Responsible capitalism means better protection for workers when the music stops

January 21, 2013 2:27 pm

The media is full of angst, anger and advice for HMV, Comet and Jessops customers who have lost out on gift vouchers, but too few are bothering to spare a thought to the thousands unceremoniously thrown out of their jobs. If Labour believes in a one nation economy, we must make sure that redundant workers get a better deal.

Trauma of redundancy

Anyone reading Caitlin Leyshon’s article in the New Statesman about losing her job in Zavvi should be in no doubt, being made redundant is a painful, traumatic process. Not only does your livelihood and ability to pay your rent disappear – but so do your relationships with friends and colleagues. People spend more than half of their waking hours at work. After long periods of service for one employer it can be near impossible to change working habits, customs and practices to be ready for a new job.

Redundancy Rights

Our redundancy rights are weak and ineffective. Statutory redundancy pay in the UK is calculated as a function of age and length of service. For people who have had their professional identity and livelihood disappear, this pay is essential for allowing a smooth transition from employment to unemployment and back into the jobs market again. But with pay normally barely over a week’s wages for every year employed, a 30 year old who has worked for a company for a decade will get little over two month’s money upon being made redundant. If the company is in liquidation or administration, even getting this will likely be a fight, with individuals often required to go to employment tribunals to secure the money they are owed. If you have worked for an for less than two years, which will become increasingly common as our labour market changes, then you get nothing at all. If there is no money left, the government is forced to cough up for a company’s decision to run its business into the ground.

Even the few rights that exist are under attack from the Coalition government. In November Vince Cable announced that the right to a ninety day redundancy period in large companies where over 100 employees were losing their jobs would be halved, causing many workers to effectively lose forty five days of notice and pay whilst they were losing their jobs. Under the dubious banner of making our labour market more flexible, the government is stealing from the plates of the soon to be unemployed and causing the taxpayer to foot the bill of the extra dole payments which will be the inevitable result of shortening the time period available to people to seek alternative employment.

Labour’s response

At times, Labour’s response to shop closures has appeared to deviate between nostalgia for familiar brands and an odd attempt to blame the government for the lack of success of the companies involved. Not only does this strain credibility- plenty of shops closed during Labour’s time in office- but it misses the key point. While high street closures are inevitable as our retail habits change, shoddy treatment of redundant workers is not. Big name consumer brand closures make media headlines, but each year over 300,000 workers in the UK are made redundant, throwing family finances into doubt and putting futures at risk.

A better way

Where companies choose to make mass redundancies, Labour should ensure that shareholders are required to pay for the social costs of their decisions. Reversing the terrible decision to halve consultation periods for large businesses should only be the first step. Companies should be responsible for a retraining allowance, so former employees can build new skills to find alternative employment more easily. The measly statutory redundancy pay should be increased and reformed, so young people are not so cheap to fire. Where companies end up in administration, workers should have first rights to the proceeds of asset sales, not commercial creditors.

In the neo-liberal fantasy world in which the Coalition government lives, moving between jobs is no more difficult an economic transition than changing insurance providers. In the real world it can be a stressful, upsetting and difficult experience. If Labour wants to speak with authority to the newly redundant workers of HMV, Jessops and Comet, it should promise to ensure that in future people in their position will be invested in and protected, not left on the shelf.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    Do MPs still get resettlement grants (50%-100% of salary on redundancy/loss of their seat)?

  • AlanGiles

    It is reported today that from tomorrow Jan 22nd HMV will accept gift vouchers again. The trio of Sony, Universal and Warner Brothers are apparently going to help HMV with stock to keep it afloat while the administrators try to find a buyer or buyers.

    That said, it is a great pity so many people are more concerned about the £10 gift voucher Aunt Fanny gave them for Xmas than the livliehoods of hundreds of retail workers.

  • http://twitter.com/youngian67 Ian Young

    I’m sure the bosses of these companies would be the first to tell us that people rely too much on a bloated welfare state. Six months full pay to buy someones job would do much to alleviate the welfare bill.

  • Redshift1

    Well said!

Latest

  • News Full text: Labour’s NHS motion in the Commons today

    Full text: Labour’s NHS motion in the Commons today

    Labour are holding an Opposition Day debate on NHS funding today (it’s happening right now in fact: you can watch it here). Shadow Chief Secretary to Treasury Chris Leslie is leading the debate for Labour, who before the debate began said that the health service was “in crisis” and “cannot survive another five years of David Cameron.” The full text of Labour’s motion today is: That this House notes comments from leading doctors and nurses that the NHS is in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs Verdict: It’s two blokes shouting at each other, what’s that got to do with my life?

    PMQs Verdict: It’s two blokes shouting at each other, what’s that got to do with my life?

    Last week Ed Miliband was quite candid about PMQs, when he said: “Watching me and David Cameron shout at each other once a week on Prime Minister’s Questions isn’t very enlightening for anybody, let’s be frank about it. It probably massively puts people off politics if they’re watching it because they think: ‘It’s two blokes shouting at each other, what’s that got to do with my life?’” This week Miliband and Cameron headed to the chamber to prove how accurate […]

    Read more →
  • News Alternative budget for London: Labour would cut fares, freeze council tax and fund a 1,000 extra police officer

    Alternative budget for London: Labour would cut fares, freeze council tax and fund a 1,000 extra police officer

    Labour members of the London Assembly today revealed their alternative budget for the capital, which places an emphasis on helping Londoners with the cost of living. Labour’s budget spokesperson on the assembly, John Biggs AM, will publish the budget, which the party say is fully funded. The document comes as a proposed alternative to Mayor Boris Johnson’s city budget for his final year in office. Labour amendments include: – Funding 1,025 extra police officers on the street, equivalent to 33 more […]

    Read more →
  • Comment What Labour could do for coastal and countryside communities

    What Labour could do for coastal and countryside communities

    With the General Election campaign emerging from the festive break every Prospective Parliamentary Candidate (PPC) is rightly concerned with building on their exposure and contact rate in each and every constituency across the UK. For those fighting non-urban seats – be that the 30+ marginals we need to hold or win for a majority, the adjacent seats where a good show will help those marginals, and the others where a good show will help with council of Euro elections – […]

    Read more →
  • Featured The continuing adventures of New Labour ministers who are living in the past

    The continuing adventures of New Labour ministers who are living in the past

    Last week I warned that some of Labour’s senior figures from the New Labour era were “living in the past” when it comes to their critiques of of Ed Miliband and the Labour Party: “The project that Mandelson, Blair and others led was to modernise the party – changing Labour to change the country, yet now one if its key architects wants the project to be pickled in aspic. The purpose of New Labour was to change and win, not […]

    Read more →