Ed Balls launches “Tory Millionaire’s Day” campaign – and outlines some of what Labour’s alternative budget would do

February 26, 2013 1:04 pm

As we told you yesterday, Labour are launching a campaign against Osborne’s decision to implement a real terms cut to tax credits whilst on the same day cutting tax for millionaires. Launching the campaign – called “Tory Millionaire’s Day” in an email to Labour supporterss this afternoon, Ed Balls will outline the following as policies which Labour would implement if he were delivering the budget:

  • cancel the tax cut for millionaires and the raid on tax credits for working families;
  • bring back a lower 10p starting rate of tax to give 25 million people on middle and low incomes a tax cut, paid for by a mansion tax on houses over £2 million;
  • and take action to kick-start this flatling economy by bringing forward infrastructure investment, building thousands of affordable homes and boosting lending to small businesses.  

The graphic for the campaign – which will appear on leaflets, direct mails and online ads – sticks to the repeated party line that Osborne and Cameron are “writing a cheque” to millionaires. Here it is:

cheque-web_01_WEB

  • externalities

    How much will “millionaires” gain from reintroducing the unnecessary 10p rate? Just as much as those on “middle and low incomes”.

    How much will someone earning £9,000 get? Nothing.

  • Hamish Dewar

    I guess most people can work out that a tax cut of 5% on £1 million doesn’t equate to £100,000.. Presumably the latter figure (100,000) is based on the average income of those earning 1 million plus being at least twice that. But it somewhat blunts the point of this part of the message.

    I would like to see Labour going further than the 10% tax rate by supporting totally progressive tax rates. An easily stated and memorable progression would be 1% on income from 1k to 2k, 2% on income from 2k to 3k, and so on to the point of diminishing returns, which would be close to 100% in my view. This policy could be contrasted with the coalition slogan of removing people from the tax net altogether, which is patronising and divisive (tax payers v. non tax-payers).
    It goes without saying that fully progressive rates require full computerisation of the process of collecting tax. There are many ways this could be implemented, from: all income is paid to the state and the state passes on the net income to the individual; to: all income is paid to the individual and the individual uses a certified algorithm to pass on the due tax to the state. In the old days, banks could have been expected to provide this service.

  • AlanGiles

    Yet another amazing piece of cheek. I am no friend of the Tories, but “Tory Millionaires Day”. Are they different to Labour millionaires some of whom sit in the shadow cabinet?.
    Last year it was Greggs, to prove how “one of us” he is. Now it’s this. It’s all…, well….Balls

  • Dave Postles

    What’s the point? You want to spend the income on Trident?

    ‘Labour will fight the next general election on a pledge to retain
    Britain’s independent nuclear deterrent, senior party sources have said.

    Although some advisers to Ed Miliband want him to opt for a
    scaled-down, cheaper alternative to the current Trident system, there
    are growing signs that Labour will join the Conservatives in backing a
    £25billion “like-for-like” replacement.’

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-to-join-tories-in-backing-a-25bn-deal-to-renew-trident-fleet-8512209.html

    You expect us to come back with this rot?

  • Karl Hungus

    What I think may exercise voters in this debate is the Tories excuse for cutting the tax rate: the rich just aren’t up for paying high taxes, and there’s nothing the Government is willing to do about it.

    Us plebs get treated like errant schoolkids in any of our interactions with the state… (filling a tax return incorrectly; speeding fines; the way you get spoken to sometimes, at a GP appointment, or the jobcentre).

    By contrast, if you’ve got money, Government bends over backwards for you, as with this tax rate.

    It’s a commonly-felt perception, and I feel that Labour could tap into the popular mood on this issue

    • Dave Postles

      I agree entirely. When my brother was signed off as ill, he had to complete a 17-page form with 3 pages of introduction to claim his ESA (Form ESA50). The form was replete with notes about sanctions. He was told that no cancellations or amendments are allowed on the form. In addition, I had to pay a not inconsiderable amount for the GP to provide a supporting letter. I spent four hours reading background information to the form, downloading a copy, making provisional entries, and then two hours with him completing the form. He was traumatized by it. He had just been discharged from hospital after an attempted suicide. Is this really the way to treat ill people?

      • AlanGiles

        No it isn’t and it is what really angers me. Yesterday Mark’s piece on welfare, for example, where he castigated the WCA component. Quite rightly so – but he failed to acknowledge it was ex “Labour” minister Purnell who introduced it.

        I remember about 6 years ago helping a man, who had moderate learning difficulties, who had got into trouble with the DWP basically because he had misunderstood part of the form he had submitted (pre ESA) – or more correctly had been persuaded to sign it without being fully informed of what he was signing) and it was only after two lengthy and hostile interviews with the DWP (I was present at one of them) they dropped their threat of prosecution. It is cases like that which make me continue to highlight the disgusting and deliberate expenses frauds.

        A LL poster told me blithely yesterday that the scandal was now “done and dusted”. I am sure none of us believe all the old lags have gone straight, and if they do get caught out again, they will be dealt with as leniently as this unfortunate man was harshly.

        I hope whatever your brother’s troubles are, he recovers.

  • Timmo111

    I hope labour millionaires such as the Millibands send their hundred grand cheques back to the treasury or they could donate them charity.

Latest

  • Comment Let’s meet London’s housing need

    Let’s meet London’s housing need

    Meeting London’s housing need – it sounds like a simple idea, but it hasn’t happened for decades. If there is one aim politicians of all parties should meet over the next 5 years, this must be it. It is the single biggest thing we can do to improve the lives of ordinary Londoners. And with political will, a good plan and leadership, it’s possible. As any Londoner knows, London is in the middle of a desperate housing crisis. Young Londoners […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Miliband announces plans to scrap the Lords – and introduce an elected Senate of Nations and Regions

    Miliband announces plans to scrap the Lords – and introduce an elected Senate of Nations and Regions

    In a speech to Labour’s North West regional conference in Manchester, Ed Miliband will announce that a Labour government would abolish the House of Lords and replace it with an elected Senate. That has (broadly speaking) been Labour policy for some time. But there’s a twist. Miliband wants this new Senate to be a representative body made up of those from all of Britain’s Nations and Regions, as part of a new constitutional settlement to be decided by a constitutional […]

    Read more →
  • News Miliband speaks out on anti-semitic abuse targeted at Luciana Berger – and calls on social media companies to act

    Miliband speaks out on anti-semitic abuse targeted at Luciana Berger – and calls on social media companies to act

    As we reported last week, Labour MP and Shadow Minister Luciana Berger has been the victim of a sustained torrent of disgusting online anti-semtic abuse. Ed Miliband has hit out at Berger’s abusers today, calling on social media companies to be more proactive in tackling sustained, orchestrated abuse. He told Jewish News: “The anti-Semitic abuse that Luciana Berger has experienced over recent days is utterly appalling and has absolutely no place in our country. We must have no tolerance for this vile […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers

    The debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers

    Big numbers abound in housing debates and rightly so. Two-hundred thousand new homes – the number the Labour frontbench has committed to building annually – is a response to the housing crisis that is starting to approach the scale we need. But the debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers. To make the point, look at the extreme case of ‘buy-to-leave’ homes that are bought off-plan as investors’ latest fancy and sit there empty in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The mansion tax is a progressive tax and Labour in London should support it

    The mansion tax is a progressive tax and Labour in London should support it

    For those of us who believe in progressive taxation the last few weeks in London Labour have been pretty dismal. We seem to have an array of Labour MPs (mainly wannabe London mayoral candidates) and council leaders rushing to the press denouncing the proposed mansion tax as a’ tax on London’ (or if they were more honest a tax on the rich parts of London). Yes the promotion of the Mansion Tax has been inept and it would more accurate […]

    Read more →