Ed Miliband is not Tony Blair – he’ll need to seize power in his own way

February 4, 2013 6:33 am

It’s now well known that the single greatest explanation for Labour’s steady lead in the polls is the defection of former Liberal Democrat voters to the party’s ranks. If Labour can sustain a decent proportion of this new Lib Dem support it is on track to be the largest party in the next parliament.

But new Fabian Society research shows that an outright majority in 2015 also depends on Labour winning over people who didn’t vote at all in 2010. The good news is that huge numbers of people who declined to vote at the last election now say they’ll back us. But the party will only secure a majority if it can persuade these new supporters to actually cast their ballots in two years’ time.

We used a specially commissioned You Gov poll to assess the voting intentions of people who didn’t vote in the 2010 election. You Gov’s polling methodology is particularly suitable for this analysis because the pollster uses a panel of respondents and so is able to re-question people who originally told them they didn’t vote immediately after the May 2010 election. The poll found that 23 per cent of the sample of 2010 non-voters now say they’ll vote Labour. According to Fabian Society calculations using the data, this means an estimated 1.4 million people in the non-voter group now plan to vote Labour.

This shift in support is factored into Labour’s headline polling numbers and has boosted Labour’s lead by around five percentage points, which could translate into an extra 40 seats in the House of Commons. With the polls expected to narrow as the election nears, the stickiness of this non-voter bloc is likely to make the difference between a hung parliament and a Labour majority.

2010 non-voters are so important because the party has won very few supporters directly from the Conservatives. Despite the troubles the government has faced over the last 12 months only one to two per cent of voters have switched directly from Labour to the Tories (estimated at 400,000 people). Hardly ideal perhaps, but let’s not beat ourselves up too much. Even without many ex-Tories, we’re well ahead in the polls so the priority is to hang on to the supporters we’ve got.

That means accentuating our positives. I’ve suggested before that Labour is doing well because it is succeeding in building a centre left coalition of support. We know that Labour’s post-2010 converts are just as left-leaning as our 2010 voters, so it’s likely that many of the non-voters we’ve acquired are former Labour supporters who gave up on the party in the latter half of our term of office (rather like many of the ex-Lib Dems who are now returning to us). As these broadly left-leaning voters have seen the effects of the coalition and as Labour’s time in office has grown more distant they have been prepared to consider the party again.

Labour’s strength is therefore based on the return of former supporters who turned away from the party and new voters who share the same values. Meanwhile Labour’s failure to attract 2010 Conservatives has a silver lining: it means the party has fairly few current supporters who might switch back to the Tories as their mid-term blues recede. I’d argue that Labour’s polling lead is much more vulnerable to apathy and disenchantment among its loose centre-left coalition than it is to deserters from Conservative-inclined ‘swing voters’. Labour must craft its manifesto and campaign with this in mind.

In other words, 2015 is set to be an ‘Obama-style’ election, with very few people likely to switch between the two main parties and a Labour victory dependent on motivating and mobilising sympathetic voters. This analysis indicates that Labour stands a strong chance of winning as long as we can learn from the grassroots campaign techniques of the Democrats.

Ed Miliband is not Tony Blair and he’ll need to seize power in his own way. Blair’s success was based on winning over disillusioned ex-Tories who are so far resisting Miliband’s appeal. But Ed has won the backing of people who had given up on voting as well as former Lib Dems: the Fabian research shows that together there are enough of them for Labour to win.

Andrew Harrop is the General Secretary of the Fabian Society

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    The problem for Ed Miliband is that he is not seizing power. He is drifting on his way to No10.

  • JeevanJones

    When it says “over the last 12 months only one to two per cent of voters have switched directly from Labour to the Tories”, I’m assuming that’s meant to be written the other way around?

    Some very good points, particularly around non-voters. Labour supporters are notoriously hard to get out to vote, and non-voters even more so. Labour has to really focus on getting them out. There’s a massive difference between people saying they will vote, and actually doing it on election day.

  • NT86

    Winning back Tory voters is a lost cause IMO. They’ve got their own problems and their defectors are going to be eyeing UKIP with orgasmic eyes. Only traditional Tory seat which can return a Labour MP is Birmingham Edgbaston. Gisela Stuart’s a very good local MP and Eurosceptic.

    The good thing about the Lib Dems winning 6 million votes in 2010 is that it’s opened up a huge opportunity for Labour to seize, and I think that they should be able to hold onto them as most tend to be ideologically more inclined to Labour than the Tories.

    But tapping into the non-voter section of people must be Ed’s target strategy. Some of them might have been former Labour voters who simply didn’t show up to polling stations (understandably) last time.

    • AlanGiles

      Quite the most telling example of how out of touch senior Tories are was demonstrated on The World This Weekend yesterday. What was exercising the minds of former party chairmen and MPs most?. The economy?, No. Not even the EU. It was – gay marriage.

      Now I have no wish to marry another man, but quite frankly what other people choose to do in their private lives is a matter of complete indifference to me. I would imagine most people would be more concerned about rising food and fuel prices, the problems with trying to do more with less in social services, and a general feeling that nobody has any real answers to the problems that face this country. I am sure gay marriage figures very low on the list of priorities.

      At the risk of getting more “downs” under my comments, I would say the only reason Ed Miliband is doing reasonably well, is because the Coalition are doing super-bad.

      However, it is foolish to pretend Labour has very much to say (or rather they have a lot to say, or will have, once Crudas comes down from the mountain with the tablets of stone.). Whether actions will follow the endless words, who can hazard a guess?

      Here is an example of the sheer banality of our probable future Prime Minister. Perhaps he had been eating radishes that day?

  • Chilbaldi

    Another US election fetishist – US electioneering is almost completely irrelevant to what works in this country. You maybe had a nice holiday over in the US one November but that’s about it.

  • David Parker

    Even without the aid of polling it was blindingly obvious that it was the steadily growing disillusionment with New Labour that turned voters to the Lib- Dems (who sometimes appeared to be more left-wing) or a caused them to stay at home. Any reversion to the neo-liberalism of the Blair years in order to attract convinced Tory voters would be an error. On the other there are significant numbers who can be won back to policies which focus on the common good, promote public services and small businesses.

Latest

  • Comment The Living Wage has to be more than a photo op

    The Living Wage has to be more than a photo op

    The referendum on Scottish independence casts its shadow over every aspect of Scottish public life these days. This is understandable, the debate on whether Scotland should remain in Union with partners in England, Northern Ireland and Wales is a huge one, but the way it pervades every matter at Holyrood is doing a disservice to the people of Scotland. Yesterday I led a debate on behalf on Scottish Labour in support of the living wage, and specifically on extending it […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Who made my clothes?

    Who made my clothes?

    By Stella Creasy MP and Alison McGovern MP It’s been a long four years in opposition, and each year we’ve seen the country decline further for the lack of a Labour Government. But whether speaking up about legal loan sharks, the misuse of zero hours contracts or promoting the economic case for the living wage, we both believe that there are campaigns worth fighting, even if, from opposition, progress is many times harder, and very much slower. That’s why we […]

    Read more →
  • Featured 5 things Labour’s new rapid-rebuttal team need to get right

    5 things Labour’s new rapid-rebuttal team need to get right

    Yesterday’s story of a new Labour media management team, seemingly in the mould of Alastair Campbell’s famously effective rapid-response unit, and headed by Michael Dugher, should be welcome news to us all. A well-run operation can make a huge difference, and in an election as close as 2015 looks set to be, that difference could be Miliband or Cameron in Number 10. But for it to be truly helpful, it needs to get some things right. 1. Be rapid This may sound […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should politicians do God?

    Should politicians do God?

    Easter is traditionally a time when Christians reflect on their faith, and there is no reason why politicians shouldn’t do so too. But this year David Cameron forsook his usual Easter message for a much stronger and more personal foray into the religious arena. He urged Britain to be more confident of its status as a Christian country; he spoke of the strength of his own faith; he said that we should be “frankly more evangelical about the faith that […]

    Read more →
  • News Iraq Inquiry report possibly delayed until after election

    Iraq Inquiry report possibly delayed until after election

    We reported recently that the Chilcot Report is now not due to be published until 2015, causing worries among Labour strategists that it could harm the Party’s chances at the general election. However, according to the Mail today, its release date could now be held back until after polling day next year. The article states: “Whitehall sources suggest that with an election due in May 2015, it will be deemed too politically difficult to publish it until after voters have […]

    Read more →