Co-ordinating defence and development is essential for conflict prevention

3rd February, 2013 11:00 am

The most effective defence policy is not always a new piece of military hardware – it can be a world-class international development policy. Investment in education, democratic reform and viable economies can hinder the spread of conflict. The UK of course needs advanced Armed Forces to deter and defeat threats, but we must also base our defence posture on the knowledge that the careful prevention of development policy can be so much better than the painful cure of military action.

This is rooted in our experience that many of the drivers of the major threats we face are non-military.  Globalisation is fuelling a major re-distribution of economic and political influence. Demographic change is increasing pressure on, and possible conflict over, the world’s increasingly stretched natural resources. Weak and failing states outnumber strong states by two to one. The long-term security effects of climate change may range from exacerbated inter-state tensions and reinforced tendencies to state failure. In this context our security strategy must be comprehensive, encompassing developmental and diplomatic influence as much as defence.

The events of the Arab spring have shown us that political and economic factors can be drivers of conflict which could be abated through political and economic means prior to potential military action. Recent events in North and West Africa have also demonstrated the threat the international community – including British citizens and interests – faces from the region.  It is right that we take action to help defeat al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and its associates, but lasting security will derive from political, administrative, civic and social development.  As long as the conditions that fuel militancy, such as tribalism, weak governance, poverty and lawlessness remain, so does the threat.

Consider that in North Africa unemployment rates are higher than almost anywhere else in the world. Sub-Saharan Africa is the region with the highest number of people living on less than $1 a day. In Niger and Mali adult literacy is less than 30%.  If the ‘ark of instability’ across Africa is to become an ‘ark of prosperity’, it is these issues which will need to be confronted. None of this can ever be an excuse for terrorism but they do add to the sense of grievance.

There are four important principles which a comprehensive defence strategy, encompassing development and focusing on advanced conflict prevention, should follow.

First, for those countries with whom we have a working relationship, or whose failure threatens international security, we must be in the business of proactive capacity building, not in a way that leaves Western-created administrations dependent on overseas aid, but by enabling effective national and local governance, frameworks for civil justice, the functioning rule of law and a legitimate civil police. This is not nation building, but creating the conditions that will allow populations to build their own futures.

Second, the post conflict peace plan must be a core part of the pre-conflict battle plan. It is widely acknowledged that this was one of the flaws of the initial intervention in Iraq. In Afghanistan, there was much better integration at the level of planning, but the execution was still flawed. Stabilisation and support for the most basic state functions will continue to be an essential part any successful intervention, and this requires civilian and military to work better together – but both are essential. Stability will be based as much on the extent to which we support systems which empower people on a lasting basis as it will military action.

A third principle must be targeted funding. It is right that 30% of Overseas Development Assistance is directed to support fragile and conflict-afflicted states. It is important, however, to examine where funding from across government is focused. The IPPR, for example, identified in its Independent Commission on National Security an ‘Arc of Instability’ of 27 states, from Guinea to Pakistan, Somalia and Malawi, each of which had characteristics which put it at high risk of armed conflict, fragility or failure. It is worth considering the funding choices and strategies for these states and issues such as the distribution of the Conflict Pool, as well as ensuring we have the best possible methods of threat assessment so we can predict potential unrest.

Finally, as seen in Libya, Afghanistan and now Mali, regional engagement is a critical element to conflict resolution. Not only do all nations have a direct economic, security and cultural interest in stability within their area but they also have greater potential leverage and influence.  It is important, therefore, to examine how existing regional bodies such as the African Union can be strengthened and where new bodies could be beneficial.  We should also look at how governments can better support and learn from NGOs, whose on-the-ground knowledge and lived experience – whether understanding languages and customs or knowing where power lies in a particular community – would be invaluable in preventative defence policy.

Our recent history has taught us clearly that the use of the military instrument needs to be coupled with developmental and diplomatic tools, both in pre-conflict planning and to achieve any post-conflict settlement. Soft power tools can be hugely important in supporting Britain’s national interest overseas and are the basis of many vital and historic cultural ties.  Defence and development strategies play different and importantly distinct roles, and that must continue with the militarisation of aid avoided, but it is essential to explore how they can be coordinated and sit as part of wider, joined-up international policy.

Jim Murphy is the Shadow Defence Secretary. This post is part of International Development weekend on LabourList – you can join the debate on these issues at YourBritain

Latest

  • Comment Featured Labour has a self-inflicted gene pool problem

    Labour has a self-inflicted gene pool problem

    The Labour leadership hopefuls represent what Diane Abbott last week called a ‘spadocracy’. Three of the four declared candidates have previously been Special Advisers (SpAds) to various ministers over the past two decades. The argument for the prosecution goes that part of Labour’s problem is connecting to the average voter or to so-called ‘normal people’. Electing a(nother) SpAd as leader is unlikely to ameliorate this problem. If that is true, if Labour really should be avoiding the election of another […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour Lord and former Miliband advisor slams Tory plans to scrap the Human Rights Act

    Labour Lord and former Miliband advisor slams Tory plans to scrap the Human Rights Act

    Steward Wood, Labour Lord and former senior advisor to Ed Miliband, has criticised the Tories’ plans to scrap the Human Rights Act (HRA). Writing in The Telegraph (£), Wood points out that although there was no pledge to scrap the HRA in the Queen’s speech on Wednesday Labour – and the public – shouldn’t “be fooled…this was a postponement not a cancellation.” Wood goes on to note that although the British Bill of Rights – which the Tories would use […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Video Yvette Cooper claims Labour were too “squeamish” when it came to talking about immigration

    Yvette Cooper claims Labour were too “squeamish” when it came to talking about immigration

    Last night in an interview on BBC Newsnight, Yvette Cooper claimed Labour was “squeamish” when it came to talking about immigration. Talking to Laura Kuenssberg, Cooper – one of four people in the running to be Labour’s new leader – argued that she believes immigration needed to be “controlled” and “managed”. Cooper argued that Labour’s policies on immigration before the election weren’t the problem, but their “squeamish” attitude when it came to talking about the subject was: “I think it’s […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News “Early years services will be a priority” – Liz Kendall marks out importance of education and party reform

    “Early years services will be a priority” – Liz Kendall marks out importance of education and party reform

    Liz Kendall made a speech in Leicester today (the city where her constituency is), where she laid out what inspired her to enter politics, why she feels early years services are a priority, and how the Labour Party needs to change. Kendall revealed some of her life story, explaining that she did not have an extraordinary background – and how her background affects the way she sees the barriers faced by children in the UK today. She said: “I’m standing here […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Neither the Tories or the SNP are effectively dealing with FOBTs

    Neither the Tories or the SNP are effectively dealing with FOBTs

    As the last Parliament closed, Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs) remained one of the “barnacles” on the Tory boat that they failed to remove in advance of the general election. In the final two weeks before recess Sajid Javid and his junior minister Helen Grant sneaked through a statutory instrument introducing a £50 staking threshold on FOBTs, which they claimed would help players to stay in control and “make better informed decisions about their gambling”. This was despite conflicting evidence […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit