Ed Balls launches “Tory Millionaire’s Day” campaign – and outlines some of what Labour’s alternative budget would do

26th February, 2013 1:04 pm

As we told you yesterday, Labour are launching a campaign against Osborne’s decision to implement a real terms cut to tax credits whilst on the same day cutting tax for millionaires. Launching the campaign – called “Tory Millionaire’s Day” in an email to Labour supporterss this afternoon, Ed Balls will outline the following as policies which Labour would implement if he were delivering the budget:

  • cancel the tax cut for millionaires and the raid on tax credits for working families;
  • bring back a lower 10p starting rate of tax to give 25 million people on middle and low incomes a tax cut, paid for by a mansion tax on houses over £2 million;
  • and take action to kick-start this flatling economy by bringing forward infrastructure investment, building thousands of affordable homes and boosting lending to small businesses.  

The graphic for the campaign – which will appear on leaflets, direct mails and online ads – sticks to the repeated party line that Osborne and Cameron are “writing a cheque” to millionaires. Here it is:


  • externalities

    How much will “millionaires” gain from reintroducing the unnecessary 10p rate? Just as much as those on “middle and low incomes”.

    How much will someone earning £9,000 get? Nothing.

  • Hamish Dewar

    I guess most people can work out that a tax cut of 5% on £1 million doesn’t equate to £100,000.. Presumably the latter figure (100,000) is based on the average income of those earning 1 million plus being at least twice that. But it somewhat blunts the point of this part of the message.

    I would like to see Labour going further than the 10% tax rate by supporting totally progressive tax rates. An easily stated and memorable progression would be 1% on income from 1k to 2k, 2% on income from 2k to 3k, and so on to the point of diminishing returns, which would be close to 100% in my view. This policy could be contrasted with the coalition slogan of removing people from the tax net altogether, which is patronising and divisive (tax payers v. non tax-payers).
    It goes without saying that fully progressive rates require full computerisation of the process of collecting tax. There are many ways this could be implemented, from: all income is paid to the state and the state passes on the net income to the individual; to: all income is paid to the individual and the individual uses a certified algorithm to pass on the due tax to the state. In the old days, banks could have been expected to provide this service.

  • AlanGiles

    Yet another amazing piece of cheek. I am no friend of the Tories, but “Tory Millionaires Day”. Are they different to Labour millionaires some of whom sit in the shadow cabinet?.
    Last year it was Greggs, to prove how “one of us” he is. Now it’s this. It’s all…, well….Balls

  • Dave Postles

    What’s the point? You want to spend the income on Trident?

    ‘Labour will fight the next general election on a pledge to retain
    Britain’s independent nuclear deterrent, senior party sources have said.

    Although some advisers to Ed Miliband want him to opt for a
    scaled-down, cheaper alternative to the current Trident system, there
    are growing signs that Labour will join the Conservatives in backing a
    £25billion “like-for-like” replacement.’


    You expect us to come back with this rot?

  • Karl Hungus

    What I think may exercise voters in this debate is the Tories excuse for cutting the tax rate: the rich just aren’t up for paying high taxes, and there’s nothing the Government is willing to do about it.

    Us plebs get treated like errant schoolkids in any of our interactions with the state… (filling a tax return incorrectly; speeding fines; the way you get spoken to sometimes, at a GP appointment, or the jobcentre).

    By contrast, if you’ve got money, Government bends over backwards for you, as with this tax rate.

    It’s a commonly-felt perception, and I feel that Labour could tap into the popular mood on this issue

    • Dave Postles

      I agree entirely. When my brother was signed off as ill, he had to complete a 17-page form with 3 pages of introduction to claim his ESA (Form ESA50). The form was replete with notes about sanctions. He was told that no cancellations or amendments are allowed on the form. In addition, I had to pay a not inconsiderable amount for the GP to provide a supporting letter. I spent four hours reading background information to the form, downloading a copy, making provisional entries, and then two hours with him completing the form. He was traumatized by it. He had just been discharged from hospital after an attempted suicide. Is this really the way to treat ill people?

      • AlanGiles

        No it isn’t and it is what really angers me. Yesterday Mark’s piece on welfare, for example, where he castigated the WCA component. Quite rightly so – but he failed to acknowledge it was ex “Labour” minister Purnell who introduced it.

        I remember about 6 years ago helping a man, who had moderate learning difficulties, who had got into trouble with the DWP basically because he had misunderstood part of the form he had submitted (pre ESA) – or more correctly had been persuaded to sign it without being fully informed of what he was signing) and it was only after two lengthy and hostile interviews with the DWP (I was present at one of them) they dropped their threat of prosecution. It is cases like that which make me continue to highlight the disgusting and deliberate expenses frauds.

        A LL poster told me blithely yesterday that the scandal was now “done and dusted”. I am sure none of us believe all the old lags have gone straight, and if they do get caught out again, they will be dealt with as leniently as this unfortunate man was harshly.

        I hope whatever your brother’s troubles are, he recovers.

  • Timmo111

    I hope labour millionaires such as the Millibands send their hundred grand cheques back to the treasury or they could donate them charity.


  • News Weekly Survey: Momentum, fiscal charter and the Privy Council

    Weekly Survey: Momentum, fiscal charter and the Privy Council

    Supporters of Jeremy Corbyn have formed a group called Momentum, which says it will organise to campaign on issues both inside and outside the Labour Party. Do you think it should focus on working inside or outside the party? Having said two weeks ago that Labour will support the proposal, Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell has now said that the party will vote against the fiscal charter on Wednesday. Do you think the move to oppose the charter is a good […]

    Read more →
  • Comment No serious economist supports Osborne’s fiscal charter. Opposing it doesn’t make us deficit deniers

    No serious economist supports Osborne’s fiscal charter. Opposing it doesn’t make us deficit deniers

    I have been worried about the impact of George Osborne’s fiscal charter since it was floated last summer, which is why as a member of the Treasury Select Committee I asked questions of the economists who came to give evidence last July. We found no one, not even the Governor of the Bank of England, who would endorse George Osborne’s latest proposal. This was not just criticism from left wing economists. The Thatcherite professor who now runs the Institute for […]

    Read more →
  • Comment A green London isn’t a luxury, it’s a lifesaver

    A green London isn’t a luxury, it’s a lifesaver

    We’ve reached a tipping point. Most Londoners now say action is urgently needed on climate change. The ICM survey published today for Here Now climate campaigners, shows that this isn’t a preserve of ‘red’ Islington or ‘hipster’ Hackney but a view held across the capital, inner to outer London. As an executive member of SERA, Labour’s environment campaign, we’ve recognised the salience of this argument and that action is not a nice to have but a necessity. ‘It’s the environment, stupid’ […]

    Read more →
  • News Corbyn claims victory after Cameron u-turns on Saudi prison deal

    Corbyn claims victory after Cameron u-turns on Saudi prison deal

    Jeremy Corbyn is this afternoon celebrating the news that the Government has cancelled a £5.9m prisons contract with Saudi Arabia. The deal would have seen training programmes for Saudi prisons, and came under criticism because of the severity of the country’s judicial system. It emerged today, for instance, that a British pensioner is facing 360 lashes after being caught with homemade wine. Corbyn used his Labour Party Conference speech to attack the deal, claiming that overlooking Saudi Arabia’s human rights abuses […]

    Read more →
  • News Full text: McDonnell’s letter to Labour MPs on opposing fiscal charter

    Full text: McDonnell’s letter to Labour MPs on opposing fiscal charter

    Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell yesterday sent a letter to Labour MPs informing them that the party would now be voting against the Charter for Budget Responsibility on Wednesday, having previously stated they would support it. The letter has been passed on to LabourList and can be read in full here: Dear Colleague, Charter for Budget Responsibility and the Fiscal Mandate On Wednesday the vote will take place on an order to adopt the Government’s charter for Budget Responsibility including the fiscal […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends