Ed Miliband is not Tony Blair – he’ll need to seize power in his own way

February 4, 2013 6:33 am

It’s now well known that the single greatest explanation for Labour’s steady lead in the polls is the defection of former Liberal Democrat voters to the party’s ranks. If Labour can sustain a decent proportion of this new Lib Dem support it is on track to be the largest party in the next parliament.

But new Fabian Society research shows that an outright majority in 2015 also depends on Labour winning over people who didn’t vote at all in 2010. The good news is that huge numbers of people who declined to vote at the last election now say they’ll back us. But the party will only secure a majority if it can persuade these new supporters to actually cast their ballots in two years’ time.

We used a specially commissioned You Gov poll to assess the voting intentions of people who didn’t vote in the 2010 election. You Gov’s polling methodology is particularly suitable for this analysis because the pollster uses a panel of respondents and so is able to re-question people who originally told them they didn’t vote immediately after the May 2010 election. The poll found that 23 per cent of the sample of 2010 non-voters now say they’ll vote Labour. According to Fabian Society calculations using the data, this means an estimated 1.4 million people in the non-voter group now plan to vote Labour.

This shift in support is factored into Labour’s headline polling numbers and has boosted Labour’s lead by around five percentage points, which could translate into an extra 40 seats in the House of Commons. With the polls expected to narrow as the election nears, the stickiness of this non-voter bloc is likely to make the difference between a hung parliament and a Labour majority.

2010 non-voters are so important because the party has won very few supporters directly from the Conservatives. Despite the troubles the government has faced over the last 12 months only one to two per cent of voters have switched directly from Labour to the Tories (estimated at 400,000 people). Hardly ideal perhaps, but let’s not beat ourselves up too much. Even without many ex-Tories, we’re well ahead in the polls so the priority is to hang on to the supporters we’ve got.

That means accentuating our positives. I’ve suggested before that Labour is doing well because it is succeeding in building a centre left coalition of support. We know that Labour’s post-2010 converts are just as left-leaning as our 2010 voters, so it’s likely that many of the non-voters we’ve acquired are former Labour supporters who gave up on the party in the latter half of our term of office (rather like many of the ex-Lib Dems who are now returning to us). As these broadly left-leaning voters have seen the effects of the coalition and as Labour’s time in office has grown more distant they have been prepared to consider the party again.

Labour’s strength is therefore based on the return of former supporters who turned away from the party and new voters who share the same values. Meanwhile Labour’s failure to attract 2010 Conservatives has a silver lining: it means the party has fairly few current supporters who might switch back to the Tories as their mid-term blues recede. I’d argue that Labour’s polling lead is much more vulnerable to apathy and disenchantment among its loose centre-left coalition than it is to deserters from Conservative-inclined ‘swing voters’. Labour must craft its manifesto and campaign with this in mind.

In other words, 2015 is set to be an ‘Obama-style’ election, with very few people likely to switch between the two main parties and a Labour victory dependent on motivating and mobilising sympathetic voters. This analysis indicates that Labour stands a strong chance of winning as long as we can learn from the grassroots campaign techniques of the Democrats.

Ed Miliband is not Tony Blair and he’ll need to seize power in his own way. Blair’s success was based on winning over disillusioned ex-Tories who are so far resisting Miliband’s appeal. But Ed has won the backing of people who had given up on voting as well as former Lib Dems: the Fabian research shows that together there are enough of them for Labour to win.

Andrew Harrop is the General Secretary of the Fabian Society

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    The problem for Ed Miliband is that he is not seizing power. He is drifting on his way to No10.

  • JeevanJones

    When it says “over the last 12 months only one to two per cent of voters have switched directly from Labour to the Tories”, I’m assuming that’s meant to be written the other way around?

    Some very good points, particularly around non-voters. Labour supporters are notoriously hard to get out to vote, and non-voters even more so. Labour has to really focus on getting them out. There’s a massive difference between people saying they will vote, and actually doing it on election day.

  • NT86

    Winning back Tory voters is a lost cause IMO. They’ve got their own problems and their defectors are going to be eyeing UKIP with orgasmic eyes. Only traditional Tory seat which can return a Labour MP is Birmingham Edgbaston. Gisela Stuart’s a very good local MP and Eurosceptic.

    The good thing about the Lib Dems winning 6 million votes in 2010 is that it’s opened up a huge opportunity for Labour to seize, and I think that they should be able to hold onto them as most tend to be ideologically more inclined to Labour than the Tories.

    But tapping into the non-voter section of people must be Ed’s target strategy. Some of them might have been former Labour voters who simply didn’t show up to polling stations (understandably) last time.

    • AlanGiles

      Quite the most telling example of how out of touch senior Tories are was demonstrated on The World This Weekend yesterday. What was exercising the minds of former party chairmen and MPs most?. The economy?, No. Not even the EU. It was – gay marriage.

      Now I have no wish to marry another man, but quite frankly what other people choose to do in their private lives is a matter of complete indifference to me. I would imagine most people would be more concerned about rising food and fuel prices, the problems with trying to do more with less in social services, and a general feeling that nobody has any real answers to the problems that face this country. I am sure gay marriage figures very low on the list of priorities.

      At the risk of getting more “downs” under my comments, I would say the only reason Ed Miliband is doing reasonably well, is because the Coalition are doing super-bad.

      However, it is foolish to pretend Labour has very much to say (or rather they have a lot to say, or will have, once Crudas comes down from the mountain with the tablets of stone.). Whether actions will follow the endless words, who can hazard a guess?

      Here is an example of the sheer banality of our probable future Prime Minister. Perhaps he had been eating radishes that day?

  • Chilbaldi

    Another US election fetishist – US electioneering is almost completely irrelevant to what works in this country. You maybe had a nice holiday over in the US one November but that’s about it.

  • David Parker

    Even without the aid of polling it was blindingly obvious that it was the steadily growing disillusionment with New Labour that turned voters to the Lib- Dems (who sometimes appeared to be more left-wing) or a caused them to stay at home. Any reversion to the neo-liberalism of the Blair years in order to attract convinced Tory voters would be an error. On the other there are significant numbers who can be won back to policies which focus on the common good, promote public services and small businesses.

Latest

  • Featured Austin Mitchell showed us why people hate politicians

    Austin Mitchell showed us why people hate politicians

    Whilst I was out at the weekend campaigning in Hampstead & Kilburn to get the brilliant Tulip Sadiq elected Austin Mitchell picked up his poised pen and with one article brought shame to our PLP. Not only were his comments ageist and sexist – in the extreme – he also demonstrated complete contempt for both our party and his constituents. In doing so confirmed every disengaged voter’s fear about the politicians – that they’re only in it for themselves – […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Britain has to fight ISIS, but should be wary of their trap

    Britain has to fight ISIS, but should be wary of their trap

    Yesterday night the terrorist group Islamic State released a video in which they beheaded the American journalist James Foley. I would not recommend watching it. The ISIS video was gruesome but it showed more than tragedy – it was also a carefully constructed act of propaganda. And its important we take that into account before deciding on a response. The video begins with President Obama talking about air-strikes against Islamic State. It ends with the executioner telling the camera: “[A]ny […]

    Read more →
  • News Chuka Umunna sets out Labour’s long-term plan for economic growth

    Chuka Umunna sets out Labour’s long-term plan for economic growth

    Chuka Umunna, the Shadow Business Secretary, will today highlight how the Government’s Regional Growth Fund will miss its investment target by almost £1billion – a failure that will lead to “long-term economic decline”. He will slam the “flagship” scheme as being “mired in chaos and delay”. In a speech to local businesses in North London, Umunna will also set out “Agenda 2030″, Labour’s long-term plan to build a new economy that is based on a highly-skilled, highly-paid workforce. This plan […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Why we keep messing up in the Middle East

    Why we keep messing up in the Middle East

    Britain’s history of failure in the Middle East is 150 years old. The presence of Britain in the region, first as a superpower, then as an ally of the United States, has been a continual source of chaos and instability. Throughout those years, from the occupation of Egypt in 1882 to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, our failure has had a single cause: we’ve constantly over-estimated the power of military force to create peace and order. To start with, […]

    Read more →
  • News Miliband spokesperson slaps down Austin Mitchell over views on female MPs

    Miliband spokesperson slaps down Austin Mitchell over views on female MPs

    Austin Mitchell caused a stir (not for the first time) this weekend, with an article in the Mail on Sunday. In it, Mitchell suggested that a more female Parliament would be “preoccupied with the local rather than the international (not necessarily a bad thing) and small problems rather than big ideas and issues”.  Understandably, Mitchell’s comments received plenty of criticism, and now a spokesperson for the Labour leader has weighed in on the row, branding his comments “ridiculous and wrong”. […]

    Read more →