It’s time we valued our Regions as well as our Nations

20th February, 2013 4:03 pm

By Tim Roca

With devolution half complete the UK remains one of the most centralised countries in the world. London dominates in ways few other capital cities do.

England is one of the only parts of the European Union without some form of regional democracy. Less than 30% of public expenditure is spent by local government, much less than in Germany, Spain or Canada. Regional disparity abounds. The coalition’s policies are hitting Northern England hard, with over a million working families slammed by the changes to tax credits. The South West has some of the worst areas of fuel poverty, and cuts are disproportionately hammering regions outside of the South east.

Hilary Benn has called for an “English deal”, giving local authorities back powers taken by Whitehall. Maria Eagle has set out plans for transport authorities to have greater powers and financial muscle. This is good, but Labour must be bolder. Being radical and taking power from Whitehall to create strong regional government.

It’s been ten years since the failed referendum on a regional assembly in the North East. Since then devolution in Wales, Scotland and London has proven successful. Redistributing powers to regional government would allow choices to reflect regional priorities, drawing on local knowledge, and with the scale to make the big decisions needed on transport, and infrastructure. A strong dose of democracy, accountability and big picture planning could replace the plethora of Strategic Health Authorities, Local Government Leaders Boards, Local Enterprise Partnerships, and so on, which make decisions in a sort of policy vacuum. From housing, to reformed regional police forces, the potential benefits of regional government are huge.

English regional government would be good for the UK to. The regions need to be a success if the country as a whole is to prosper. As Rachel Reeves has pointed out regional growth “is not an optional extra, it is essential if we are to see the whole of Britain grow.” Research for the BBC shows that the best potential for economic growth is in the regions. The North East, and Yorkshire and Humber in particular, were found to have the highest proportion of fast-growing, export-focused companies. Regional decision making is the best way of unlocking that growth.

One of the main arguments deployed by the SNP for independence is the damage caused by Westminster Tory Governments. But dislike of Whitehall government can be heard just as strongly in Plymouth and Peterlee as in Stirling or Swansea. Regional government would create a strong federal United Kingdom.

Finally regional government could be good for Labour. Regional government would allow Labour to mitigate some of the worst decisions of any future Tory government. The Scottish Government used its autonomy to delay the worst of Osborne’s self defeating cuts. Had Labour controlled regions had the same flexibility then perhaps the UK wouldn’t have seen the collapse in confidence it did.

The level of devolved power regions should receive is open to debate. However the regions could be the foundations of a one nation Labour government, rebalancing the economy and redistributing power from the centre. Regional government would mean a stronger, more united Britain and would have the added benefit of creating Labour regional and devolved administrations that could make the right choices for their communities.

  • http://twitter.com/Bodrugan John Gillingham

    and what did Labour do when over 50,000 signatures calling for a Cornish Assembly were presented to them in 2001? Threw them in the bin, that’s what.

  • MrSauce

    Excellent.
    A new tier of politicians (probably populated by failures at the National level): that will sort out our public finances and make Britain economically competitive.
    Bravo! Perhaps we could follow that super-successful model of Spanish regional autonomy.
    Oh, hang on a minute…

    • Redshift1

      Well you could abolish county councils whilst you’re at it, so in many places, it wouldn’t be an extra layer but a less confusing, more appropriate layer. In many unitary council areas like Greater Manchester, it’d improve coordination of things like transport.

      Nearly everyone in Europe has regional government. Even the traditionally very centralised French model is broken up more than ours.

  • http://www.tumblr.com/blog/spitefuel Spitefuel

    The simple solution is devolve to an English parliament in Birmingham or Manchester. Have London as the British parliament. Move all government departments out of London and only have the PM’s office in London.

    The US, Australia and Canada all have their capital as a city that is not their largest city and also at a suitable distance from their financial sector. This separation serves to keep a suitable distance between bankers and politicians and also serves to broaden the reach of the nations representation (although in all these examples they could do with increasing it somewhat).

  • MonkeyBot5000

    One way to address the amount of spending that is done through central rather than local government is to get away from this idea of a mansion tax and add more bands to the council tax system.

    The council tax bands haven’t been changed since before the housing boom and we only have bands A-H to cover the whole range of property values. If we added I, J & K bands etc, we could better represent current property values and get more money to local councils to spend on services.

    Unfortunately, that wouldn’t involve any more jobs for politicians and the money wouldn’t be under the control of the Treasury.

  • Cobbett

    I’m not convinced that any semi-autonomous regional governments would be more efficient. Each region would still require the plethora of different local policy, commissioning and administrative organisations and the legislative and logistical relationship between those boards and the national government would add more bureaucracy, inconsistency and confusion.

Latest

  • Comment Is Blue Labour the answer to Labour’s woes?

    Is Blue Labour the answer to Labour’s woes?

    What can the much-derided Blue Labour offer the party? It is a question worth asking, because the leadership contest has so far largely eschewed big ideas. Surely, losing so badly in England and being flat-out destroyed in Scotland calls for a thorough reckoning with the party’s downward trajectory from 2005 to the present – a soul-searching process which asks: what is Labour now for? Jeremy Corbyn is excelling and inspiring partly because he is the only candidate with a clear […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Calais migrant crisis is a bigger problem than you think

    The Calais migrant crisis is a bigger problem than you think

    The crisis in Calais didn’t start overnight. It is a problem that has been allowed to grow in spurts. Last September, the British and French authorities claimed the situation was at crisis point with hundreds desperate to make the dangerous journey of illegally entering the UK. There is a clear pattern. First, the situation is allowed to fester until it becomes too big to handle. Then each side offers one-off additional funding to bring calm. Tensions are relieved temporarily, but then get […]

    Read more →
  • News Harriet Harman urges Cameron to demand compensation from the French government over Calais crisis

    Harriet Harman urges Cameron to demand compensation from the French government over Calais crisis

    Harriet Harman has written to the David Cameron to urge him to ask the French government to pay compensation to Britons affected by the chaos at Calais. In a letter to the Prime Minister (the full text of which you can find below), Labour’s interim leader argues that the government has ignored warnings from Labour and hauliers about the growing crisis at Calais. There are thought to be over 3,000 people living in a ‘migrant camp’ in Calais and over […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured What do final CLP nomination patterns mean for each leadership candidate?

    What do final CLP nomination patterns mean for each leadership candidate?

    Two weeks ago I did an initial analysis of the patterns in the CLP nominations for Leader. We now have the final nomination figures: 145 for Jeremy Corbyn (though some sources are saying 147) (38% of those nominating), 110 for Andy Burnham (29%), 109 for Yvette Cooper (29%), 18 for Liz Kendall (5%). This means that 267 CLPs (41%) did not nominate. As I said last week some deliberately don’t bother – the two large Oxford CLPs (where I live) […]

    Read more →
  • News Milifandom founder reveals who she’s backing for Labour leader

    Milifandom founder reveals who she’s backing for Labour leader

    Abby Tomlinson, the founder of Milifandom, has announced that she is backing Andy Burnham to be Labour’s next leader. Really proud to have such a great advocate for my campaign in @twcuddleston. Thanks for the support Abby. — Andy Burnham (@andyburnhammp) July 31, 2015 Tomlinson started a ‘fandom’ for former Labour leader Ed Miliband in the lead up to the last general election. She formalised her attachment Miliband by declaring herself a “Milifan”, part of the “Milifandom”. Among other things, Tomlinson argued […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit