Public services are at a turning point

January 17, 2013 3:57 pm

Public services are at a turning point. The money’s run out just as our ageing population and rising unemployment mean there is more demand for social support than ever before. We need to find ways to do different for less, because, if we don’t, those people who need public services the most will find them salami-sliced away until they no longer exist – and the political right will take this manufactured failure as an excuse to extend privatisation.

In a very real sense, public services must adapt or die. Over 20 leading Labour councils are exploring how to make public services work better for the people they exist to serve by using cooperative approaches to transform them. A new publication, Towards Cooperative Councils, explores how this movement is developing. Taking examples from across the country, the publication shows how far Labour’s cooperative councils have come in reshaping local services by rethinking the relationship between citizens and the public services they rely on.

We can run public services differently by making them more directly accountable to the people they serve. State ownership is not the only form of public ownership, and accountability to the state is not the only form of democratic accountability. There are viable alternative forms of public ownership, accountability and control, and the key to making these work is empowerment – shifting power from the providers of public services to the people who use them, giving citizens the power they need to make the change they want to see.

Doing that is not simple; it requires a revolution in public services because empowering users means turning public services upside-down. It requires a total rethink of what a council is and what a council does, and it offers lessons for how a future Labour government might reshape public services more widely by extending people power.

The publication shows how Rochdale has mutualised its entire housing stock so that tenants have the power to improve housing services and the places where they live. Lambeth is putting its youth services under community control so that individual neighbourhoods can choose the services that will steer vulnerable young people away from crime and towards a better future. Stevenage is involving local people in deciding how to spend community budgets. In all these cases, power and control is shifting from town halls to citizens – and by doing that the quality of services improves.

The cooperative revolution in public services has already begun. It is an approach that can help people unlock their destinies by giving them back control over their lives, and its effect is greatest for the most marginalised and excluded communities. As Ed Miliband says in his introduction to the publication:

“There is a hard-headed case for this kind of bottom-up decision-making. Often it is the best way to make sure that change reflects what residents want, or to make sure that services are protected. But it serves our values too. At the heart of One Nation politics is a belief in binding people together as a community. Often the services that are chosen or protected are the very services that do that. In that way, cooperative councils can be a direct means to building One Nation. Instilling an ethos of the common good, emphasising what we share, and beginning to rebuild the ties of community and solidarity that encourage people to spend time together and look after one another.”

This publication might just offer us a glimpse of what a future One Nation Labour government looks like, a future that’s being forged right now in Labour councils across the country.

Steve Reed is the Labour MP for Croydon North and former leader of Lambeth Council. You can download “Towards co-operative councils” here.

  • AlanGiles

    “We need to find ways to do different for less,”

    Wasn’t that the idea behind Cameron’s “Big Society” nonsense?

    Sounds fine in theory. But in practice…………..

  • JoeDM

    As Liam Byrne’s note said in 2010:

    Dear Chief Secretary,
    I’m afraid there is no money.
    Kind regards – and good luck!
    Liam

    So we know where to put the blame: Crash Gordon and Ed Balls.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    Leaving aside all of the party “Punch & Judy” bashing of each other, this article (along with many others) does point towards a very uncomfortable truth. We simply cannot afford, on current projections, to continue to afford the lifestyle we have collectively voted for ourselves in the last 60 years, with both main parties taking it in turns to pretend the problem does not exist. Whether it is unfunded tax cuts (or tax cuts funded by privatisations), or unfunded welfare extensions, both have the same effect. The future projections for people of working age becoming a minority of the population will only make things worse.

    Something must change, and radically. What should it be? Increased taxation, or decreased welfare? Increased efficiencies, or decreased expenditure? Import millions of vigorous new workers but lose our identity as the price for doing so? I do not know, but it is predictable that if we do not do something, our children and indeed grandchildren will not enjoy our levels of state support. This article does make some good points and should be supported, but there is very little that mutualised and localised public service provision can do about “the big picture” of demographics.

Latest

  • Comment Fracking regulations must be tighter

    Fracking regulations must be tighter

    This morning, Labour tabled amendments in the House of Lords to the Government’s Infrastructure Bill that would significantly tighten the regulations for shale gas extraction in the UK. Since March 2012, when I set out the environmental and regulatory conditions that needed to be met to ensure that any future shale extraction was properly controlled, Labour have pushed the Government to improve the current regulatory framework, which has crucial and unacceptable flaws. Time and again, David Cameron’s stance has eschewed responding […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly Survey: Darling v Salmond, NEC results and Austin Mitchell

    Weekly Survey: Darling v Salmond, NEC results and Austin Mitchell

    Yesterday’s televised debate between Alistair Darling and Alex Salmond was the second of the Scottish referendum campaign. Salmond appeared victorious this week, as Mark Ferguson covers in his review. However, the showdown earlier this month saw Darling come out on top, as Conor Pope reported. That means one win each for the two sides, but who gained most? Does Better Together’s resilient poll lead mean the victory was theirs? Or is the momentum now with Yes to Independence? We want to hear […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour offer a referendum on the EU?

    Should Labour offer a referendum on the EU?

    The EU question has never been far from earshot in the build up to and subsequent fallout from the recent European elections. Many might well be sick of the arguments by now, but they are likely to come back with a vengeance as the general election draws nearer. The EU debate offers a chance for Labour to carve out a stance that separates them from the Conservatives as well as the Liberal Democrats. And if Labour were take a clear […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Salmond bests Darling – but the bully boy still can’t answer the basic questions

    Salmond bests Darling – but the bully boy still can’t answer the basic questions

    So with only a few weeks to go until the biggest day in Scotland’s history, Alex Salmond was the victor in last night’s televised debate. He shouted, he hectored, he obfuscated. But the polls clearly showed he was the winner. Indeed, his victory was a clear cut one, whilst Darling’s previous victory was more marginal. Whether or not it will have an impact on the polls remains to be seen (early evidence suggests it won’t), but Salmond performed markedly better than […]

    Read more →
  • News Tories rely on millions from secretive clubs as membership plummets in marginals

    Tories rely on millions from secretive clubs as membership plummets in marginals

    More than half of the money raised for the Tories in many of their key seats come from donations made by unincorporated associations – who do not have to declare where their money comes from. Since the last election, over £5.5million has been given to the Conservative Party from these private clubs and business groups. Harriet Harman will today highlight these figures in a speech in London, where she will point out that analysis of the Tories accounts shows that membership […]

    Read more →