Ed Miliband is not Tony Blair – he’ll need to seize power in his own way

February 4, 2013 6:33 am

It’s now well known that the single greatest explanation for Labour’s steady lead in the polls is the defection of former Liberal Democrat voters to the party’s ranks. If Labour can sustain a decent proportion of this new Lib Dem support it is on track to be the largest party in the next parliament.

But new Fabian Society research shows that an outright majority in 2015 also depends on Labour winning over people who didn’t vote at all in 2010. The good news is that huge numbers of people who declined to vote at the last election now say they’ll back us. But the party will only secure a majority if it can persuade these new supporters to actually cast their ballots in two years’ time.

We used a specially commissioned You Gov poll to assess the voting intentions of people who didn’t vote in the 2010 election. You Gov’s polling methodology is particularly suitable for this analysis because the pollster uses a panel of respondents and so is able to re-question people who originally told them they didn’t vote immediately after the May 2010 election. The poll found that 23 per cent of the sample of 2010 non-voters now say they’ll vote Labour. According to Fabian Society calculations using the data, this means an estimated 1.4 million people in the non-voter group now plan to vote Labour.

This shift in support is factored into Labour’s headline polling numbers and has boosted Labour’s lead by around five percentage points, which could translate into an extra 40 seats in the House of Commons. With the polls expected to narrow as the election nears, the stickiness of this non-voter bloc is likely to make the difference between a hung parliament and a Labour majority.

2010 non-voters are so important because the party has won very few supporters directly from the Conservatives. Despite the troubles the government has faced over the last 12 months only one to two per cent of voters have switched directly from Labour to the Tories (estimated at 400,000 people). Hardly ideal perhaps, but let’s not beat ourselves up too much. Even without many ex-Tories, we’re well ahead in the polls so the priority is to hang on to the supporters we’ve got.

That means accentuating our positives. I’ve suggested before that Labour is doing well because it is succeeding in building a centre left coalition of support. We know that Labour’s post-2010 converts are just as left-leaning as our 2010 voters, so it’s likely that many of the non-voters we’ve acquired are former Labour supporters who gave up on the party in the latter half of our term of office (rather like many of the ex-Lib Dems who are now returning to us). As these broadly left-leaning voters have seen the effects of the coalition and as Labour’s time in office has grown more distant they have been prepared to consider the party again.

Labour’s strength is therefore based on the return of former supporters who turned away from the party and new voters who share the same values. Meanwhile Labour’s failure to attract 2010 Conservatives has a silver lining: it means the party has fairly few current supporters who might switch back to the Tories as their mid-term blues recede. I’d argue that Labour’s polling lead is much more vulnerable to apathy and disenchantment among its loose centre-left coalition than it is to deserters from Conservative-inclined ‘swing voters’. Labour must craft its manifesto and campaign with this in mind.

In other words, 2015 is set to be an ‘Obama-style’ election, with very few people likely to switch between the two main parties and a Labour victory dependent on motivating and mobilising sympathetic voters. This analysis indicates that Labour stands a strong chance of winning as long as we can learn from the grassroots campaign techniques of the Democrats.

Ed Miliband is not Tony Blair and he’ll need to seize power in his own way. Blair’s success was based on winning over disillusioned ex-Tories who are so far resisting Miliband’s appeal. But Ed has won the backing of people who had given up on voting as well as former Lib Dems: the Fabian research shows that together there are enough of them for Labour to win.

Andrew Harrop is the General Secretary of the Fabian Society

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    The problem for Ed Miliband is that he is not seizing power. He is drifting on his way to No10.

  • JeevanJones

    When it says “over the last 12 months only one to two per cent of voters have switched directly from Labour to the Tories”, I’m assuming that’s meant to be written the other way around?

    Some very good points, particularly around non-voters. Labour supporters are notoriously hard to get out to vote, and non-voters even more so. Labour has to really focus on getting them out. There’s a massive difference between people saying they will vote, and actually doing it on election day.

  • NT86

    Winning back Tory voters is a lost cause IMO. They’ve got their own problems and their defectors are going to be eyeing UKIP with orgasmic eyes. Only traditional Tory seat which can return a Labour MP is Birmingham Edgbaston. Gisela Stuart’s a very good local MP and Eurosceptic.

    The good thing about the Lib Dems winning 6 million votes in 2010 is that it’s opened up a huge opportunity for Labour to seize, and I think that they should be able to hold onto them as most tend to be ideologically more inclined to Labour than the Tories.

    But tapping into the non-voter section of people must be Ed’s target strategy. Some of them might have been former Labour voters who simply didn’t show up to polling stations (understandably) last time.

    • AlanGiles

      Quite the most telling example of how out of touch senior Tories are was demonstrated on The World This Weekend yesterday. What was exercising the minds of former party chairmen and MPs most?. The economy?, No. Not even the EU. It was – gay marriage.

      Now I have no wish to marry another man, but quite frankly what other people choose to do in their private lives is a matter of complete indifference to me. I would imagine most people would be more concerned about rising food and fuel prices, the problems with trying to do more with less in social services, and a general feeling that nobody has any real answers to the problems that face this country. I am sure gay marriage figures very low on the list of priorities.

      At the risk of getting more “downs” under my comments, I would say the only reason Ed Miliband is doing reasonably well, is because the Coalition are doing super-bad.

      However, it is foolish to pretend Labour has very much to say (or rather they have a lot to say, or will have, once Crudas comes down from the mountain with the tablets of stone.). Whether actions will follow the endless words, who can hazard a guess?

      Here is an example of the sheer banality of our probable future Prime Minister. Perhaps he had been eating radishes that day?

  • Chilbaldi

    Another US election fetishist – US electioneering is almost completely irrelevant to what works in this country. You maybe had a nice holiday over in the US one November but that’s about it.

  • David Parker

    Even without the aid of polling it was blindingly obvious that it was the steadily growing disillusionment with New Labour that turned voters to the Lib- Dems (who sometimes appeared to be more left-wing) or a caused them to stay at home. Any reversion to the neo-liberalism of the Blair years in order to attract convinced Tory voters would be an error. On the other there are significant numbers who can be won back to policies which focus on the common good, promote public services and small businesses.

Latest

  • Comment To be a party for all workers, we need to protect the self-employed

    To be a party for all workers, we need to protect the self-employed

    Ed Miliband pledged in his speech to conference last week to end a “21st century discrimination” and fight to “deliver equal rights for the self-employed in Britain”. According to Ed, this is the new frontline on which the Labour Party must battle on behalf of the workers. And make no mistake, it has a lot of ground to cover. Of the 4.6 million people classified as self-employed, only 30% have any kind of pension. Median earnings for the self-employed have […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Gordon Brown to present Scotland petition to Westminster

    Gordon Brown to present Scotland petition to Westminster

    Following the Scottish referendum, politicians from all parties have been pledging that further devolution of powers to Scotland will happen.   At the forefront of the campaign to ensure that Scotland does receive more powers from Westminster (and without any ‘strings attached’) is Gordon Brown. Today, he will announce that in two weeks times he will bring a petition to Westminster calling for the government to honour it’s promise to give Scottish Parliament more powers. Brown will bring this to […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Game On

    Game On

    So now we know what we truly always knew. The Tories are Tories. They are going to fight the next election on welfare cuts for the working poor and tax cuts for the lowest and highest paid. It will be interesting to see whether the rise in the tax threshold balances the cuts to Working Family Tax Credit. With the poor Cameron giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other. So very like a Tory. For the rich […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Freelancing needs a policy agenda of its own

    Freelancing needs a policy agenda of its own

    The self employed are often the ‘most entrepreneurial, go-getting people in Britain’ . That is what Ed Milliband said during his conference speech when he placed a commitment to the self employed and albeit freelance workers at the heart of his election pledges for the general election. One of Labour’s six pledges is to provide equal rights to the self employment. As Ed Mililband noted ‘two out of three don’t have a pension, one in five can’t get a mortgage. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron’s pledge to scrap the Human Rights Act shows he’s legally illiterate

    Cameron’s pledge to scrap the Human Rights Act shows he’s legally illiterate

    In a crowded field, there is one issue which can always evoke splenetic outrage in the Daily Mail and the Tory backbenches: the Human Rights Act. And so it came as no surprise that its abolition ‘once and for all’ formed an integral part of David Cameron’s speech to the Tory conference. He had a simple pitch: the UK government is being told what to do, not by its own Courts but by Strasbourg. So we need a British Bill […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y