Labour MP slams Huhne for delaying Guilty plea and costing taxpayers money

4th February, 2013 2:43 pm

Simon Danczuk MP, who initially reported Huhne to police in May 2011, has today slammed the former Lib Dem MP for delaying his guilty plea and thus costing the CPS money. Danczuk said:

“Chris Huhne had the opportunity to plead guilty in front of magistrates over six months ago. Instead, he decided to put the CPS to no doubt considerable expense in preparing the case for trial only for him to change his mind and suddenly plead guilty. I sincerely hope the judge in sentencing will make Huhne repay these wasted costs. None of us are above the law including ministers.” 

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • John Ruddy

    Thats a little unfair, as the sentencing guidelines already include a factor of how early you plead guilty, and generally speaking, people who plead, even at this stage, dont get charged with costs – so why should it apply to Huhne?

    • rekrab

      John, he isn’t an every person with an everyday kind of job and isn’t this charge all about perverting the course of judgement? basically, he told a lie to prevent being charged with a traffic offence.

      • John Ruddy

        Yes, I know what the charge was. I also know that he will still get a discount for pleading guilty.
        If we are to recover costs from people who plead not guilty and are then found guilty (or change their plea) we would bankrupt a great many people – and you would find a lot more cases go to trial, as fewer folk change their plea.

        • rekrab

          John, you make a good point however we must recognise that Huhne was a cabinet minister and was fully aware that the coalition was on an austerity cost cutting course, a plan that has had devastating effects on many many people.

          • Chilbaldi

            He doesn’t get as much of a reduction of sentence as he would have if he had pleaded guilty earlier. That is punishment enough.

          • John Ruddy

            So our justice system should be harsher on people from particular political parties?
            I’m no lover of the coalition, but that attitude is totally against what Justice is….

          • rekrab

            John, I tend to say this isn’t a who framed Roger Rabbit situation? we’re talking about an MP, a former cabinet member who sat in the place that makes laws and legislation and told a lie to protect his career.Is there no more decent politicians left that have the courage of their conviction and responsibility to tell the truth?

          • AlanGiles

            I totally agree. MPs and ministers of all parties are very keen to tell the rest of us how we should all behave, but that seem to think they should be above any inconvenient law themselves. In the case of Mr Huhne, he was standing for the leadership of his party, knowing that two years before he had committed a serious crime (perverting the course of justice is taken very seriously by the courts).

            However, I doubt that he will be banged up with a thug. If I recall Lord Archer and Jonathan Aitken, they will either go to an open prison or be given a job in the prison library. Also like Lord Taylor, Morley and Chaytor he may even get a remission on his sentence. He might even develop Alzheimers like the Saunders character, thankfully totally recovered to rude health as soon as he is released.

            Anyway, he is a millionaire several times over so I am sure he won’t starve when he ends his sentence.

            I do think any and every politician, regardless of party, needs to be like Caesers wife, if they expect to be called “Honourable members”

    • Brumanuensis

      That’s a very good point John and precisely what the progressive reduction in sentence discount is meant to reflect.

  • Amber_Star

    What about Danczuk’s comment re having some sympathy for Huhne, which I read in the Guardian a few minutes ago? Is Danczuk trying to face both ways on this or is the Graun mistaken about the ‘sympathy’ quote?

  • aracataca

    I loathe the Fib Dems largely because of their enormous capacity to be economical with the truth and the unpleasant nature of many of their campaigns. That said, and at the risk of getting murdered on here, isn’t there a bit of scope for some sadness at these events? After all he’s 58, his career is at an end and pretty shortly he’s going to be banged up for 23 hours a day probably with a violent thief for company and eating food that you probably wouldn’t give to a dog.

    • Daniel Speight

      I suspect prison food is probably as good as what is served in the Palace of Westminster, and far better than what is served up in some of our fast food chains. Whether you would give it to a dog I’m not qualified to answer.

      • AlanGiles

        Too true. I was only thinking the other day, when I was working, sometimes at the end of a long day, rather than go home and prepare food I’d just “treat” myself to a beefburger.

        I wonder how many horses I ate!.

        Also, of course if it is anything like the cases of other wealthy men sent to prison, if it is an open prison, he will probably be allowed out for Sunday luncheon (Saunders and Archer were) and they will probably take high tea with the governor.

        • Daniel Speight

          Alan I once had a Christmas dinner prepared by two men who had learned to cook in prison. A lot safer than your beefburgers I think, and very tasty as well;-)

          As for Huhne, just another of our political class showing his true nature. I would guess he will get out quicker than others who commit the same crime. Mind you I will not gloat over the damage done to his family. I feel nothing but sympathy for them. All this just to hang onto a driving license.

  • Mark Myword

    For all sentences (except mandatory sentences), judges and magistrates are required by law to give a discount of sentence for an early guilty plea unless there are strong reasons, explained in open court, for not doing so. The usual discount are: 33% for guilty plea at the first opportunity for plea, 25% for a guilty plea later – but before trial date, 10% at the door of the court on trial date, no discount once the trial is underway. Huhne’s trial was not listed for today (was it?), therefore he is entitled to 25%. The reason is to encourage the accused to plead guilty as early as possible consistent with their entitlement to legal advice. If discount are arbitrarily remitted, it encourages even the hopeless case to go for trial. What has the accused got to lose? In this respect, Huhne should be treated no better or worse than any other offender. The fact that he has held a position of public trust, and yet committed a crime, will be reflected in the initial sentence (before discount)

  • He is still a multi millionaire and after his stretch doing porridge will return to splendour which most could never dream of

  • David B

    And I bet the same MP voted against the reduciton of MP’s by 60, costing ten’s of millions over the term of the next parliment, and all for the political advantage of the Labour party.

  • ColinAdkins

    Interesting to read the columnist in the Guardian stating he earned a fortune whilst working in the City. Got paid it more like. No one properly earns that fortune.

Latest

  • Comment Featured Uncategorized Britain seems to be fragmenting but English socialism is being reborne

    Britain seems to be fragmenting but English socialism is being reborne

      by Tom Kelsey and Jon Wilson The referendum brought to light deep fractures that risk destroying the left, and with the prospect of a bruising leadership election the divisions seem to be getting wider. Working class voters in once industrial towns and cities think their political leaders are out-of-touch with no understanding of life in a country many feel is rapidly changing for the worse. The idea of the nation, particularly of a resurgent England, has become a channel […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Uncategorized As the dust settles on the vote for Brexit, it is time to reach out to our democracy’s missing millions

    As the dust settles on the vote for Brexit, it is time to reach out to our democracy’s missing millions

    At a critical point in the development of the Labour party leadership, this article offers a few thoughts on a future Labour agenda for democratic reform that transcends internal politicking. After four years of working at Bite The Ballot, a party-neutral youth democracy movement – and one that unites decision-makers of all persuasions in its work – I can say that British politics still has a long way to go on the road to democratic renewal. Though the pieces are still […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured We must bring politics back to our communities rather than leave people to rely on Westminster “elites”

    We must bring politics back to our communities rather than leave people to rely on Westminster “elites”

    All told, it’s not been a good few months for the standing of our politicians. Whether you think there was a good case to have a referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU or not, the reason we were all put through it was ultimately one of internal Conservative party management. A fundamental question about who we are as a nation and how to best represent our interests was embarked upon because David Cameron thought it was his best […]

    Read more →
  • News Kinnock: Labour must show that its socialism can “work in practice”

    Kinnock: Labour must show that its socialism can “work in practice”

    Neil Kinnock has criticised “ideological flights of fancy”, and said that Labour needs to show that socialism can “work in practice” before it can be successful. The former leader has said that winning parties have to be “professional” as well as having a “sense of belief”, and launched a strong attack on “career politicians”. “You can enchant people by ideological flights of fancy, but that’s not going to help them at all,” Lord Kinnock told BBC programme Conversations this week. He said […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Wayne David: Top-down change no longer works – we must boost democracy from the ground up

    Wayne David: Top-down change no longer works – we must boost democracy from the ground up

    If we are serious about extending political engagement and closing the gap between people and politics, Labour needs to do two things. Firstly, we need to have a coherent and powerful narrative about bringing power closer to the people. And secondly, we need to have a series of practical proposals to make the political process more accessible and relevant to people. Even though Labour was the party which introduced devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and recently favoured “permissive” […]

    Read more →
x

LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends










Submit