Will Labour win in 2015? Labour supporters think – Yes (Maybe)

14th January, 2013 4:44 pm

We’ve already told you who LabourList’s MP of the year is, how our readers rate the shadow cabinet and how Ed Miliband has performed over the past twelve months, but there’s one set of responses we haven’t released yet – Do Labour supporters think Labour is on track to win the General Election?

The answer is Yes (Maybe) – or perhaps Maybe (Yes). It’s not a no – but it’s not a sign of total confidence either. Here’s how you voted (percentages are below):

willlabourwinin2015

Do you think Labour is on track to win the General Election?
Response Percent
Yes 42.8%
No 11.8%
Maybe 43.5%
Don’t Know 2.0%

878 of you voted in our end of year survey. Thanks to everyone who took part

  • AlanGiles

    Just to cheer up more despondent LL readers, I think, barring some really staggering luck with the economy, the Coalition will LOSE the 2015 election, so Labour will “win” it, but I don’t think anybody should get excited about the idea of a 1997 landslide. As things stand today I suspect they will get a small majority in double figures, but of course, as Tim Wonnacott says to each team on “Bargain Hunt” – ‘that could be a winning score’.

    However, that said, we now know that Balls will still be Shadow (and probably real) Chancellor, so I think he will have to come up with something better than “too far too fast”, you still have Twigg trying to turn both ways at Education, you still have the incipient Mayor of Birmingham as shadow at DWP.

    I don’t think just parrotting “one nation” (which it never will be), will take much more exposure as a catchphrase. If you actually want to win rather than just be seen as the lesser of two evils, you have to offer policies that inspire ordinary working (and non-working) people to WANT to vote FOR YOU. Just rearranging coalition policies is not going to get you very far, and will probably result in another one term government.

    • AlanGiles

      Sadly, since writing the above,(about luck with the economy) it looks as if there might well be yet another major catastrophe on the High Street:-

      http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hmv-board-pondering-retailers-future-192420858–finance.html

      For all the thousands of people who are losing their jobs, and cannot find another, or can only find short term or part time work, perhaps now would be a good time for Labour to stop going on about “strivers” and trying to make a false distinction between those in work and those out of it.

      • robertcp

        Alan, Labour politicians should be banned from saying strivers for the next 10 years. Banning the phrase One Nation might be too much to hope for!

      • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

        Alan, you’ll love this news re one of the UK’s most infamous strivers:

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/9797837/Tony-Blair-widens-his-web-via-the-stock-markets.html

        • AlanGiles

          I think Auntie Tony (who looks more camp with every new photograph) is aiming to be the richest man in the graveyard.

          Again his “charitable” work gets mentioned – my guess is the greatest proportion of the charity money goes to the “Cherie/Tone” charity.

          Is there nothing this man won’t do for money? expect to see him with the other has-been actors and desperate for a relaunch tarts on “Celebrity Big Brother” or the jungle rubbish – if the fee is high enough.

          That aside, I just wish the “One Nation” Labour party supporters would now recognize the bogosity of this silly term (interestingly filched from the Conservatives in the 19th century – so good to see Eddie keeping up to date). As long as we have warmongering ex PMs, prancing round the world like a 1930s matinee idol, Oxbridge know-nothings who believe we should do what they say and not as they do (running a “no ifs, no buts” advertising campaign to frighten benefit claimants at the same time as they were lodging bogus expense claims for cleaning and pretending their second home was in fact their parents home), as long as we have stupid, greedy women like Margaret Moran able to evade criminal penalties having been found guilty of multiple charges of fraud (“deny me and I’ll kill myself”) that we have the sons and daughters of “famous” politicians foisted on safe constituencies – in short – as long as we have politicians who think they are above the law and different standards of behaviour apply to them, there cannot be “one nation”. Better men than Ed Miliband and his bunch of political pygmies strove for that happy state. they failed, and it is dishonest for the current group of spineless politicians who live in fear of upsetting the press and 24 hour news, to even pretend it will ever happen.

          I wonder – deep down – if even the most simpering Labour sycophant really believe this Nirvana is possible?.

    • robertcp

      Alan, Ed Balls was right when he said in 2010 that the Coalition’s deficit reduction was “too far, too fast” but Labour does need to start thinking about what it will do after 2015. Part of this should probably be a slightly slower rate of deficit reduction.

      • AlanGiles

        Hi Robert. Ed Balls was one of so many people who were right, but that doesn’t mean that he has the answers to the problems we have. Just because the coalition look set to
        lose the next election (and it seems that HMV won’t be the last big
        name to go under in this year):-

        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21021073

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jan/08/festive-sales-disappoint-uk-retailers

        At least one other big name is widely
        rumoured set to become a web-only company before the years end.

        But – 2000 people lost their jobs at
        Jessops last Friday at no notice at all. HMV employ over 4500 people,
        and rent quarter day falls on 25th January – 10 days
        time, so it is not inconceivable that in a month we will have over
        6500 people unemployed. I am not sure calling in Deloite, who did so
        much for Woolworths is such a smart move (nor was it a very clever
        idea for HMV to appoint the former chief of Jessops as their head
        last year, long after it was public knowledge that Jessops was in
        severe trouble).

        Even if every supermarket in the nation
        went on a recruiting drive, it is unlikely they could come up with
        6500 full time vacancies. Also, it should be remembered one of the
        “big five” supermarkets had a bad Xmas.

        Given all this, if Labour want to
        really look different from the Coalition they should stop going on
        about “strivers” and suggesting that being unemployed, for
        whatever reason, makes you a “lesser” person. Last weeks debate
        on welfare concentrated on lower paid people losing benefits, rather
        more than the plight of the unemployed. In other words, stop dancing
        to the Coaliton’s tune. And TRY to sound genuine.

        If you were one of these 6,500 people
        facing the dole queue, would you be very taken by constant references
        to “the squeezed middle”, or consoled by the long term musings of
        pseudo-intellectual Jon Crudas, or, frankly Ed Miliband with his
        autocue of cliche’s at the Fabian Society on Saturday?.

        It is getting harder for workers in the
        retail sector to find even part-time jobs (many people have to have
        more than one – I have spoken of my neighbour, poor woman who is on
        a “no hours” contract with Tesco. I was talking to her the other
        day about what she thought of Labour’s “One Nation” of
        “strivers”. Her response, unfortunately, is unprintable, even in
        2013.

        The fact is politicians regardless of
        party talk ABOUT people rather than TO them, except at election time.
        You get the feeling they are ardent viewers of TV soap operas where
        everybody works next door to their home, and if they lose a job they
        will get one next day at the Launderette (do they still exist?) or
        the corner shop or the cafe. Nobody is out of work for more than a
        day – unless they want to be. Perhaps as most politicians came
        straight from Oxbridge they spent too much time forming their views
        and ideas from cheap drama?.

        Until all of them, whatever the party,
        really take a grip of the long term problems of this country and are
        not just after a cheap headline and a quick fix for the next
        election, we will continue to drift on with minority governments,
        because the public, as a whole, tend to believe that they are all the
        same, all self interested and know nothing about life on a housing
        estate. Keep muttering “one nation” is banal and pointless.

        • robertcp

          I agree Alan.

  • Amber_Star

    Boundary changes are still being mooted as possible by the Tories. I will be more confident once these are finally ruled out. Lords are voting today on something which might help to make them less likely.

    • AlanGiles

      The government was in fact defeated last night in the Lords by some “rogue” LibDem peers, so things will remain the same for 2015, Amber. This news rather got lost in the terrible news of the possible loss of thousands of jobs at HMV.

      • Chilbaldi

        Doubly important that we win in 2015 so that this gerrymandering is off the menu for good.
        Win in 2015, have a minor boundary review, goodbye Tory gerrymandering.

  • Brumanuensis

    As a ‘maybe’, I should perhaps emphasise that whilst I would never vote ‘yes’ to a question such as this, I’m confident it can be done. I just don’t want to be complacent.

    • robertcp

      I would also say “maybe”. Biggest party in a hung Parliament will be a good result after the disaster in 2010. It is all to play for because the Lib Dems joined the Coalition and Ed Miliband has moved away from the New Labour nonsense.

  • http://www.facebook.com/john.richards.94617999 Keith Lenaghan

    Tories couldn’t win last election and they are a lot less popular now than they were then, so Labour will win or go into coalition with LibDems Please sign petition. We want a Spring election http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/33327

Latest

  • Featured News Labour call for 16-year-olds to be able to vote in EU referendum

    Labour call for 16-year-olds to be able to vote in EU referendum

    One of Labour’s election promises was to give 16-year-olds the vote as early as 2016. Now, the party look set to call for the government to give 16- and 17-year-olds the vote in the EU referendum.   A Labour source said that young people have a “tremendous vested interest in whether or not we stay in the EU or leave.” This amendment to the referendum bill could have strong support in the Lords, even if it doesn’t on the government […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Is civic nationalism the way forward for England?

    Is civic nationalism the way forward for England?

    What is striking about the general election in England and Scotland is not just the difference in outcome but emotional tone. In Scotland, burgeoning support for the SNP was not simply about particular policies but an expression of what the sociologist Emile Durkheim called ‘collective effervescence’ – powerful emotional identification with a wider community. By contrast, in England support for the Conservatives seemed based largely on judgments about Labour’s economic competence and fears about SNP influence, with no whiff of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why proportional representation will be Labour’s only saviour

    Why proportional representation will be Labour’s only saviour

    Everyone’s whispering about it: the Conservatives pulled a blinder offering the Lib Dems the referendum on changing the voting system at the beginning of the Coalition’s term. Doubtless if it had be run at the same time as the 2015 General Election, things may well have turned out very differently. As it was, Cameron et al made their ‘partner’ show their hand too early; the Lib Dems should have kept those cards closer to their chest in the hope of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Blairism is no solution to Labour’s identity crisis

    Blairism is no solution to Labour’s identity crisis

    The ‘Blairites’ are certainly right about the so-called 35% strategy. How one envies the SNP for whom every Scottish voter is a target voter. Whatever happened to ‘One Nation Labour’? They are also right to suggest that we should help people fulfil their aspirations but their definition of aspiration is too narrowly focused. It’s one thing to aspire to shop at John Lewis – I might aspire to shop at Fortnum and Mason – but what about those who aspire […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Our human rights are not the Tories’ to give away

    Our human rights are not the Tories’ to give away

    When discussing the Human Rights Act it is important to set out the developments which led to it so as to dispel the falsehood, too often insinuated in the anti-European press, that the Act constitutes the meddling in British affairs by the bureaucracies of the European Union. On 10th December 1948 the U.N. adopted The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in response to the Second World War and the atrocities committed during it. Its purpose was to ensure individuals, without […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit