Let’s rejoice in the fact that people who love each other will be able to marry. Because there’s a lot of joy in that.

5th February, 2013 4:41 pm

At about 7pm tonight when MPs vote to introduce historic equal marriage legislation, David Cameron will rightly get a share of the credit. He has been brave enough to face down the majority his party over an issue of equality, but he hasn’t been able to take his party with him. He won’t be able to credibly claim this as a modernising moment for the Tory Party. Quite the opposite. Today will reveal the scale of the out to touch, backwards looking, deeply socially conservative (and in some cases downright bigoted) group that sits behind Cameron on the Tory benches.

Cameron could walk through the opposite lobby to as many as half of his MPs tonight. This may be a “free vote”, but as a rebellion it could be on the same scale as Iraq. Labour MPs broke the whip to oppose military action overseas. Tory MPs defy their leader to stop two people who love each other achieving equal rights and getting married to each other.

What a sad set of priorities.

The truth is that tonight’s legislation will pass thanks Labour votes (at least 225 by our latest count). Whilst it’s deplorable that 13 or more Labour MPs will vote against (and at least 5 will seek to avoid the backlash by abstaining), it’s clear that this legislation will pass thanks to Labour votes. Ed Miliband should have made that clear by whipping the vote, stating that equality is not a “conscience issue” and forcing those Shadow Ministers who are not expected to back the legislation to choose between voting with the rest of the PLP and their Shadow Ministerial roles. Alas Miliband took a different route – but it doesn’t mean that Labour should be denied the credit for this great leap forwards.

That a Tory leader should ever make a public stand on an issue of equality is testament to the enduring legacy Labour’s record. The great leaps forward for gay rights (and equal rights more broadly) over Labour’s 13 years in power is something that most Labour people are incredibly proud of, and which will never be reversed. After today Gay Marriage will be much the same. In recent weeks the fallacy has been repeated that Civil Partnerships were introduced with ne’er a word of discontent. Bollocks. They were opposed by the Tory back woodsmen then as Equal Marriage is opposed now. But, as former Tory MP Matthew Parris noted in the Times recently, Vote ‘no’ and you will blush to remember it.

By the time we all go to bed tonight, something truly historic will have happened in politics and our country, something which will bring newfound rights (and more importantly, joy) to millions. All those who wish to be married will now be able to do so under an equal system. The questions about how the legislation is flawed are for another day, as is the anger at those (on all sides of the house) who would have denied rights to people based on their sexuality.

Today, lets rejoice in the fact that people who love each other will be able to marry.

Because there’s a lot of joy in that.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    Okay Mark. So you and your side look like winning a parlimentry majority that you will rejoice at upsetting most of the Christian, Jewish, Musim faiths as well as other faiths. Of course 2000 years of history and our civilisation need to ripped up and rewritten because you and the current mob have decided that gay marriage is now to be railroaded through.
    I have said before that Milliband did right not to whip the vote.
    In the end it was a free vote so don’t try to make out that Cameron is some kind of hero. Poeple voted according to their conscience and as it was a free vote perhaps you would like to appoligise to those Labour MPs brave enough to defy the mob rule, and not to vote with that nice David cameron and Goerge Osborne and the lovely fluffy Michael Gove.
    I wish that those who abstained had had the courage of their convictions and voted against.

    • Brumanuensis

      “Of course 2000 years of history and our civilisation need to ripped up and rewritten because you and the current mob have decided that gay marriage is now to be railroaded through”.

      “As for respecting other people it is actually some very agressive gay rights people who have been deliberately trying to book church halls and the like for civil partnership receptions just to enjoy causing offense, in exactly the same way as Nazis forced Jews to eat pork”.

      “This use of law to drive religious views out of public life is in no way new and has been part of the main plank of many a dictator. The constitution of Hitler’s Third Riech contains such pledges, the difference is that he was not pretending to be tolerant”.

      But of course, you complained to Chillbaldi…

      “So a good bit of name calling and you dismiss those that don’t agree with you as being “old worlde” and therefore inferior to yourself”.

      Not that you’d indulge in name-calling Jeremy. Oh no. Not at all.

      • Jeremy_Preece

        Glad that you have been following so avidly :)

    • http://www.facebook.com/george.morgan.505960 George Morgan

      Jeremy, a majority of religious people support equal marriage. If the minority of religious people who want to impose their religious views on everybody else are defeated in the name of securing freedom and equality for marginalised and oppressed people that certainly is something to celebrate.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

      Brave enough to admit their homophobia. Shame on every one of them. Labour MPs who support discrimination….

      • Jeremy_Preece

        Hello again Mike
        What a day it has been. My last certainty in life was ended when I noticed that we were in complete agreement over the by election in Eastliegh.
        So normal service has been resumed.
        We have been over this before, it was a free vote, and that is democracy works.
        Other versions of democracy is where people are bullied into how to vote, while the henchmen watch how each votes so that they can get to them and give them their beating later if they vote the wrong way. Now that it my idea of shame.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

          Only that didn’t happen. Your view is in a small minority within the Labour party.

  • Hamish Dewar

    Your logic seems confused here Mark.
    It appears that you praise the (few) Labour MPs who defied the whip on Iraq,
    But you excoriate any (probably equally few) who go against the majority on a free vote –a concept which you don’t approve of anyway.
    If this is not an issue of conscience, it is difficult to think of any that would be.
    In the meantime, the electorate have other priorities.

    • Jeremy_Preece

      Let me clarify. Its all about principles
      If Labour MPs defy the whip in a way that Mark agrees with then it is great and they are heros.
      If they vote in a free vote in a way that Mark doesn’t like, then they are traitors.
      Makes sense dosn’t it!

      Anyway those who hate democracy hate free votes :)

    • AlanGiles

      I have to admit I agree with Mark. I am a bit of an old romantic on the quiet. If people have such strong feelings for each other, and want to get married, then let them, regardless of the fact they are of the same sex. Let’s think of those men and women who marry, not out of love, but for some advantage, to get on in the world, for the sake of their careers or to put it bluntly, for their partners bank balance. Because they are of the opposite sex, the Church (whichever it might be) won’t be concerned about that, or at least they won’t question the motives of a male or female 18 year old marrying a male or female of 60. By contrast you might get two men (or two women) who love each other for genuine reasons. I think if I had been opposed to this bill, I would have abstained rather than vote against, for the simple reason it doesn’t seem right to question the morality of something we don’t have personal experience or knowledge of. Personally I would feel uncomfortable having to vote on issues like abortion, because again, I have no real knowledge of the issue. Due to my families personal circumstances it is highly likely if abortion had been legal all those decades ago, I wouldn’t be here today (which would no doubt make a lot of people happy!). However it was both dangerous and illegal, and the illegality would have deterred my family. Many lives were destroyed because of the harsh view society had at that time on both illegitimacy and abortion, and these views pertained well into the swinging sixties.

      As I am not religous, I cannot approach these subjects with feelings of morality, but only out of sheer practicality. In a world of uncertainty and unhappiness, if two people regardless of sex want to be committed to each other, and are genuine in their love for each other, who are we to prevent them from hving the same rights a heterosexual couple have?.

      Just as having an abortion in the 1940s was illegal, it is worth remembering that gay men could still be sent to prison well into the 1960s, just for what and who they were.

      It is a really strange thought that “morality” was responsible for things like this, and I think in 2013 it is time we really adopted a live and let live attitude.

    • AlanGiles

      Hamish, Those MPs who voted against Iraq were voting against death and destruction.

      Those MPs who voted against this bill were voting against life and love.

      There is a massive difference there.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Very pleased with the result and the overwhelming support of Labour MPs

  • http://twitter.com/AndyJSajs AndyJS

    Of 145 female MPs, 18 voted against (including 13 Tories) = 12.4%.
    Of 500 male MPs, 157 voted against = 31.4%.

Latest

  • Comment Featured This election campaign has raised questions about the Conservatives’ fitness to govern

    This election campaign has raised questions about the Conservatives’ fitness to govern

    Elections are about competence. And this one is no different. People want to know the ability of leaders and their parties to take reasonable and balanced decisions. In normal circumstances, this is to the benefit of the incumbent given that they have a track record and extreme events such as, say, a global financial crisis are relatively rare. This election takes place in an environment where there are a series of warning signs – on NHS performance, the benefits system, […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Murdoch reportedly “berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband”

    Murdoch reportedly “berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband”

    The Sun have never been fans of Ed Miliband. This was only exacerbated by his decision to attack Rupert Murdoch over phone hacking (leading indirectly to the closure of the News of the World), backing the Leveson inquiry, announcing plans to restrict media ownership and apologising for posing with a copy of The Sun. But it’s fair to say that The Sun never liked Miliband anyway, and after viciously turning on Labour during the 2010 election campaign (anyone remember Gordon […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour launch LGBT manifesto and promise to challenge prejudiced representations of LGBT people

    Labour launch LGBT manifesto and promise to challenge prejudiced representations of LGBT people

    Today Labour are launching their Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) manifesto. In it they’ll promise if elected they’ll put prioritise access to mental health services for young people, particularly those bullied because or their sexuality or gender identity. As part of this launch Angela Eagle, Shadow Leader of the House of Commons, has highlighted that nearly a quarter of lesbian, gay and bisexual young people, and half of young trans people, have attempted suicide. To deal with this, alongside focussing on […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The vital battle for the soul of the Co-operative movement

    The vital battle for the soul of the Co-operative movement

    While the rest of the Labour movement is trying with all its might to remove the Tories from power, there is a distracting but vital battle going on for the soul of the Co-operative movement and the existence of Labour’s sister party, the Co-op Party. We in the Labour movement have long had a partner in the Co-operative movement through the Co-operative Party. I’m proud to have been a member of both parties for over 20 years. Labour and the Co-op […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband announces plans for emergency nursing recruitment drive as part of “NHS Rescue Plan”

    Miliband announces plans for emergency nursing recruitment drive as part of “NHS Rescue Plan”

    Ed Miliband is set to announce Labour’s “NHS Rescue Plan” – starting with an emergency recruitment drive designed to get another 1,000 nurses into training this year. Speaking to student nurses at Manchester Metropolitan University, the Labour leader will say that this 1,000 nurses is the first installment of the 20,000 nurses (and 8.000 doctors) the party would fund thanks to its “time to care” fund. Labour would – on the first day of a Miliband government – ask universities to […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit