Sorry, Boris, your cuts just don’t add up

January 26, 2013 12:12 pm

This week we have seen the Coalition Government’s statistics called into question. The numbers they use to justify their cuts seem to be cover for their ideological preference to cut back the state – leading to claims of ‘Lies, damned lies, and statistics!’.

In London Boris Johnson is doing the same and it’s a bit like a Punch and Judy show at City Hall at the moment – we accuse Boris of cutting police numbers and he flatly denies it. In fact, he says, he is increasing police numbers. We accuse him of putting Londoners safety and security at risk through the proposed cuts to the Fire Service due to attendance times increasing. Boris says this isn’t true and there will only be a marginal delay in a fire engine attending an incident. We say why won’t he stand up for London on the NHS and he says … not a lot actually.

The figures being used by the Mayor to justify his cuts to police and fire are highly manipulated and his cuts simply don’t add up.

The figures he uses to claim an increase in police numbers are based on a low point in 2011 during a recruitment freeze. Rather than the high point in 2010 when the investment put in under Ken Livingstone and the last government meant record numbers. Boris’s plans will also strip out police officers from Safer Neighbourhood Teams and also cut the number of police in two thirds of London’s boroughs compared to 2010. PCSOs are also seeing cuts that lead us to think the role is being phased out by stealth (they are extremely popular with the public but not so popular with the police). PCSO numbers will fall by 70% – there were 4,322 in 2010 with only 1,304 planned for 2015.

Remember that only last year Boris was re-elected on a pledge to get 1,000 more Police in London.

The Mayor – and his policing deputy Stephen Greenhalgh – are aiming to cut 20% from the Policing budget, improve public confidence by 20% and see a 20% cut in recorded crime. This is the “20:20:20” plan. It sounds too neat. It’s the kind of gimmick thought up by one of Boris’s overpaid advisers who has then got someone with a calculator to come up with figures to fit the soundbite.

The figures being used to support the proposals to cut fire services in London are similar. They are designed to make you doubt the obvious – that less is clearly not more. Less is sometimes just less. While it’s true that we would also have had to make cuts, and that real efficiency savings are important, sometimes the language of ‘efficiency savings’ mask unacceptably deep cuts to our emergency services. These cuts are too far, and too fast and are putting the safety and security of Londoners at risk.

We have opposed cuts to London’s fire budget of £45m over the next two years. We have highlighted the impact of station closures on target times for fire appliance getting to fires. Time matters, over the past decade the performance of the London Fire Brigade and the safety of Londoners has increased. We do not want a return to the bad old days.

The current target time for fire engine attendance is six minutes for the first appliance and eight for the second. The fact that there will be an increase in the average time it takes for a fire engine to reach an incident is not disputed – this is predicted to increase from 4 to 10 minutes.

The Mayor talks about average attendance times by Boroughs or across London. This makes the increase in times look marginal. But the cuts to stations and appliances don’t impact on a uniform London-wide basis. These cuts hit areas immediately around the stations that are closing and stations that are losing a fire engine. The key point is not the average increase, but the maximum increase. The increase should be estimated on at most a local ward level, but ideally a postcode level. This is possible to do (and publish) through similar modeling exercises to that currently being used to justify the cuts. It doesn’t take a statistics degree to explain why this detail hasn’t been published.

Feedback from London Labour’s 999 SOS campaign and from Party members running petitions locally shows that even people who never, or seldom vote Labour, are willing to sign up to save our emergency services.

Boris’s figures don’t add up – he is weak on cuts to our vital emergency services. He is failing to stand up for Londoners and is trying to keep his fingerprints off his cuts. We cannot allow him to get away with this attack on London’s frontline emergency services.

Fiona Twycross is a Labour Londonwide Assembly Member

Latest

  • Comment Local Government Bold and unique – a role for local government in our modern state

    Bold and unique – a role for local government in our modern state

    As we talk about our country’s constitution in the coming months, the starting point is what powers the Scottish Parliament should have. And whilst devolution for other nations and regions is also a central part of the wider debate, it is a chance for us to be clear about what powers local government should be able to exercise in the future too. I appreciate that, as the councillor in charge of housing in Islington, this argument might sound a bit […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour Conference 2014: Liveblog

    Labour Conference 2014: Liveblog

    12.44: Angela Eagle, chair of the National Policy Forum, has just addressed conference asking them to agree with Labour’s policy platform, which she called a “contract between us in the Labour party and the British people”. 11:48: Now Gloria de Piero and Jon Ashworth (who are focussing on member mobilisation) are talking to members and volunteers on stage. They’re also taking one of their “Labour Express” buses out on the doorstep over conference too. 11:36: General Secretary Iain McNicol now making […]

    Read more →
  • Featured What is “Labour’s Plan for Britain’s Future”? And what announcements are on the cards at conference?

    What is “Labour’s Plan for Britain’s Future”? And what announcements are on the cards at conference?

    The tagline of Labour conference this year is “Labour’s Plan for Britain’s Future”, and Britain’s future is very much up for grabs. Of course there’s a General Election in just eight months time, but the very nature of Britain and how Britain is governed has been thrown into question by the Scottish Independence referendum and its aftermath. As Miliband said on arriving in Manchester: “The last few months have been about keeping our country together. The next eight months will be […]

    Read more →
  • News Chuka Umunna calls for the Lords to be scrapped and replaced with a Senate

    Chuka Umunna calls for the Lords to be scrapped and replaced with a Senate

    In a flurry of interviews and announcements this morning (including Miliband announcing plans for a £8 an hour Minimum Wage, and Yvette Cooper confirming Labour will scrap Police and Crime Commissioners), Shadow Business Secretary has come out for Lords reform. In an interview with the Independent, he proposed a Senate modelled along the Spanish system as an alternative: “The House of Lords is unsustainable in its current form, and it’s a complete anachronism … The Spanish senate is not a […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper confirms Labour will scrap Police and Crime Commissioners

    Cooper confirms Labour will scrap Police and Crime Commissioners

    That Labour would be scrapping Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) had been all but confirmed already. Now the Sunday Times(£) reports that Yvette Cooper will announce that they’re to be scrapped in her conference speech this Wednesday, but in the meantime, here’s what she told them: “This was Theresa May’s flagship reform and it just hasn’t worked…The model is just fundamentally flawed. It’s costing too much. They spent £80m on the original elections. It will cost £50m to hold the […]

    Read more →