way that many disabilities and illnesses can lead to both physical and mental effects. This is also the case for many common treatments: such as those for schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis.

Pretending the effects of illnesses and disabilities can be separated in this way goes against all medical practice. Going even further, and using this method to ignore sick and disabled people’s needs, is at best hopeless policy, and at worst deliberate cruelty. We cannot let the government treat some of the most vulnerable people in British society in this way.

HOW YOU CAN HELP?

The main way you can help is by spreading the message about these changes to ESA. The government have tried to sneak them under the radar – the last thing they will want is people talking about them.

Here are some great ways you can raise awareness:

1) Email your MP (you can search by name or constituency at http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/);

2) Share this blog post on twitter (using the hashtag #esaSOS), Facebook and other social media.

3) Email your friends and family a link to this post – or simply talk to them about it.

Thank you so much for reading this far. Now let’s make sure these unwanted, damaging benefit changes never see the light of day.

If you want to do more, please sign #WOWpetition and call on the government to think again. 

A longer version of this post appeared at the Diary of a Benefit Scrounger blog.

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    Having had 2 assessments in 2012 by the French Company that Labour first gave the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) contract to in 2009, I can say this new development with their imaginary test is a worry.

    • Timmo111

      Labour got atos involved much earlier then that, in fact the economy was going very well when that choice was made so you can bet your life that labour would be doing the same right now had they won the election.

  • kb32904

    I have just watched the most compelling debate on the WCA and MPs of all colors stood to declare it unfit for purpose. They each recited incorrect decisions received by their constituents. Not one MP stood in defence of Atos until Mark Hoban did the summing up for the govt. the tale he told nearly made me check he was still talking about Atos and the WCA ! His tale was one of perfect decisions by a company that could do no wrong !!

    Unbelievable !

    As for contacting MPs Sue – I emailed mine (he’s yours too) about the mobility changes in PIP. I got the standard auto-response followed by a ‘leave it with me while I find out what’s happening’ yet here we are 10 days later and nothing ! Not a squeak !

    It really disappoints me that they either don’t want to face the realities that we have as disabled people or else they think that everything in the DWP is rosy and choose to ignore us or they really don’t care. Whichever it is, it’s not good enough ! We put them in that place to represent us but as soon as they get their backsides on the shiny green seats, for the vast majority of them it appears that their seat there means that out goes any concern they have for us, their constituents – until the next election of course when suddenly, they can’t do enough to help !

  • As_expected

    In case it needs to be said, readers could do worse than sign and pass on the #WOWpetition for a Cumulative Impact Assessment on cuts to benefits for disabled people: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/43154

  • AlanGiles

    The present and the previous government and their polecat henchmen at ATOS prove they haven’t the slightest idea what the sick and disabled go through.

    It has been known for decades that physical and mental wellness and illness are closely entwined, and that increased stress makes a patients condition deteriorate. Making people who already have severe problems even more anxious is inhumane, and yet again demonstrates how politicians of all parties are so ignorant about so many aspects of life – perhaps they should drive around in ministerial cars a little less, and go on less stage-managed visits to hospitals, and see things for themselves, as they really are, rather than told what they want to hear by some little wet-behind-the-ears 20 something “adviser”.

Latest

  • Featured News Weekly survey: Budget surplus, Syria and Heathrow expansion

    Weekly survey: Budget surplus, Syria and Heathrow expansion

    The Labour leadership team seem to have agreed with George Osborne’s proposals that the government should run a budget surplus in “normal times”. Over the weekend Chris Leslie, Shadow Chancellor, said that signing up to these proposals was important for Labour to gain economic credibility. However, it’s unlikely everyone in the party will agree, particularly as 77 academics have argued this ignores “basic economics”. What do you think? Is it right for Labour to aim to run a budget surplus in […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour leadership candidates answer readers’ questions on education

    Labour leadership candidates answer readers’ questions on education

    LabourList readers can submit weekly questions on a different topic to the Labour leadership candidates. Here are the answers we got back from the first round of questions, on education. Note: Yvette Cooper’s will be added when we receive them. 1) How would you improve the quality and availability of childcare? Corbyn: It is important for all children to socialise together from an early age, and it’s a community good. We need to expand wraparound childcare at schools and free childcare […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Soft on welfare? The challenge of a popular welfare policy that works

    Soft on welfare? The challenge of a popular welfare policy that works

    We are being told that Labour lost votes through being seen as “too soft” on welfare. But we must understand the complexity of public attitudes in this area, and the difficulties of reconciling these attitudes with policy that works, and with the reality of the hardship caused by a “tough” policy. It must be Labour’s role to lead the debate on benefits, as well as follow public opinion. We can challenge the misinformation behind policies like Universal Credit and the […]

    Read more →
  • News Mary Creagh says failure to act in Syria “opened the door to ISIS”

    Mary Creagh says failure to act in Syria “opened the door to ISIS”

    Shadow International Development Secretary Mary Creagh has said that the failure of western governments to act against Bashar al-Assad in 2013 helped give rise to jihadist group ISIS. Writing for Progress Magazine, Creagh describes the vote that stopped the possibility of UK intervention in Syria as a “shock defeat” that “reverberated around the world”. Following the use of chemical weapons in Syria two years ago, the Government put forward a motion to begin military action against Assad’s regime. Creagh outlines the series […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Workers under the hammer: Sotheby’s workers need all the help they can get

    Workers under the hammer: Sotheby’s workers need all the help they can get

    Last week, I had the privilege to speak on a panel a number of women speaking about their experience of being in low paid work in London. Two days later, one of these women, I can’t name her for fairly obvious reasons although it still somehow feels wrong not to, lost her job simply for protesting for better pay. The common thread in the very moving stories – as the women described the long hours, poor conditions and inadequate rates […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit