Jon Cruddas is right, pro-Europeans need to get their arguments straight – and prepare for the referendum

26th January, 2013 4:33 pm

Is there such a thing as a “timely” book review? Perhaps there is – because if so Jon Cruddas has written one today.

After a week in which Europe has moved to the top of the Tory Party’s to-do list (overtaking the economy, unfortunately) Cruddas has chosen an interesting time to take a look at David Charter’s “What if Britain left the EU?” which is a “road-map for a UK exit from the Union”. This is of course of particular interest because Cruddas is a prominent and long-standing supporter of an EU referendum, and that’s a position he hasn’t renounced since he became Labour’s policy chief.

So this book review is unlikely to have been done by accident – and Cruddas is no stranger to using reviews to explore issues he cares about (see this one on the Tory “rising stars” and this one on class).

That said, Cruddas’s interest seems to be less why he would want an EU referendum (essentially, if previous statements are anything to go by, because he think the political elite needs to give the British people a say) and more why the Tory right wants a referendum, and why Cameron has been forced into acquiescing to their demands. Essentially, Cruddas believes that the Tory Party is determined to take us out of Europe entirely on the basis of internal party wrangling – and that the left should be alert to the risk that this could actually happen. He says:

“This is a shockingly coherent book. It ascribes a logic to what, from the outside at least, appears degenerative Tory thinking. For pro- Europeans – about whom the author states “only the scale of their defeat remains to be settled” – it implies that with Cameron’s speech, we have begun another interregnum leading to the 2017 referendum. The honest assessment is that the mainstream of the Conservative Party want out. We now have under five years to rebuild a pro-European case from first principles.”

The Tory Party knows it’s having a referendum, and – apart from Cameron’s desperate (and ultimately doomed to failure) hopes of renegotiating Britain’s place in in the union – it knows it wants to leave. The Labour Party has no such certainty on a referendum, and little certainty on why staying in Europe is a good thing. Cruddas is right to say that pro-European forces have only a few years to get our house in order and our arguments ready. And whether he intends to imply it or not, it’s hard not to believe that Cruddas also thinks that an EU referendum is a racing certainty – with all of the impact on Labour’s next manifesto that might entail…

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]

  • MarkHoulbrook

    The debate continues on the British position on the European Union German adventure. Jon Cruddas is yet again spearheading a debate from the comfort of his armchair in his private library. The story of Europe is not a new phenomenon. It raises its head every time a serving goverment wishes the attention to move away from a British crisis on monetary and fiscal policy or just plain old “I have run out of ideas” syndrome. The dilemma for Labour is how do they utilise Cruddas to spin their way out Milibands “On the Hoof” reply to Cameron during question time.

    80 per cent of Labour supporters and its small 200, 000 membership favour a referendum. The British people want to part company with further european federalism but remain in a flexible market and favour a referendum. The political elite as Crudass describes ( HE thinks) need to give the people there say. The political elite withing Labour ranks do not do referendums( Please refer to New Labour’s term in Government)

    My question to Cruddas who I find extremely annoying, (who has time to read books, be a Labour Party Policy Review Guru, write for independent websites and represent his tax payer funded role as a Member of Parliament) is how does Ed Miliband make the relationship with Europe more flexible given that if Britain joins the destined to fail Eoro club it will become more rigid not flexible?

    The Labour Party potentially is in more of a pickle than the Tories given there are just as many who wish to see a referendum. The Labour Party is split well 0.33 % of the population.

    Cruddas will fall nto the Conservative trap.

  • NT86

    He’s obviously right, but it’s sad that Labour now has this task until 2017, when popular opinion seems to favour the referendum. Blair and Kinnock should have never been so staunchly pro EU because it’s now come back to bite Labour in the bum. It has overshadowed the fact that the broad political left also has a very long history of Euroscepticism in its DNA. Look at how the right wing media portrays it as a communist superstate. It’s not only a concern of the Tory right and UKIP. One just has to look at those Labour MP’s who voted for the referendum in 2011. Many were from the Socialist Campaign Group. Euroscepticism was nearly a dirty word in the last Labour government. I don’t necessarily favour withdrawal, but there is a serious need for reform. The status quo won’t suffice.

    In Labour’s 13 years, they certainly should have taken a balanced approach to the EU.

  • Couldn’t agree with Cruddas more. On the other post about the anti-Cameron poster by Benedict Pringle, people were pointing out (rightly) the “Gene Hunt” risk of the poster’s message. But infinitely more importantly, I also think that approach is the wrong approach on the core issue. If we were planning on demonizing Cameron for supporting a referendum, I wonder whether our next brainwave would be putting Labour on record against Cameron’s asinine love of Christmas, puppies and motherhood? We must stay in the EU, and the shift in the polls the last few days proves that we can win a referendum on economic and geo-political arguments as Wilson did in 1975, but Labour has to adopt Cruddas’ position sharpish and sound eager to promise, fight and win a referendum from here on in. Our lack of referendums since ’75 on the EU eats away at both our domestic politics and our relationship with Brussels, and we need an attitude change if we are to have any hope of fixing either of these problems.

  • Daniel Speight

    The fear of an EU referendum is really the fear of the public by our political class, in this case those in the Labour leadership. If the economic argument can be made for why leaving the EU would be a disaster, and I suspect it can, then that fear is unnecessary or at least inflated. Cruddas is the one figure that gives me hope among the presence of so many apparatchiks and red princes.

  • Amber_Star

    People are aware of the upsides of being in the EU. They want the downsides mitigated. They want politicians to cease talking about ‘the British people’ unless being British confers some advantages above those which accrue to an EU citizen who is resident in Britain. And I don’t mean getting to vote for the politicians who bang on about ‘the British people’ because many British people don’t consider voting in the UK general elections to be much of an advantage.

    So, IMO, that’s the challenge for Labour. Show people that being British, being able to vote in a UK general election, matters by having policies which allay their fears about strangers benefitting from their contributions (via their effort & taxes) to build infrastructure, systems & social security which they believe will benefit (generally speaking) themselves, their families, their friends & neighbours.

    The above may sound selfish; but how it sounds is neither here nor there, politically speaking. There’s lots of polling & studies which show this is people’s attitude to the EU. Polling also supports my assertion that people already recognise the benefits of being in the EU but they want the downsides dealt with. And just telling them they are wrong about the downsides (even if they are wrong) will not do. If there is an entrenched belief there’s a ‘problem’ then Labour must come up with an imaginative, easily understood, ‘policy’ to deal with it.

  • Get our arguments right, yes. Referendum, no. Labour are not taking us out of the EU so we cannot offer a referendum where that may be the outcome

Latest

  • Comment Featured Tomorrow we must defeat Goldsmith’s vile race politics

    Tomorrow we must defeat Goldsmith’s vile race politics

    If there’s one Conservative we should all have time for, it’s Sayeeda Warsi. There’s a lot we don’t agree on but she’s often worth listening to. Her disappointment with the Conservative’s mayoral campaign is a case in point: “this isn’t the Zac Goldsmith I know”. What prompted Warsi’s dismay? Perhaps Goldsmith’s decision to be the face of a virulently divisive campaign. He’s put his name to leaflets that buy into stereotypes about British Indians and Tamils (all of “them” love […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour MPs will get a free vote on Trident, says Len McCluskey

    Labour MPs will get a free vote on Trident, says Len McCluskey

    Labour MPs will be given a free vote on the renewal of Trident according to Len McCluskey, leader of Unite. Jeremy Corbyn will allow MPs to vote with their consciences over the issue which has split the Parliamentary Labour Party, according to the General Secretary of the UK’s largest trade union. However, McCluskey urged the Labour leader to be “clearer about it” when he gave an interview to The Guardian. “What I’m expecting to happen, and what I am told will […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Corbyn rails against “devastating” impact of Tory spending cuts

    Corbyn rails against “devastating” impact of Tory spending cuts

    Jeremy Corbyn today returns to his core anti-austerity message by launching a new attack on Tory spending cuts which have “devastated” public services. With little more than 24 hours to go until polls open in elections around Britain, Corbyn highlights record hospital waiting times, rising class sizes and cuts to the fire service and police. The Labour leader also warned of a “£4.8bn black hole” in Tory spending plans, following George Osborne’s chaotic Budget, which could lead to cuts to thousands more police, nursing […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Owen Smith: Universal Credit cuts show the hypocrisy of Tory claims to be the workers’ party

    Owen Smith: Universal Credit cuts show the hypocrisy of Tory claims to be the workers’ party

      As wrongheaded Government decisions go, it’s hard to imagine one much worse than deciding to make 2.5 million working families right across the country over £2,100 a year worse off.  It nails your values and priorities to the mast in mile-high ugly lettering, showing that supporting working people struggling to get by just isn’t what you think politics is about. Yet this is exactly what the Tories are doing by deciding to press ahead with cuts to Universal Credit, […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour standing more candidates than any other party in this week’s council elections

    Labour standing more candidates than any other party in this week’s council elections

    Labour will stand more council candidates than any other party in tomorrow’s elections, in what is being used as evidence of the party’s growth since the election of Jeremy Corbyn last year. 2,632 Labour candidates will be facing the electoral test tomorrow – covering over 90 per cent of all council wards up for election. It is 13 more than are being stood by the Tories, and 870 more than the Lib Dems, in the latest sign of decline for the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit