It’s time we valued our Regions as well as our Nations

February 20, 2013 4:03 pm

By Tim Roca

With devolution half complete the UK remains one of the most centralised countries in the world. London dominates in ways few other capital cities do.

England is one of the only parts of the European Union without some form of regional democracy. Less than 30% of public expenditure is spent by local government, much less than in Germany, Spain or Canada. Regional disparity abounds. The coalition’s policies are hitting Northern England hard, with over a million working families slammed by the changes to tax credits. The South West has some of the worst areas of fuel poverty, and cuts are disproportionately hammering regions outside of the South east.

Hilary Benn has called for an “English deal”, giving local authorities back powers taken by Whitehall. Maria Eagle has set out plans for transport authorities to have greater powers and financial muscle. This is good, but Labour must be bolder. Being radical and taking power from Whitehall to create strong regional government.

It’s been ten years since the failed referendum on a regional assembly in the North East. Since then devolution in Wales, Scotland and London has proven successful. Redistributing powers to regional government would allow choices to reflect regional priorities, drawing on local knowledge, and with the scale to make the big decisions needed on transport, and infrastructure. A strong dose of democracy, accountability and big picture planning could replace the plethora of Strategic Health Authorities, Local Government Leaders Boards, Local Enterprise Partnerships, and so on, which make decisions in a sort of policy vacuum. From housing, to reformed regional police forces, the potential benefits of regional government are huge.

English regional government would be good for the UK to. The regions need to be a success if the country as a whole is to prosper. As Rachel Reeves has pointed out regional growth “is not an optional extra, it is essential if we are to see the whole of Britain grow.” Research for the BBC shows that the best potential for economic growth is in the regions. The North East, and Yorkshire and Humber in particular, were found to have the highest proportion of fast-growing, export-focused companies. Regional decision making is the best way of unlocking that growth.

One of the main arguments deployed by the SNP for independence is the damage caused by Westminster Tory Governments. But dislike of Whitehall government can be heard just as strongly in Plymouth and Peterlee as in Stirling or Swansea. Regional government would create a strong federal United Kingdom.

Finally regional government could be good for Labour. Regional government would allow Labour to mitigate some of the worst decisions of any future Tory government. The Scottish Government used its autonomy to delay the worst of Osborne’s self defeating cuts. Had Labour controlled regions had the same flexibility then perhaps the UK wouldn’t have seen the collapse in confidence it did.

The level of devolved power regions should receive is open to debate. However the regions could be the foundations of a one nation Labour government, rebalancing the economy and redistributing power from the centre. Regional government would mean a stronger, more united Britain and would have the added benefit of creating Labour regional and devolved administrations that could make the right choices for their communities.

  • http://twitter.com/Bodrugan John Gillingham

    and what did Labour do when over 50,000 signatures calling for a Cornish Assembly were presented to them in 2001? Threw them in the bin, that’s what.

  • MrSauce

    Excellent.
    A new tier of politicians (probably populated by failures at the National level): that will sort out our public finances and make Britain economically competitive.
    Bravo! Perhaps we could follow that super-successful model of Spanish regional autonomy.
    Oh, hang on a minute…

    • Redshift1

      Well you could abolish county councils whilst you’re at it, so in many places, it wouldn’t be an extra layer but a less confusing, more appropriate layer. In many unitary council areas like Greater Manchester, it’d improve coordination of things like transport.

      Nearly everyone in Europe has regional government. Even the traditionally very centralised French model is broken up more than ours.

  • http://www.tumblr.com/blog/spitefuel Spitefuel

    The simple solution is devolve to an English parliament in Birmingham or Manchester. Have London as the British parliament. Move all government departments out of London and only have the PM’s office in London.

    The US, Australia and Canada all have their capital as a city that is not their largest city and also at a suitable distance from their financial sector. This separation serves to keep a suitable distance between bankers and politicians and also serves to broaden the reach of the nations representation (although in all these examples they could do with increasing it somewhat).

  • MonkeyBot5000

    One way to address the amount of spending that is done through central rather than local government is to get away from this idea of a mansion tax and add more bands to the council tax system.

    The council tax bands haven’t been changed since before the housing boom and we only have bands A-H to cover the whole range of property values. If we added I, J & K bands etc, we could better represent current property values and get more money to local councils to spend on services.

    Unfortunately, that wouldn’t involve any more jobs for politicians and the money wouldn’t be under the control of the Treasury.

  • Cobbett

    I’m not convinced that any semi-autonomous regional governments would be more efficient. Each region would still require the plethora of different local policy, commissioning and administrative organisations and the legislative and logistical relationship between those boards and the national government would add more bureaucracy, inconsistency and confusion.

Latest

  • News Labour lose control of county council after resignation

    Labour lose control of county council after resignation

    Labour appear to have lost control of Nottinghamshire County Council following the resignation of a councillor from the Party. Cllr Ian Campbell last night confirmed on Twitter that he was resigning the party whip, but would continue as an independent. The resignation leaves Labour with 33 seats on the 67-seat council, just shy of an overall majority. It is not yet clear why Campbell has decided to resign – although last week he did announce that he was opposed to the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The reality behind IDS’s unemployment figures

    The reality behind IDS’s unemployment figures

    Figures released earlier this month by the Office for National Statistics show the number of people unemployed falling by 132,000 to 2.08 million in the three months to the end of June.  At 6.4% this is the lowest since late 2008 and down from 6.5% in May. These figures had the Work and Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, rushing into TV studios to claim that the Tories’ long-term economic plan was ‘working’ as people were no longer trapped in unemployment […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland How could Labour tackle inequality in an independent Scotland?

    How could Labour tackle inequality in an independent Scotland?

    Labour has worked to reject a central claim of the pro-independence campaign, that an independent Scotland would be a fairer and more equal country. Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont has insisted that Alex Salmond doesn’t care enough about social justice to reduce inequality, and Gordon Brown has predicted that SNP policy to lower corporation tax will start a race to the bottom on wages. Despite growing support for independence in working class communities, Labour’s argument seems to resonate. Writing for […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour shouldn’t increase National Insurance contributions to fund the NHS

    Labour shouldn’t increase National Insurance contributions to fund the NHS

    What’s safer, more appealing and more likely to guarantee electoral victory than the clinical and antiseptic interpretation of a ComRes survey? Expensive American politicos-for-hire might have a claim to the title. Still, the news that 49% of people would pay more [tax] if the money was going directly to the National Health Service (NHS) should be taken with a daily recommended amount of salt. People might say to a nice young surveyor, “Sure, I don’t mind paying a little more […]

    Read more →
  • News Glasman: Catholics should trust Labour

    Glasman: Catholics should trust Labour

    In an interview with the Catholic Hearld, Labour peer Maurice Glasman has argued that Catholics should put their trust in the Labour Party. Known for making controversial comments, Glasman begin by recognising the ways in which he feels Labour have potentially alienated Catholic voters and “all faithful people” – by failing to appreciate the family. He says that this is because “Labour has been captured by a kind of aggressive public sector morality which is concerned with the individual and the […]

    Read more →